![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 7475767778 92> |
Author | ||
Ambient Hurricanes ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 25 2011 Location: internet Status: Offline Points: 2549 |
![]() |
|
The usage of the word gnosis (knowledge) does not indicate an acceptance of gnostic beliefs any more than our use of the word "knowledge" would. "Gnostic" was simply a name that early followers of the philosophy pinned on themselves to indicate their emphasis of personal knowledge as the way to salvation. When the gnostics talked about "gnosis," they were talking about an inner knowledge by which you could save yourself. This is entirely different from the biblical doctrine of faith. Faith is trust in something outside yourself: namely, Jesus Christ, the savior of mankind. Christians believe (and have believed as long as Christianity has been around) that you cannot save yourself by knowledge or might or anything else, but only by grace, through faith in Christ Jesus. Your animal sacrifice example doesn't work, either. The Epistle to the Hebrews makes it clear that animal sacrifices were a foreshadowing of Christ, who was the ultimate sacrifice to atone for all sins on the cross. |
||
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
|
||
![]() |
||
timothy leary ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 29 2005 Location: Lilliwaup, Wa. Status: Offline Points: 5319 |
![]() |
|
I respect your position, I just do not believe it. If not many go through the narrow gate, then the criteria to pass through must be stringent, to know the truth you must live the truth. If you do not believe the New Testament has come down in a corrupted manner and you believe the words you read today are the words that were written in the 1st century here is something to ponder......."How can you say, 'We are wise, And the law of the Lord is with us'? But behold, the lying pen of the scribes Has made it into a lie" (Jer 8:8 NASB)
The second reality that modern Christians fail to understand is the fact that the Gospels that were given to the Gentiles by the Ebionite Nazirene Disciples of Yeshua/Jesus, were themselves of a more simple and lesser spiritual level, even prior to being corrupted by the Gentiles. Thus, St. Jerome writes with respect to the Original Gospel which was written in Hebrew Characters: "A difficult work is enjoined, since this translation has been commanded me by your Felicities, which St. Matthew himself, the Apostle and Evangelist, did not wish to be openly written. For if it had not been Secret, he would have added to the evangel that which he gave forth was his; but he made up this book sealed up in the Hebrew characters, which he put forth even in such a way that the book, written in Hebrew letters and by the hand of himself, might be possessed by the men most religious, who also, in the course of time, received it from those who preceded them. But this very book they never gave to any one to be transcribed, and its text they related some one way and some another". And this is confirmed in the Epistle of Peter And James where it is written: "Hear me, brethren and fellow-servants. If we should give the books to all indiscriminately, and they should be corrupted by any daring men, or be perverted by interpretations, as you have heard that some have already done, it will remain even for those who really seek the truth, always to wander in error. Wherefore it is better that they should be with us, and that we should communicate them with all the fore-mentioned care to those who wish to live piously, and to save others." |
||
![]() |
||
dtguitarfan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 24 2011 Location: Chattanooga, TN Status: Offline Points: 1708 |
![]() |
|
You know, this is interesting, because if you had asked me, up until recently, what the gospel was, I would have immediately quoted that same verse. But I only recently realized the problem - why is it that the first verse most evangelicals jump to in order to declare the message of the gospel is a quote from Paul? Why isn't it a quote from Jesus himself? Jesus' message of what the gospel amounted to: "the kingdom of heaven is at hand!" (Mark 1:14-15, Matthew 3:2, Matthew 4:17, just to name a few....) Does this make you curious, as it did me, when I first heard this? ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Tom Ozric ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: September 03 2005 Location: Olympus Mons Status: Offline Points: 15926 |
![]() |
|
I was brought up as a Christian in my youth, but those beliefs and values seemed to have gone out the door from my mid-teens onwards.
Neal Morse is now my saviour.........
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
AlexDOM ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: February 02 2011 Location: Indianapolis Status: Offline Points: 775 |
![]() |
|
Jesus Christ is my savior, and all ours if we accept it or not. But yeah Morse is my hero, one of my favorite individuals by far.
|
||
![]() |
||
Tom Ozric ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: September 03 2005 Location: Olympus Mons Status: Offline Points: 15926 |
![]() |
|
MORSE - incredible on Keyboards, amazing on Guitar, brilliant at composing Prog, superb voice and he's stage personality is spot-on. Who could expect more from an artist. His 'messages' come across very sensibly and they are perfectly legit. The track 'We All Need Some Light' (Transatlantic) has meaningful lyrics and a seriously kick-ass melody. Top-shelf Prog, no doubt. The guy can do no wrong as far as I'm concerned (and I haven't even heard much of his stuff.....).
|
||
![]() |
||
zeqexes ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 19 2012 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1238 |
![]() |
|
Absolutely agreed
|
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Jonathan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 18 2012 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 201 |
![]() |
|
I am a Quaker although I am an unconventional one because in terms of Philosophy I am a Confucian and I might want to become a Christian Zoroastrian as well. So I'm technially a Conservative Christian Humanist.
|
||
![]() |
||
Ambient Hurricanes ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 25 2011 Location: internet Status: Offline Points: 2549 |
![]() |
|
Timothy and Geoff: sorry for the late replies here. I haven't had much time for PA as of late and when I've been on it's mostly been quick reading without posting.
Timothy: first of all, that's quite a dubious reading of Jeremiah 8:8. From what I've read, there's no real proof that this verse refers to an actual corruption of the Torah; it just as likely could refer to false prophecies, interpretations, etc. that perverted the original meaning of the text. Obviously, the Law still existed in uncorrupted form at the time, since Jeremiah could refer to his audience's knowledge of the Law and demand that they return to it. As to the idea of Scripture being originally written in Hebrew, here's an excerpt from the Wikipedia article on the subject: "The Hebrew Gospel hypothesis (or proto-Gospel hypothesis or original Gospel hypothesis is a group of related theories advancing the proposition that the Gospel of Matthew was first composed in Hebrew or Aramaic. It originates with the early Christian writer Papias, and was then repeated by later Church Fathers including Jerome. It survives into the modern period, but studies have shown it to be untenable.[1]" When even modern biblical critics (whose ideas the rest of the article discusses) dismiss a belief that runs contrary to traditional Christianity, I think we ought to be skeptical of it. Jerome and some other early fathers may have thought the original gospel was written in Hebrew, but modern historical scholarship has confirmed the church tradition that the original document was Greek. As far as the epistle of Peter to James goes, I would appreciate a citation for your source because I only found this writing in obscure places, and all the information I could find on it was that it was from a group of early writings falsely attributed to the early church father Clement. It doesn't sound very credible to me, unlike the gospels, for which we have thousands of thousands of pieces of historical evidence and verification. Geoff: My purpose was not to define the gospel, but to critique gnosticism; if I was to put the gospel in a nutshell, I would use John 3:16 (predictably), as I just did over in the atheist/agnostic thread. Yes, the message about the kingdom of heaven is important; a huge emphasis in the gospels is that Christ came to inaugurate God's kingdom on earth. But it's also important to realize that the kingdom of heaven is emphasized in Matthew, while other books emphasize different things. The Gospel has many layers, and is very deep, but it all centers around Jesus Christ and His incarnation, earthly life and ministry, death, resurrection, ascension, and second coming. |
||
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
|
||
![]() |
||
dtguitarfan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 24 2011 Location: Chattanooga, TN Status: Offline Points: 1708 |
![]() |
|
Oh, no doubt the ideas in the Bible are many layered. However, "the kingdom of heaven is at hand" is, by definition, THE gospel. Gospel was a word used specifically for one type of good news in the day: the news of a new Caesar. So, "the kingdom of heaven is at hand" was quite literally a gospel message - a politically subversive one as well. I just think it's interesting, when you think about it, because Christianity today seems to have overwhelmingly taken the attitude that this world does not matter - more than that, it's evil, so to hell with it. But I don't think that's how God works - God cares about this creation, that he declared was "good" and he wants us to take care of it as well. I think we're finding, these days, that a lot of the doctrines have been very distorted through the mixing of other religious views into Christianity, and this is very evident when people like Carl Medearis (just finished his fantastic book "Speaking of Jesus", which I highly recommend, though it doesn't quite get into the subjects I'm hinting at here) ask people what they think of Christianity and the responses are overwhelmingly negative - whilst the following question "what do you think of Jesus?" always has positive results. Something went very, very wrong with our doctrine. But those who dare to challenge it are shot down as being heretics - and yet the message they are bringing is taking hold anyways. If you're interested in exploring deeper, I could recommend some books, but I'll warn you - they will radically challenge ideas you may have held all your life. |
||
![]() |
||
Ambient Hurricanes ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 25 2011 Location: internet Status: Offline Points: 2549 |
![]() |
|
I see where you're coming from; I especially like your point about the gospel being political, because there's a common misconception among Christians that it wasn't. But tell me this: how do you define "the kingdom of heaven," and what does it mean for that kingdom to be at hand? |
||
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
|
||
![]() |
||
dtguitarfan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 24 2011 Location: Chattanooga, TN Status: Offline Points: 1708 |
![]() |
|
Well, I won't try to define "the kingdom of heaven" because it's better to let the Bible do it for me. Jesus has so many parables of what it will look like, and before him were the prophets who described it as well. One of my favorite descriptions of what it will look like: In that day the wolf and the lamb will live together; the leopard will lie down with the baby goat. The calf and the yearling will be safe with the lion, and a little child will lead them all. The cow will graze near the bear. The cub and the calf will lie down together. The lion will eat hay like a cow. The baby will play safely near the hole of a cobra. Yes, a little child will put its hand in a nest of deadly snakes without harm. Nothing will hurt or destroy in all my holy mountain, for as the waters fill the sea, so the earth will be filled with people who know the Lord. In that day the heir to David’s throne will be a banner of salvation to all the world. The nations will rally to him, and the land where he lives will be a glorious place.
Isaiah 11:6-10 Another description I love, from Isaiah 2:4: The Lord will mediate between nations and will settle international disputes. They will hammer their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will no longer fight against nation, nor train for war anymore. So what I get from this that I find interesting (and somewhat contrary to what a lot of Christians seem to think will happen) is that the first description from Isaiah does NOT say that there will be peace because there will no longer BE any wolves or bears or lions because the sheep and the goats and the cows killed them all, or used some kind of futuristic gene therapy to transform them all into sheep and goats and cows, or they were all banished somewhere terrible - they're there! But they no longer have the desires to oppress. And what I think Jesus meant by "at hand" is that it is near enough for us to grasp some piece of it now. It is both here and not fully here. Both a future that will be realized, and yet near enough for us to grasp some piece of it now. |
||
![]() |
||
Jonathan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 18 2012 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 201 |
![]() |
|
I think Christianity and the Philosophy of Confucianism are compatible. What do you guys think? |
||
![]() |
||
Ambient Hurricanes ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 25 2011 Location: internet Status: Offline Points: 2549 |
![]() |
|
^^Geoff: I give a hearty "amen" to that. The kingdom truly is here both already and not yet. Such a paradox! But wonderful at the same time. It's here in God's Word and Sacraments, in His church, and in the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, and it's coming in it's fullness at Christ's return.
It's weird. I find myself agreeing with you but still wanting to elaborate further, but really we could go on for about 1000 pages on this topic and still not exhaust it ![]() |
||
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
|
||
![]() |
||
Ambient Hurricanes ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 25 2011 Location: internet Status: Offline Points: 2549 |
![]() |
|
As a Christian, I can affirm many things about Confucianism. It contains many good moral and ethical teachings from which Christians can learn. However, Confucianism is, at it's very core, humanistic to the exclusion of God, and teaches that humans can save themselves. So no, I don't think Christianity and Confucianism are compatible, but I am open to learning from the wisdom of Confucius just as I have learned from other non-Christians as diverse as Aristotle and Neil Peart. |
||
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
|
||
![]() |
||
Jonathan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 18 2012 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 201 |
![]() |
|
But from what I've studied I've learned that Confucius believed in only one God like Deists, He called it "The Way" and also "Heaven". But you see Confucianism is more of a Philosophy than a Religion which is I think it can be compatible with other religions.
|
||
![]() |
||
dtguitarfan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 24 2011 Location: Chattanooga, TN Status: Offline Points: 1708 |
![]() |
|
Indeed - the topic is one that is simple enough to be understood by a child, yet complex enough to be discussed at length by great minds. If you would like, I can recommend some reading that has influenced my thinking, but I'll warn you right off the bat - many of the authors I would recommend are authors who have been called "heretics" by some of the influential radio personalities and televangelists, so enter at your own risk! ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Ambient Hurricanes ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 25 2011 Location: internet Status: Offline Points: 2549 |
![]() |
|
^I think you misunderstand my positions, Geoff; I loathe the televangelists' prosperity gospel and shallow teachings. They're the ones who are heretics.
And as someone who has read stuff ranging from Upton Sinclair to G.K. Chesterton, I love reading things from multiple points of view. Go ahead and list the recommended readings or PM me if you like; I can't guarantee I'll be able to read them very soon (I have a ton of books on my list!) but I'll try to dig into a couple. Speaking of which, have you ever read anything on the Internet Monk blog? |
||
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
|
||
![]() |
||
Ambient Hurricanes ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 25 2011 Location: internet Status: Offline Points: 2549 |
![]() |
|
I'm not sure about his views on God specifically (to my knowledge he had no concept of a personal God, anyway; perhaps a more deistic concept) but I think his philosophy is still incompatible with Christianity because it teaches salvation by works. Various aspects of the philosophy are consistent with Christianity, however. I especially like the Confucian emphasis on filial piety/loyalty (though I don't always agree with the way he applied that principle) and think much of it concurs with Christian ethics. |
||
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
|
||
![]() |
||
Jonathan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 18 2012 Location: North Carolina Status: Offline Points: 201 |
![]() |
|
What Religions/Philosophies are compatible with Christianity?
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 7475767778 92> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |