Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Beatles: Sgt Pepper vs Abbey Road
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Beatles: Sgt Pepper vs Abbey Road

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345
Author
Message
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 18066
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 hours 8 minutes ago at 11:29
Originally posted by MortSahlFan MortSahlFan wrote:

I actually think these are the two most overrated Beatles albums... Take "A Day in the Life" off Pepper and it's an average album (for The Beatles). And if you remove the first two songs (best) - Come Together, Something, and "Abbey Road" is another average Beatles album.
...

Hi,

This is sad, because in many ways, it does not take in consideration (afaik) that at the time, all the music on the radio was formulated cereal mish mash, and most of it was so childish and ridiculous as to keep the serious music listeners off the radio.

But:

1. Sgt Pepper's was in STEREO ... and it blew up the market for more individual players to take home, and this album was a must ... the majority of the radio dial at the time, was in MONO.

2, It's content, was different, as compared to the average stuff on radio that sounded the same after 3 songs, however, you did not have the album, because it wasn't in stereo, now.

3. Compared to a lot of stuff on the air in those days, Sgt Pepper's was much more educated and worked through ... the majority of works on the air at the time, did not have as good a rendition on the studio as the Beatles got at Abbey Road, for example, and the production made a lot of the rest of the AM dial music, sound really poor. 

4. What you gonna get, and listen to? Crappy sounding AM radio stuff, or the new STEREO thing? And it was a double whammy ... different, and then in STEREO. 

5. The Rolling Stones immediately followed up the idea! The "Between the Buttons" album I got was in Stereo, but there was very little separation as if the folks that made it sound stereo, did not know what to do. It was their next album where the STEREO was much more visible.

I kinda hope that folks get to see the history of things a bit better, it changes the perceptions ... and I have this weird idea that Internet folks don't have these thoughts in mind when they say some of these things. It MADE a heck of a difference, and helped change the times, and how music was perceived.

It was, also, one of the first big production albums (as a manner of speaking) that finally told us all that the recording industry was changing and FINALLY accepting rock music ... it would be a few more years, but classical music was still more important in terms of recording, and the quality ... and no one wanted to spend time and money on a cheap rock band with long hair, as many folks said at Abbey Road ... until one album made them more money than classical music ... mostly because the band did not get paid as much!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.336 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.