Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Topjukes
Forum Newbie
Joined: November 13 2009
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 9
|
Posted: November 08 2012 at 19:04 |
Here at Plane Groovy we've released a number of Prog albums on heavyweight vinyl - with universally positive feedback. The really heartening aspect of this is that, having listened to our releases, people are then going back and revisiting their old vinyl collections - in a hugely positive way. This makes me very happy!
|
www.planegroovy.com - for the music you always wanted to hear on vinyl!
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: November 08 2012 at 09:58 |
Catcher10 wrote:
But I do listen to both, although having the luxury of growing up more with the older prog, of course to me that will always be the preference....and of course on vinyl  |
Is that a luxury? I grew up with Prog, I also grew up with the Beat explosion of the 60s and I grew up with synth pop of the 80s - I'm 55 and I'm still growing up. If just one artist is being innovative and creative in any given time period or any given era then surely that is enough, that is the real luxury, not the media you hear it on, but the artist that makes you sit up and listen. Look back to 100-400 years ago and the literally thousands of classical composers that were producing scores and manuscripts for sonatas, concertos and symphonies that no one today will ever hear, even those like Louis Spohr who aren't part of the Now That's What I Call Classical Music #34 swathe of popular classics that passes for "Classical Music" now-a-days are reduced to being a side-note of passing interest to a select few. No one alive today had the "luxury" of growing up with that music, and since the only means of recording that music was by pen and ink, few will ever hear it. And it wasn't that much different 40 years ago when we had the "luxury" of only hearing the music that the likes of Tony Stratton Smith or Richard Branson decide we should hear and all those thousands of bands who failed to get a recording contract are now lost forever just because the music they were creating failed to impress one of maybe 100 people involved in signing bands to the few record labels that existed back then. And that was a crap situation regardless of how nostalgic you are or how darkly hued your rose-tinted spectacles are. Now we get to hear everyone who ever made a noise that can be called music if we care to listen. That is the greatest luxury that digital recording can offer us - it removes the power from the record labels and the recording studios to dictate to us what we should listen to and what we can listen to. And only digital media can do this for us - sure a few people have the "luxury" of recording onto antique analogue equipment and then paying to have someone master that onto acetate for a limited production run of a few hundred vinyls, but for the rest of the aspiring musicians out there, (who are not as untalented or creatively vacuous as some would have us believe), digital recording, digital media and digital delivery/distribution has opened the magic box of earthly delights. And that is a luxury I will treasure for the rest of the time I spend on this planet growing up.
Edited by Dean - November 08 2012 at 10:00
|
What?
|
 |
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17990
|
Posted: November 08 2012 at 09:26 |
Surrealist wrote:
Progressive Rock music has been in decline since the late 1970's. While there have been splashes of interesting things things from time to time.. I don't think I have yet to hear a contemporary prog band that has released something that has had the impact of the greats of the golden age.
I blame a lot of this on production. Not for lack of it.. but more the opposite. Too much. The digital age has not helped this at all... both sonically and giving the artists the easy way out. Instead of having the grind it out... and practice, they can just manipulate the tracks after the fact in Pro Tools etc.
The general public isn't impressed by a drummer who can actually play complex patterns in real time because all bands now... even pop bands have their releases homogenized by the engineers and producers who use quantization software on the rhythm section as standard protocol prior to mixing. Carl Palmer, Bruford, Allan White, John Weathers etc didn't have that luxury.
Prog has shifted in general toward Metal Prog which really is a separate genre of music completely. Metal must be heavy for it to be metal.. and heavy drumming is not prog drumming just because it is in odd metering. The great prog drummers used the entire spectrum, and ALL of them had good jazz chops also. They could play in the pocket.. they could articulate jazz coloring, and of course drive it home in a heavy way when needed.. but with a certain amount of restraint as far as the overall content of an album.
|
There is some merit here........
Dean wrote:
Progressive Rock has been in decline since the mid-70s. Production has got nothing to do with it. If you don't like modern Prog then fine, you don't like modern Prog. If you don't like modern production then fine, you don't like modern production. The Prog Metal connection is completely irrelevant since that is a merely a sub-set of modern Prog, there is plenty of modern prog out there thart has no Metal connection, and there is metal out there that has a jazz connection - none of these in themselves can be used to explain your distain. Good modern drummers aren't that hard to find, for example Gavin Harrison can knock-out complex polyrhythms and polymeters and (more importantly) knows the difference between them, all you need is articulated ears to hear them.
|
...and there is some merit here.
I would not take either as black and white. Mid 70s, late 70s, I agree somewhere in there it changed, for the worse or better is matter of opinion. I think it did progress into what it is now, electronica seems to be the big influence on what we here now. A lot of "electronica" and experimentation went into DSOtM, I think a lot of bands tried to follow that path and many probably still try to....Maybe not, I have no idea what an artist is thinking as they write, record, produce a new album. I think the ones that are still around probably draw off their own influence...they try to better what they did the last time rather than do what another band had done.
Its easy for me to say I like the whole package of older prog, back in the analog days. But I am very, very picky on what I tend to migrate to in the new prog, digital age....Its different, sounds different, looks different, tastes different...
But I do listen to both, although having the luxury of growing up more with the older prog, of course to me that will always be the preference....and of course on vinyl 
|
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: November 05 2012 at 13:32 |
|
What?
|
 |
progbethyname
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 30 2012
Location: HiFi Headmania
Status: Offline
Points: 7868
|
Posted: November 05 2012 at 13:07 |
Guldbamsen wrote:
Well just because one prefers analogue to digital doesn't necessarily mean that others have their ears sown on backwards.I prefer vinyl - and in many cases I prefer analogue instruments to digital, but I won't sit here and say that I have anything real to base my opinion on. Personally, I feel that IQ's Frequency would have benefited immensely from a real piano and some analogue keys, but maybe that has something to do with the end production of the thing. Again, I don't pretend to know anything about this, but I still maintain that Frequency would have been a far warmer and vibrant album had these things roamed the way I would've liked them to. How's that for (anti)proof?  Who said something about ranting?  |
Interesting opinion. Well I would like to hear what that would sound like. FREQUENCY is a terrific album.
|
Gimmie my headphones now!!! 🎧🤣
|
 |
progbethyname
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 30 2012
Location: HiFi Headmania
Status: Offline
Points: 7868
|
Posted: November 05 2012 at 13:04 |
Guldbamsen wrote:
Dean wrote:
I never made such a clam....  |
Fixed. |
Agreed.
|
Gimmie my headphones now!!! 🎧🤣
|
 |
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin
Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
|
Posted: November 05 2012 at 12:58 |
timothy leary wrote:
^ There you go with that ear surgery stuff again. |
So I've got a thing for ears. I'm a sick man, trust me I know
|
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams
|
 |
timothy leary
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
|
Posted: November 05 2012 at 12:53 |
^ There you go with that ear surgery stuff again.
|
 |
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin
Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
|
Posted: November 05 2012 at 12:51 |
Dean wrote:
I never made such a clam....  |
Fixed.
|
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams
|
 |
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin
Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
|
Posted: November 05 2012 at 12:51 |
Well just because one prefers analogue to digital doesn't necessarily mean that others have their ears sown on backwards.
I prefer vinyl - and in many cases I prefer analogue instruments to digital, but I won't sit here and say that I have anything real to base my opinion on. Personally, I feel that IQ's Frequency would have benefited immensely from a real piano and some analogue keys, but maybe that has something to do with the end production of the thing. Again, I don't pretend to know anything about this, but I still maintain that Frequency would have been a far warmer and vibrant album had these things roamed the way I would've liked them to. How's that for (anti)proof?  Who said something about ranting? 
|
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: November 05 2012 at 12:46 |
 I never made such a claim....
|
What?
|
 |
progbethyname
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 30 2012
Location: HiFi Headmania
Status: Offline
Points: 7868
|
Posted: November 05 2012 at 12:43 |
I just tried out a new sound recording format when importing my CDs onto my I pod. I went with 16 bit 47.1khz. It sounds just as good as the 24bit. Can't tell the difference. You were right DEAN!!! Anyway. Usually the standard for at is 16/44.1, but this sound Format (WIFF) is 16/47.1. I guess the extra 3 point frequency boost makes a sh*t load of difference! Really cleans up old recordings very very well. Ahhh the importance of digital sound.
|
Gimmie my headphones now!!! 🎧🤣
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: November 05 2012 at 11:17 |
I agree Ian, it's one mouth-foaming rant too many. When argument fails then insulting anyone who disagrees is a not the way to put across any points that people will be willing to take notice of. Time to move on.
|
What?
|
 |
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: November 05 2012 at 11:12 |
Well now you are just insulting those who don't agree with you.
|
|
 |
Surrealist
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 12 2012
Location: Squonk
Status: Offline
Points: 232
|
Posted: November 05 2012 at 11:06 |
I could not agree with you more, it was & is, a significant factor. Some
weeks ago I bought a copy of Gentle Giant - In a Glass House on 180gm
vinyl & it sounds nothing like my original U K. copy. Gone are the
spacial qualities, seperation & dynamic range of the original, it is
a louder & puchier, with the rythm section pushed so far forward
in the mix & the rest of instuments so crouded, that I couldn't
listen to it.. On examination, in small print on the back cover, I found
the reason ''Re-Mastered from the Original1/4 inch tapes 2010".
To me it's so obvious what has been going on.. and just reading most of the responses here from other posters just shows how they have all swallowed the digital hype and then try to justify it with incomplete science. It's like trying to talk to the zombies in "Night of the Living Dead" Everyone is dead.. their ears are dead, their gear is dead, the medium they listen to is dead. The bands are dead, and their fans are dead.
I always laugh at the endless arguments about "What is progressive rock?" The typical silly argument is that it has to be "progressing" WRONG. It's a genre with it's own bricks and mortar and rules. If it had to be progressing then it would HAVE to be moving into "electronica" to keep up with the times.
Classical music has a bricks and mortar protocol as does jazz, reggae, country, techno, etc.
While progressive rock has the least amount of rules... it still has rules..
What classic prog band didn't use analog synths? Both acoustic and electric guitars, experiment in odd meter performed by top shelf musicians who usually had some formal training at least somewhere in the band? The great bands had members who could actually sing, and none of the great bands ever digitally manipulated their music before the first pressing of the album...
Every great prog guitarist knew who Wes Montgomery was. Every prog drummer knew Buddy Rich was God. Anyone ever taking a prog solo had a copy of "Bitches Brew" in their album collection. Every great prog band knew that prog didn't start with St Pepper.
"The Musical Box" is drawing better than Genesis did doing "Lamb" today. What does that tell you. A LOT! Pretty much says it all.
|
 |
Aquiring the Taste
Forum Groupie
Joined: October 23 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 68
|
Posted: November 04 2012 at 03:38 |
Surrealist wrote:
Progressive Rock music has been in decline since the late 1970's. While there have been splashes of interesting things things from time to time.. I don't think I have yet to hear a contemporary prog band that has released something that has had the impact of the greats of the golden age.
I blame a lot of this on production. Not for lack of it.. but more the opposite. Too much. The digital age has not helped this at all... both sonically and giving the artists the easy way out. Instead of having the grind it out... and practice, they can just manipulate the tracks after the fact in Pro Tools etc.
The general public isn't impressed by a drummer who can actually play complex patterns in real time because all bands now... even pop bands have their releases homogenized by the engineers and producers who use quantization software on the rhythm section as standard protocol prior to mixing. Carl Palmer, Bruford, Allan White, John Weathers etc didn't have that luxury.
Prog has shifted in general toward Metal Prog which really is a separate genre of music completely. Metal must be heavy for it to be metal.. and heavy drumming is not prog drumming just because it is in odd metering. The great prog drummers used the entire spectrum, and ALL of them had good jazz chops also. They could play in the pocket.. they could articulate jazz coloring, and of course drive it home in a heavy way when needed.. but with a certain amount of restraint as far as the overall content of an album.
|
I could not agree with you more, it was & is, a significant factor. Some
weeks ago I bought a copy of Gentle Giant - In a Glass House on 180gm
vinyl & it sounds nothing like my original U K. copy. Gone are the
spacial qualities, seperation & dynamic range of the original, it is
a louder & puchier, with the rythm section pushed so far forward
in the mix & the rest of instuments so crouded, that I couldn't
listen to it.. On examination, in small print on the back cover, I found
the reason ''Re-Mastered from the Original1/4 inch tapes 2010".
|
 |
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: November 03 2012 at 22:20 |
Surrealist wrote:
Prog has shifted in general toward Metal Prog which really is a separate genre of music completely. Metal must be heavy for it to be metal.. and heavy drumming is not prog drumming just because it is in odd metering. The great prog drummers used the entire spectrum, and ALL of them had good jazz chops also. They could play in the pocket.. they could articulate jazz coloring, and of course drive it home in a heavy way when needed.. but with a certain amount of restraint as far as the overall content of an album.
|
You have obviously never heard Pain of Salvation, especially 12:5.
|
 |
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Online
Points: 18169
|
Posted: November 03 2012 at 17:11 |
Dean wrote:
Progressive Rock has been in decline since the mid-70s. Production has got nothing to do with it. If you don't like modern Prog then fine, you don't like modern Prog. If you don't like modern production then fine, you don't like modern production. The Prog Metal connection is completely irrelevant since that is a merely a sub-set of modern Prog, there is plenty of modern prog out there thart has no Metal connection, and there is metal out there that has a jazz connection - none of these in themselves can be used to explain your distain. Good modern drummers aren't that hard to find, for example Gavin Harrison can knock-out complex polyrhythms and polymeters and (more importantly) knows the difference between them, all you need is articulated ears to hear them. |
I just picked up that Bill Bruford DVD about "The Beat" ... what a fantastic drum lesson that is ... and one of the nicest tricks .... it's the same thing ... on different drums and it sounds totally different! Yeah ... check out his comment about the left hand, too!
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: November 03 2012 at 13:59 |
Progressive Rock has been in decline since the mid-70s. Production has got nothing to do with it. If you don't like modern Prog then fine, you don't like modern Prog. If you don't like modern production then fine, you don't like modern production. The Prog Metal connection is completely irrelevant since that is a merely a sub-set of modern Prog, there is plenty of modern prog out there thart has no Metal connection, and there is metal out there that has a jazz connection - none of these in themselves can be used to explain your distain. Good modern drummers aren't that hard to find, for example Gavin Harrison can knock-out complex polyrhythms and polymeters and (more importantly) knows the difference between them, all you need is articulated ears to hear them.
|
What?
|
 |
Surrealist
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 12 2012
Location: Squonk
Status: Offline
Points: 232
|
Posted: November 03 2012 at 13:27 |
Progressive Rock music has been in decline since the late 1970's. While there have been splashes of interesting things things from time to time.. I don't think I have yet to hear a contemporary prog band that has released something that has had the impact of the greats of the golden age.
I blame a lot of this on production. Not for lack of it.. but more the opposite. Too much. The digital age has not helped this at all... both sonically and giving the artists the easy way out. Instead of having the grind it out... and practice, they can just manipulate the tracks after the fact in Pro Tools etc.
The general public isn't impressed by a drummer who can actually play complex patterns in real time because all bands now... even pop bands have their releases homogenized by the engineers and producers who use quantization software on the rhythm section as standard protocol prior to mixing. Carl Palmer, Bruford, Allan White, John Weathers etc didn't have that luxury.
Prog has shifted in general toward Metal Prog which really is a separate genre of music completely. Metal must be heavy for it to be metal.. and heavy drumming is not prog drumming just because it is in odd metering. The great prog drummers used the entire spectrum, and ALL of them had good jazz chops also. They could play in the pocket.. they could articulate jazz coloring, and of course drive it home in a heavy way when needed.. but with a certain amount of restraint as far as the overall content of an album.
|
 |