Political discussion thread

Whatever class you are, most people would want to have a iob and house secure before moving. Only really young people or people with no family or nothing to lose, or really, really adventurous, would move without some sort of security. And in that case wealth would help quite a lot.

The voice of experience^

thellama73 wrote: Most people would want to have a roast beef dinner too, but it doesn't mean that couldn't do without one if necessary.

Even I will call out how terrible this analogy is. And how reality still shows moving when poor is much more difficult than moving when rich. Again, I side with you on most things but this time TheDoctor is right, yes

The T wrote: thellama73 wrote: Most people would want to have a roast beef dinner too, but it doesn't mean that couldn't do without one if necessary. Even I will call out how terrible this analogy is. And how reality still shows moving when poor is much more difficult than moving when rich. Again, I side with you on most things but this time TheDoctor is right, yes

I assumed we were talking about the truly poor, as in the homeless. It is easy for them to relocate. They have nothing to take with them, and no need to secure residence or job. All they have to do is scrape together enough money for a bus ticket and voila, move accomplished.

My overarching point was that it annoys me the way people complain about things being impossible when they are merely inconvenient. People who say "I hate living in Texas, but I can't move" are really saying "I hate living in Texas, but not enough to do something about it, not as much as the first immigrants to America hated living in Europe, not enough to simply get in my car and leave." If you want to leave, leave. If you don't want to leave, quit yer whining.


Edited by thellama73 - November 29 2012 at 20:24

thellama73 wrote: The T wrote: thellama73 wrote: Most people would want to have a roast beef dinner too, but it doesn't mean that couldn't do without one if necessary. Even I will call out how terrible this analogy is. And how reality still shows moving when poor is much more difficult than moving when rich. Again, I side with you on most things but this time TheDoctor is right, yes I assumed we were talking about the truly poor, as in the homeless. It is easy for them to relocate. They have nothing to take with them, and no need to secure residence or job. All they have to do is scrape together enough money for a bus ticket and voila, move accomplished. My overarching point was that it annoys me the way people complain about things being impossible when they are merely inconvenient. People who say "I hate living in Texas, but I can't move" are really saying "I hate living in Texas, but not enough to do something about it, not as much as the first immigrants to America hated living in Europe, not enough to simply get in my car and leave." If you want to leave, leave. If you don't want to leave, quit yer whining.

I was talking about me, obviously, as we were discussing me wanting to move from Texas.  I'm not exactly poor.  Nowhere near wealthy either.  And at least for today, not homeless.  I want to leave, but also would like to continue my middle class existence.  I'm not willing to go homeless to get out of this state.  At least not yet. 

One sign that Slarti is back: lots of links and quotes.

WalMart is not an owner of this sweatshop; it's a retailer who buys and re-sells goods. I do believe that WalMart, as any large company, has some kind of a Code of Conduct for its suppliers. But, understand that the factory in question wasn't even directly contracted to WalMart, in which case WalMart couldn't have enforced their Vendors' Code of Conduct. 

Slartibartfast wrote:  If you want to be an apologist for bad company behavior, enjoy yourself.

Slarti brings out the worst in us...

timothy leary wrote: Where can I get a row of pictures of dead guys?

Well the state has given the world plenty of those just type communism facism socialism or nationalsocialism.