Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Posted: September 20 2013 at 06:34
Have not read the entire thread but Sabbath in the early 70's ( I was there) was commonly referred to as ' Underground'. I would definitely say they were the fathers of metal and prog metal for that matter. Rainbow, Judas Priest, Iron Maiden followed in their wake. IMHO of course.
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Unfortunately Wikipedia wasn't alive in the 1970 so cannot be regarded as the definitive reference.
Regardless of what we decide to call those rock dinosaurs now, they were never call metal back then.
I was in school in the '70s, we certainly called Black Sabbath 'heavy metal', at least by the latter half of the '70s.
Even back then there were arguments on whether Rush, Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, Aerosmith, etc were heavy metal....at least me and my friends had those discussions when we were in high school (again, late '70s).
To the best of my memory (which can fail me at times), my circle of friends would've said bands like Black Sabbath, Judas Priest, Scorpions, Motorhead, maybe even early Kiss were heavy metal, bands like LZ, Rush, Deep Purple, Thin Lizzy, etc were not.
Again, I'm talking about mid-late '70s and not early '70s like Dean, but I've always thought that albums like Black Sabbath's self-titled, 'Paranoid', & 'Master Of Reality' were heavy metal. I never thought of them in any way as being prog, though.
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
Posted: September 20 2013 at 09:39
Ah, this is back in the halcyon days when the biggest argument at our local rock club was whether bands were heavy metal, hard rock, or prog (plus the usual divisions over whether American or British was best - you couldn't like both!)
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17863
Posted: September 20 2013 at 10:26
Based on the poll....I still say Rush, but obviously the fact that Black Sabbath is not even mentioned in the PA portion of Progmetal, an amendment seems logical.
Did BS influence current progmetal bands? Who knows...ask the bands.....but I do feel they should be included in a list of early metal bands as influencial, to what degree, again who knows.
To me Ritchie Blackmore's Rainbow had more prog attributes in their music than BS did....and I always considered Rainbow to be metal back in the day.
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: September 20 2013 at 10:52
Jbird wrote:
Dean wrote:
Unfortunately Wikipedia wasn't alive in the 1970 so cannot be regarded as the definitive reference.
Regardless of what we decide to call those rock dinosaurs now, they were never call metal back then.
I was in school in the '70s, we certainly called Black Sabbath 'heavy metal', at least by the latter half of the '70s.
Even back then there were arguments on whether Rush, Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, Aerosmith, etc were heavy metal....at least me and my friends had those discussions when we were in high school (again, late '70s).
To the best of my memory (which can fail me at times), my circle of friends would've said bands like Black Sabbath, Judas Priest, Scorpions, Motorhead, maybe even early Kiss were heavy metal, bands like LZ, Rush, Deep Purple, Thin Lizzy, etc were not.
Again, I'm talking about mid-late '70s and not early '70s like Dean, but I've always thought that albums like Black Sabbath's self-titled, 'Paranoid', & 'Master Of Reality' were heavy metal. I never thought of them in any way as being prog, though.
Since I use the precident that I knew of the term Prog Rock in Britain back in the early 70s as proof that it wasn't a terminology that was invented in the mid 80s, then I concede the point that Heavy Metal existed as a terminology in the Mid to Late 70s in the USA and it was possibly used as a synonym for Heavy Rock and Hard Rock, just as Prog Rock was a synonym for Art Rock, Avant Garde Rock and even (I kid you not) Techno-Rock back then. As is the case today, the propencity for bands to resist labels and pigeonholling tends to make musicology an inexact science, even some 70s Glam Rock bands resisted the "Glam" tag (while wholeheartedly leaping upon the lucrative bandwagon)..
Without the levelling nature of the Internet, these terminologies were very parochial and oft specific to one particular music magazine or weekly newspaper - in the UK we knew of the existance of Rolling Stone, but we read NME and Melody Maker, Cream was practically unheard of and never seen on the magazine shelves in the local newsagent. Even so, to call Masters of Reality or Paranoid Heavy Metal in 1977 or 2013 is a hindsight back-definition, in 1970/71 it was Heavy Rock
Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13090
Posted: September 20 2013 at 19:54
Dean wrote:
Jbird wrote:
Dean wrote:
Unfortunately Wikipedia wasn't alive in the 1970 so cannot be regarded as the definitive reference.
Regardless of what we decide to call those rock dinosaurs now, they were never call metal back then.
I was in school in the '70s, we certainly called Black Sabbath 'heavy metal', at least by the latter half of the '70s.
Even back then there were arguments on whether Rush, Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, Aerosmith, etc were heavy metal....at least me and my friends had those discussions when we were in high school (again, late '70s).
To the best of my memory (which can fail me at times), my circle of friends would've said bands like Black Sabbath, Judas Priest, Scorpions, Motorhead, maybe even early Kiss were heavy metal, bands like LZ, Rush, Deep Purple, Thin Lizzy, etc were not.
Again, I'm talking about mid-late '70s and not early '70s like Dean, but I've always thought that albums like Black Sabbath's self-titled, 'Paranoid', & 'Master Of Reality' were heavy metal. I never thought of them in any way as being prog, though.
Since I use the precident that I knew of the term Prog Rock in Britain back in the early 70s as proof that it wasn't a terminology that was invented in the mid 80s, then I concede the point that Heavy Metal existed as a terminology in the Mid to Late 70s in the USA and it was possibly used as a synonym for Heavy Rock and Hard Rock, just as Prog Rock was a synonym for Art Rock, Avant Garde Rock and even (I kid you not) Techno-Rock back then. As is the case today, the propencity for bands to resist labels and pigeonholling tends to make musicology an inexact science, even some 70s Glam Rock bands resisted the "Glam" tag (while wholeheartedly leaping upon the lucrative bandwagon)..
Without the levelling nature of the Internet, these terminologies were very parochial and oft specific to one particular music magazine or weekly newspaper - in the UK we knew of the existance of Rolling Stone, but we read NME and Melody Maker, Cream was practically unheard of and never seen on the magazine shelves in the local newsagent. Even so, to call Masters of Reality or Paranoid Heavy Metal in 1977 or 2013 is a hindsight back-definition, in 1970/71 it was Heavy Rock
I have a completely different experience, Dean. In the States, particularly where I grew up (the Detroit area), the term "heavy metal" was used interchangeably with "hard rock" to describe early 70s bands like Sabbath, Mountain, certain Zeppelin songs, Grand Funk, and earlier bands like Electric Flag, Savage Grace and the Amboy Dukes (particularly the albums just prior to Ted Nugent going solo) -- although "hard rock" was used most often; whereas the term "prog rock" was never used that I can recall. We read Creem and Rolling Stone back then, and many reviews used the term "heavy metal" (taken, or so I believed, from Steppenwolf's "Born to be Wild"), but never prog or progressive.
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: September 20 2013 at 19:59
The Dark Elf wrote:
Dean wrote:
Jbird wrote:
Dean wrote:
Unfortunately Wikipedia wasn't alive in the 1970 so cannot be regarded as the definitive reference.
Regardless of what we decide to call those rock dinosaurs now, they were never call metal back then.
I was in school in the '70s, we certainly called Black Sabbath 'heavy metal', at least by the latter half of the '70s.
Even back then there were arguments on whether Rush, Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, Aerosmith, etc were heavy metal....at least me and my friends had those discussions when we were in high school (again, late '70s).
To the best of my memory (which can fail me at times), my circle of friends would've said bands like Black Sabbath, Judas Priest, Scorpions, Motorhead, maybe even early Kiss were heavy metal, bands like LZ, Rush, Deep Purple, Thin Lizzy, etc were not.
Again, I'm talking about mid-late '70s and not early '70s like Dean, but I've always thought that albums like Black Sabbath's self-titled, 'Paranoid', & 'Master Of Reality' were heavy metal. I never thought of them in any way as being prog, though.
Since I use the precident that I knew of the term Prog Rock in Britain back in the early 70s as proof that it wasn't a terminology that was invented in the mid 80s, then I concede the point that Heavy Metal existed as a terminology in the Mid to Late 70s in the USA and it was possibly used as a synonym for Heavy Rock and Hard Rock, just as Prog Rock was a synonym for Art Rock, Avant Garde Rock and even (I kid you not) Techno-Rock back then. As is the case today, the propencity for bands to resist labels and pigeonholling tends to make musicology an inexact science, even some 70s Glam Rock bands resisted the "Glam" tag (while wholeheartedly leaping upon the lucrative bandwagon)..
Without the levelling nature of the Internet, these terminologies were very parochial and oft specific to one particular music magazine or weekly newspaper - in the UK we knew of the existance of Rolling Stone, but we read NME and Melody Maker, Cream was practically unheard of and never seen on the magazine shelves in the local newsagent. Even so, to call Masters of Reality or Paranoid Heavy Metal in 1977 or 2013 is a hindsight back-definition, in 1970/71 it was Heavy Rock
I have a completely different experience, Dean. In the States, particularly where I grew up (the Detroit area), the term "heavy metal" was used interchangeably with "hard rock" to describe early 70s bands like Sabbath, Mountain, certain Zeppelin songs, Grand Funk, and earlier bands like Electric Flag, Savage Grace and the Amboy Dukes (particularly the albums just prior to Ted Nugent going solo) -- although "hard rock" was used most often; whereas the term "prog rock" was never used that I can recall. We read Creem and Rolling Stone back then, and many reviews used the term "heavy metal" (taken, or so I believed, from Steppenwolf's "Born to be Wild"), but never prog or progressive.
Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13090
Posted: September 20 2013 at 20:44
Dean wrote:
The Dark Elf wrote:
Dean wrote:
Jbird wrote:
Dean wrote:
Unfortunately Wikipedia wasn't alive in the 1970 so cannot be regarded as the definitive reference.
Regardless of what we decide to call those rock dinosaurs now, they were never call metal back then.
I was in school in the '70s, we certainly called Black Sabbath 'heavy metal', at least by the latter half of the '70s.
Even back then there were arguments on whether Rush, Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, Aerosmith, etc were heavy metal....at least me and my friends had those discussions when we were in high school (again, late '70s).
To the best of my memory (which can fail me at times), my circle of friends would've said bands like Black Sabbath, Judas Priest, Scorpions, Motorhead, maybe even early Kiss were heavy metal, bands like LZ, Rush, Deep Purple, Thin Lizzy, etc were not.
Again, I'm talking about mid-late '70s and not early '70s like Dean, but I've always thought that albums like Black Sabbath's self-titled, 'Paranoid', & 'Master Of Reality' were heavy metal. I never thought of them in any way as being prog, though.
Since I use the precident that I knew of the term Prog Rock in Britain back in the early 70s as proof that it wasn't a terminology that was invented in the mid 80s, then I concede the point that Heavy Metal existed as a terminology in the Mid to Late 70s in the USA and it was possibly used as a synonym for Heavy Rock and Hard Rock, just as Prog Rock was a synonym for Art Rock, Avant Garde Rock and even (I kid you not) Techno-Rock back then. As is the case today, the propencity for bands to resist labels and pigeonholling tends to make musicology an inexact science, even some 70s Glam Rock bands resisted the "Glam" tag (while wholeheartedly leaping upon the lucrative bandwagon)..
Without the levelling nature of the Internet, these terminologies were very parochial and oft specific to one particular music magazine or weekly newspaper - in the UK we knew of the existance of Rolling Stone, but we read NME and Melody Maker, Cream was practically unheard of and never seen on the magazine shelves in the local newsagent. Even so, to call Masters of Reality or Paranoid Heavy Metal in 1977 or 2013 is a hindsight back-definition, in 1970/71 it was Heavy Rock
I have a completely different experience, Dean. In the States, particularly where I grew up (the Detroit area), the term "heavy metal" was used interchangeably with "hard rock" to describe early 70s bands like Sabbath, Mountain, certain Zeppelin songs, Grand Funk, and earlier bands like Electric Flag, Savage Grace and the Amboy Dukes (particularly the albums just prior to Ted Nugent going solo) -- although "hard rock" was used most often; whereas the term "prog rock" was never used that I can recall. We read Creem and Rolling Stone back then, and many reviews used the term "heavy metal" (taken, or so I believed, from Steppenwolf's "Born to be Wild"), but never prog or progressive.
that's what I said.
I was referencing the fact that the term "heavy metal" was used where I grew up, but never prog (not in the 70s at least). I was merely reiterating the differences in parlance due to geography (and/or culture), even though you and I are referring to the same damn thing.
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Posted: September 20 2013 at 23:16
Sabbath is a bit confusing. They became 'just' metal (rather than early/proto-metal) once Dio joined as the frontman. They tried to go back to their 70s sound with Gillian but thereafter, the Tony Martin albums again stuck to 80s metal. Sabbath, JP, Scorpions actually became heavier in the 80s (JP were already metal and just crossed over even more to the speed metal side of things) while DP and Rainbow mellowed down a bit. I don't know much about UFO post Michael Schenker but I guess they too fell over to the hard rock side in the 80s rather than the proto metal of Lights Out? Another thing about Sabbath is the 70s albums, especially Sabbath Bloody Sabbath/Sabotage were more prog-related while the full on metal albums of the 80s were much more straight up. I tend to agree with Dean that Dio-Sabbath influenced power metal rather than prog metal.
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Posted: September 21 2013 at 00:26
IF there can be just one father. It's never that linear in music. Obv, prog metal was influenced by lots of bands that may not have been metal or may not have had prog elements even. Uli Roth, Michael Schenker and, a little after them, Eddie Van Halen popularised shred metal and that is a very important part of prog metal. The prog elements are derived more from Rush rather than Iron Maiden. Iron Maiden too internalised some elements of Rush's music but say the prog part of DT derives much more from Rush than IM. IM was a bigger influence on early prog metal acts like Queensryche or Fates Warning. By the time DT arrived, the metal elements were derived more from Metallica. What was NWOBHM at the beginning of the 80s was already just hard rock by the end of that decade.
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65289
Posted: September 21 2013 at 01:22
I'd agree that Progmetal simply progressed and probably did not have a
single father; the problem is that Rush was not Metal by any stretch
nor Sabbath progressive (small 'p') by any equal stretch. I'm comfortable with
Maiden being claimed as the first true progressive metal band, but would share that honor somewhat with what Ozzy & Randy were doing at the same time.
I
also agree that Progmetal was more a spawn of metal than prog, but in a
more subtle way. Maiden's music was wholly original and the
energy of the circa 1980 line-up was coming from a fresh place.
Maiden's sound and approach was new, and that was clear to
anyone who heard them. This was not Priest or Sabbath or
Zeppelin or Queen or the Scorps or Rush. Heavy?
Absolutely. Progressive? You bet.
Harris, Murray, Di'Anno were fine musicians all, and they wanted to
show what they could do with a tight unit that could do very heavy and
very complex at the same time. That was unusual, and it got
them a strong following early on.
Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14191
Posted: September 21 2013 at 04:58
Regardless all the discussions, the very first time I've heard of "Prog Metal" it was about Dream Theater. When I have heard them the first time I thought to a metal version of Marillion, but I don't remember which album it was.
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Although Ozzy and friends were playing heavy metal in the late 1960's/early 1970s, they didn't use that expression to describe it - for that we need to cross to the USA. The term 'heavy metal' first appears in print in William Burroughs' 1962 novel The Soft Machine. His character Uranian Willy is described as "the Heavy Metal Kid". Burroughs later re-used the term in his 1964 novel Nova Express:
"With their diseases and orgasm drugs and their sexless parasite life forms - Heavy Metal People of Uranus wrapped in cool blue mist of vaporized bank notes - And the Insect People of Minraud with metal music."
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17863
Posted: September 21 2013 at 13:15
timothy leary wrote:
Although Ozzy and friends were playing heavy metal in the late 1960's/early 1970s, they didn't use that expression to describe it - for that we need to cross to the USA. The term 'heavy metal' first appears in print in William Burroughs' 1962 novel The Soft Machine. His character Uranian Willy is described as "the Heavy Metal Kid". Burroughs later re-used the term in his 1964 novel Nova Express:
"With their diseases and orgasm drugs and their sexless parasite life forms - Heavy Metal People of Uranus wrapped in cool blue mist of vaporized bank notes - And the Insect People of Minraud with metal music."
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.183 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.