Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - "Retro Prog"
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

"Retro Prog"

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Poll Question: Whats your opinion
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
36 [63.16%]
8 [14.04%]
6 [10.53%]
2 [3.51%]
5 [8.77%]
You can not vote in this poll

Author
Message
someone_else View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Offline
Points: 24297
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote someone_else Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 23 2019 at 13:26
Option #1, no doubt.
Back to Top
Lewian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14742
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lewian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 23 2019 at 16:57
I actually don't like the idea of doing "retro" stuff, however I like some of these bands (Anekdoten!) because I don't consider them retro. OK, they borrow some elements from the past and they maybe won't win an innovation contest, which is fair enough, but at the end it's still their own music and can be appreciated on its own terms. Occasionally stuff shouts "retro" at me, and then I can do without it (some Big Big Train comes to mind, although I have heard them do more "autonomous" stuff as well). 

PS: Voted "other". Smile



Edited by Lewian - December 23 2019 at 16:59
Back to Top
Barbu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: infinity
Status: Offline
Points: 30850
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Barbu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 23 2019 at 20:50
Nothing against it, bien au contraire.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35886
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 23 2019 at 22:49
I like some retro-prog and retro music generally, and some I don't. I used to be rather more disdainful of retro-prog and called it Gorp (regressive progressive rock). I can often like music that evokes music of the past, and some that even tries to convince one that it was made much earlier. I did a topic on retro music pretending to be of the past CLICK and was not surprised that others didn't find it interesting.

Under the Prog umbrella, I like various retro-folk prog, retro-Krautrock, retro-psychedelic and retro-progressive electronic acts. I like Matt Berry's retro prog nods. I really like some modern retro acts that have a 60s to 70s loungey jazzy, exotica feel to them, and evoke people like Serge Gainsbourg. I'm probably not going to be so into ones that are trying to sound like classic Yes, or much symphonic/ "mainstream" Prog.

For me the music of retro acts can sound just as accomplished as that which it is imitating, or evocative of, but that doesn't mean that I will hold it in as high regard as I do value innovation and progression. And in a way, much of my favourite music feels rather timeless, and other music I love for its place in time and can make me feel very nostalgic (even if evokes a time and place before I was born). I can really enjoy music that brings to mind another time, and some of my favourite music can feel both contemporary and retro.
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28054
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote richardh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2019 at 01:38
These is an area where people really get their panties in a bunch.

One of the ideas of Progressive Rock Music is to make music that has strong comparisons with classical music. ELP , Yes , Tull and Genesis put down the foundation stones of the genre we love. No one made a rule that you couldn't do what they did. Progressive Music on the other hand is a whole different thing. Progressive Rock Music diverged from Progressive Music as early as 1972 in my view ( at least as far as those bands were concerned) . However they were so brilliant at what they did that none actually questions this! Close To The Edge was not really that progressive at all but it now considered the very epitomy of the greatest Progressive Rock Music made!

The problem with so many so called Retro artists is not that they are copying (really who gives a sh*t) but more that they simply are not as good at it. I mean they really can't be can they?! The genre was created by musical genius and 100% inspiration. It's laughable to even think that Wobbler could be a valid replacement for Yes at their splendid best. Ludicrous. That said I enjoy a lot of retro prog including stuff that is generally sneered at such as Glass Hammer and some other bands but that's because I'm not hung up on the idea of originality. This has always been a doubtful idea in the first place. Music is something that evolves. It's not something that is invented by a few individuals.
Back to Top
miamiscot View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 23 2014
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 3574
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote miamiscot Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2019 at 08:53
I feel sorry for those who cannot get into "Retro" Prog. First of all, none of these so-called Retro bands sound anything like the greats from yesteryear. The Flower Kings do not sound like Yes. Big Big Train does not sound like Genesis. Secondly, the concept of "progression" needs refining. Most bands, past and present, utilize rock instruments and Western tonality (with chromatic and diatonic scales). Therefore the amount of "progression" possible (given those constraints) will diminish over time. Those acts in the late 60's and early 70's had it easy! Bruford refers to this as slack being pulled from a rope - there was a lot of slack to be picked up in 1969, not as much now. And finally, all music is subjective. What I like may not be what you like. And that's okay!!! You can be wrong about Wobbler and I can be wrong about Magma.
Back to Top
TCat View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 07 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 11612
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote TCat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2019 at 10:03
No issue with it as long as it is done well and not overly cheesy.
 
I find the band Cheeto's Magazine to be one that really appeals to me with a mix of Styx at their best and Queen, but also a lot of unique sound.  Their album "Amazingous" makes me very happy.  One of the best of this past year.

Back to Top
Snicolette View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 02 2018
Location: OR
Status: Offline
Points: 6039
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snicolette Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2019 at 11:42
Originally posted by TCat TCat wrote:

No issue with it as long as it is done well and not overly cheesy.
 
I find the band Cheeto's Magazine to be one that really appeals to me with a mix of Styx at their best and Queen, but also a lot of unique sound.  Their album "Amazingous" makes me very happy.  One of the best of this past year.
  They are indeed amazingous!
"Into every rain, a little life must fall." ~Tom Rapp
Back to Top
Upbeat Tango Monday View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 10 2015
Location: Buenos Aires
Status: Offline
Points: 1189
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Upbeat Tango Monday Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2019 at 12:36
No issue at all. As a matter of fact, it's expected!
As I've always said, prog rock is a music genre like any other, with its own parameters of internal logic. It has nothing to do with an artist or band changing styles or creating "something new" (whatever the f*ck that means...this genre is not about fashion of trendsetting)
I've heard some *censored* calling Steve Wilson a prog master for releasing a 100% pop album. They don't get it, at all.

Metal fans know when a release isn't metal enough, pop fans know when an artist changes genres...why can't prog fans understand this basic concept? Maybe we should start calling the genre Symph rock or whatever sub-label, in order to avoid speaking nonsense with a word that is misused and poorly understood in music, politics and life in general. Progression (regression as well) has nothing to do with linearity in time. Changes are not always progressive, nor are they a ladder, a straight line...Giving more power each day to the church/state will be seen as progressive by dim-witted fanatics, for instance...but I digress.
Two random guys agreed to shake hands. Just Because. They felt like it, you know. It was an agreement of sorts...a random agreement.
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Raff Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2019 at 12:41
As usual, I find myself in agreement with Lewian, so I also voted "Other". When I still wrote reviews I came across albums that were so retro as to border on plagiarism (Wobbler's Rites at Dawn comes to mind), so, as a whole, I am not crazy about bands who reproduce a sound dating from over 40 years ago. However, there are exceptions.

One thing that very few people mention is that "retro prog" does not exclusively mean "symphonic". A number of modern Canterbury bands are unabashedly retro - my fellow Italians The Winstons come to mind - and there are also retro Avant and jazz-rock bands. As I tend to like these three subgenres more than straightforward symphonic prog (the classics being the exception), I find their approach more to my taste - but there's no denying that, in many ways, they are as retro as Wobbler and Big Big Train, to name but two.
Back to Top
Dellinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dellinger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2019 at 14:57
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

These is an area where people really get their panties in a bunch.

<font style=": rgb255, 255, 255;">One of the ideas of Progressive Rock Music is to make music that has strong comparisons with classical music. ELP , Yes , Tull and Genesis put down the foundation stones of the genre we love. No one made a rule that you couldn't do what they did. Progressive Music on the other hand is a whole different thing. Progressive Rock Music diverged from Progressive Music as early as 1972 in my view ( at least as far as those bands were concerned) . However they were so brilliant at what they did that none actually questions this! Close To The Edge was not really that progressive at all but it now considered the very epitomy of the greatest Progressive Rock Music made!
<font style=": rgb255, 255, 255;">
<font style=": rgb255, 255, 255;">The problem with so many so called Retro artists is not that they are copying (really who gives a sh*t) but more that they simply are not as good at it. I mean they really can't be can they?! The genre was created by musical genius and 100% inspiration. It's laughable to even think that Wobbler could be a valid replacement for Yes at their splendid best. Ludicrous. That said I enjoy a lot of retro prog including stuff that is generally sneered at such as Glass Hammer and some other bands but that's because I'm not hung up on the idea of originality. This has always been a doubtful idea in the first place. Music is something that evolves. It's not something that is invented by a few individuals.


Yeah, it sounds accurate about the so called Retro artists not being so good at copying. I mean, not all of them, of course. I believe this might be because the original prog bands were not trying to do prog, nor were they following a set formula for their music, they were just doing what they wanted to do. Now, those retro prog artists seem to have to follow certain aspects... they have to be long songs, they have to have long instrumental passages, they have to have odd time signatures, they have to have one or two (or more) epics... and so on. And that often makes their music forced and uninspired. I mean, all those aspects should be at the service of the music, if needed, and not the music at the service of the formula.
Back to Top
HackettFan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote HackettFan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 25 2019 at 21:51
Originally posted by dougmcauliffe dougmcauliffe wrote:

I know this is broad, but I've seen some criticisms and single star reviews of some retro prog bands/albums saying they are treading the waters of past greats or they're unoriginal. So what are your thoughts? Personally, I love retro prog and don't get some peoples problems. If some of these albums were recorded and produced note for note in the 70s they would likely be held as prog classics. So imo, some criticisms are silly.

Other. I am, would be, and have been troubled by lack of originality. However I don't think the "waters of the past" have been treaded upon so thoroughly that there is no open territory left.


A curse upon the heads of those who seek their fortunes in a lie. The truth is always waiting when there's nothing left to try. - Colin Henson, Jade Warrior (Now)
Back to Top
Guldbamsen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guldbamsen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2019 at 03:54
For me it boils down to the individual artist and how exactly they wield inspiration and certain wellknown musical gestures. I find the most recent Wobbler album to be almost like an ode to Yes ca 1973 and a damn fine one at that. I almost never think of Wobbler when spinning that album but must remind myself once in a while that it indeed isn’t Yes playing. Conversely, an act like Phideaux who has worn his influences on his sleeves ever since he started out never really sounds like any other artist than himself. Sure I pick up on different sections that sound like Floyd and so forth, but I am never in any doubt as to whom I am listening to. A combination of his vocals and melody phrasings over either the guitar or piano that does this imo.

Two very different forms of ‘retro-prog’ and I rather dig both.
It’s when the music turns formulaic and sterile where I turn away.

Edited by Guldbamsen - December 26 2019 at 03:55
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20248
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sean Trane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2019 at 04:15
AAMOF, the retro thing exists in all areas of rock (not just prog) and even in jazz

The 80's were filled with 50's & 60's revivals (Stray Cats, FYC, the "new romantics", Bevis Frond, etc...) without being too "retro", but Lenny Kravitz was the first one to really go "retro", even taping his albums on 70's consoles.

In jazz, there are still people doing Bop music ala 50's (good'ol' Marsalis), but jazz was all too often about purists anyways.  Then there is the so-called "spiritual jazz" (that includes Shabaka Hutchings and Kamasi Washington) is total retro of late 60's and 70's jazz somewhere between Pharoah, Alice Coltrane and McCoy Tyner.

In prog, the Swedish trilogy AnglaBerkDoten started the retro thing. 


Edited by Sean Trane - December 26 2019 at 04:18
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28054
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote richardh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 27 2019 at 01:51
Originally posted by Dellinger Dellinger wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

These is an area where people really get their panties in a bunch.

<font style=": rgb255, 255, 255;">One of the ideas of Progressive Rock Music is to make music that has strong comparisons with classical music. ELP , Yes , Tull and Genesis put down the foundation stones of the genre we love. No one made a rule that you couldn't do what they did. Progressive Music on the other hand is a whole different thing. Progressive Rock Music diverged from Progressive Music as early as 1972 in my view ( at least as far as those bands were concerned) . However they were so brilliant at what they did that none actually questions this! Close To The Edge was not really that progressive at all but it now considered the very epitomy of the greatest Progressive Rock Music made!
<font style=": rgb255, 255, 255;">
<font style=": rgb255, 255, 255;">The problem with so many so called Retro artists is not that they are copying (really who gives a sh*t) but more that they simply are not as good at it. I mean they really can't be can they?! The genre was created by musical genius and 100% inspiration. It's laughable to even think that Wobbler could be a valid replacement for Yes at their splendid best. Ludicrous. That said I enjoy a lot of retro prog including stuff that is generally sneered at such as Glass Hammer and some other bands but that's because I'm not hung up on the idea of originality. This has always been a doubtful idea in the first place. Music is something that evolves. It's not something that is invented by a few individuals.


Yeah, it sounds accurate about the so called Retro artists not being so good at copying. I mean, not all of them, of course. I believe this might be because the original prog bands were not trying to do prog, nor were they following a set formula for their music, they were just doing what they wanted to do. Now, those retro prog artists seem to have to follow certain aspects... they have to be long songs, they have to have long instrumental passages, they have to have odd time signatures, they have to have one or two (or more) epics... and so on. And that often makes their music forced and uninspired. I mean, all those aspects should be at the service of the music, if needed, and not the music at the service of the formula.
 

The only band I've ever heard doing the retro thing as well as the seventies bands is Elephant9.
One of the great issues with modern prog for me is that the drummers are not as good (although in many cases they are good and acceptable nevertheless) . Elephant9 have bucked the trend. When I first heard them I thought I was listening to a young Carl Palmer on the drums. That is an extreme rarity.
 
Back to Top
thief View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 21 2015
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1546
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote thief Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 23 2020 at 23:56
Which bands are retro prog? If it's Wobbler and co., I'm fine with it. Would rather listen to Wobbler than 80s-00s Neoprog, I guess that's enough praise.

Originally posted by miamiscot miamiscot wrote:

I feel sorry for those who cannot get into "Retro" Prog. First of all, none of these so-called Retro bands sound anything like the greats from yesteryear. The Flower Kings do not sound like Yes. Big Big Train does not sound like Genesis. Secondly, the concept of "progression" needs refining. Most bands, past and present, utilize rock instruments and Western tonality (with chromatic and diatonic scales). Therefore the amount of "progression" possible (given those constraints) will diminish over time. Those acts in the late 60's and early 70's had it easy! Bruford refers to this as slack being pulled from a rope - there was a lot of slack to be picked up in 1969, not as much now. And finally, all music is subjective. What I like may not be what you like. And that's okay!!! You can be wrong about Wobbler and I can be wrong about Magma.


Agree 100% with a rope thing.
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28054
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote richardh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2020 at 00:18
^ yeah makes sense, there hasn't been any great innovation in rock music since the seventies but what I actually like about the 90's on beyond is that there are bands that will embrace several musical influences and not just one or two. The hilarious aspect of the thing though is that unless one of those influences is Yes, ELP or Genesis then it's not prog!
Back to Top
Cristi View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams

Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 43716
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Cristi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2020 at 02:16
I like a few bands
 
Spocks Beard
TFK
Karmakanic
Magic Pie
Magenta
Presto Ballet
The Watch
Anekdoten
The Tangent
Airbag


Edited by Cristi - February 24 2020 at 02:44
Back to Top
LAM-SGC View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 26 2018
Location: se
Status: Offline
Points: 1544
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LAM-SGC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2020 at 04:00
I love retro. A lot of the current Swedish bands I like, several of them being friend's bands, have done it in the right way in my view, and have recreated the true underground feel of 67-73 by combining psych, hippy, hard rock, space, acid music.
My fav at the moment is a Swedish retro band called Lykantropi, who sound and look like a mix of Jefferson Airplane, Fairport Convention, Jethro Tull and Uriah Heep.

Another great current 70s retro band is Hällas.

Big Elf of course.
Back to Top
Mortte View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: November 11 2016
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 5538
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mortte Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2020 at 12:15
Finnish Sammal is ok, but mostly I love much more the original sixties/seventies prog.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.152 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.