Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Top 10s and lists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Four non English prog bands from the 70's.........
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Four non English prog bands from the 70's.........

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18244
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2020 at 17:33
Two more bands who charted:






Back to Top
Jaketejas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 27 2018
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1988
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jaketejas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2020 at 18:01
Once again, another thought-provoking list. Chicago and Styx were extremely popular in the 1970s, but they are, as has been said by others, more on the fringe. They definitely had many proggy moments. Some people prefer to call Chicago jazz. I think Styx probably deserves to be in there. Some might make a similar argument for Boston, but that's pushing it. It does remind me of a guy who used to ONLY listen to Chicago and Boston. Weird.

Jefferson Starship was a biggie

Saga (Canadian) was around then, but didn't become very popular until the late 70s/early 80s transition period.

Another possible entry might be Sky, with their Australian roots, but then again, they also had English members in the group. So, you'd have to split the difference.

Frank Zappa (Captain Beefheart, etc.) was doing all kinds of stuff back then. But, some people prefer to call him jazz, too.

Triumph had a number of proggy moments in the 70s, but there was sort of a tug of war going on there between Gil Moore (who was more straight up rock) and Rik Emmett, who excelled at many different styles: Classical (great stuff there), jazz (he won awards for jazz), and rock. The most proggy moment to my ears from the 1970s was The Blinding Light Show. But, what they gave to prog on the one hand in the 1970s, they took away on the other, with some real cheese-ball songs. So, once again, you'd have to split the difference.

Steely Dan deserves consideration, and if you don't think so, you can tell Micky. He'd just loooove to have that conversation with you.

I'm sure that there are others ... but my brain isn't firing on all cylinders today. When I think "prog rock + 1970s + USA", I immediately think of Kansas, Styx, and Jefferson Starship. When I think "prog rock + 1970s + Canada", I immediately think of Rush and Triumph ... with Saga building up steam!

Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18244
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2020 at 18:06
As I said before Styx had some prog songs but over all not prog imo(maybe that's why they are only prog related on here). Steely Dan are jazz fusion like I said before also. Some stuff was proggy but over all I have a tough time thinking of Steely Dan as prog.

Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 08 2020 at 18:08
Back to Top
Jaketejas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 27 2018
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1988
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jaketejas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2020 at 18:52
If that’s what you’re going for, I think that’s fair enough. They can sort of go either way, depending on your personal tastes. Just curious. What do you think about Jefferson Starship? In hindsight, would you include them on your list?

Glass Harp another group.

Edited by Jaketejas - July 08 2020 at 19:00
Back to Top
BrufordFreak View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 25 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Status: Offline
Points: 8185
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote BrufordFreak Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2020 at 18:55
FOCUS, people, FOCUS!!!



And then there was the whole Jazz-Rock Fusion scene--which included a lot of European bands (thanks to Manfred Eicher's ECM label). Also, Jean-Luc Ponty was doing medium size venues to promote his very popular albums in the late 70s and early 80s.

TD may not have been included under the prog rock label (yet) but they were quite popular in the record stores.  
Drew Fisher
https://progisaliveandwell.blogspot.com/
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18244
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2020 at 19:26
Originally posted by Jaketejas Jaketejas wrote:

If that’s what you’re going for, I think that’s fair enough. They can sort of go either way, depending on your personal tastes. Just curious. What do you think about Jefferson Starship? In hindsight, would you include them on your list?

Glass Harp another group.

They are maybe worth mentioning but if we mention them we also have to mention the Grateful Dead and then also the Doors and then things will just snowball from there. Of course Spirit would have to be mentioned too and it just gets to be one big proto psycho-delic rabbit hole. Wink So anyway, JA are on here as proto prog but JS aren't on here at all I don't think. Maybe prog related would be appropriate but they didn't even pop up for that in a search. 

I didn't know Glass Harp had any charting albums. So far I haven't seen anything saying they did. I've heard of them for sure especially since Phil Keaggy has made a name for himself in christian music circles and even collaborated with some prog guys(including Neal Morse but also Tony Levin & Jerry Marotta(both of whom played with Peter Gabriel).

To answer your question no Jefferson Starship would not make my list. However, you can add them to your list if you want but based on my knowledge of the genre I would not consider them prog over all. I understand they had some progressive material but so did Led Zeppelin and the Who and neither of them are typically considered prog either. 


Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 08 2020 at 19:31
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18244
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2020 at 19:29
Originally posted by BrufordFreak BrufordFreak wrote:

FOCUS, people, FOCUS!!!



And then there was the whole Jazz-Rock Fusion scene--which included a lot of European bands (thanks to Manfred Eicher's ECM label). Also, Jean-Luc Ponty was doing medium size venues to promote his very popular albums in the late 70s and early 80s.

TD may not have been included under the prog rock label (yet) but they were quite popular in the record stores.  

Focus was one of the original four bands I mentioned on the first post of the first page. Wink
Back to Top
Jaketejas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 27 2018
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1988
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jaketejas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2020 at 20:05
Psychedelic rabbit hole. That’s funny! I think of Jefferson Airplane like that but Jefferson Starship was more organized in their music, I think. Not really a Prog Band per se, but they played some music that was proggy at times.

Glass Harp toured with a lot of people who charted but I didn’t find anything either. Maybe they were number one on the Christian Prog charts or something.

So ... you’ve exhausted the supply then? Probably makes sense. It was the disco era. People in the States were more interested in rock versus disco versus urban cowboy versus soul. Prog elements found their way into rock but few were interested in going too far out on a limb. The radio format favored shorter popular songs, I suppose.

Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18244
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2020 at 20:23
Originally posted by Jaketejas Jaketejas wrote:

Psychedelic rabbit hole. That’s funny! I think of Jefferson Airplane like that but Jefferson Starship was more organized in their music, I think. Not really a Prog Band per se, but they played some music that was proggy at times.

Glass Harp toured with a lot of people who charted but I didn’t find anything either. Maybe they were number one on the Christian Prog charts or something.

So ... you’ve exhausted the supply then? Probably makes sense. It was the disco era. People in the States were more interested in rock versus disco versus urban cowboy versus soul. Prog elements found their way into rock but few were interested in going too far out on a limb. The radio format favored shorter popular songs, I suppose.


Well for US bands I can't think of many others. Starcastle is worth mentioning but I don't see any evidence they charted despite the fact that there albums sold pretty well at the time and they opened for a lot of bands. Also, Happy the Man are considered to be one of the best american prog bands of all time but I don't think they charted either. They were initially supposed to be Peter Gabriel's backing band but that fell through. Nonetheless it led to them being ona  major label and that helped but outside of the DC/Virginia area I don't think they became very well known(except in prog circles). Crack the Sky were similar in that they had local success in a few states and while I don't know if they charted in the 70's a couple of their later albums made it to the far end of the billboard charts which is why I included them. Someone mentioned Saga. It looks like they charted in the 80's in the US but not earlier. I'm not sure about Klaatu(also Canadian)but I don't think they charted. I do know they at least achieved some notoriety for fooling some people(inadvertently probably)into thinking they were really the Beatles. That kind of publicity while totally false probably did at least make some people wonder who they were. FM were an important Canadian band also but I don't think they charted either. Max Webster while not fully prog did achieve some pretty big success in Canada but I think they had very little if any real success in the US. 
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18244
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2020 at 20:24
Ok, I stand corrected. Klaatu did have some chart success in the US so they officially count.

Edit: Klaatu are prog related on here so they don't count. This is started to feel like a ping pong game. LOL


Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 08 2020 at 20:26
Back to Top
Jaketejas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 27 2018
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1988
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jaketejas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2020 at 20:45
There was great popular music in other genres, but most of the Prog ... other than the bands we mentioned earlier ... was coming from Britain.   You’d hear elements of Prog in bands like Toto and Styx. Rush was thrown in with the hard rock/early metal folks. There was no Prog radio to speak of. You’d catch glimpses of Yes, JT, PF, etc. here and there. King Crimson was nowhere to be found until MTV came along. Early Genesis didn’t exist for me in the US until curiosity made me explore their earlier catalogue. I discovered Sky by accident through my interest in classical guitar. With the internet, we’re really spoiled!
Back to Top
Jaketejas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 27 2018
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1988
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jaketejas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2020 at 20:58
BOC got quite a bit of airplay but your on the fringe again there.
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15242
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2020 at 21:23
Originally posted by Psychedelic Paul Psychedelic Paul wrote:

There was only one Dutch prog band who were the Focus of attention in England in the 1970's, although I've since discovered many other great Dutch bands since I first visited ProgArchives back in 2010. Smile


I just listened to MOVING WAVES (Focus II) the other day for the first time in years. Still one of the best prog albums to emerge from the Dutch world.

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
Jaketejas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 27 2018
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1988
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jaketejas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2020 at 22:53
Fortunately with PA there is a deep vein of Prog to mine and explore. It’s all gathered in one place, rather than scattered incoherently amongst varied pop/rock/jazz/etc genres.
Back to Top
Awesoreno View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 07 2019
Location: Culver City, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3036
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Awesoreno Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2020 at 03:41
Would hesitate to call Steely Dan a fusion group. Same as Chicago. The Dan are like jazz-inflected art rock/pop. Suppose I'm splitting hairs here anyway hehe.
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15242
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2020 at 08:53
Originally posted by Awesoreno Awesoreno wrote:

Would hesitate to call Steely Dan a fusion group. Same as Chicago. The Dan are like jazz-inflected art rock/pop. Suppose I'm splitting hairs here anyway hehe.


Agree

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18244
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2020 at 10:52
Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:

Originally posted by Awesoreno Awesoreno wrote:

Would hesitate to call Steely Dan a fusion group. Same as Chicago. The Dan are like jazz-inflected art rock/pop. Suppose I'm splitting hairs here anyway hehe.


Agree

In my mind there's a difference between pure fusion and jazz rock. At one point the two terms were more or less synonymous(kind of like prog and art rock)but then later came to be known as two separate although related entities. Chicago were originally doing what was called horn rock(same thing with BS&T) but I think jazz rock applies. Scroll down to the jazz rock section here(about mid way through the page).  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jazz_fusion#Jazz_rock They don't mention Steely Dan but I think they qualify also. I wouldn't necessarily put either of them in the same grouping as Mahavishnu Orchestra or Return to Forever either. 


Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 09 2020 at 10:53
Back to Top
Jaketejas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 27 2018
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1988
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jaketejas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2020 at 11:04
However one wants to classify them, they were able to blend rock and jazz in an interesting way. My definition of Prog is a pretty wide net. Of course, here you have on one end of the spectrum, some die-hards who like the Big 6 and a few “second tier” groups, and that’s as far as Prog goes up to the late 70s. That’s fine. It’s all a matter of personal opinion and experience.   Probably bragging rights comes into it a bit. And, those who shout the loudest tend to be heard the most. But, let’s not forget the art of listening, the context in which the music was written (location, time, circumstances) and try to be fair. I have one foot in the UK and one foot in the USA, and it is interesting to me to see how progressive music developed in both countries, as well as other parts of the world. The history is, after all, very different. I enjoy hearing from people who discuss proggy bands from all over. It is a good way to discover new music, even if that “new music” might be decades old in some cases.
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18244
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2020 at 14:29
I have a wide net too but at some point you have to make the distinction between which bands are prog related(and maybe more comfortably fit in other genres)and which bands could truly be classified as prog. Otherwise it becomes this runaway snowball thing. I understand that it's a subjective thing of course. There's people who don't agree with bands I consider prog. For example I consider Traffic to be prog and I know they are on here but some people don't. Some people don't consider Pink Floyd to be prog either. Apparently any band who was played on the radio can't be prog. SMH. 

Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 09 2020 at 14:30
Back to Top
Lewian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14691
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lewian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2020 at 15:31
Kraftwerk?
(OK, I see, you're not counting electronic...)
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.112 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.