Coheed And Cambria: The real reasons !!!

The T wrote: Frustrating... Well, it seems I'm always in the wrong side of these debates... I just hope they're added to the Related category... if this mtv-teen-emo band makes it to art-rock, Rush, Crimson, Anekdoten, and many more would really turn in their graves....   Wait, they're not dead...

I think he said that the admins were looking it over, which means that was the selection process for being PR. I think.

Well, they're up, and I've added all their albums [except for the Last Supper DVD], so if anyone wants to review [except for The T ] you can go ahead on and do so.

On another note, a question...how come everywhere Coheed's name appears, there's an asterisk next to it?

-SS

Shwang_Shwinga wrote: On another note, a question...how come everywhere Coheed's name appears, there's an asterisk next to it? -SS

The asterisk usually appears next to the name of a new addition, and means the information submitted is incomplete. People who have access to the database will remove it as soon as possible.

Ghost Rider wrote: Syrinx wrote: Well it's about frickin' time, haha. Just don't remove them this time, please! It may be a controversial addition, but the fact that they're listed as prog-related shouldn't make it too big of a deal. They may not be entirely prog, but to deny that it hasn't influenced them quite a bit is silly. I've been waiting for them to be added for, like, two years now I think. Well, as you're new to this forum, you probably don't know that ANY controversial addition is a big deal, even if it is in PR. I speak from personal experience, especially as regards the addition of Iron Maiden last year in October. The backlash wasn't what I would call pleasant. Ah, and if I were you, I would avoid using terms like 'silly', which, while not as strong as others, are not generally used to pay people a compliment.

Oh, I know. I've been here about as long as you, and I'm not nearly as active, but I do my share of lurking. I've seen some of the backlash, but I'm just hoping people don't freak out. I just personally see them as a worthy addition, in my opinion, much like those who don't. So yeah, "silly" was a poor choice of words, so I apologise. I do respect the opinions of others, even if I sounded like a bit of a jerk. My apologies.

micky wrote: Ghost Rider wrote: Syrinx wrote: Well it's about frickin' time, haha. Just don't remove them this time, please! It may be a controversial addition, but the fact that they're listed as prog-related shouldn't make it too big of a deal. They may not be entirely prog, but to deny that it hasn't influenced them quite a bit is silly. I've been waiting for them to be added for, like, two years now I think. Well, as you're new to this forum, you probably don't know that ANY controversial addition is a big deal, even if it is in PR. I speak from personal experience, especially as regards the addition of Iron Maiden last year in October. The backlash wasn't what I would call pleasant. Ah, and if I were you, I would avoid using terms like 'silly', which, while not as strong as others, are not generally used to pay people a compliment. hahahhah... consider yourself moderated buddy.  If you've been waiting that impatiently ...for how many years... for this group to be added. I'd say getting on the wrong side of Madam Ghost Rider is the least of your concerns.  I'd worry about not having a life hahahhaha.

Was that really necessary? I frequent this forum because I like music, and I like this band, so yeah, I take a minute or two every once in a while to see if they've been added or not. That hardly constitutes as "not having a life." I could say something about your 10,000 posts in about the same amount of time that I've been here, but I assume you're just a big a fan of progressive music as I am, so that would be a moot point. So I'm just going to consider your point moot as well, and your tone extremely arrogant and immature.

Syrinx wrote: Ghost Rider wrote: Syrinx wrote: Well it's about frickin' time, haha. Just don't remove them this time, please! It may be a controversial addition, but the fact that they're listed as prog-related shouldn't make it too big of a deal. They may not be entirely prog, but to deny that it hasn't influenced them quite a bit is silly. I've been waiting for them to be added for, like, two years now I think. Well, as you're new to this forum, you probably don't know that ANY controversial addition is a big deal, even if it is in PR. I speak from personal experience, especially as regards the addition of Iron Maiden last year in October. The backlash wasn't what I would call pleasant. Ah, and if I were you, I would avoid using terms like 'silly', which, while not as strong as others, are not generally used to pay people a compliment. Oh, I know. I've been here about as long as you, and I'm not nearly as active, but I do my share of lurking. I've seen some of the backlash, but I'm just hoping people don't freak out. I just personally see them as a worthy addition, in my opinion, much like those who don't. So yeah, "silly" was a poor choice of words, so I apologise. I do respect the opinions of others, even if I sounded like a bit of a jerk. My apologies. micky wrote: Ghost Rider wrote: Syrinx wrote: Well it's about frickin' time, haha. Just don't remove them this time, please! It may be a controversial addition, but the fact that they're listed as prog-related shouldn't make it too big of a deal. They may not be entirely prog, but to deny that it hasn't influenced them quite a bit is silly. I've been waiting for them to be added for, like, two years now I think. Well, as you're new to this forum, you probably don't know that ANY controversial addition is a big deal, even if it is in PR. I speak from personal experience, especially as regards the addition of Iron Maiden last year in October. The backlash wasn't what I would call pleasant. Ah, and if I were you, I would avoid using terms like 'silly', which, while not as strong as others, are not generally used to pay people a compliment. hahahhah... consider yourself moderated buddy.  If you've been waiting that impatiently ...for how many years... for this group to be added. I'd say getting on the wrong side of Madam Ghost Rider is the least of your concerns.  I'd worry about not having a life hahahhaha. Was that really necessary? I frequent this forum because I like music, and I like this band, so yeah, I take a minute or two every once in a while to see if they've been added or not. That hardly constitutes as "not having a life." I could say something about your 10,000 posts in about the same amount of time that I've been here, but I assume you're just a big a fan of progressive music as I am, so that would be a moot point. So I'm just going to consider your point moot as well, and your tone extremely arrogant and immature.

hahahhaha.. you should have said something

I'm used to it though.. not everyone gets my sense of humour.... thinks I have one,  or has one themselves.  I fully expected you to comment on my 10000 posts and have fun with it. 

sorry for not having a stick up my ass and having some fun.  Enjoy the site


Edited by micky - August 16 2007 at 11:38

chopper wrote: After all that, they've been here all day and not so much as a single rating!

doesn't that always happen.

chopper wrote: Nice snake Micky.

in Raffaella's honor... she had her first encounter with a rattler

The T wrote: TheProgtologist wrote: Shwang_Shwinga wrote: Well, they're up, and I've added all their albums [except for the Last Supper DVD], so if anyone wants to review [except for The T ] you can go ahead on and do so. On another note, a question...how come everywhere Coheed's name appears, there's an asterisk next to it? -SS   I removed it SS.   Congrats on a job very well done!!!!!!     Oh Mr. Shwang_Swhinga, I'll review them...Just don't expect the highest or ratings... Today's-MTV music is not my thing....   But I'll review with my usual fairness....

micky wrote: Syrinx wrote: Ghost Rider wrote: Syrinx wrote: Well it's about frickin' time, haha. Just don't remove them this time, please! It may be a controversial addition, but the fact that they're listed as prog-related shouldn't make it too big of a deal. They may not be entirely prog, but to deny that it hasn't influenced them quite a bit is silly. I've been waiting for them to be added for, like, two years now I think. Well, as you're new to this forum, you probably don't know that ANY controversial addition is a big deal, even if it is in PR. I speak from personal experience, especially as regards the addition of Iron Maiden last year in October. The backlash wasn't what I would call pleasant. Ah, and if I were you, I would avoid using terms like 'silly', which, while not as strong as others, are not generally used to pay people a compliment. Oh, I know. I've been here about as long as you, and I'm not nearly as active, but I do my share of lurking. I've seen some of the backlash, but I'm just hoping people don't freak out. I just personally see them as a worthy addition, in my opinion, much like those who don't. So yeah, "silly" was a poor choice of words, so I apologise. I do respect the opinions of others, even if I sounded like a bit of a jerk. My apologies. micky wrote: Ghost Rider wrote: Syrinx wrote: Well it's about frickin' time, haha. Just don't remove them this time, please! It may be a controversial addition, but the fact that they're listed as prog-related shouldn't make it too big of a deal. They may not be entirely prog, but to deny that it hasn't influenced them quite a bit is silly. I've been waiting for them to be added for, like, two years now I think. Well, as you're new to this forum, you probably don't know that ANY controversial addition is a big deal, even if it is in PR. I speak from personal experience, especially as regards the addition of Iron Maiden last year in October. The backlash wasn't what I would call pleasant. Ah, and if I were you, I would avoid using terms like 'silly', which, while not as strong as others, are not generally used to pay people a compliment. hahahhah... consider yourself moderated buddy.  If you've been waiting that impatiently ...for how many years... for this group to be added. I'd say getting on the wrong side of Madam Ghost Rider is the least of your concerns.  I'd worry about not having a life hahahhaha. Was that really necessary? I frequent this forum because I like music, and I like this band, so yeah, I take a minute or two every once in a while to see if they've been added or not. That hardly constitutes as "not having a life." I could say something about your 10,000 posts in about the same amount of time that I've been here, but I assume you're just a big a fan of progressive music as I am, so that would be a moot point. So I'm just going to consider your point moot as well, and your tone extremely arrogant and immature. hahahhaha.. you should have said something I'm used to it though.. not everyone gets my sense of humour.... thinks I have one,  or has one themselves.  I fully expected you to comment on my 10000 posts and have fun with it.  sorry for not having a stick up my ass and having some fun.  Enjoy the site

I'll summarize micky's post history for you:

hahahahahahahahahahahh ahhahahhahahh ahahhaha

DREAM THEATAAR

hahahahahhahha

hey there Ghost Rideys
DREAM THEATAR!!



hahahahahhahahhahahahha
hahahahhhahaha
DThahaGRDThaha


for micky




Edited by heyitsthatguy - August 16 2007 at 13:02