Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
mithrandir
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 25 2006
Location: New Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 933
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 15:19 |
don't forget, Metal wouldn't be he same if it weren't for Punk either,
|
|
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11415
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 15:00 |
SteveG wrote:
For something that's deemed to be so small, Punk's lasting impact on music cannot be underestimated. There would be no New Wave movement without it and no Grudge movement as a response to New Wave. And let's not forget the entire arty Post Punk movement. Prog simply has not have had that impact on Pop music, regardless of how big it was, unless we look in terms of Punk being a reaction to Prog, which would place Prog right back into the negative light that it was cast into in the middle to later seventies.
|
Have to agree with most of this but as for the reasons, things get a tad blurry hereabouts. As Dean has correctly pointed out already, Punk's musical legacy was rudimentary and meager at best, until such time as we reached circa '79 and the so-called Post Punk artists emerged. I guess that what Punk bequeathed to music were the sorts of values I personally still hold dear e.g. discipline, brevity, economy, focus, structure etc in stark contrast to the spacey improvs and lengthy noodly meanderings that afflict some of the worst Prog. It also probably goes without saying that Punk was accessible so that anyone with a very basic set of chops and a cheap guitar could join a band with like minded souls without being subjected to ridicule or having to attend a conservatoire beforehand. Similarly, the subject matter was considerably more pragmatic, prosaic and political (at least in the UK) than the sort of conceptual tangents so beloved of Sinfield, Anderson, Gabriel, Lake et al. Prog was effectively overripe and rotting by circa 1974/75 and had lost much of its customer base. I'm still unsure what deserting Prog fans started to listen to instead between then and the end of the decade?
Edited by ExittheLemming - March 07 2015 at 15:15
|
|
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11415
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 14:37 |
SteveG wrote:
ExittheLemming wrote:
Tom Verlaine felt Television were not part of any so-called punk movement. "We felt outside of that," he says. "I don't think any of those bands (Patti Smith, Blondie, Talking Heads, Voidoids) were punk and everybody knows they're not punk so it's kind of a dead issue. Nobody calls those bands punk, outside of maybe the Ramones."
|
I'm aware of the distinctions between the spirit of the law and the letter of the law, Ian. Simply put, Television has to be categorized. So what category would you place them in?
|
I wasn't being pedantic. If they have to be categorised, Television are a rock band who stripped away a lot of the habitual blues vocabulary from their music which gave it a somewhat unique sound for the time. No more, no less.
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 12:52 |
^Wakeman's capes were part of the Yes concert experience! Now, as the boss said before, back to the topic.
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
Svetonio
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 12:41 |
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 12:09 |
Finnforest wrote:
That too, yes, but prog rock also. (being Glam)
|
Agreed. I saw Wakeman perform with Yes in the early seventies with his trademark capes. Now, that was Glam!
Edited by SteveG - March 07 2015 at 12:37
|
|
LearsFool
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 09 2014
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 8642
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 12:01 |
^ To be honest, that statement, to me, reeks of saying that everything artful in rock must come from prog or a connection to it.
Synchronicity does have those connections, mainly "Mother"'s guitar line taking many tidbits from Fripp's guitarwork, but that album was very much a genre stew in the new wave idiom. The artistry of it I wouldn't attribute to prog.
|
|
|
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 11:50 |
That too, yes, but prog rock also. I think the musical artistry of an album like Synchronicity owes something to prog rock.
|
|
LearsFool
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 09 2014
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 8642
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 11:48 |
^ The particular colour I believe you're referring to is taken from glam, not prog.
|
|
|
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 11:45 |
Oh I certainly recognize its influence on later music, but I think prog also had an influence on later pop artists which may be unrecognized because punk seems to be favored more by music writers. Would many of the "colorful" 80s bands have embraced such flamboyance and freedom without prog pushing boundaries a decade earlier? Maybe, maybe not.
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 11:34 |
Finnforest wrote:
Dean's comments ring true to me, about how small it really was.
Despite the consistant baying of every music publication of the day, there were just a handful of kids at school getting into the whole punk/new wave thing. 95% of the student body just wanted their Who, their Angus, and their JimmyP.
Everyone listened to hard rock and very few cared who Johnny Rotten was. Even as regards prog, the established prog and prog related bands had more fans than did the punk bands. It wasn't until later, by the time MTV was getting huge, that the "new" sound would rival Mr. Townshend and Mr. Page in terms of popularity in those high schools halls around here.
|
For something that's deemed to be so small, Punk's lasting impact on music cannot be underestimated. There would be no New Wave movement without it and no Grudge movement as a response to New Wave. And let's not forget the entire arty Post Punk movement. Prog simply has not have had that impact on Pop music, regardless of how big it was, unless we look in terms of Punk being a reaction to Prog, which would place Prog right back into the negative light that it was cast into in the middle to later seventies.
Edited by SteveG - March 07 2015 at 11:38
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 10:56 |
Finnforest wrote:
Dean's comments ring true to me, about how small it really was.
Despite the consistant baying of every music publication of the day, there were just a handful of kids at school getting into the whole punk/new wave thing. 95% of the student body just wanted their Who, their Angus, and their JimmyP.
Everyone listened to hard rock and very few cared who Johnny Rotten was. Even as regards prog, the established prog and prog related bands had more fans than did the punk bands. It wasn't until later, by the time MTV was getting huge, that the "new" sound would rival Mr. Townshend and Mr. Page in terms of popularity in those high schools halls around here.
|
It is all about perception. Things seem bigger when you're smaller. People born in 1963/4 would be entering their formative teen years in 1976/7 just as punk "exploded" on the music and subculture scene. As I'm sure we all remember from being that age, whatever interests you at that time not only tends to stay with you for your whole life, it becomes your entire world, often to the exclusion of all else. In this thread we have two distinct age groups from that era - those who were entering their teens during the "prog" and "psych" eras and those who were entering their teens during the "punk" era and while that hasn't produced a totally polarised view of the period from 1976 to 1977, it has shown a difference in perception.
|
What?
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 10:33 |
Very well then. Back on Topic everyone, Dean is not amused! I hope that helped.
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 10:29 |
SteveG wrote:
^We will continually disagree on this Dean, as I'm more interested in discussing music then playing with academics. We both have different priorities and it's better just to give each other space and move on. Agreed? |
No. Not agreed. It has nothing to do with "academics" or "semantics" or any other weasel-words you care to mention. You claimed I said something that I never actually said. Just admit it then you can move on.
And btw. The whole Television side-track that this thread had careered off on is irrelevant.
|
What?
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 10:21 |
^We will continually disagree on this Dean, as I'm more interested in discussing music then playing with academics. We both have different priorities and it's better just to give each other space and move on. Agreed?
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 10:16 |
SteveG wrote:
Oh well, I guess we're back to semantics then.
|
Well.. no. It has sod all to do with semantics. Throwing "semantics" back at me every time you make an incorrect assumption or misconstrue something is not a get out of jail free card.
Edited by Dean - March 07 2015 at 10:16
|
What?
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 10:15 |
Toaster Mantis wrote:
Just like ExitTheLemming said earlier, punk seems to function as a "cultural movement" first and a genre of music second in a lot of places so quite a few artists, who don't fit musically into the associated style get embraced by the subculture as part of it for reasons that are more sociological than anything else. Television's a good example of that, being more of an eccentric garage rock band whose fanbase happened to come mostly from the subculture gathered around the CGBG circuit. Same situation with The Fall for that matter, if you wanna see an example from my side of the Atlantic. |
I agree 100% with you and Lemming (Ian) on how Television should be perceived, and how them perceived themselves musically, but again, how do we classify them if not by the Punk moniker?
|
|
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 10:12 |
Dean's comments ring true to me, about how small it really was.
Despite the consistant baying of every music publication of the day, there were just a handful of kids at school getting into the whole punk/new wave thing. 95% of the student body just wanted their Who, their Angus, and their JimmyP.
Everyone listened to hard rock and very few cared who Johnny Rotten was. Even as regards prog, the established prog and prog related bands had more fans than did the punk bands. It wasn't until later, by the time MTV was getting huge, that the "new" sound would rival Mr. Townshend and Mr. Page in terms of popularity in those high schools halls around here.
|
|
Toaster Mantis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 09:58 |
Just like ExitTheLemming said earlier, punk seems to function as a "cultural movement" first and a genre of music second in a lot of places, so quite a few artists who don't fit musically into the associated style get embraced by the subculture as part of it for reasons that are more sociological than anything else. Television's a good example of that, being more of an eccentric garage rock band whose fanbase happened to come mostly from the subculture gathered around the CBGB circuit. Same situation with The Fall for that matter, if you wanna see an example from my side of the Atlantic.
Edited by Toaster Mantis - March 07 2015 at 10:26
|
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook
|
|
Svetonio
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
|
Posted: March 07 2015 at 09:53 |
^ Schick rock?
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.