Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Reviewing Trends I'd Like to Kill
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Reviewing Trends I'd Like to Kill

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Necrotica View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Colaborator

Joined: July 28 2015
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 3365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Necrotica Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Reviewing Trends I'd Like to Kill
    Posted: February 28 2021 at 16:12

Hey everyone, how's it going? So, I'll be upfront and say that this is a response to the "Worst Reviews" thread that was just recently created (and thankfully closed). We don't need that kind of negativity on this site; however, I'd like to offer up a more constructive approach by bringing up some reviewing trends and approaches that simply aren't very transformative or helpful. Hopefully it serves to aid everyone in maintaining higher reviewing standards going forward.


1.  Beginning a review by ranting about whether the artist in question should be on ProgArchives. If a group or artist are in the Archives, they're in the Archives. Case closed, move on. I can't count how many Radiohead or Metallica reviews I've read that begin with this argument, and it gets pretty ridiculous after a while. It also serves as a really petty and boring first paragraph to have to read. 


2.  Taking the rating descriptions too seriously. I wouldn't stress too much about "how well an album fits in a prog collection" (in fact, I think that format's a bit antiquated and outdated as it is). Point is, I'd say just review an album based on its own merits rather than how it fits in the "prog scheme of things." This one coincides a bit with #1.


3.  One-paragraph blurb reviews. Some of these aren’t bad, but I don’t feel as though they offer up enough detail about the album and its merits. It just seems kinda lazy and the write-ups end up seeming too barebones as a result. I’d suggest two decently-sized paragraphs or more to flesh out arguments in more detail. It is worth noting, however, that this trend isn’t as prominent anymore.


4.  Constantly hammering in a bias. Yeah, we get it. You gave every Steven Wilson album a 1/5 because you simply don’t get why so many people enjoy his work. But that doesn’t mean you should post review after review beating a dead horse when just a review or two should be enough to drive the point home. The constant flood of negativity gets tiring and grating, and I’ve seen it with several artists now (I remember there being a user who used his account specifically to sh*t on Ulver’s entire discography). 


As always, try not to take my post as gospel. I still have some work to do with my writing as well; it’s just that I’d also like to see the overall standards of reviewing improve. Hope everyone’s having a great day, and feel free to message me if you want to talk. Smile


Take me down, to the underground
Won't you take me down, to the underground
Why oh why, there is no light
And if I can't sleep, can you hold my life

https://www.youtube.com/@CocoonMasterBrendan-wh3sd
Back to Top
Hrychu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 03 2013
Location: poland?
Status: Offline
Points: 5364
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hrychu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2021 at 16:20
Giving a fine album a 1 or 2 star review only because it's not prog
“On the day of my creation, I fell in love with education. And overcoming all frustration, a teacher I became.”
— Ernest Vong
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SteveG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2021 at 16:23
Starting off a review by saying "I don't know why every other reviewer ranks this album so poorly when I think it's a masterpiece. "
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
rushfan4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66264
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rushfan4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2021 at 17:07
I disagree with #2.  This is a prog rock site and I think that the ratings should be based on the guidelines provided by the site owner.  Kind of Blue might be a great album but it doesn't deserve 5 stars on a prog rock website where 5 stars means "a masterpiece of prog rock music".  Write it up as a masterpiece all that you want in your review but in the end the best that it should be rated here is a 4.  My opinion of course.  That beiing said, I quit writing reviews a few years ago and honestly I don't read very many of them these days either.  
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.