Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Do the Beatles get too much credit..
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Do the Beatles get too much credit..

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 252627
Poll Question: See opening post for question.
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
52 [30.95%]
113 [67.26%]
3 [1.79%]
You can not vote in this poll

Author
Message
ObeisantBread84PROG View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: Yesterday
Location: America
Status: Offline
Points: 5
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ObeisantBread84PROG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 09:17
I personally think the Beatles do not get enough credit. Most people nowadays have no clue that their favorite artist(s) might not exist without the Beatles. They revolutionized music in a never before seen way and their impact is still felt today.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35812
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 09:38
Although I answered Yes, I do agree with that, and had the question been, "Do the Beatles get too little credit?", I also would have answered yes. The band gets too much credit from some (including some who have claimed that The Beatles deserve all the credit they can get), and not enough credit from others. It seems likely that on average it (the band) does fall more on the side of too little credit these days. The influence and effect that The Beatles had on music is incredible, especially considering its fairly short run. Hearing "A Day In The Life" alone has been very influential, including to Robert Fripp. And without The Beatles, there would have been no The Rutles.





Funnily enough, I listen to The Rutles and sing their songs more than The Beatles.
Back to Top
Valdez View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 691
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Valdez Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 09:50
Every bit of credit The Beatles have ever gotten is well deserved.  Theres a reason the whole planet went mad over them. They certainly had the magic. 
https://bakullama1.bandcamp.com/album/sleepers-2024

Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35812
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 10:09
Originally posted by Valdez Valdez wrote:

Every bit of credit The Beatles have ever gotten is well deserved.  Theres a reason the whole planet went mad over them. They certainly had the magic. 


I really disagree because I have seen/heard very dubious claims about The Beatles, and I just don't trust the accuracy of people when it comes to what all people would give credit for (people make mistakes, don't know the full history). Not only have I heard that the Beatles invented raga rock, but that it invented raga. I also have heard The Beatles credited with inventing what is known as musique concrete even though they did not, but popularised it by taking that into their own music. Somewhere in this thread I think I listed some claims made by people that seem very suss to me. That the Beatles invented heavy metal music, a claim I have seen multiple times, well I don't know how true that is.

It would be incredible to me if not even one person ever gave undue credit to The Beatles (I framed this particularly in terms of innovation and origination, and not all the the planet goes mad for experimentation, innovation and origination). Actually, depending on what one means by the whole planet went mad for them, well if that means everyone loved them, that would not be true. My dad loathed The Beatles, but then I guess you could say he went mad about them in his own way by getting mad at them.

That and Lord Mountbatten are the two things I would remember him talking about the most that he absolutely hated (my dad was a British officer in India during partition). Later he was in corrections and setting up rehabilitation units, and he blamed The Beatles, I think, overmuch for drug abuse. I think he may have given The Beatles too much credit for leading people to drug abuse.

One thing we call all agree at least, The Beatles did invent rock and roll. ;) Okay maybe not. Hair metal? Perhaps. I came from the perspective that if one can find/ has heard even one claim from one person crediting The Beatles with something that there is insufficient evidence for, or is just plain wrong, then The Beatles have been given too much credit including on the claim that the Beatles are worthy of all credit that has been given to them. As said, I also think the Beatles does not get enough credit by some. Good, magic, that's subjective, but it makes sense to look to specific claims about The Beatles that are stated as fact, such as The Beatles invented such-and-such.

Edited by Logan - Yesterday at 10:23
Back to Top
Valdez View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 691
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Valdez Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 10:45
  Maybe we are overthinking them a bit?
     They Deserve credit... Not BS.

Inventing  Rock and Roll & Raga? Sorry, Nah.
Worldwide pop Phenomenon?  Definitely.

We could replace the word magic in this case with many others.
Luck
Talent
Popularity
Chops
 



Edited by Valdez - Yesterday at 10:48
https://bakullama1.bandcamp.com/album/sleepers-2024

Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35812
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 11:30
^ When I made this poll I was thinking specifically about claims of origination and innovation. Not all credit is deserved. Some of the credit that The Beatles get, or has received, is BS, or unfounded; therefore, I don't think that The Beatles deserve all the credit that has been given to them. I am very happy to see credit given where it is due.

EDIT for a tangential note: Taylor Swift is another worldwide pop phenomenon whom I would doubt deserves all the credit and accolades that she has been given. How much credit the Beatles should be given for her music and success, I don't know, but of course The Beatles has had a profound effect on music/ has been very influential.

Edited by Logan - Yesterday at 12:02
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17511
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 7 hours 46 minutes ago at 07:46
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

 
...
Somewhere in this thread I think I listed some claims made by people that seem very suss to me. That the Beatles invented heavy metal music, a claim I have seen multiple times, well I don't know how true that is.
...
The Beatles, I think, overmuch for drug abuse. I think he may have given The Beatles too much credit for leading people to drug abuse.
...

Hi,

Honestly, I find this thread (not the idea, but so many bad responses!) kinda sad ... pretty soon we're gonna ask how much credit Mozart deserves, and then Beethoven if we get bored.

The main issue, is that the majority of folks that responded, and probably said NO ... were NOT THERE, to have a better idea of how things went down ... but the negative stuff is so much about the press ... they decided to dislike the Beatles because their potty was nicer looking than yours, and then to say that the drugs killed SF, and the music scene, but they would not mention the mannequin that was sent over to show up the hippies ... she had flowers in her hair and was supposed to be a symbol of what the Bay Area was all about in the scene. 

The sad thing is how the media reacted and to this day, the stuff that some younger folks seem to find is all the bad doodoo ... and not realize that it was a part of the attempt to bring down the supposed good things the Beatles did ... but I tell you one thing ... no person that EVER made millions off the Beatles ever complained about it ... maybe one or two that didn't get the free use of one of the groupies! They are all over the "biographies" ... that are so empty and vacuous as to make you and I throw up a time or two.

I don't think that asking the question 50 years later, is gonna get a serious and well thought out comment ... most folks are into something else in their tastes, and The Beatles, are a long way off their tastes, and their very own growl. I think that if we separate the folks by age, that we might find a better answer ... a generation that had no idea that there was no Internet, and the only music you heard was on the rimky-dinky small radio, and then, all of a sudden, FM radio showed up ... WITH ONE PROBLEM .... the majority of Beatles listeners were on that rimky-dinky small radio, and they would have to spring for a stereo system, and now you have an issue ... many of those folks were kids like you and I and it took me at least 5 more years before I got my own little stereo at home, and FINALLY was able to listen to the Beatles in stereo, both LP and the FM radio.

I think we need to improve our calls on some of these ideas and polls ... comparing different generations is NOT going to get you a good answer at all ... and this is not higher education/college where you will get graded for your comments out of time and place! And a lot of folks take advantage of the idea they have to know something ... or other, that is different from today's.

SIDE NOTE: A class I taught on the arts, I had an idea. I asked the kids (2 classes/44 new kids for UCSB) how the brick buildings in Greece kept their warmth -- 2k or 3K years ago ... and there were, of course, some 15 bits that were insane ... it was like ... Greece? Where is that? What do you mean heat up a room? House? See, if you can find the answer ... it's simple, and let me tell you that the movies don't help at all!!! And probably very similar to the answers here ... you don't have to have been there, but a little studying and reading would help the answers! I, NEVER, thought of history as ... preferences!


Edited by moshkito - 7 hours 42 minutes ago at 07:50
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Cristi View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams

Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 43654
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Cristi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 7 hours 33 minutes ago at 07:59
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

 
Somewhere in this thread I think I listed some claims made by people that seem very suss to me. That the Beatles invented heavy metal music, a claim I have seen multiple times, well I don't know how true that is.

They did not. yes, Helter Skelter was noisy and distorted, but there were others that were already doing the same thing. Heavy metal was not created with just one song, it was an evolution.

There is a good video about the birth of heavy metal, pre-Black Sabbath, I'll have to find it again and post it here. 

edit:



Edited by Cristi - 7 hours 13 minutes ago at 08:19
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35812
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 2 hours 25 minutes ago at 13:07
^ That is one of the most common claims I have seen about The Beatles, that it invented Heavy Metal. There was a PA forum member who was insistent on that, which might have been an inspiration for this topic.

^^ I would describe The Beatles as an example for an idea I was somewhat interested in. I made this many years ago, and I don't recall what trains of thought led me to this, but quite often I conceptualise based on comments in the forum. The poll itself was for fun. If this were for a classical forum, and I knew more about questionable claims made about Mozart's innovation and origination, then I might well have done him. Of course, as most everyone knows, Mozart basically ripped off all of his best stuff from Salieri.

Anyway, it would be nice to have more topics that elicit a "this makes me so happy" than a "kinda sad" response. And I know just the man for the job.

Edited by Logan - 2 hours 21 minutes ago at 13:11
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 252627

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.164 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.