Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - What are we to do in an era with out privacy?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhat are we to do in an era with out privacy?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
bardberic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 02 2021
Location: PA, USA/Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 870
Direct Link To This Post Topic: What are we to do in an era with out privacy?
    Posted: August 24 2024 at 23:00
What are we supposed to do when it is literally illegal to protect users' privacy and not censor speech?

I ask this in response Pavel Durov's arrest in France. He himself has committed no crimes, but because a platform he runs does not censor speech the EU and Russia do not condone, he is being held personally accountable for "complicity" in others' anonymous behaviors.

I am out for words and don't even know where to begin on how much I f**king hate this. The governments hate freedom of speech, and yet countries like France are supposed to protect that very right - what is the point of the right to free speech if one cannot run a platform that allows others to exert it?

What infuriates me about this situation is the fact that the site owner, who himself has done no wrongdoing, is being held accountable for other people's supposed "wrongdoing" on a platform that operates in a country different from the one arresting him. I'd expect this scenario from China or Russia, not France nor the EU, and supposedly the United States was after him as well... the biggest issue is that Telegram is based in the UAE, NOT France nor the EU. Whatever French/EU laws were broken by other people (not Pavel himself) were done so on an app that operates in a different country, meaning the so-called "crimes" were committed in another country and thus not under French jurisdiction. Why does any of this have to do with French law enforcement?

This development is f**king enormous, and it should scare literally everyone sh*tless. This is the start of dystopia and I don't now aht the f**k I'm supposed to do next... not like I'm a cybercriminal or dark web fugitive/whatever but this news feels like something out of China.

I'm pissed and I don't know what to do...

Edited by bardberic - August 24 2024 at 23:48
Back to Top
Mirakaze View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Eclectic, JRF/Canterbury, Avant/Zeuhl

Joined: December 17 2019
Location: (redacted)
Status: Offline
Points: 4061
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 25 2024 at 06:06
Government overreach is something that citizens should always be aware of and censorship measures must always be treated with scrutiny. I do think it should be pointed out however that the "problematic" content on Telegram isn't limited to hate speech or the like but things like child pornography, drug trade, financial crimes; the kinds of crimes that you don't have to put in quotes and can in all other contexts go to jail over for facilitating. The reason the French justice department specifically has gone after him is because Durov has French citizenship.
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15243
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 25 2024 at 08:20
There has been no true privacy for decades. I've watched ex-CIA whistleblower testimonies that spill the beans about satellites being able to see what's inside your walls from orbit. In fact no technologies are released to the public unless they serve a dualistic purpose of weaponization of some sort.

In the age of the internet we all live in glass houses. ANYTHING you do on line is saved and stored in super computers in the Utah desert. The only way i know of to prevent cyber spying is to build your own Unix computer and avoid all the spyware they insert upon manufacturing PCS and Macs.

Being visible can be used to your advantage. Our consent is needed to bring much government overreach to reality so if we vehemently oppose certain policies the gatekeepers will get the word.



https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
bardberic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 02 2021
Location: PA, USA/Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 870
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 25 2024 at 14:24
Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:

There has been no true privacy for decades. I've watched ex-CIA whistleblower testimonies that spill the beans about satellites being able to see what's inside your walls from orbit. In fact no technologies are released to the public unless they serve a dualistic purpose of weaponization of some sort.

In the age of the internet we all live in glass houses. ANYTHING you do on line is saved and stored in super computers in the Utah desert. The only way i know of to prevent cyber spying is to build your own Unix computer and avoid all the spyware they insert upon manufacturing PCS and Macs.

Being visible can be used to your advantage. Our consent is needed to bring much government overreach to reality so if we vehemently oppose certain policies the gatekeepers will get the word.




Yes. I mean this came literally an hour after I came home from my local Best Buy with a new computer to replace my old one which broke. I talked with the tech support there for over an hour about privacy issues - look, I've been skeptical about Windows 10 since I got it in 2017 (before which I had been using a Mac), but I modified the operating system using the command line so that many of my skepticisms were removed (for instance I literally deleted the update driver so the computer CANNOT update, even if I wanted to... a big f**k you to Microsoft, btw, for FORCING updates on the device and in doing so, collecting ALL information on the system). With this new computer running Windows 11, which literally REQUIRES a Microsoft account to setup - which also beyond INFURIATES me because I have literally been locked out of EVERY MS account I've created because I REFUSE to give them my phone number, which they will eventually require (like all big tech these days) to sign in using forced multi-factor authentication... do not get me started on why 2FA is the f**king bane of my existence; I cannot stress how much I f**king hate 2FA from both a privacy and a security standpoint, but digress - anyway, I'm currently at an extended stay hotel which has a wifi network that requires online verification to use, which means I cannot connect to that network, nor thus set up the computer. I'm kind of SOL, unless I have the Best Buy set it up for me, which they charge $100 to do, which I'm not going to f**king pay.

Welcome to 2024 where if you don't have internet access you can't set up a computer on which you spent $1000. Shame on Microsoft, and shame on society for allowing big tech to do this. Mark Zuckerberg has even called the mass populace "stupid/idiots" for essentially just giving him their personal information for free, and I agree with him.

Anyway, the point of this reply? ig I have no choice but to root the bootloader on this $1000 computer and install a Linux kernal, which in all fairness I've been wanting to do for years but never had the motivation to do until now. I wish I could create a custom Unix-based OS, but I don't have the coding sills necessary for that. My choices are either MacOS (not happening because the Apple ecosystem is horrible), literally using Unix itself and thus not being able to use the stupid machine for anything that can't be done with command-line executables, or Linux. ig the lattermost makes the most sense. This also comes three months after I was lied to ASUS about their Zenfone having an unlockable bootloader. I intended to install LineageOS on it, but as it turns out, this promise was a lie, so now I have create a Google account (lmao not happening) to set it up. They were literally sued in the UK for this, and once I have my housing situation under control, I'm probably going to open up a lawsuit here in the US, as well, for false advertising.

Last week, as it turns out, I got locked out of my Discord account (which is probably a good thing tbh), because the email associated with the account locked me out because I refuse to give them my phone number for 2FA, banned from Wikipedia and Reddit because someone else who got banned from those sites used the same IP address on this public wifi network I'm on at this extended stay hotel and thus anyone, such as myself, who logs into their accounts on this IP will also be banned, even if they are innocent (so it's not just government institutions that have no regard for privacy; it's anyone who wants to hold on to any kind of power...). And about two weeks ago I finally got access to my god damned bank account, which I got locked out of as well because I refused to give them my phone number for 2FA again - I fought them for over a month and they finally decided, after over five hours of aggregated discussion with them to finally re-implement security questions for me to log in instead. Needless to say I'm piseed about all of this.

2024 has been a living Hell for privacy. It's just one thing after another, after another, and I can't get a f**king break. Dystopia in the making, and I have no control over my virtual life anymore, meanwhile it's becoming harder and harder and harder to escape the grasps of the internet every day. If I could permanantly log off forever, I would. But then I would literally not be able to do many things I need to do, like I could before the 2020 pandemic. I hate this. I hate the internet. I hate how people take the internet and their mobile phones for granted, and that it's impossible to live a life wthout one anymore. It wasn't until the 2020 lockdowns that I was finally forced to become a "netizen," even f that was the direction life was heading beforehand, and I want to go back...

Edit: And further to my point, about losing access to Discord and getting banned on Reddit/Wikipedia, etc... here is the ONE tech company that actually does respect users' privacy, and that very aspect of the platform he runs is what makes him a criminal. We are f**ked, for anyone who wants an iota of privacy in the future.

Edited by bardberic - August 25 2024 at 21:48
Back to Top
bardberic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 02 2021
Location: PA, USA/Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 870
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 25 2024 at 21:58
Originally posted by Mirakaze Mirakaze wrote:

Government overreach is something that citizens should always be aware of and censorship measures must always be treated with scrutiny. I do think it should be pointed out however that the "problematic" content on Telegram isn't limited to hate speech or the like but things like child pornography, drug trade, financial crimes; the kinds of crimes that you don't have to put in quotes and can in all other contexts go to jail over for facilitating. The reason the French justice department specifically has gone after him is because Durov has French citizenship.


You're missing my point entirely. I didn't quotate "crimes" because nobody has committed genuine crimes' I'm well aware what the platform has been used for. I quotated it because Pavel wasn't the one to commit any crimes.

The point here is that you cannot, for instance, arrest Henry Ford because other people use his car invention to commit crimes (eg, driving while intoxicated, ramming attacks, etc.), or John Browning for inventing the modern pistol. More relevantly, crimes have been committed on the world wide web via the dark web, pretty much identically to how Telegram is being used in these cases. Nobody has ever thought about arresting Tim Berners-Lee for inventing the world wide web, which can be used as a tool for crime; why is Pavel Durov treated differently?

All he did was make a platform that respects users' privacy, and thus anonymizes them - if people want to use this platform for crime, you cannot hold him accountable for others' crimes - he didn't "pull the trigger," and his design no more encourages illegal behavior than John Browning's, Henry Ford's, nor Tim Berners-Lee's inventions have... in other words, this arrest is unprecedented, unfair, and extremely immoral.

Edited by bardberic - August 25 2024 at 22:01
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 6341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 05:16
Telegram isn't the only social media site used to commit crimes.  All the big social media sites are used for things like child pornography, drug trade, financial crimes...Facebook, Youtube, X, Tic Toc., Instagram, Douyin, Reddit...

When a government has 100% control of social media's narrative, the government will not arrest the CEO... for crimes committed on the site.  Zuckerberg is safe. 

Governments want 100% control over all social media sites. The government's goal is to control the narrative and prevent any speech or opinion that contradicts the government's narrative.  Free Speech morphs into opinions and narratives that agree with the government's narrative. Any narrative or opinion that disagrees with the government's narrative is Hate Speech. 


Edited by omphaloskepsis - August 26 2024 at 15:11
Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13627
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 06:38
I give this thread another two days max before it is zapped.

ADMIN!Tongue
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 6341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 07:10
Interview from four months ago with Telegram CEO.


Back to Top
Lewian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14727
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 07:15
Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:

 
Governments want 100% control over all social media sites. The government's goal is to control the narrative and prevent any speech or opinion that contradicts the government's narrative.  Free Speech morphs into opinions and narratives that agree with the government's narrative. Any narrative or opinion that disagrees with the government's narrative is Hate Speech. 
I'm surprised that I see so much anti-government speech then, all over the place. Wasn't it you yourself who linked piles of youtube videos that make your anti-government point?
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17510
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 08:42
Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

...
I'm surprised that I see so much anti-government speech then, all over the place. Wasn't it you yourself who linked piles of youtube videos that make your anti-government point?

HI,

I think it depends on each situation. NO two of them are ever the same. In the times of the Portugal/Spain dictatorships there was a lot of censorship and this and that and you already know the famous situation in Spain, with the Civil War ... if we need another Guernica for your mind/memory, or another Lorca snuff! In our case in Portugal it affected us directly. One of mom's brothers was snuffed out, and my dad went to Brazil with family to work on literature, where he made his fame. The "unknown" here, is why he left, thought the artistic thing is a bit strange considering that dad was high up in the Portuguese Navy ... I'm guessing that the politics were very sticky, and the literary thing of which he had been a part for a long time, seems like a good excuse.

Someone published a book, with a set of film reviews that were censored by the government, and they were all at least half the original size and made no sense. 

In the end, I am not sure what the complaint is about, as this even happens in America ... when a woman named Gore threatened businesses with bad publicity, and then Mr. T "firing" everyone publicly, and the media applauding ... goes ay back to the Lions and the Christians, and the like situations ... but it is about the money ... a site with bad/poor stuff has several million hits daily ... and lots of advertising revenue ... why the heck would they bother listening to you, except banning you for being anti-social ... you think Lus(k)t and any others worry about your words? It's simpler to just ban you these days ... less hassle, and your writing in many other places kinda ... dies off after a few days!

Can't win. 

In America you can do something about it, but too many folks don't care, and won't go elect someone else to reverse that ... this or that ... and some state groups are intentionally creating this and that without the public vote, because they know they will lose. But the public won't vote those folks out ... and it's hard to say those folks don't care! Next election? Same turkey ... same as the last turkey ... hey, it must be dinner time and Cruise time ... I need to get my daily puffing first, though! Tongue




Edited by moshkito - August 26 2024 at 09:04
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 6341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 09:02
Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:

 
Governments want 100% control over all social media sites. The government's goal is to control the narrative and prevent any speech or opinion that contradicts the government's narrative.  Free Speech morphs into opinions and narratives that agree with the government's narrative. Any narrative or opinion that disagrees with the government's narrative is Hate Speech. 
I'm surprised that I see so much anti-government speech then, all over the place. Wasn't it you yourself who linked piles of youtube videos that make your anti-government point?


Depends on the country.  UK sentenced a man to prison for 20 months for an anti-immigration Facebook post. Another UK citizen was sent to jail for retweeting an anti-immigration post. It's hard to sentence folks to jail for anti-government narratives in America.  Free Speech is protected in our Constitution.  Instead, the US government wages lawfare, and censorship, and puts pressure on companies to fire employees. 

Tucker was fired from FOX after Blackrock bought 15% of FOX. Now? Tucker cannot fire himself.  The man that Tucker interviewed in the video just got arrested by France.

 Canada froze folks' bank accounts. Germany, France, and Australia arrest their citizens for anti-government narratives. 

Governments prioritize influencers and important people with a wide subscriber base to harass. Do you deny that the governments I listed are not targeting important people who express anti-government narratives?Wink 


Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17510
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 09:11
Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:

...
t's hard to sentence folks to jail for anti-government narratives in America.  Free Speech is protected in our Constitution.  Instead, the US government wages lawfare, and censorship, and puts pressure on companies to fire employees. 
...

Hi,

I actually think that the Free Speech thing is a joke. And many folks abuse it, be it a bunch of falsities or simply political jargon, which is all the "media" cares about.

The "pressuring" should be added to the Constitution as ... not a form of Free Speech, but abuse. But when government folks do it, it adds another difficulty to the whole mess! It's now very stinky!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20240
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 10:37
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

I give this thread another two days max before it is zapped.

ADMIN!Tongue


It won't be because of the topic itself, but because of the interveners insulting each other.
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Lewian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14727
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 11:43
Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:

Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:

 
Governments want 100% control over all social media sites. The government's goal is to control the narrative and prevent any speech or opinion that contradicts the government's narrative.  Free Speech morphs into opinions and narratives that agree with the government's narrative. Any narrative or opinion that disagrees with the government's narrative is Hate Speech. 
I'm surprised that I see so much anti-government speech then, all over the place. Wasn't it you yourself who linked piles of youtube videos that make your anti-government point?


Depends on the country.  UK sentenced a man to prison for 20 months for an anti-immigration Facebook post. Another UK citizen was sent to jail for retweeting an anti-immigration post. It's hard to sentence folks to jail for anti-government narratives in America.  Free Speech is protected in our Constitution.  Instead, the US government wages lawfare, and censorship, and puts pressure on companies to fire employees. 

Tucker was fired from FOX after Blackrock bought 15% of FOX. Now? Tucker cannot fire himself.  The man that Tucker interviewed in the video just got arrested by France.

 Canada froze folks' bank accounts. Germany, France, and Australia arrest their citizens for anti-government narratives. 

Governments prioritize influencers and important people with a wide subscriber base to harass. Do you deny that the governments I listed are not targeting important people who express anti-government narratives?Wink 


I'm from Germany. I know a lot of people who say anti-government stuff. None of them was arrested. The word "targeting" can have a wide range of meanings so you'll find the odd story to back that up. Not everybody can say absolutely everything legally in Germany, that's true, for example Holocaust denial. You may think that absolutely everything should be freely said, insults, slander, lies, incitement of hatred and violence, and that's OK, but there is a point for not allowing everything. Anyway examples for restriction of freedom of speech are few and far between. 
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 6341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 12:06
Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:

Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:

 
Governments want 100% control over all social media sites. The government's goal is to control the narrative and prevent any speech or opinion that contradicts the government's narrative.  Free Speech morphs into opinions and narratives that agree with the government's narrative. Any narrative or opinion that disagrees with the government's narrative is Hate Speech. 
I'm surprised that I see so much anti-government speech then, all over the place. Wasn't it you yourself who linked piles of youtube videos that make your anti-government point?




I'm from Germany. I know a lot of people who say anti-government stuff. None of them was arrested. The word "targeting" can have a wide range of meanings so you'll find the odd story to back that up. Not everybody can say absolutely everything legally in Germany, that's true, for example Holocaust denial. You may think that absolutely everything should be freely said, insults, slander, lies, incitement of hatred and violence, and that's OK, but there is a point for not allowing everything. Anyway examples for restriction of freedom of speech are few and far between. 


  • You're spot on about Holocaust denial. 
  • Germany's parliament passed legislation in 1985, making it a crime to deny the extermination of the Jews. In 1994, the law was tightened. Now, anyone who publicly endorses, denies or plays down the genocide against the Jews faces a maximum penalty of five years in jail and no less than the imposition of a fine.

A couple of links to German Hate Speech raids:


https://apnews.com/article/germany-women-misogyny-raids-internet-hate-crime-31d3e61aab90bdce3f6f0d96e21d0fe4

https://apnews.com/article/europe-germany-3e4dfe0b9da0dcd54702569632642109


Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35804
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 13:27
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

I give this thread another two days max before it is zapped.

ADMIN!Tongue


It won't be because of the topic itself, but because of the interveners insulting each other.


But since we officially have a moratorium on political threads, I don't see one keeping politics out of the discussion. It is a very political topic. And topics that encourage conspiracy theory type thinking generally are problematic.

Edited by Logan - August 26 2024 at 13:30
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 14:17
The propagandist is on a mission.

Edited by Easy Money - August 26 2024 at 14:22
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35804
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 15:07
^ True. At one time I might sooner have expected the kind of propagandist that supports Prog Supremacy to be dominant at a Prog forum, but the propagandist seeks to disseminate their views any chance they get. And at a forum like this they can feel special, like the voice of reason (the one who holds the key to truth) amongst the ignorant masses, instead of one of many in more echo chamber type places which attract many like-mined people. Oh, they will still argue the details of their favourite conspiracy theories etc. at many venues.

Edited by Logan - August 26 2024 at 15:18
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65251
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 15:36
Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

I'm from Germany. I know a lot of people who say anti-government stuff. None of them was arrested. The word "targeting" can have a wide range of meanings so you'll find the odd story to back that up. Not everybody can say absolutely everything legally in Germany, that's true, for example Holocaust denial. You may think that absolutely everything should be freely said, insults, slander, lies, incitement of hatred and violence, and that's OK, but there is a point for not allowing everything. Anyway examples for restriction of freedom of speech are few and far between. 

Finally someone who not only lives in said countries, but knows some history.

Saying that Anti-government speech is being suppressed (which in some cases it is) is becoming another way for Far-right conservatives to say 'We wish our countries were a little more xenophobic, a little more Christian, and a little more anti-abortion... oh, and we're tired of losing elections.'

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Lewian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14727
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2024 at 15:43
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

 
Finally someone who not only lives in said countries, but knows some history.
That's nice of you; still, to set the facts straight, I'm from Germany, have lived there some 35 years and still have close contacts there, but now live in Italy.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.207 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.