Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Emulating Classic Prog Is Not Prog
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedEmulating Classic Prog Is Not Prog

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 20212223>
Author
Message
Nick Dilley View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 31 2012
Location: Mordor
Status: Offline
Points: 173
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 20 2012 at 12:04
Originally posted by ProgressToChange ProgressToChange wrote:

There is a difference between being influenced by something and being an exact duplicate of it (regardless of variable arrangements).

Examples, Tool is influenced by King Crimson, but sound utterly different from them. Porcupine tree are 'influenced by' Pink floyd but sound utterly different from them (at least their last few albums).

What makes me tune out completely are bands that sound like a fascimile of  Genesis, Yes, Floyd or any of those core bands that emanated from the 'original' movement.

In my opinion it shows a complete lack of regard for genuine necessity of innovation on both the emotional and the technical level.

Some bands I think are completely innovative outside of the 70s 'core' groups in their approach to what we define as the 'progressive' or experimental sub-genre:

Devil Doll (what band does this one sound like? Really.)

Ruins (This is the ultimate 'progressive' band IMO, even though they are expressively influenced by Magma, they sound completely different than Magma in that they manage to take it 5 steps further with only bass, drums and the occasional guitar)

Bark Psychosis (instead of explain why I think they are amazing, I will simply provide a clip).



The sound of animals fighting, another great modern progressive band who seem to arrive at the genuine article without trying to consciously sound like some classical 'prog' band. The Entire album titled 'The ocean and the sun' is totally amazing from beginning to end, if you prefer originality to bands who sound conspicuously like Genesis.



I want to mention the question of 'originality' here. I think the OP was not reticent in his mention of this, because what he seemed to be referring to was bands who manage to sound progressive without sounding either musically or vocally like Genesis, or any of the other 'classic' prog bands. So I think his/her take on this was quite formidable and cannot really be argued with.




All I meant was accuracy, that's it. I am basing that on live shows I've attended and videos of lives shows. But everything you said is basically what I meant. They know how to really use their voices! We are on the same page!
Back to Top
Nick Dilley View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 31 2012
Location: Mordor
Status: Offline
Points: 173
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 20 2012 at 12:06
whoops I quoted the wrong post! sorry! I meant to quote the one before the one I actually quoted...


but since I quoted this one...nice music! Thanks!
Back to Top
ProgressToChange View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 20 2012 at 12:43
The interesting thing is many of the 'progressive' bands I listen to have something emotionally in common with the less progressive music I listen to. I don't think technicality for the sake of it is always needed. I like emotion as much as I like technicality, but music cannot subsist without emotion. So I get sort of disenchanted with a lot of so called 'prog' when it lacks genuine emotion. I guess what i'm saying is it needs to be emotionally progressive as well.

Here is an example of a band I consider very 'emotionally progressive' despite whatever anybody else might think of them. This music deeply touches me in a way most cannot.




Edited by ProgressToChange - April 20 2012 at 12:46
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 21 2012 at 02:47
Originally posted by Nick Dilley Nick Dilley wrote:



All I meant was accuracy, that's it. I am basing that on live shows I've attended and videos of lives shows. But everything you said is basically what I meant. They know how to really use their voices! We are on the same page!


I haven't attended shows of either so I really cannot comment on that.  I have watched videos of their concerts and heard other live recordings and did not find accuracy to be a particularly unique aspect of Labrie's singing. He is more melodic than many other metal singers and that is probably the somewhat exaggerated views on his singing come from.  I also think Gilmour and Layne have/had better voices to begin with, and agree that they use(d) it better. 
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2012 at 11:10
Prog is always Progressive, this is clearly explained by Keith Emerson:

Quote "It is music that does progress. It takes an idea and develops it, rather than just repeat it. Pop songs are about repetition and riffs and simplicity. Progressive music takes a riff, turns it inside out, plays it upside down and the other way around, and explores its potential."

Keith Emerson

Some people here see progression as evolution in time, Emerson's definition is more radical, the progressive element is in the structure of each track, in the way the musician explores te potential of the song instead of repeating a riff over and over.

This simplifies it a bit, even if the music is almost a rip of any previous band, the Progressive element is in the structure.

Iván

            
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2012 at 11:22
^^^  But not a definition generally applied strictly....whether with regard to 70s prog or contemporary.   It is a great definition of prog but a rather demanding one.  
Back to Top
ProgressToChange View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2012 at 21:07
As long as people don't forget the emotional element, which is what musical is all about, I think technical exploration is good. But all too often a lot of these generic prog bands do just that. Opting to emulate Yes or genesis or crimson and completely foregoing what made all these bands great. The spiritual, emotional element. Which is another point about emulation. You cannot live vicariously through another persons emotions. It cheapens it and makes it seem fake. Wipe the slate clean and start fresh from a musical and emotional perspective and let the influences in subconsciously instead of so deliberately. That's what all the bands I posted above do. But make no mistake, there is only one Genesis, One pink floyd, One Yes and one Crimson. I personally ignore all imitators of these bands. 
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2012 at 22:00
Originally posted by ProgressToChange ProgressToChange wrote:

As long as people don't forget the emotional element, which is what musical is all about, I think technical exploration is good. But all too often a lot of these generic prog bands do just that. Opting to emulate Yes or genesis or crimson and completely foregoing what made all these bands great. The spiritual, emotional element. Which is another point about emulation. You cannot live vicariously through another persons emotions. It cheapens it and makes it seem fake. Wipe the slate clean and start fresh from a musical and emotional perspective and let the influences in subconsciously instead of so deliberately. That's what all the bands I posted above do. But make no mistake, there is only one Genesis, One pink floyd, One Yes and one Crimson. I personally ignore all imitators of these bands. 

Of course there's only one Genesis, one Yes, one pink Floyd, but there's also one Marillion, one Flower Kings, etc.
We are not talking about bands that COPIED the pioneers, w are talking about bands that captured a style and added their own emotions and lyrics.

Lets see three bands as an example:

  1. Fish's Marillion: People say they are almost Genesis clones (I don't think so), despite any similarity. their music is highly emotional and Fish was almost as good lyricist as Peter Gabriel
  2. Anglagard: it's obvious they have elements from King Crimson ad Genesis among others, but thheir music is unique.
  3. Triumvirat: Many accuse them of being ELP clones, yes they have clear influence but  IMO their albums as a trio (IoaDD and Spartacus) are superior to anything ELP did except maybe Trilogy, their arrangements are simply fantastic and they are oriented towards conceptual albums, something that ELP rarely did.

Now, if we talk  about bands as Starcastle or Unifaun that are simply Yes and Genesis clones, i don't give a damn for them, but very few can be considered clones.

Iván
            
Back to Top
twosteves View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 01 2007
Location: NYC/Rhinebeck
Status: Offline
Points: 4091
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2012 at 23:18
Originally posted by ProgressToChange ProgressToChange wrote:

As long as people don't forget the emotional element, which is what musical is all about, I think technical exploration is good. But all too often a lot of these generic prog bands do just that. Opting to emulate Yes or genesis or crimson and completely foregoing what made all these bands great. The spiritual, emotional element. Which is another point about emulation. You cannot live vicariously through another persons emotions. It cheapens it and makes it seem fake. Wipe the slate clean and start fresh from a musical and emotional perspective and let the influences in subconsciously instead of so deliberately. That's what all the bands I posted above do. But make no mistake, there is only one Genesis, One pink floyd, One Yes and one Crimson. I personally ignore all imitators of these bands. 

I agree----can not listen to groups that copy ----it's actually laughable to me when it's not sickening. Find your own voice in art or why bother?
Back to Top
dtguitarfan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 24 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Status: Offline
Points: 1708
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2012 at 05:09
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

^^^  But not a definition generally applied strictly....whether with regard to 70s prog or contemporary.   It is a great definition of prog but a rather demanding one.  

Progressive Rock IS demanding.
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2012 at 10:07
Originally posted by dtguitarfan dtguitarfan wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

^^^  But not a definition generally applied strictly....whether with regard to 70s prog or contemporary.   It is a great definition of prog but a rather demanding one.  

Progressive Rock IS demanding.


Maybe, but my point was many bands referred to as prog may not qualify under Emerson's definition.  It may be difficult to demonstrate that element of exploration in the more theatrical/artsy side of prog, for example.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2012 at 10:33
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by dtguitarfan dtguitarfan wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

^^^  But not a definition generally applied strictly....whether with regard to 70s prog or contemporary.   It is a great definition of prog but a rather demanding one.  

Progressive Rock IS demanding.


Maybe, but my point was many bands referred to as prog may not qualify under Emerson's definition.  It may be difficult to demonstrate that element of exploration in the more theatrical/artsy side of prog, for example.

By the contrary, you're adding one element more, the fusion in this cases is not only withinn different genres and influences, but also the artistical theatric element.

Plus remember, in order to create a theatrical act, you need elaborate lyrics that go beyond the usual "babe, babe babe i love you babe.

Take Genesis for example, the band created the Musical Box but the song alone makes little sense,. or at least 
doesn't show the richness of the concept

Quote Play me Old King ColeThat I may join with you,
All your hearts now seem so far from me
It hardly seems to matter now.

And the nurse will tell you lies
Of a kingdom beyond the skies.
But I am lost within this half-world,
It hardly seems to matter now.

(...)

You stand there with your fixed expression
Casting doubt on all I have to say.
Why don't you touch me, touch me,
Why don't you touch me, touch me,
Touch me now, now, now, now, now...

Credits: GABRIEL, PETER / BANKS, ANTHONY / COLLINS, PHIL / HACKETT, STEVEN / RUTHERFORD, MICHAEL

The Musical Box lyrics © EMI Music Publishing, CARLIN AMERICA INC, WINDSWEPT HOLDINGS LLC


It seems as pedophilia or a minors rape.

As you see, you don't capture the whole story, so Peter wrote a preface in the album that gave us more info:

Quote While Henry Hamilton-Smythe minor (8) was playing croquet with Cynthia Jane De Blaise-William (9), sweet-smiling Cynthia raised her mallet high and gracefully removed Henry's head. Two weeks later, in Henry's nursery, she discovered his treasured musical box. Eagerly she opened it and as "Old King Cole" began to play, a small spirit- figure appeared. Henry had returned - but not for long, for as he stood in the room his body began ageing rapidly, leaving a child's mind inside. A lifetime's desires surged through him. Unfortunately the attempt to persuade Cynthia Jane to fulfill his romantic desire led his nurse to the nursery to investigate the noise. Instinctively Nanny hurled the musical box at the bearded child, destroying both.

Credits: The Musical Box lyrics © EMI Music Publishing, CARLIN AMERICA INC, WINDSWEPT HOLDINGS LLC
 

But still people who didn't had the album or simply never read the preface, were lost, so he started to narrate the whole story  before the song on stage (Of course this helped the band to tune their only set of instruments without the uncomfortable silence):



If you notice, the theatrical plot created, is the one that gives sense to the song taking us back to the moment in which Henry is killed by Cynthia and forced to return to the Musical Box, even the Old Henry mask helped to understand the concept., it's a brilliant combination of music, literature and theatrics...What can be more Prog than that?

Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 25 2012 at 11:45
            
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2012 at 10:45
I didn't say it would be difficult to accommodate Genesis specifically in that definition.  Or for that matter, VDGG.  But not many theatrically oriented bands have the sophistication of either.  The underlying musical substance must evidence an element of exploration if we have to apply Emerson's definition strictly, a theatrical format by itself is not imo enough.  And lyrical exploration is a Pandora's Box.  By that token, any rock opera might be called a prog album...e.g Crimson Idol.  Whereas, rock opera is just one of many rock oriented formats that prog adapted and expanded on.  Genesis are not prog because they are theater, they just happened to make prog rock in a theatrical format. 

That by the way is just one of the constraints Emerson's definition places when applied to prog as the term is generally applied to bands.  The progginess of a multi-suite pastiche becomes dubious under such an approach.  


Edited by rogerthat - April 25 2012 at 10:47
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2012 at 10:51
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

 By that token, any rock opera might be called a prog album...e.g Crimson Idol.  Whereas, rock opera is just one of many rock oriented formats that prog adapted and expanded on.  Genesis are not prog because they are theater, they just happened to make prog rock in a theatrical format. 



Not quite, because the theatrics alone are not enough, you must also play Prog music.

There are many Rock Operas or conceptual albums that have no relation with Prog. But if you have a Prog band thatv uses theatrics to enhance the visual and musical experience, well, that's even better.

In the case of ELP, the music is Prog, but the theatrics are only part of the show (Don't affect the nature of the music for good nor bad), 

Remember, for many people it's boring to watch a two hours concert with three guys doing nothing on stage except play their instruments, people want a show.

Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 25 2012 at 10:54
            
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2012 at 10:57
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

 By that token, any rock opera might be called a prog album...e.g Crimson Idol.  Whereas, rock opera is just one of many rock oriented formats that prog adapted and expanded on.  Genesis are not prog because they are theater, they just happened to make prog rock in a theatrical format. 



Not quite, because the theatrics alone are not enough, you must also play Prog music.

There are many Rock Operas or conceptual albums that have no relation with Prog. But if you have a Prog band thatv uses theatrics to enhance the visual and musical experience, well, that's even better.

Iván


Well, we seem to be saying the same thing.  Genesis are prog because they are prog, not because they are theater.  On the other hand, as one looks for bands like Genesis and calls them prog, the theater element takes a precedence over the prog element of Genesis.  I am speaking of the practical application of the word prog here and how it conflicts with Emerson's definition, not what bands do qualify under such a definition.   It is not wrong to look for bands that are like Genesis and call them prog if they are such in a certain way because that is how bands are classified in many rock genres, but Emerson's definition doesn't easily accommodate the generally subjective, fuzzy manner in which we classify bands as prog. 
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2012 at 12:30
Unless you were one of the lucky few who saw Genesis play live with during that theatrical period then the stage spectacle (which was really just Gabriel in a costume and not that much of a spectacle) is irrelevant - just as whatever drama was created in a back-story to a piece of music didn't really make a great deal of difference to the music or anyone's understanding of the lyric. The theatricals were nothing more than stage presentation (as Gabriel said, there were such long gaps between songs as everyone retuned their instruments he had to do something to hold the audiences attention), and they did little to enhance the music - and certainly not on album, listening to it in the comfort of your sitting room. On stage theatrics were such a minor part of 70s Prog they are barely worth even mentioning, even while Floyd had flying pigs and crashing aircraft they were such a small part of the show, which was mainly four blokes stood on stage not doing very much while some lights flashed and a projector showed some synched pictures - even during the Wall not a great deal happened in the two hours show really, some roadies built a wall out of giant lego while eight blokes stood on stage not doing very much, and every once in a while there were some giant inflatable puppets that would sway around unconvincingly like Pinoccio in a mild draught then leave the stage. Don't get me wrong - it was a great show, but it wasn't theatre by a long stretch of the imagination. With Genesis, Yes, ELP, Floyd, Tull and all those other bands that put a little bit of effort into their stage show, that came after the event - their popularity grew solely on the reputation of the music, not the theatric spectacle - people (most of whom never saw the bands live) didn't buy the albums because of the live shows or the press reporting of the live shows, but because of the music.
What?
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2012 at 12:35
^Clap
Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13627
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2012 at 12:47
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Unless you were one of the lucky few who saw Genesis play live with during that theatrical period then the stage spectacle (which was really just Gabriel in a costume and not that much of a spectacle) is irrelevant - just as whatever drama was created in a back-story to a piece of music didn't really make a great deal of difference to the music or anyone's understanding of the lyric. The theatricals were nothing more than stage presentation (as Gabriel said, there were such long gaps between songs as everyone retuned their instruments he had to do something to hold the audiences attention), and they did little to enhance the music - and certainly not on album, listening to it in the comfort of your sitting room. On stage theatrics were such a minor part of 70s Prog they are barely worth even mentioning, even while Floyd had flying pigs and crashing aircraft they were such a small part of the show, which was mainly four blokes stood on stage not doing very much while some lights flashed and a projector showed some synched pictures - even during the Wall not a great deal happened in the two hours show really, some roadies built a wall out of giant lego while eight blokes stood on stage not doing very much, and every once in a while there were some giant inflatable puppets that would sway around unconvincingly like Pinoccio in a mild draught then leave the stage. Don't get me wrong - it was a great show, but it wasn't theatre by a long stretch of the imagination. With Genesis, Yes, ELP, Floyd, Tull and all those other bands that put a little bit of effort into their stage show, that came after the event - their popularity grew solely on the reputation of the music, not the theatric spectacle - people (most of whom never saw the bands live) didn't buy the albums because of the live shows or the press reporting of the live shows, but because of the music.

Superb post, every single word of which is absolutely spot on what really happened.
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
Gerinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2012 at 12:54
I don't care much about theatrics either, they can be nice when watching a concert but most of the times you enjoy music it will be on record. But a nice story or concept accompanying a song or album helps enhancing the purely musical listening experience, such as in The Lamb or Get'em Out by Friday.
 
As for the bands accused of being clones, my experience tells me that the more you listen to them the less you see them as clones. Give them a chance and many of them will reveal their own qualities. Take Citizen Cain for example, their album Somewhere But Yesterday sounds on first listen like a blatant Gabriel Genesis clone, but now it's one of my all-time favourite albums, the style and sound may be similar but the compositions and interpretations are great in their own right.
 
 
 
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2012 at 13:03
^Totally agree.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 20212223>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.