'I don't get it' |
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 7> |
Author | ||
Hrychu
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 03 2013 Location: poland? Status: Offline Points: 5357 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
On the day of my creation, I fell in love with education. And overcoming all frustration, a teacher I became.
Ernest Vong |
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I wouldn't just dismiss a claim, but for me to really believe it, especially if it went against what I as merely an appreciator thought, I would want to understand the reasoning. From doctors I have wanted second opinions and have got bad advice before. As I don't know the all around , or extent, of music expertise of Randy Jackson or Eddy Van Halen, I may understandably be less likely to put trust in them as authorities than you. As for the Prog term, from all the discussions on what is Prog here, and so-called Prog musicians saying their music is not Prog, I'd think it's nebulous due to lack of overall consensus (at least at this forum it seems so, maybe Randy could nail the definition). If you ask Paul, if you ask David D, if you ask Ivan, or Hrychu, Cristi, Silly Puppy, Dean, Peter, Tony R, ManwithHat, Yam Yam, Steve Wyzard, Gordy, cstack, I doubt we will all get the same answer. I don't know that Eddie Van Halen and Randy Jackson, or Roger Waters, James LaBrie, Robert Fripp, Robert Wyatt, Ian Anderson, Frank Zappa, Peter Hammill, Peter Gabriel, Geddy Lee, Fish, Bjork (controversial addition, I love her music) etc. would have defined it quite the same either. I have more than one working definition. It can be more of a codified style/genre, more of an approach to making music.... I tend to favour the approach assessment. As some say, not all Prog (as a genre) music is truly progressive and not all progressive (adjective) music is Prog. Debates often happen about what is an isn't Prog here. Some take a narrower approach than others. It can be a very big umbrella term or focus more narrowly on music (often people think Symphonic Prog like Yes, Genesis, Focus etc. particularly). I do seem to be able to recognise prog in various forms, and often it comes to nuances when it seems right for the site or not. For me Prog extends beyond boundaries we have seen some gatekeepers try to set for PA. To me it is quite limitless. I care more about progressive, experimental and art music than Prog as some codified genre with defined parameters.
Edited by Logan - July 31 2024 at 18:16 |
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65251 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I can tell prog rock the moment I hear it--- "Hey", I'll say, "that's prog", and be delighted & curious about who the artist is. That artist may or may not consider themselves prog, and with all due respect to the rock musicians who insist they 'are not prog', well, I beg to differ. They're prog whether they like it or not.
|
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17510 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hi, Only one problem ... they created the music and their inspiration is/was somewhere else, and not "prog" as you know it. This is tough stuff. And it gets harder when RF says KC is not prog or progressive ... they are, based on their regiment of rehearsal, the best classical troup in rock music second to none ... and because of that they are "not" prog, or progressive? I have no idea, what to call it, except great music, regardless of any titles.
|
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
And by that same token, Randy Jackson and Eddie Van Halen might not recognise the same music you know to be Prog as Prog. It doesn't inherently change what the music is, but perceptions are relevant to what we're discussing. I won't just accept what they say nor what other musicians say as authorities, nor causally dismiss it. That said, it's not really important to me how they use the Prog term, or that I use it the same way, as long as I understand what they mean. And for me to give much credence to their beliefs such as thinking progressive rock is the best form in the world I still would want to understand what they mean by progressive rock and what the argument is.
Edited by Logan - July 31 2024 at 18:27 |
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65251 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
They recognize the same music you & I know to be Prog because they are (or were in Eddie's case,RIP) consummate musicians and professionals, and that is not something to be dismissed. They're accomplished, established recording artists who worked like hell to come in to their own as great players. Their careers don't just fall from the sky, it was hard-earned and they do get to have a highly credible perspective.
One can talk about opinions or perspectives or definitions, but at some point we cannot just lump those individual's perceptions into some 'That's not what others think' or 'They have a different idea of what prog is'. As a musician myself ~ both trained & self-taught ~ that would be missing the point. Do we dismiss what Alfred Hitchcock thought of a particular movie, filmmaker or director even if he himself is not our favorite filmmaker? Only to our ignorance and subjective pitfall. No, these peoples' views have weight and high credibility, and I'm willing to observe that weight & credibility regardless of my opinion may be of their own work. |
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65251 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
And he'd be wrong. Of course KC is progressive rock music, what else are they, especially considering their long history as rock musicians who have clearly and without doubt created rock music that progresses. Fripp's comments are both absurd and demonstrably incorrect, and let's face it, he haS a bone to pick with music journalists and opinion-makers. I don't blame him, but he's incorrect and quite frankly has a stick up his brilliant ass. |
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15243 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ a lot of time artists want to consider themselves "outsiders" and don't want to be associated with a pigeonholded "genre" I agree with you that classic prog has pretty much been well established as to what it is but more modern acts that blur the distinctions between prog and non-prog genres are a bit harder to define or detect There are also shades of prog varying from slight crossover to extremely brutal (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'8ac211c8bf6f16a2',t:'MTcyMjQ3NTg5NS4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();< style=": ; top: 0px; left: 0px; border: medium none; visibility: ;" width="1" height="1">
|
||
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
||
Awesoreno
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 07 2019 Location: Culver City, CA Status: Offline Points: 3036 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Also, art isn't science. So treating professional musicians like doctors is not an apt comparison. Yes, their experience counts for a lot. But I can't expect Randy Jackson to find the perfect music for me the same way a doctor can prescribe life-saving medical advice.
|
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65251 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ You can make the same comparison in the arts (I used doctors because Logan did)--- if experimental painter Gerhard Richter told you the best realist is Wang Jianwei and that his brand of social realism is actually superior to what most painters are doing, to dismiss that as merely opinion would be a mistake. You'd go out and find a Wang Jianwei book, or at least you should.
|
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
Hugh Manatee
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 07 2021 Location: The Barricades Status: Offline Points: 1587 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^I'm struggling to understand how dismissing his OPINION as merely an opinion would be a mistake. This is nothing more than an appeal to authority, and yes I may find a Wang Jianwe book and agree or disagree, but that would also be just my opinion.
A lot of people, including supposed art experts point to Picasso as some kind of master of art, but personally I don't get it. Edited by Hugh Manatee - August 01 2024 at 00:07 |
||
I should have been a pair of ragged claws
Scuttling across the floors of uncertain seas |
||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17510 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hi, All in all, and his changes and different things he did, I would suggest that the whole thing was about the FREEDOM that the arts did in Europe in the earlier part of the 20th Century. During and after the 70's it became too commercial, and the originality that you saw was no longer as evident. The "mastery" he had, was more about his ability to just paint, non-stop and endup with thousands of works that were distributed throughout the whole family when he passed away. But he should also get some credit for his politics ... remember that he did not allow his Guernica painting to go to Spain until AFTER the dictatorship was gone ... and that was/is a massive statement for the arts in Spain which exploded then, and didn't stop/die for at least 30 years with their film industry doing fantabulous things. I'm not sure what "mastery" meant, but more than once, he stood in front of the camera and just painted and was done in 30 minutes or less ... and it was neat, and far out. There aren't many artists that are/were that comfortable with themselves as to not even have to show off and still come up with something out of the blue, which he always did.
|
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65251 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
This just illustrates my point. You shouldn't dismiss it at all-- it's an appeal to expertise & background, not authority. That you might think an artist good or bad is irrelevant because you're not an a lifelong art expert or a painter (I assume). You don't have to get why Picasso is considered so important or a genius, but those who have the seasoned understanding and perception of art and art history do. And frankly, though Picasso may not be among my very favorite painters, neither is Jackson Pollock but I get why he's so vital and gifted, and I see why he's considered to be so. Sometimes you have to step out of yourself to see the reality of a certain field, and it is always possible one day you may absolutely understand why Picasso is so great even though you might not have a print of his on your wall. Edited by Atavachron - August 01 2024 at 17:15 |
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15243 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ actually you have to question EVERYTHING. Sometimes artists are merely propped up by paid "experts" to generate sales through media hype. Your doctor analogy is flawed because one third of deaths in the USA are caused by MEDICAL MALPRACTICE. Having studied biology i can guarantee that a lot of what the population considers factual science is actually nothing more than marketing. The arts are a matter of taste. Some of the highest rated albums of all times are not that great to my ears meanwhile some of the greatest discoveries i've found are the lowest rated and most disliked albums of all time. Music critics have their place of course to give someone a sense of what they can expect but as far as opinions go about liking or not liking, that's fairly subjective just like some of us like brussel sprouts and others hate them. No expert will convince anyone otherwise. (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'8ac98b16f8ebfa7e',t:'MTcyMjU1NDI2NC4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();< style=": ; top: 0px; left: 0px; border: medium none; visibility: ;" width="1" height="1">
(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'8ac992318f862524',t:'MTcyMjU1NDU1NS4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();< style=": ; top: 0px; left: 0px; border: medium none; visibility: ;" width="1" height="1">
Edited by siLLy puPPy - August 01 2024 at 17:22 |
||
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65251 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
[QUOTE=siLLy puPPy] ^ actually you have to question EVERYTHING. Sometimes artists are merely propped up by paid "experts" to generate sales through media hype. Your doctor analogy is flawed because one third of deaths in the USA are caused by MEDICAL MALPRACTICE. Having studied biology i can guarantee that a lot of what the population considers factual science is actually nothing more than marketing. The arts are a matter of taste. Some of the highest rated albums of all times are not that great to my ears meanwhile some of the greatest discoveries i've found are the lowest rated and most disliked albums of all time. Music critics have their place of course to give someone a sense of what they can expect but as far as opinions go about liking or not liking, that's fairly subjective just like some of us like brussel sprouts and others hate them. No expert will convince anyone otherwise. It wasn't my doctor analogy, it was Logan's, I just used that as it was Greg's example. And no, when it comes to artists that are demonstrably significant it is not a "matter of taste"-- whether one likes the Beatles or not, they were gifted, highly important, and sold a lot of records. In the same way, most painters who are considered truly great or genuinely important are so because they've proven over years to be successful and are considered great by both fans and professionals. This idea that it's just all opinion is, at the end of the day, an easy and simplistic notion. I'd even say it's childish and shows a lack of seasoned exposure & understanding of the bigger picture. |
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15243 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ there are many gifted artists beyond what has been popular throughout history who never got the chance to shine. For every Picasso, imagine the artists that were better and persecuted by religious or political institutions for not adhering to the cultural norms. What i'm saying is that it's pretty much controlled what makes it to the public and what doesn't at least in traditional terms. The internet has been revolutionary but still the human condition is easily swayed by so-called "experts" giving credence to one artist and not one that's equally as brilliant or even more so. (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'8ac9bff0ab4cf96b',t:'MTcyMjU1NjQyOS4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();< style=": ; top: 0px; left: 0px; border: medium none; visibility: ;" width="1" height="1">
|
||
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I mentioned doctors as an aside when I was talking about appeals to authority as an example of something where I might appeal to expertise. I'd sooner trust a neurologist's take on the state of my brain than, say, a urogolist who has only studied other parts of the anatomy, or a purrologist whose focus is cats, or a furologist named Bob Drake (sorry if this bearly makes sense). |
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65251 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
^^ No, most artists do get a chance to shine if only because they paint and show & try to sell their work. Many great and/or successful artists were persecuted by religious or political institutions and still broke through in their time (or much later).
And no, there were not other painters that were "better" than Picasso any more than there were better artists than Velazquez, Dali, or Goya. Velazquez's Las Menians is considered to be the finest non-Abstract painted work of its time for several very good reasons - It's a mistake to assume that known greatness is political or happenstance anymore than unknown greatness is due to persecution or bad luck. It just isn't that simple, and how you see the world is not neccesarily how the world works. |
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15243 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ yeah but there's also the fact that sometimes artists are well ahead of their time and the public truly doesn't "get it" meaning they haven't calculated on how the artist has put together a piece of art that is too many steps ahead of how the average person can connect the dots. This is true of "experts" too As far as using Picasso as an example of "best" painter. Sure, he was great technically at reproducing real life events but how do you know other contenders weren't allowed to show their works or sell their product? I mean unless you were there you have no idea how history transpired. Also talent may have sprung up but the artists weren't given the resources to nurture their talent. Personally i think Hieronymous Bosch was much more skilled both creatively and technically no matter how perfect the strokes of paint pleased painting professors Just speaking from a progressive rock perspective which is more modern and traceable there were bands far more talented than many of what's gone down in history as the most innovative Sure there are universal agreements like King Crimson, Yes and Frank Zappa but even if one recognizes that these artists were original doesn't mean they necessarily attracted mass appeal in every case (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'8ac9f2907f9a7af8',t:'MTcyMjU1ODUwMi4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();< style=": ; top: 0px; left: 0px; border: medium none; visibility: ;" width="1" height="1">
|
||
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I have noticed it from Neo-Prog fans (and Prog Metal fans) quite a bit here over my many years here. Here are some fun, perhaps, old Neo-Prog threads: :D Neo-Prog Defense Thread (sword in hand) (CLICK) In Defence of Neo-Prog (CLICK) Neo prog bands, is there a real problem? (CLICK) Bashing RIO/ Avant-Prog and Klaus Schulze is just plain stupid (j/k). A lot of the time defensive people are trying to clear up misconceptions, infer knowledge and/or infer greater understanding and different perspectives as they see it no matter the genre, thing or idea they are defending. Sometimes it's not about defending or accusing but just sharing a different idea and perspective -- people may interpret the intent in a negative light. Like criticism, this can be handled civilly and constructively or rudely, with arrogance, petulance, self-righteousness.... Edited by Logan - August 01 2024 at 20:44 |
||
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 7> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |