American presidential election, let PA decide

I'm in the wrong country to vote, but I picked Sanders.
Amazingly on another forum one person was gushing over Hilary as it will be a "dynasty" in politics!
I said to them there were still places available in North Korea if they want that sort of thing.
Given that we'll all "die nasty" anyway if she or Trump get in!

Refreshing to see Trump does not have any votes. That's what I like to see.

manofmystery wrote: Pastmaster wrote: The two I would want, John Mcafee and Austin Petersen, lost the libertarian primaries. I really wouldn't want to vote for anyone else. Really, you liked the blogger and the guy with a unsolved murder in his past better than Gary Johnson? Johnson should be included as an option in this poll, by the way.  Will be on the ballot in all 50 states.

Pastmaster wrote: manofmystery wrote: Pastmaster wrote: The two I would want, John Mcafee and Austin Petersen, lost the libertarian primaries. I really wouldn't want to vote for anyone else. Really, you liked the blogger and the guy with a unsolved murder in his past better than Gary Johnson? Johnson should be included as an option in this poll, by the way.  Will be on the ballot in all 50 states. Yes, because I agree with their views more than Johnson. I know if I were a business I wouldn't want to be forced to make something against my will.

Eh? Would you like to run that past the boys and girls again, this time with a little more explanation... Who is being forced to make something against their will? ... and while you're at it, what precisely is this 'something' they are being forced to make?

This seems a somewhat farcical method for deciding which 'also ran' candidate to vote for.

Or if Giant Meteor is not to your liking, this guy's running again:

The T wrote: Yes, the presidency of the USA has to be decided on the issue of bakers making cakes for the "wrong" people...

A Person wrote: Pastmaster wrote: Hopefully, smart consumers will start boycotting the business and get it to change their ways or go out of business.  Because the average consumer has the same economic power as a business, not to mention the time and money to spend learning and acting on such things.

"I was on a rock band, therefore I am wise and versed about the complexities of politics and history". Multiple people quoted on this and many other websites. 

Pastmaster wrote: Consumers do have the choice to not support a business. Yes, one person can't make a difference, but if consumers as a whole start a boycott a smart business will respond to that and fix whatever the problem consumers are having. Now, that's not to say there aren't business that have shady ways of making money, but in theory what I'm saying should work.

I don't think consumers have much choice at all. I cannot willfully choose to buy from ethical companies all the time or even as often as possible because i don't have 100% knowledge or the money and time to invest in such endeavors. And consumers as a whole are not copies of me either. Boycotts/strikes are good for supporting workers who are seeking concessions because there is a more immediate effect, but there is no way for the entire population to act in a way that could be equal to, say, regulations put into place to protect the environment.