| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
jean-marie 
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 27 2010
Location: FRANCE
Status: Offline
Points: 2585
|
 Posted: August 20 2011 at 18:58 |
Beatles by far but i love the Stones too 
|
 |
Bonnek
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 01 2009
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 4515
|
Posted: August 22 2011 at 05:51 |
The Stones so easily. Don't like Britpop
|
|
Hober Mallow
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 26 2011
Location: Everywhere
Status: Offline
Points: 178
|
Posted: August 25 2011 at 11:04 |
Never really liked the stones
|
|
“When Fortuna spins you downward, go out to a movie and get more out of life.” John Kennedy Toole
|
|
The Bearded Bard
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: January 24 2012
Location: Behind the Sun
Status: Offline
Points: 12859
|
Posted: May 03 2012 at 13:38 |
^Me neither.
 Snow Dog wrote:
Beatles every time for me. |
Edited by The Bearded Bard - May 03 2012 at 13:39
|
|
|
|
The-Winkler
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 30 2012
Location: Harlow newtown
Status: Offline
Points: 125
|
Posted: May 03 2012 at 13:56 |
|
They both switched places in my favour over the years....at the moment its The Beatles and tbh i can't ever see that changing again
|
|
Dayvenkirq
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
|
Posted: May 03 2012 at 14:21 |
The Bearded Bard wrote:
^Me neither.
Snow Dog wrote:
Beatles every time for me. |
|
All of the above.
|
|
Progosopher
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 12 2009
Location: Coolwood
Status: Offline
Points: 6467
|
Posted: May 03 2012 at 21:19 |
Personally, I find this funny because there is no question, nor has there ever been for me, that the Beatles are far better than the stones. 
|
|
The world of sound is certainly capable of infinite variety and, were our sense developed, of infinite extensions. -- George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty"
|
|
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13063
|
Posted: May 03 2012 at 21:36 |
The Stones had a run of some absolutely great albums ( Beggar's Banquet, Sticky Fingers, Get Your Ya-Ya's Out, Exile on Main Street), but their catalog is riddled with less than stellar releases as well. In context with the era, The Beatles were uniformly brilliant. You have to feel a little sad for the Stones, though. Throughout the 60s they were always in The Beatles' shadow. Then The Beatles quit, and what happens? Along comes Led Zeppelin. 
|
|
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
|
|
spknoevl
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 14 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 296
|
Posted: May 04 2012 at 07:27 |
|
I think the Stones might have benefitted more if they'd quit in their prime instead of becoming a sad reflection of their former selves. They were a great band in their day, but now the name conjures up images of the cryptkeeper-like faces of Mick and Keef as they sleepwalk their way through another sloppy set of classic tunes accompanied by an every growing army of sidemen.
|
|
http://martinwebb.bandcamp.com
The notes are just an interesting way to get from one silence to the next - Mick Gooderick
|
|
geneyesontle
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 14 2012
Location: Quebec
Status: Offline
Points: 1266
|
Posted: May 04 2012 at 16:53 |
|
By very very very very far The Beatles. I don't like so much The Stones. It's like comparing Genesis (Peter Gabriel days) to ABBA
|
|
Poseidon wants to Acquire the Taste of the Fragile Lamb
- Derek Adrian Gabriel Anderson, singer of the band Geneyesontle
|
|
mongofa
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 26 2011
Location: Zanzibar
Status: Offline
Points: 410
|
Posted: May 05 2012 at 17:19 |
|
Quarry
Edited by mongofa - May 05 2012 at 17:19
|
|
|
|
jude111
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 20 2009
Location: Not Here
Status: Offline
Points: 1754
|
Posted: May 06 2012 at 03:42 |
Wow, no love for the Stones? Okay, the Beatles wrote the songbook. But who can listen to it fresh? Even as a pre-pubescent child, it already sounded worn. Yeah, I went through a Beatles phase at 13; it was over at about 14 or 15. It's great stuff, there's no denyin' it.
But The Stones, though. Wow. BEGGAR'S BANQUET, LET IT BLEED, STICKY FINGERS, EXILE ON MAIN STREET. Even at their lowest, they were still writing songs like "Fool to Cry" and "Angie." And just when you think they were over, out comes TATTOO YOU, SOME GIRLS and EMOTIONAL RESCUE. (Admittedly, I stopped after those.) Listening to BEGGAR'S BANQUET is like listening to Robert Johnson or something. It's more than music, it's an attitude.
There have been tons of Beatles imitators that followed in their wakes. I could play you at least 20 songs where your first reaction might be, "Is that McCartney singing?" But who else sounds like the Stones? The New York Dolls, maybe...
The Beatles, in retrospect, were white bread. The Stones, though, were rock, blues, glam, punk, funk - a black band in Edgar suits (MiB, lol).
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: May 06 2012 at 04:52 |
jude111 wrote:
There have been tons of Beatles imitators that followed in their wakes. I could play you at least 20 songs where your first reaction might be, "Is that McCartney singing?" But who else sounds like the Stones? The New York Dolls, maybe...
|
Eh, practically every 'gritty' hard rock band, be they authentic or wannabe, is heavily influenced by Rolling Stones. Starting with Aerosmith. Yes, they may be a pale version of the Stones but so are most if not all Beatles imitators.
|
|
Svetonio
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
|
Posted: May 06 2012 at 05:07 |
|
The Stones
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
the beatles vs the rolling stones
