Ok. Which is superior ? |
Post Reply | Page <1 45678 9> |
Author | ||
Tom Ozric
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 03 2005 Location: Olympus Mons Status: Offline Points: 15916 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
As good as Dark Side is, Foxtrot is s still my preferred album. The
|
||
CosmicVibration
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 26 2014 Location: Milky Way Status: Offline Points: 1396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
DSOTM is border line very good /excellent. Foxtrot is border line excellent / phenomenal. |
||
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Online Points: 13055 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Humorously enough, the tribute to the album Return to the Dark Side of the Moon features a veritable cornucopia of prog musicians: Rick Wakeman (Yes) Steve Howe (Yes) Peter Banks (Yes) Bill Bruford (Yes, King Crimson) John Wetton (King Crimson) Adrian Belew (King Crimson) Tony Levin (King Crimson) Allen White (Yes) Geoff Downes (Yes) Aynsley Dunbar (Frank Zappa & The Mothers) Tony Kaye (Yes) Billy Sherwood (Yes) Dweezil Zappa (Zappa on Zappa) Gary Green (Gentle Giant) Scott Page (Pink Floyd, Supertramp) Colin Moulding (XTC) Larry Fast (Nektar) Throw in jazz, rock and blues performers like... Edgar Winter (White Trash, EWG) David Sancious (Stanley Clarke, Peter Gabriel) Tony Franklin (Kenny Wayne Shepherd, Roy Harper, David Gilmour) Jimmy Haslip (Yellowjackets, Allan Holdsworth) Vinnie Colaiuta (Joni Mitchell, Frank Zappa) Robben Ford (Miles Davis, Yellowjackets, L.A. Express) Jeff Baxter (Steely Dan) Robbie Krieger (The Doors) One has to wonder if these extraordinary musicians appreciate the album and its progressive influence a sight more than you do. Edited by The Dark Elf - April 04 2020 at 12:25 |
||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
||
jamesbaldwin
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 25 2015 Location: Milano Status: Offline Points: 5986 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I have chosen DSOTM but I subscrive your opinion, it is exactly the thesis I have supported elsewhere: the overestimation of DTSOM because of its great production, its sound effects, its captivating tricks.
|
||
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
|
||
Lewian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If an album has a great production and sound effects that perfectly fit into the general scope of the album and underline its message in a perfect way, that doesn't mean that the album is only appreciated so highly because of production and sound effects. Foxtrot is an excellent album of progressive rock and I now think it may be my favourite out of Genesis' studio albums. However I voted for DSOTM, not because of production and sound effects because apart from the supreme songwriting there is something really deep about this album, touching the basis of the human condition, if you want. There are some reaction videos around demonstrating what it does to people. Now I love Watcher of the Skies to pieces but it will not trigger this kind of feelings. Obviously this has nothing to do with how proggy it is, that's a side issue of little musical and emotional interest.
|
||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Online Points: 35802 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Did the Squirrels ever do this with Foxtrot? I think not.
Edited by Logan - April 04 2020 at 17:26 |
||
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Online Points: 13055 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Pink Floyd used part of the proceeds from Dark Side of the Moon to fund the production of Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
If that isn't progressive, I don't know what is. In any case, this is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who.
|
||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
||
Mortte
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 11 2016 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 5538 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Who really cares what´s progressive and what´s not? At least I don´t. Great albums are great albums, whatever genre they are.
|
||
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Same, but unfortunately 'not prog' is all Barney has to go on hammering DSOTM.
|
||
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 28023 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
In general it comes into the category of albums that are really important but I don't care to listen to that much. It did achieve a wider audience because of the perception that it actually meant something and was a commentary on the human race and the way modern life makes us slightly insane. I totally agree with that but it still doesn't make it any more interesting as a piece of music. I never got the hype over the production at all. It's way too 'clean' for me. I was never a vinyl junkie or headphone listener though. As I said in my earlier post it works well as a singular piece in a 'live event' especially when you have the right video backdrops. Nowadays using the PA classification I consider it to be Crossover. I think calling it 'AOR' is incorrect but I respect Barney for stoking up a debate. About a million years ago ( well maybe 15) I even started a thread 'Is Dark Side Of The Moon overrated?' A lot of people then did think so and that probably hasn't changed. It was a very clever deception in some respects. At the time of its release it got the masses on board thinking they were getting into the 'hard stuff' when it was really just the tame soft gateway variety! |
||
M27Barney
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 09 2006 Location: Swinton M27 Status: Offline Points: 3136 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ haha...anyway..yesterday was indoors date night and her indoors was cooking lamb shank...whilst she was upstairs preparing her wardrobe (stepping one beyond your show)...I asked Aleksa to play DSOTM (my aleksa is paired to my v. Expensive wireless soundbar n surround sound oojimy-whatsit...I drank hobgoblin and took in the music...I had forgotten the tangerine dream bit...bit still enjoyed the VCS in any colour...but that horrible female singer got on my tits and I dont like saxophone...the last track would be epic with a monster guitar solo instead of that horrible female backing singer...2 stars...😎 and genre....curates egg...prog in parts perhaps...
|
||
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Believe it or not, I agree completely that DSOTM is just gateway prog at the most. That is exactly why it hooks in a lot of people and I don't even think it's a deception unless Bob Dylan writing simple songs with profound lyrics is also considered a deception. But all that aside, the issue here for me is I don't even consider Genesis far above the gateway prog territory. If we were talking about some of the more demanding Canterbury stuff like National Health, VDGG, King Crimson, Gentle Giant or Magma (not even getting into Avant/RIO), I could understand. But Genesis itself is extremely accessible. In many ways, Genesis (in its prog phase) stands in a similar place in terms of its appeal to those who mainly like symphonic/melodic/accessible prog as DSOTM does w.r.t rock listeners who want some sophistication without going full tilt prog. Genesis is nice and easy to get into. Its Britishisms may be a tad quirky at times but that's about the only difficulty you would encounter. This is not to say that a lot of Genesis' work in their prog phase isn't brilliant. It is. But this is a good opportunity to refute the notion that because something is easy to listen to and not too complex means it cannot be brilliant. Maybe what Floyd did on Dark Side offered a convenient model for bands like BOC to appear sophisticated by adding some melody and/or piano sections to their songs (Astronomy/Flaming Telepaths); Styx would do the same as well. But at that time, 1973, they offered something very different from the other big rock bands. Not heavy and fast like Sabbath or Purple, not rambling like Led Zeppelin. Not over the top like Queen. The closest parallel is what The Who were doing at around the same time. But Gilmour's gentle vocals added a dimension that The Who did not have. And while Gilmour is not as effective in hard rocking vocals as Daltrey, he is pretty good himself going by the evidence of Money (or Young Lust later on The Wall). That range, to be adequately hard rocking and also very melodic and even plaintive, brought a different set of emotions to the table, complemented in turn by Waters' lyrics. It is not so much a deception as it is an album that is greater than the sum of its parts. Floyd in that DSOTM-Wall phase were better than any other rock/prog band at putting together an album. Everything on their albums had a reason to exist. No placating or pandering big egos ( a la the second half of Fragile), no throwaways, every song dovetailed into a larger concept (until Waters went for a full fledged concept album with Wall). The irony is Genesis could have had it all as this is the direction in which Gabriel steered them towards on Lamb Lies Down on Broadway (and long before Floyd at that). But Banks & Co promptly began grumbling about Gabriel hogging all the limelight so it was back to melodic and pleasant albums which are better at showcasing musicianship than having something in particular to say.
|
||
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator Retired Admin Joined: January 22 2009 Location: Magic Theatre Status: Offline Points: 23104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
So prog is basically a sport?
It’s not about how the music sounds and makes you feel but rather more importantly whether or not it’s prog proper. Nahh...I know what it is. Every major rock album out there received some form of backlash by certain folks who deem it crap/soft/unoriginal/etc...just ask The Beatles....and well Dark Side is almost universally loved from here to Timbuktu...and when folks then prefer Foxtrot or Yeti for that matter - albums far less known to the general public - it quickly becomes a mudslinging match where instead of mentioning why X album is brilliant...it turns into X album is great because Y is sh*t. Nothing is just brilliant anymore...it needs to be great in spite of something else...preferably with a sly sting to the kidneys: the music you love is crap! Here I can prove it: a+k does not equal prog. Now how can it be any good? |
||
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams |
||
Lewian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I don't get the bit about "deception" and masses thinking they get into the "hard stuff". Isn't it just what it is? And I think it got the people because they liked it and could relate to it, not because they'd want to brag about listening to something sophisticated and "hard stuff"... That some went on starting to appreciate more complex stuff because of it is a nice bonus but surely not the album's raison d'etre.
|
||
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
This is fast resembling the Beatles thread, I am afraid. As somebody who does like Foxtrot, I find this so bizarre - the litany of excuses made and conspiracies cited, like it's not as if Floyd just made a great album, plain and simple. Doesn't the voting too reflect that this is a tough choice?
|
||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20604 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Edited by SteveG - April 06 2020 at 05:25 |
||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
||
M27Barney
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 09 2006 Location: Swinton M27 Status: Offline Points: 3136 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Aye. DSOTM...is better produced an far more commercial, since it still sells...but so did abbey rd by the scouse insects and Thriller by that strange geezer....
Of course its a subjective call on whether or not it is crossover prog, AOR, art rock or plain pop...but I still rate every minute of Foxtrot > every minute of DSOTM....as most symphonic prog connoseurs would....😎 |
||
Cristi
Special Collaborator Crossover / Prog Metal Teams Joined: July 27 2006 Location: wonderland Status: Online Points: 43626 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Your fanaticism is ruining Foxtrot for me tbh, I don't plan to listen to it any time soon so thank you (wish there was a middle finger emoticon on PA). |
||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20604 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Edited by SteveG - April 06 2020 at 06:19 |
||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
||
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
And on cue, just when I said this has descended to the level of The Beatles are overrated thread, you confirm this. Thanks much.
|
||
Post Reply | Page <1 45678 9> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |