| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Pixel Pirate 
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
|
 Posted: December 23 2004 at 05:39 |
 Emperor wrote:
Rush is Hard'n'Art to my opinion (or maybe Proto-Prog-Metal :-)), but there's no such version for reply... |
Proto-Prog-Metal,that sums up Rush rather nicely. A sort of precursor to Queensryche and Dream Theater. Good definition!
|
|
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
|
 |
maddog
Forum Newbie
Joined: December 23 2004
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 26
|
Posted: December 23 2004 at 06:33 |
|
They are not a prog-rock band,they hardly are a rock band.I can't stand the vocals of Geddy Lee,i don't appreciate the intellectual style they think they have,i could have been much less polite but.....anyway i hope they would have borned in 2112 or in any era after my death.
|
|
Vielleicht irrte sich der general-general-general
|
|
headboy
Forum Groupie
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 67
|
Posted: December 23 2004 at 07:11 |
hmmm..
-----------------
welease woger!
|
|
Pixel Pirate
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
|
Posted: December 23 2004 at 07:33 |
|
I know that many people hate Rush passionately so maddog expresses a feeling that's very common outside of our little prog fraternity.
|
|
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
|
|
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
|
Posted: December 23 2004 at 13:21 |
maddog wrote:
They are not a prog-rock band,they hardly are a rock band.I can't stand the vocals of Geddy Lee,i don't appreciate the intellectual style they think they have,i could have been much less polite but.....anyway i hope they would have borned in 2112 or in any era after my death. |
Hardly a rock band?
We are talking about Rush here aren't we?
Not Jennifer Rush !
|
|
|
|
plodder
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 19 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 255
|
Posted: December 23 2004 at 15:29 |
|
I'm not voting. What stupid choices.
Counterparts, their worst album. I'm sat here mouth, open in disbelief.
Presto the start of their decline?? You have too be joking. Presto is
fantastic.
I know that everyone is entitled to their opinions but aye karamba.
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: December 23 2004 at 15:57 |
sigod wrote:
Reed Lover wrote:
Rush are not prog.
They are unique.
So they defy classification!
|
Like Elvis then?
|
Exactly like Elvis, but with talent, musical ability, song writing ability, intelligence and integrity..
Nothing like Elvis then, I guess..
|
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|
Dan Bobrowski
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5243
|
Posted: December 23 2004 at 16:04 |
Sweetnighter wrote:
danbo wrote:
Have you checked out the band? Syzygy, that is. |
I have one song of theirs on my comp, off of their recent release MOTH... its not bad! They're very ELPish (no, i didn't say elvish, you silly prog geeks).
Syzygy.... if you say "Sizzle G" quickly then that almost does it.
|
MOTH is good, but they have more aspects then ELP to their sound. Actually, most of the album is instrumental.
|
|
tuxon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
|
Posted: December 23 2004 at 16:13 |
IT TOOK A VERY SICK PERSON TO COME UP WITH THE ELVIS IS DEAD PART OF THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How could you ruin the memory of Elvis by describing his death in such a sick,demented and vulgar way?
# 1 Elvis fan in the U.S. Deanna
Maybe a bit of tangent, but I know what I mean.
|
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group
|
Posted: December 23 2004 at 18:11 |
|
I like Rush a lot. I would go so far as to say they are my favorite band. But I wouldn't go so far as to say they are pure prog. There first album was nothing but hard rock. There was not an inkling of progressive music on that record. They reached there progressive peak on either A Farewell to Kings or Hemispheres. Starting on Permanent Waves they started doing New Wave stuff with occasional progressive bits and odd meters on about half of their songs. Since then, they have become less and less progressive and more and more mainstream. That is my statement, if anybody cares. They started becoming very pop rock around Roll the Bones and Counterparts.
|
|
plodder
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 19 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 255
|
Posted: December 23 2004 at 19:22 |
redbar89 wrote:
They started becoming very pop rock around Roll the Bones and Counterparts. |
Aieeeeeeeee. What is the matter with you people. Pop rock?? Counterparts?? It's the heaviest of all their albums.
If you want to argue it's the least progressive, then OK I'll go along with that, but pop??. You have to be kidding me.
|
|
Sweetnighter
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1298
|
Posted: December 23 2004 at 19:24 |
redbar89 wrote:
I like Rush a lot. I would go so far as to say they are
my favorite band. But I wouldn't go so far as to say they are pure
prog. There first album was nothing but hard rock. There was not an
inkling of progressive music on that record. They reached there
progressive peak on either A Farewell to Kings or Hemispheres. Starting on Permanent Waves they
started doing New Wave stuff with occasional progressive bits and odd
meters on about half of their songs. Since then, they have become less
and less progressive and more and more mainstream. That is my
statement, if anybody cares. They started becoming very pop rock around
Roll the Bones and Counterparts. |
lol, thats Rush in a can for ya.
proto-prog-metal? honestly people. don't you think we spend a little
too much time labeling things? The music is what it is, call it hard
rock, call it prog. Even a harsh cynic must concede that, as mentioned
above, there are definitely some, if not many, progressive elements to
their music. Pieces like Xanadu, Cygnus (I and II) and 2112 are
undeniably influenced by progressive rock. Is the band still prog?
Maybe not, but multitudes of one time prog bands moved on to other
musical styles.
|
|
I bleed coffee. When I don't drink coffee, my veins run dry, and I shrivel up and die.
"Banco Del Mutuo Soccorso? Is that like the bank of Italian soccer death or something?" -my girlfriend
|
|
project23
Forum Newbie
Joined: December 17 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 24
|
Posted: December 23 2004 at 21:36 |
Counterparts is the album that got me to start listening again. I lost interest for awhile after hearing Hold Your Fire. 
|
|
Cygnus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 12 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 520
|
Posted: July 19 2005 at 05:25 |
|
RUSH IS SIMPLY THE FIRST PROG METAL BAND. THEY ARE LIKE SABBATH FOR PROG
|
|
Hammill
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 09 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 400
|
Posted: July 19 2005 at 06:01 |
Cygnus wrote:
RUSH IS SIMPLY THE FIRST PROG METAL BAND. THEY ARE LIKE SABBATH FOR PROG |
King Crimson were (and still are) much more heavier and progressive than Rush.
|
|
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: July 19 2005 at 06:30 |
Hammill wrote:
Cygnus wrote:
RUSH IS SIMPLY THE FIRST PROG METAL BAND. THEY ARE LIKE SABBATH FOR PROG |
King Crimson were (and still are) much more heavier and progressive than Rush.
|
Well if you call that cacophony of noise, music maybe so. On the other hand if you want actual tunes then Rush are heavier (but not neccesarily prog)
|
|
|
|
Tony R
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
|
Posted: July 19 2005 at 06:48 |
I agree with Reed Lover.
About everything.
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: July 19 2005 at 07:13 |
^ I don't agree with Tony R....................when he said that the Admin here are a bunch of faggots!
Edited by Snow Dog
|
|
|
|
Mategra
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 23 2004
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 592
|
Posted: July 19 2005 at 07:59 |
|
Pseudo prog that's it.
|
|
Hammill
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 09 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 400
|
Posted: July 19 2005 at 10:13 |
Snow Dog wrote:
Hammill wrote:
Cygnus wrote:
RUSH IS SIMPLY THE FIRST PROG METAL BAND. THEY ARE LIKE SABBATH FOR PROG |
King Crimson were (and still are) much more heavier and progressive than Rush.
|
Well if you call that cacophony of noise, music maybe so. On the
other hand if you want actual tunes then Rush are heavier (but
not neccesarily prog) |
do you believe that albums like red, lark's tongues in aspic,
construkction of light and power to believe are just noise and nothing
else....??
|
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
RUSH is..........
