Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Steven Wilson Vs. Roine Stolt
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSteven Wilson Vs. Roine Stolt

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 19>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
M27Barney View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2006
Location: Swinton M27
Status: Offline
Points: 3136
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 26 2012 at 06:22
Unfortunately for Mr S. Wilson, I think that Roine Stolte is a superior composer and a much more accomplished lead-guitarist too...This is my personal opinion, but It may well be accepted within the symphonic prog brotherhood...I will concede that PT seems to appeal to a lot of people beyond hard core proggies - but this can be seen as a weakness rather than a strength......
Back to Top
Argonaught View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 04 2012
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 1413
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 26 2012 at 04:23
 
Originally posted by Meta Meta wrote:

 
 
You don't find early KC uniquely innovative? I consider them to be one of the single most important influences on the development of early prog.

I think SW is more than a little self aware. Take this line from postcard for instance:
 
"I'm lame and self-obsessed, that I will concede"
 
There are a few other PT and SW lyrics that show the same sort of self-awareness. The man has an ego and it's well deserved, in my opinion. His ego isn't even close to being on the same level as Fripp, though.

Innovation: Yes, I do believe that. Come on, Fripp was only 23 at the time of ITCOCK debut. He already made a statement he was seeking to re-shape the musical world, but it would still take him a few years to get ready for the seismic shift of LTIA, Starless and Red.  

By the way, I am voting with the PA crowd here: If you look at the KC ratings, on average the Wake/Lizard/Islands are  just below the "Excellent" mark,  while the average of the next three albums borders on the "Masterpiece" category. 

Egomania vs. Self-Awareness: I agree in general. I think that these are just the two sides of the same coin, or two different manifestation of the same "imbalance" - like bullies are usually turn out to be cowards. But also, let's not assume that everything Wilson writes is about his core self.  

Back to Top
Meta View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: August 22 2012
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 69
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 26 2012 at 02:45
Originally posted by Argonaught Argonaught wrote:

(1) The pre-Bruford  KC could be compared to the pre-Harrison PT - innovative, but not uniquely so; not standing out visibly enough on the musical landscape
 
You don't find early KC uniquely innovative? I consider them to be one of the single most important influences on the development of early prog.
 
Originally posted by Argonaught Argonaught wrote:

Now, as to Wilson's personality: he does come across as a self-important, arrogant person. If you watched the GAYD DVD: during the intro, he thrusts himself onto the stage and promptly strikes the "Cristo Redentor atop Corcovado" pose. It's like saying, 'I come to redeem My flock from the demons of Katy Purry and Justin Beaver'. He proceeds to exorcise the demons by making his peculiar  hand gestures right in front of the musicians' faces. I said to my wife, 'Gee, if Wilson did that to me, I might punch him right into his pallid face'. She replied, 'That's probably what Niko did, for which he got fired'. 

I think SW is more than a little self aware. Take this line from postcard for instance:
 
"I'm lame and self-obsessed, that I will concede"
 
There are a few other PT and SW lyrics that show the same sort of self-awareness. The man has an ego and it's well deserved, in my opinion. His ego isn't even close to being on the same level as Fripp, though.
Back to Top
QuestionableScum View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Edmonton
Status: Offline
Points: 245
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 23 2012 at 10:47
I largely agree with Wilson, although he came off as an arrogant ass in the interview.

However, Stolt came off as vindictive and spiteful by suggesting that Wilson is trying to target a particular kind of audience.

Back to Top
ole-the-first View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2012
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 1534
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 23 2012 at 10:36
^You say that like there's something bad.
This night wounds time.
Back to Top
Argonaught View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 04 2012
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 1413
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 23 2012 at 09:02

Originally posted by DisgruntledPorcupine DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:

I can't find a single KC element in any PT song ever written. PF I understand a bit. There's a difference between influence, and being a rehash of the past. SW makes a good point, while he might have been extreme with his wording, it's valid nonetheless.

How about Nil Recurring?

I'd agree, however, that the PT members (apart from the excellent Gavin H) haven't really had the skills and/or ambition to emulate the intensity and sophistication of KC. 

But there are more similarities between KC and PT (or, to be more accurate, between Bobby and Stevie) than many of us notice .. consider these:

- Both passionately nurture and worship their aircraft carrier-size egos. Both will pay attention to the fans and band members for exactly as long as it's necessary for a given ego-worshiping session. 


- Both get bored with the "same old" quickly and predictably, even when the same "same old" has made them rich and famous.

Think of the KC vs. PT incarnations:

(1) The pre-Bruford  KC could be compared to the pre-Harrison PT - innovative, but not uniquely so; not standing out visibly enough on the musical landscape

(2) The Fripp-Bruford-Wetton era is similar to the 21st century PT: The first album indicated a virtual re-birth of the band, resulting in a sharp increase in visibility (LTIA/In Absentia), but the musical contents were a little "imperfect", so to speak. The second album was near-perfect, and the third was immaculate. --- I don't count the 4th album by PT, The Incident, because by that time Wilson's mind had moved on and away. 

(3) The third incarnation of KC may have retained some of the DNA of the earlier band, but received a massive  blood transfusion (+ Belew, - Wetton). This opened the door to the Projekcts phase - for better of worse. I believe Wilson is undergoing the same transformation right now.

Now, as to Wilson's personality: he does come across as a self-important, arrogant person. If you watched the GAYD DVD: during the intro, he thrusts himself onto the stage and promptly strikes the "Cristo Redentor atop Corcovado" pose. It's like saying, 'I come to redeem My flock from the demons of Katy Purry and Justin Beaver'. He proceeds to exorcise the demons by making his peculiar  hand gestures right in front of the musicians' faces. I said to my wife, 'Gee, if Wilson did that to me, I might punch him right into his pallid face'. She replied, 'That's probably what Niko did, for which he got fired'.    








Edited by Argonaught - November 23 2012 at 09:04
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 27956
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 18 2012 at 01:42
I don't think either bands are copies of anything. This thread is completely redundant. You pays your money and takes your choice and individual taste plays a big part in that decision.
Back to Top
DisgruntledPorcupine View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2010
Location: Thunder Bay CAN
Status: Offline
Points: 4395
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 17 2012 at 19:48
I can't find a single KC element in any PT song ever written. PF I understand a bit. There's a difference between influence, and being a rehash of the past. SW makes a good point, while he might have been extreme with his wording, it's valid nonetheless.
Back to Top
javier0889 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 21 2010
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 170
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2012 at 18:10
For one time I was lazy and didn't read all the pages, but still, Steven, I love you and all, but you can't say those things when your music is clearly ctrl c+ctrl v from Pink Floyd and King Crimson albums.
I guess if TFK is 1972, then SW is 1974....?
http://www.last.fm/user/javier0889
Back to Top
M27Barney View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2006
Location: Swinton M27
Status: Offline
Points: 3136
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2012 at 13:45
And if Roj says I'm a fan-boy then I am going to throw my wifes knickers at Stolte during the next tour of GB.......
Back to Top
M27Barney View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2006
Location: Swinton M27
Status: Offline
Points: 3136
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2012 at 13:41
Originally posted by Roj M30 Roj M30 wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by Roj M30 Roj M30 wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

^ in what way though?
 
I'm sure you said you have their albums.  I know you have or have heard the new one as I have seen your curmudgeonly review of it.  You don't need anybody to tell you how they have evolved.  You are a symphonic prog fan and you have a pair of ears.  Listen to The Flower King, then Flower Power, then Unfold The Future then the new one.  If you can't hear the changes in this band throughout their career, well........I'll rest my case.
 
This is from a fan who feels they were at their very best in those early years.  A largely instrumental band with a heavy leaning towards jamming, however a lot of ambient music too as well as blues and psychedelia.  Garden of Dreams is unlike anything I have ever heard. 
I'm interested in the fans views though. I'm not a fan of the TFK (although I have 5 albums inc Unfold The Future) and find it actually quite hard to listen to their music. However I am also having a struggle with Anglagard's latest which feels like an inferior version of what they've done before and also dislike Glass Hammers 'If' more than Banks Of Eden although I really like that band a lot and would count myself a fan.
I like music to make sense. Composition is very important to me and I find the majority of TFK not particularly interesting compositionally and there is precious little else to draw me in. The latest album has some excellent drumming and is well produced but not much else grabs me. However I may change my view in the future , who knows? As is said earlier I intend to keep the albums , they havn't been consigned to a draw or put out of sight. I may still play them but generally there are loads of other things I would rather listen to ,whether symphonic or not (prog wise).
 
That's fair comment.  Definitely keep them.  There's a friend of mine who listened to Flower Power a couple of times, hated it and threw it in the drawer!  Now a couple of years down the line he is a TFK fanboy LOL.
 
I am a fan of Glass Hammer too.  Whilst I like "If" and still listen to it occasionally, with Davison sounding so like Anderson I can't help but feel they're a bit too close to the bone.  I don't have Cor Cordium yet, and I know there's a new one out soon.  I'll get them both but expect more of If, although I'll keep an open mind.  I'd much rather a return to the days of Lex Rex if I'm honest.  That is a great album.
Eh? That was me that was - and I didn't actualy "Hate" Flower Power when I first heard it - But I bought "Flower Power" in one of my famous prog Offensives (in otherwords - just earned a lot of money) - and I purchased FP along with about 25-30 other CD's - all from different bands - and I was dissapointed with a few of them - and listened to FP disc 1 - with my ears expecting something I didn't get.....I only liked the early instrumental bit of GOD - then it semed to meander..so this CD got placed in the collection and sort of forgotten - then I got SWA - and the title track blew me away - so then I tuned in - and listened to GOD again and it started to grow....and grow.....FK were like Yes - I didn't like at first but then I suddenly "got it"......And back to the whole jist of this thresd - Me and Roj stayed at Steve's houe in Hemel Hemstead - when he was just starting out......he's an excellent guitarist but he can't touch Stolte - for playing nor composition.....
Back to Top
theadolescentprogger View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: March 23 2012
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 88
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2012 at 13:04
Well, having heard very little Porcupine Tree, I'm not really qualified to say, but having recently heard "The Flower King", I'm giving this one to Roine. But I wouldn't really call Radiohead Prog, just well composed Alt. Rock.
Back to Top
Clepsydra View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 494
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 04 2012 at 21:16
I prefer TFK much more than the drab PT.........
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2012 at 13:46
Originally posted by Any Colour You Like Any Colour You Like wrote:

Wait, what?


Exactly.  Still, lol.
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 27956
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2012 at 01:39
Originally posted by Roj M30 Roj M30 wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by Roj M30 Roj M30 wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

^ in what way though?
 
I'm sure you said you have their albums.  I know you have or have heard the new one as I have seen your curmudgeonly review of it.  You don't need anybody to tell you how they have evolved.  You are a symphonic prog fan and you have a pair of ears.  Listen to The Flower King, then Flower Power, then Unfold The Future then the new one.  If you can't hear the changes in this band throughout their career, well........I'll rest my case.
 
This is from a fan who feels they were at their very best in those early years.  A largely instrumental band with a heavy leaning towards jamming, however a lot of ambient music too as well as blues and psychedelia.  Garden of Dreams is unlike anything I have ever heard. 
I'm interested in the fans views though. I'm not a fan of the TFK (although I have 5 albums inc Unfold The Future) and find it actually quite hard to listen to their music. However I am also having a struggle with Anglagard's latest which feels like an inferior version of what they've done before and also dislike Glass Hammers 'If' more than Banks Of Eden although I really like that band a lot and would count myself a fan.
I like music to make sense. Composition is very important to me and I find the majority of TFK not particularly interesting compositionally and there is precious little else to draw me in. The latest album has some excellent drumming and is well produced but not much else grabs me. However I may change my view in the future , who knows? As is said earlier I intend to keep the albums , they havn't been consigned to a draw or put out of sight. I may still play them but generally there are loads of other things I would rather listen to ,whether symphonic or not (prog wise).
 
That's fair comment.  Definitely keep them.  There's a friend of mine who listened to Flower Power a couple of times, hated it and threw it in the drawer!  Now a couple of years down the line he is a TFK fanboy LOL.
 
I am a fan of Glass Hammer too.  Whilst I like "If" and still listen to it occasionally, with Davison sounding so like Anderson I can't help but feel they're a bit too close to the bone.  I don't have Cor Cordium yet, and I know there's a new one out soon.  I'll get them both but expect more of If, although I'll keep an open mind.  I'd much rather a return to the days of Lex Rex if I'm honest.  That is a great album.
Yep Lex Rex is great although my favourite is The Inconsolable Secret. They took a bit of chance with the second disc and I think it paid off (although many would disagree which is fair enough , one man's meat etc)


Edited by richardh - September 27 2012 at 01:41
Back to Top
Roj View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Manchester, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 26 2012 at 02:59
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by Roj M30 Roj M30 wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

^ in what way though?
 
I'm sure you said you have their albums.  I know you have or have heard the new one as I have seen your curmudgeonly review of it.  You don't need anybody to tell you how they have evolved.  You are a symphonic prog fan and you have a pair of ears.  Listen to The Flower King, then Flower Power, then Unfold The Future then the new one.  If you can't hear the changes in this band throughout their career, well........I'll rest my case.
 
This is from a fan who feels they were at their very best in those early years.  A largely instrumental band with a heavy leaning towards jamming, however a lot of ambient music too as well as blues and psychedelia.  Garden of Dreams is unlike anything I have ever heard. 
I'm interested in the fans views though. I'm not a fan of the TFK (although I have 5 albums inc Unfold The Future) and find it actually quite hard to listen to their music. However I am also having a struggle with Anglagard's latest which feels like an inferior version of what they've done before and also dislike Glass Hammers 'If' more than Banks Of Eden although I really like that band a lot and would count myself a fan.
I like music to make sense. Composition is very important to me and I find the majority of TFK not particularly interesting compositionally and there is precious little else to draw me in. The latest album has some excellent drumming and is well produced but not much else grabs me. However I may change my view in the future , who knows? As is said earlier I intend to keep the albums , they havn't been consigned to a draw or put out of sight. I may still play them but generally there are loads of other things I would rather listen to ,whether symphonic or not (prog wise).
 
That's fair comment.  Definitely keep them.  There's a friend of mine who listened to Flower Power a couple of times, hated it and threw it in the drawer!  Now a couple of years down the line he is a TFK fanboy LOL.
 
I am a fan of Glass Hammer too.  Whilst I like "If" and still listen to it occasionally, with Davison sounding so like Anderson I can't help but feel they're a bit too close to the bone.  I don't have Cor Cordium yet, and I know there's a new one out soon.  I'll get them both but expect more of If, although I'll keep an open mind.  I'd much rather a return to the days of Lex Rex if I'm honest.  That is a great album.
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 27956
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 26 2012 at 01:49
Originally posted by Roj M30 Roj M30 wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

^ in what way though?
 
I'm sure you said you have their albums.  I know you have or have heard the new one as I have seen your curmudgeonly review of it.  You don't need anybody to tell you how they have evolved.  You are a symphonic prog fan and you have a pair of ears.  Listen to The Flower King, then Flower Power, then Unfold The Future then the new one.  If you can't hear the changes in this band throughout their career, well........I'll rest my case.
 
This is from a fan who feels they were at their very best in those early years.  A largely instrumental band with a heavy leaning towards jamming, however a lot of ambient music too as well as blues and psychedelia.  Garden of Dreams is unlike anything I have ever heard. 
I'm interested in the fans views though. I'm not a fan of the TFK (although I have 5 albums inc Unfold The Future) and find it actually quite hard to listen to their music. However I am also having a struggle with Anglagard's latest which feels like an inferior version of what they've done before and also dislike Glass Hammers 'If' more than Banks Of Eden although I really like that band a lot and would count myself a fan.
I like music to make sense. Composition is very important to me and I find the majority of TFK not particularly interesting compositionally and there is precious little else to draw me in. The latest album has some excellent drumming and is well produced but not much else grabs me. However I may change my view in the future , who knows? As is said earlier I intend to keep the albums , they havn't been consigned to a draw or put out of sight. I may still play them but generally there are loads of other things I would rather listen to ,whether symphonic or not (prog wise).
Back to Top
Roj View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Manchester, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 25 2012 at 03:05
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

^ in what way though?
 
I'm sure you said you have their albums.  I know you have or have heard the new one as I have seen your curmudgeonly review of it.  You don't need anybody to tell you how they have evolved.  You are a symphonic prog fan and you have a pair of ears.  Listen to The Flower King, then Flower Power, then Unfold The Future then the new one.  If you can't hear the changes in this band throughout their career, well........I'll rest my case.
 
This is from a fan who feels they were at their very best in those early years.  A largely instrumental band with a heavy leaning towards jamming, however a lot of ambient music too as well as blues and psychedelia.  Garden of Dreams is unlike anything I have ever heard. 
Back to Top
zeqexes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 19 2012
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1238
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2012 at 23:09
Originally posted by CryoftheCarrots CryoftheCarrots wrote:

16 pages of a totally pointless argument over who is righter than who !!!!!
The interview in question is f**king years old !!! Who gives a toss what they thought back then. Both artists whom I love and respect unconditionally have moved on. Steven and Roine BOTH play on Steve Hacketts new Genesis Revisited 2 cd. Move on people.

You're so right. It's so pointless arguing, they're both very different. And even if they were similar, arguing would still be stupid because all it would do is make people angry. Both Wilson and Stolt are allowed to have their own opinion, and their opinion is just as 'right' as anyone's.
Back to Top
Daggor View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 26 2011
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 12
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2012 at 22:14
Maybe I only thought of it because I am a raving lunatic of a Bigelf fanboy, but did anyone else catch the irony in SW's statement given the fact that the last band to tour with Porcupine Tree is completely and apologetically derivative of 70s prog and 70s rock?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 19>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.281 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.