Brexit: A change of heart?? |
Post Reply | Page <1 56789 14> |
Author | |||||
LAM-SGC
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 26 2018 Location: se Status: Offline Points: 1544 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
The irony is that before the referendum May was a remainer but Corbyn has always been a leaver.
|
|||||
Chaser
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 18 2018 Location: Nottingham Status: Offline Points: 1202 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Ok, so the two votes went as expected. Theresa May's deal got hammered and the motion of no confidence in the government was defeated.
So, what next? I suspect that Theresa May's plan B is plan A. She will keep pushing her deal and parliament will keep rejecting it. Unless the backstop is removed then it has zero chance of being approved. Meanwhile Jeremy Corbyn will keep proposing no confidence motions in the government and will keep being defeated. The clock will keep ticking towards no deal, which now looks odds on. |
|||||
Songs cast a light on you
|
|||||
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer Joined: June 22 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 16130 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
^^^ I agree. There's no time to come up with something new now. It's taken two years to come up with the no-show she's just presented. In any case, anything she comes up with would be rejected by the opposition and by hardline Brexit tories.
We're leaving with no deal, so we better get used to it, and the EU must be seen to be as unsupportive as possible, othewise it may embolden the Euro skeptic brigades in the other member states. Not sure what the future looks like, but I don't think it would do any harm, or be an over reaction, at this point, to start stocking up on essential items like non perishable foods and basic medical supplies. |
|||||
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|||||
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Offline Points: 20240 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
isn't there also a major issue with the fact that ID cards (not speaking of passports) don't exist (or are not mandatory) in the UK, therefore you can claim whatever as long as you're on the territory without showing a piece of ID. As for the anti-eastern Europeans entering the country (but they're a minority nowadays, as it's mostly African & Asian refugees), wasn't a big part of the Leave votes coming from Commonwealth-countries migrants (Pakistanis or Jamaicans for ex) ??
Actually I can understand this, because if Europe has been busy building the economy, it's not done much on the social dept. the European Parliament and the Council have been mostly liberal (in the economic sense of the word, not in the conservative sense), and nothing was built to avoid states making competitions against other states to attract investors.
|
|||||
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Offline Points: 20240 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
There is a third scenario everyone is forgetting about Deal or no-deal is what everyone is concentrating about... But I suspect that some are thinking to simply cease that Art 50 bullsh*t stuff (I'm sure it can be done, as an emergency procedure... my money's on it), so that means Remain, until a better deal is done.... which could be years to come
|
|||||
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer Joined: June 22 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 16130 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
I actually hope you're right. It is an option, but it would p!ss off so many people, I'm not convinced May would go with it. It would alienate so many tory brexiteers, see her overthrown in favour of someone like Rees Mogg or Boris Johnson, and would embolden UKIP. |
|||||
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|||||
Chaser
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 18 2018 Location: Nottingham Status: Offline Points: 1202 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Yes, I agree with what you say Blacksword.
Pro remainers are trying to get Theresa to rule out no deal. They know that, if she did that, the only options left on the table would be her deal (which is a non starter) or cancelling article 50 and remaining (which would, of course, result in mayhem in the UK) Or else another referendum, but May has ruled it out, and polls show only a minority in the UK actually want another referendum. Whatever MP's say I think a no deal exit looks more likely with every day that passes. |
|||||
Songs cast a light on you
|
|||||
Lewian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14727 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
I think the UK should join EFTA and EEA, no Irish border, and that could find a cross-party majority if it was just for the benefits of that approach alone. Unfortunately all the "that's not really Brexit and would ignore the will of the people" rhetoric and party political muddle will probably make this impossible. Ask people in Norway why they are in there and not in the EU and you will find that it makes a real difference. As long as people think that any kind of compromise that gives the 48% (and those in the 52% that are not hardliners) even a tiny little bit is a betrayal of the people (what people??), nothing good will happen for the UK.
Edited by Lewian - January 17 2019 at 05:02 |
|||||
Chaser
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 18 2018 Location: Nottingham Status: Offline Points: 1202 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
The "Norway Model" could win support, but the problem is that we would have to adopt "Norway +", which means staying in the customs union. That means it's almost the same as staying fully in the EU, but without any say in the rules. For that reason, Brexiteers would never accept it, and even a lot of remainers are not keen because it's a worse option than we've got now. The problem with joining EFTA is that the EFTA countries would have to agree to us joining, and, at the moment, they're not too keen: They're concerned that having the UK in EFTA would upset the whole balance of EFTA, as the UK would dwarf all the other EFTA countries combined. Any future trade deals would thus be based on the needs of the UK rather than of the other EFTA countries. They're also worried that the UK would use EFTA as a "stop off" on the way to a full exit of the EU. They don't want us turning up, buggering up EFTA, and then buggering off out of it. On the question of the Irish Backstop, I would also recommend reading this interesting article on BBC news yesterday: I think it reveals what we knew all along: that the backstop is needed by the EU, but it's not needed to preserve the Good Friday Agreement, as many claim. There is a solution to the Ireland border issue: we leave under WTO rules but continue to trade with Ireland on the same basis as we do now and claim a National Security Waiver with the WTO The EU won't like it as it means a backdoor to cheap foreign imports into the EU, which undermines their protectionist policies, but what can they do about it? If the EU argues against the National Security Waiver then it will look like they're undermining the Good Friday Agreement and peace in Ireland |
|||||
Songs cast a light on you
|
|||||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17510 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
I think, and this means I THINK, that the English wanting to get out of the EU is the most selfish and stupid thing going, when considering the "global economy" thing that is helping many countries ... instead of making 20 deals with South American and Central American countries, you make one, and that's that ... it's the same thing with the European Union, and my take on it is that some rich farts are wanting to take this away from the Labor folks so they can make more money, and screw the public. I find it bizarre that someone is trying to make their own deals, instead of having to go through anything else ... it's another TRUMP'ism all over again, and this has been the history of Europe for hundreds of years, that many principalities and lordships controlled the economy and the money ... and now that they are losing that battle because the population has gotten too much larger than their little hole in the ground ... many of them are trying to fight back with lies, so they can try and gain some measure of control again ... to make even more money! Like they need it! I know my point is a bit naive, but it's what it looks like to me ... a bunch of rich farts that are losing control of all the riches ... and maybe that is what needs to happen in GB ... not the opposite!
|
|||||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
|||||
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Offline Points: 20240 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
I don't understand why the No Deal worshippers are doing, though... Why reject a deal (even not e very good one) with the EU, when No Deal at all can only make matters worse for them... or are they going to declare economic warfare with the EU once they're out of itand that's why they don't want to sign in obeying the rules of the agreement (provided there are any) Or are the No Dealers simply blind extremists whose faith can only be detrimental to their own cause ? |
|||||
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer Joined: June 22 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 16130 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
They're either extremists or mindless optimists who don't understand that if you can't trade in a cost effective manner with another nation (or union of nations) businesses go out of business, and countless numbers of people are made unemployed. The unemployed need paying for, but tax revenues which fund welfare diminish because there are millions fewer tax payers and GDP drops considerably, so you have a serious problem on your hands. Brexiters generally fall into two other categories (generally speaking) The very wealthy who actually aren't really affected significantly if we remain or leave, but want to leave so they can avoid incoming EU legislation on tax avoidance (probably), and the poor who blame EU immigration for their poverty. The latter feel their position is validated, because the former also want to leave, and the latter believe they are 'on their side' when in reality they couldn't give a monkeys about them, and are solely protecting their own interests. Too harsh?? |
|||||
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|||||
Lewian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14727 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
That seems to ignore that Ireland is a member of the EU and as such bound by EU agreements. And this is not because the EU enforces them on Ireland but because there is no appetite in Ireland to leave the EU and become a UK satellite instead. So I'd be surprised if Ireland would be happy with this "solution" in the first place.
|
|||||
Lewian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14727 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Around the same time I heard a Norwegian politician interviewed on BBC saying that the Brits would be welcome. Ultimately we can't know. "remainers are not keen because it's a worse option than we've got now" - yeah well, that's the nature of compromise that nobody gets what they believe is best. Probably you're right and not enough people on all sides want compromise. Tough luck then.
|
|||||
Lewian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14727 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
That's the essence of the "taking back control" rhetoric... The thing is, people have various ideas connected to this. Some big cheeses think that they can get rid of all kinds of annoying EU rules such as workers protection, environmental regulations etc. whereas some Corbynistas think that it's actually EU regulations that stop them from having the socialism they dream of. The average brexiteer probably has no clue what they'd do with the "control" that they are so keen on "winning back" but that's the smallest problem because these people will not actually control anything anyway.
Edited by Lewian - January 17 2019 at 09:00 |
|||||
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Wonder if Pedro is aware that Bruce Dickinson of Iron Maiden fame is an ardent Brexiteer. The funny part is we have Fripp on quote saying the very prospect of Brexit has already made touring in the EU difficult for him. And yet, if you ask Bruce, Brexit is going to help everyone get rid of the horrendous EU bureaucracy and all that. And his fans cheer him on for saying so.
|
|||||
lazland
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 28 2008 Location: Wales Status: Offline Points: 13627 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
I'm not surprised they cheer him. Even amongst ardent Europhiles, there is a (correct) realisation that the EU is not a particularly pleasant organisation, and most certainly not a very democratic one. As with all centralised monoliths, of course. When on holiday in Gozo last year, I had a very interesting chat with a chap at the local bar we frequent. He said that Malta very gratefully accepts the millions of Euros thrown at them for various projects. Indeed, you see the signs everywhere advertising the Commission's largesse, as with, btw, South Wales. However, he said, he really did not understand the British attitude. Take their money, he said. And when they tell you to do something you don't want to do, be more like us. Tell them to f**k off, and don't take a blind bit of notice. |
|||||
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time! |
|||||
Chaser
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 18 2018 Location: Nottingham Status: Offline Points: 1202 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
I think you've hit the nail on the head! This is why the EU just doesn't work. Europe wide rules and regulations are great, as long as everyone enforces them and abides by them, whereas, in reality, they don't. The British have always had a strong tradition of respecting rules and regulations, and our government dutifully enacts and enforces them, even though our citizens often resent them. If you go to Italy, Spain, or France, you soon find out that they don't give two hoots about EU regulations. Take the Common Fisheries Policy. It's well known that our government enforces the fishing quotas, and our fishermen are restricted in their catches, whilst, at the same time, Spanish and French trawlers ignore the rules and fish out our waters. The EU is not a level playing field and I doubt if it ever will be, as only a few countries actually play by the rules.
|
|||||
Songs cast a light on you
|
|||||
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Offline Points: 20240 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
What
most don't realize is that 45 Billions owed by the UK o the EU (for 10
years for not pitching in the common bucket) that was negociated in the
brexit Deal (and reduced down from the 60 billions) are still payable,
whether deal or no deal. This could go to trial and of course 60B would
be claimed by the EU.
yup, not a chance in hell for that icecube to live more than 2 seconds.
Should that happen, UK in the EFTA (and it's not likely as they would instantly become the majority partner, if only by size, but also by power ... and all the migraines coming from a member with 30 Commonwealth countries in tow), this would be bad news for the EC, as Scotland & Norway are basically the only two big oil producers in Europe.
|
|||||
Lewian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14727 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
"Is my country more dysfunctional than yours?" - BBC today
|
|||||
Post Reply | Page <1 56789 14> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |