Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
DiamondDog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 15 2011
Location: Cambridge
Status: Offline
Points: 320
|
Posted: April 06 2012 at 03:02 |
For me, the most influential band in prog was King Crimson, but in terms of importance, 1-2-3 (Clouds) is impossible to calculate. It would be healthy if we could seriously discuss influential bands of the 80s 90s and 00s, but it seems the legacy of the past is difficult for more recent bands to shake off.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: April 05 2012 at 21:59 |
Vibrationbaby wrote:
Marillion is another band that everyone was comparing to Genesis and other dinosaur bands back in '83. I could never understand that. I can't see anything that the two bands have in common. marillion were just a band that became popular during an era where everybody was listening to new wave and top forty crap. I dunno. I think I'll just go and bash my head against the wall for a while. You guys read too much into prog when it's not really that complex at all.
|
I agree entirely. They were more influenced by Pink Floyd and Rush and this probably became even more evident once Fish left the band. He just sort of sounded like Gabriel a bit but the music didn't have a whole lot in common with Genesis. As for influence in the 70s, I think some Italian prog rock bands have cited ELP as a major influence. Triumvirat also mention ELP as an influence. The Canterbury bands influenced each other, but that is understandable because it was a smaller scene, with the musicians shuttling between bands. But I broadly agree that in the 70s, prog rock bands were influenced more by rock and classical music and less by other prog rock bands.
|
|
The_Jester
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 29 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 741
|
Posted: April 05 2012 at 17:47 |
I'd say Zappa too. He really had a big influence in music in general and, most particularly, in prog.
|
La victoire est éphémère mais la gloire est éternelle!
- Napoléon Bonaparte
|
|
Vibrationbaby
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
|
Posted: April 05 2012 at 09:39 |
OT Räihälä wrote:
Vibrationbaby wrote:
What about Nue!? nobody mentioned Nue! unless I'm going blind in my old age. They were copied by everyone from Hawkwind to Bowie.
|
Never heard of Nue! Can't be that big influence... unless you're talking about Neu! [neu] means [new] in German.
Edit:
Oh, and Moshkito: why do you always put three fullstops when one is enough? How can you afford so many? And have you thought about your carbon footprint? [Tongue in cheek mode off] It's a pain to read when there are one million needless fullstops.
|
Well excuse me. I think I know the meaning of the word. Anyway. If you listen to Opa-Loka off Hawkwind's Warrior On The Edge Of Time there is definitely some Neu ! influence. Lemmy even said it was drummers Alan Powell and Simon King's idea back in the seventies after he got sacked. I dunno I don't think prog bands were " influenced " by other prog bands except maybe offshoot bands like Flash. Maybe The Nice had some bearing on bands like Ekseption or Triumvirat but I don't even think that they were even listening to each other. I saw an interview with Ian Anderson back in the seventies and he came off to be only vaguely familiar with the music of Focus who occasionally could sound like JT because of Van Leer's flute. Progrock or art rock artists ( whatever you want to call them ) were influenced by other musicians outside of their early seventies phenomenom and there was a lot of original music happening back then where did bands like Gentle Giant, Gnidrolog, Egg or Soft machine find their roots? Not from prog bands Classical, medieval and Baroque composers ( particularily JS Bach ), rock groups from the sixties primarily the Beatles and jazzmen formed the core of their "influences. The movement was even dubbed " Baroque & Roll " by someone at some point I don't think any electric guitar player can honestly say that they weren' "influenced " to some extent by Hendrix really. I just don't think any band put in ad in Melody Maker that said something like : " Hey man, ELP copycat band looking for a cat who can play keyboards exactly like Emerson man". Marillion is another band that everyone was comparing to Genesis and other dinosaur bands back in '83. I could never understand that. I can't see anything that the two bands have in common. marillion were just a band that became popular during an era where everybody was listening to new wave and top forty crap. I dunno. I think I'll just go and bash my head against the wall for a while. You guys read too much into prog when it's not really that complex at all.
Edited by Vibrationbaby - April 05 2012 at 09:40
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17510
|
Posted: April 05 2012 at 09:04 |
Zombywoof wrote:
I'm going with Zappa. If you read through many of the classic Prog bands' liner notes, you will find that somewhere, he is connected! |
I actually agree, but probably for different reasons. Even John Lennon had already mentioned Frank, and what he was doing with the guitar was noticed in many places, and helped a lot of folks do a lot of other work.
In the end, even folks in Germany and France appreciated Frank, in ways that even he could not understand or relate to ... which I suppose you could say is the ultimate compliment! I always thought it was funny that the Faust album has that nice comment about Frank Zappa ... and he could not relate to it, or maybe only appreciated it in quiet but his "inner circle" could not allow him to appreciate anyone else, except some obtuse composer of music that no one really paid attention to!
I do think that somewhere along the way he could/should have come down from the wording and such in his music ... but in the end, in Southern California when you are branded with a blue and pink background and a star is born, that is all you can do and will do and that's that ... and that is where Frank stayed and his trust continues to keep him there ... a faded and gone rock star!
And seeing his son play the old "hits" ... is sad ... it's like watching the Boston Pops play the Star Wars theme one more time ... it's old ... and it's not sounding better! And I'm not sure that is a good thing to help his legacy!
Edited by moshkito - April 05 2012 at 09:05
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17510
|
Posted: April 05 2012 at 08:41 |
OT Räihälä wrote:
...
Oh, and Moshkito: why do you always put three fullstops when one is enough? How can you afford so many? And have you thought about your carbon footprint? [Tongue in cheek mode off] It's a pain to read when there are one million needless fullstops. |
I write in what is known as a "thinking" or "theatrical" style. That means that the "dots" are what is often considered and called "thinking pauses" or "pregnant pauses" in theater and film.
It is possible, however, that while I see that, you might not, and that is a difference that is ... always the case between two or more people.
If I may ask, do you have to be an English Grammar professor to appreciate "writing", in any form? ... if that is the case I'm thinking that you are not checking out the meat and potatoes of the content at all ... and yeah ... you will have indigestion and not appreciate what was being said. It's like saying that everyone from Greek Mythology to Burroughs has to write the way you like ... that means you hate poetry and EE Cummings is your enemy! ... I forgot ... you are into prog, or something like it, right?
Edited by moshkito - April 05 2012 at 08:44
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
|
topographicbroadways
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 20 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5575
|
Posted: April 05 2012 at 00:40 |
Prog Bands of the 70's tended to have a pretty specific sound that has died out. There is way more variety nowadays in what would be defined as 'prog'. Which is good.
Agreed with the above. Zappa is a hugely influential artist. You can hear his influences in Avant, Alternative rock and lots of heavier stuff as well
When you think of the general music landscape today classic Prog actually had very little impact.
|
|
|
Zombywoof
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 26 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1217
|
Posted: April 04 2012 at 23:18 |
I'm going with Zappa. If you read through many of the classic Prog bands' liner notes, you will find that somewhere, he is connected!
|
Continue the prog discussion here: http://zombyprog.proboards.com/index.cgi ...
|
|
ghost_of_morphy
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2755
|
Posted: April 04 2012 at 22:45 |
harmonium.ro wrote:
Neu! was also essential for the early post rock movement (Tortoise, Cul De Sac, Trans Am, Ganger, etc.), and, before that, for the noise rock / minimalist punk / avantgarde etc. movement consisting of people like Glenn Branca and Rhys Chatham. |
Neu! was very influential, but not on the scale of defining prog for a decade.
|
|
|
ghost_of_morphy
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2755
|
Posted: April 04 2012 at 22:43 |
Prog_Traveller wrote:
60's/70's The Nice, Pink Floyd, Moody Blues, King Crimson, Yes, Genesis, VDGG, Magma, Camel, Caravan, Gong, Genesis, Gentle Giant, Nektar, Procol Harum, PFM, Renaissance and probably a bunch of others as well. SOme more than others of course. Any big or even moderately well known band is going to have some kind of influence on the newer bands.
80's Saga, Marillion, IQ, Peter Gabriel(he was very popular in the eighties), Kate Bush, Rush. Seriously there aren't that many from the eighties unfortunately.
90's Flower Kings, Spock's Beard, Porcupine Tree, Radiohead
00's Transatlantic, Neal Morse, Mars Volta, Opeth, Porcupine Tree(I'll list them in this decade as well since this is when they really broke big).
In order for a band to be influential they have to have some significant degree of popularity(at least within the specific genre in this case prog).
|
I would argue that Genesis had the most impact in the 80's, although Peter Gabriel solo is also a good choice, Rush, well, maybe... but I wouldn't put them in the mix.
|
|
|
trackstoni
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 23 2008
Location: Lebanon
Status: Offline
Points: 934
|
Posted: April 04 2012 at 22:13 |
maani wrote:
Influential....where? And FROM where? For example, there are non-English European prog bands who had quite a bit of influence on later groups. (PFM comes to mind.) And if we are talking influence ON non-English European bands, then Gentle Giant would have to be pretty close to the top of the list (along with Genesis, Yes, ELP and Floyd).
But it sounds like we are being U.S.-centric here, so...
I would question the "influence" of King Crimson: they were certainly among the progenitors of prog, and there are a few prog bands who exhibit some influence from them. (Mars Volta is among the most obvious.) But I would not say that their OVERALL influence was very large. On the other hand, Rush probably influenced more neo-prog and especially prog-metal bands than almost anyone (as well as quite a few non-prog bands!). (Though some of the most influential neo-prog bands - Marillion, Porcupine Tree, IQ, Spock's Beard et al - were influenced less by Rush than by Genesis, Yes, Gentle Giant, Floyd, ELP, Moody Blues et al.)
Ultimately, it is difficult to trace influence back "clearly" with any certainty in order to establish a "hierarchy" of influence, since there was quite a bit of "cross-influence" going on vis-a-vis the seminal prog bands (mid-60s to early 70s), and the supposed influence of later prog bands is itself based on the bands that influenced THEM.
However, it is clear that the Beatles, while not prog themselves, began almost all of the "experimentation" that led to prog, and influenced almost every seminal prog band to one degree or another. (Floyd and Moody Blues are the two most direct, but Genesis, Yes, and even Gentle Giant show traces. Interestingly, Crimson seems to have "sprung full-grown from the head of Zeus," with little if any direct Beatle influence.)
BTW, I'm surprised no one mentioned Zappa. True, no one sounds exactly like him. But perhaps second only to the Beatles, his influence can be heard pretty broadly throughout prog.
Peace. |
Totally Agree with this !
|
Tracking Tracks of Rock
|
|
Horizons
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: January 20 2011
Location: Somewhere Else
Status: Offline
Points: 16952
|
Posted: April 04 2012 at 17:21 |
|
Crushed like a rose in the riverflow.
|
|
Progdaybay
Forum Newbie
Joined: March 13 2010
Location: Québec
Status: Offline
Points: 18
|
Posted: April 04 2012 at 16:16 |
I would say "The Flower Kings" and "Transatlantic". They are the masters of long and fantastic epics ! In the Symphonic sub-genre, which is the most "pure" prog, in my view.
|
|
Vibrationbaby
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
|
Posted: April 04 2012 at 15:40 |
So my German is a bit rusty. Tsk, tsk, tsk.
|
|
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: April 04 2012 at 14:57 |
Neu! was also essential for the early post rock movement (Tortoise, Cul De Sac, Trans Am, Ganger, etc.), and, before that, for the noise rock / minimalist punk / avantgarde etc. movement consisting of people like Glenn Branca and Rhys Chatham.
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: April 04 2012 at 14:18 |
OT Räihälä wrote:
Vibrationbaby wrote:
What about Nue!? nobody mentioned Nue! unless I'm going blind in my old age. They were copied by everyone from Hawkwind to Bowie.
|
Never heard of Nue! Can't be that big influence... unless you're talking about Neu! [neu] means [new] in German.
|
Neu! didn't have to influence a lot of people to make an impact, they just had to be an influence to the right people, and thus be an influence once-removed as it were. I think it is fair to say that many of the post-punk synth bands of the 80s were indirectly influenced by Neu! through being themselves being influenced by Eno, Bowie, Joy Division, Ultravox!, Numan etc.
Edited by Dean - April 04 2012 at 14:19
|
What?
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: April 04 2012 at 14:03 |
OK...I will sing then!
|
|
|
OT Räihälä
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 09 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 514
|
Posted: April 04 2012 at 14:01 |
Vibrationbaby wrote:
What about Nue!? nobody mentioned Nue! unless I'm going blind in my old age. They were copied by everyone from Hawkwind to Bowie.
|
Never heard of Nue! Can't be that big influence... unless you're talking about Neu! [neu] means [new] in German.
Edit:
Oh, and Moshkito: why do you always put three fullstops when one is enough? How can you afford so many? And have you thought about your carbon footprint? [Tongue in cheek mode off] It's a pain to read when there are one million needless fullstops.
Edited by OT Räihälä - April 04 2012 at 14:03
|
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: April 04 2012 at 13:20 |
moshkito wrote:
Dean wrote:
^ Stanshall?
So, Pedro, are you saying that no one who ever picked up an instrument was ever influenced or inspired to play by someone whose playing they had heard before? And by implication of that, every artist is unique and original? |
Not everyone has learned music because they heard someone else. This, of course would be harder in the Western World, where we think that the music history is what defines music ... but that's like saying that the indian in the middle of nowhere in Canada can not play his flute ... let me tell you ... there are some that make Ian sound like a little kid playing with his stick. Or Spain, where there are more guitar pickers on the streets that will make 99 out of 100 electric guitar players look really bad ... EVEN in progressive and prog music! I keep thinking like this ... if someone plays a violin he is automatically a classic player ... and when you hear Shankar do this ... it should make you wonder ... is that really true? ... is it possible that there is music out there that we can not conceive that is not on the scales that we know?
I believe there is! |
I suspect you may be over-thinking this a little. "Folk" musicians learn by ear - the Indian flautist or the Spanish guitarist learnt to play by listening to better players - they did not teach themselves from scratch without having heard how the instrument should be played or without knowing the old tunes that older players had played. To be "traditional" in that they are 100% influenced by everything they heard before, it would be impossible not to be.
Someone who plays a violin is not a automatically classical player - the violin has been used as a folk instrument for centuries - fiddle-players can be classical, but it is not necessarily so.
As to other scales... sure there are lots, all of which are easily conceived - just using 7-notes out of the 12 chromatic notes in an octave there are 462 possible scales we could use (and we generally use two of them - the major and the minor - or perhaps use one of the 7 modes if we are feeling particularly adventurous). If we go micro-tonal then there is no limit to how many scales we could create, all of them perfectly conceivable.
moshkito wrote:
And the Indians in Mato Grosso in Brazil near where I lived played music ... very different from anything that you or I ever heard and the "rhythms" were not "westernized" ... or "african" ... as we know them. This is really hard to discuss here and explain .. because it is music defined on a "feel" ... not what you and I know. This is the same thing with "ragas" and their ultimate design and goal ... to free the musician to become a "master" ... which means that they can create "feelings" with their instrument that "takes you away". |
And? One of the strange phenomenons of music is that even though some indigenous music sounds a little strange to our ears, all music is actually of a very similar structure and formation through out the human world. While we have invested a lot of academic time and effort creating the even-tempered scale and other wonders of Western Music Theory - this is only so we can collect together 82 different musicians in one place and have them play in tune, and then send that music score across the world and have another 82 different musicians play it and it will sound exactly the same. Yet for all that we haven't progressed much further than Pythagoras in the identification of octaves their division into tonal intervals. The human ear likes that tonal interval, and we all seem to naturally like pentatonic scales derived from those tones - there are strong science-y reasons why this is that I'll not go into here, but suffice to say Brazilian folk music and Indian folk music and Indonesian folk music and Hebredian folk music and Baroque Classical music and Progressive Rock and Regaeton all uses scales that are mathematically very similar.
Ragas are examples of some of those pentatonic modes (scales) taken from a 7-note scale within the 12-step octave, they are not a rhythm, they are a melody based upon those five (pentatonic) notes. They sound "eastern" to our ears because they are not based upon the even-tempered scale of Bach, but essentially they are the same as western pentatonic scales which is why Shankar, Harrison and McLaughlin could incorporate them seamlessly into western music.
Rhythms are also "genetically" similar throughout the world because we are bipeds and rhythms are made for dancing, even odd-meter rhythms can be counted in steps. Four to the floor, Dubstep and Waltzes (3/4 and 6/8) are popular because they are instantly recognisable as danceable, but more than that, we can count them in our heads very easily without having to be Carl Palmer. So when get to the odd time-signatures and rhythms we manage those by sub-dividing them into what we can count in our heads, for example - 13/4 is a mind-funk to count until you realise it's really just 3/4+3/4+4/4+3/4 (waltz-waltz-foxtrot-waltz).
moshkito wrote:
I do believe, honestly, that a lot of this "progressive" work, was about people exploring these possibilities a lot more ... really ... listen to the lyrics of TFTO ... they don't make sense otherwise ... and is why that piece is so important for me and the "progressive" music genre. But yeah ... in the end ... nous sommes du soleil ... |
moshkito wrote:
And yes, Snow Dog ... drums is good ... I've always thought that with 2 drummers we could really spice things up nice!
So .. influential for me, as a foreigner with no country ... is harder for you folks I would imagine ... than it is for me. |
Dual drummers never really work IMO (seen several bands try them and the results are disappointing - Space Ritual for example) - a better solution has always been to have a drummer and a percussionist (Gong).
Edited by Dean - April 04 2012 at 13:21
|
What?
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17510
|
Posted: April 04 2012 at 12:05 |
spknoevl wrote:
I agree that Johnny Mac and Mahavishnu influenced many people. Fripp has stated that he was so influenced by MO that he had to stop listening to them so he wouldn't up doing an imitation. However, I don't really consider MO a progressive rock band - just a great jazz-rock band that influenced the prog rock movement and jazz movements. |
Was, and I think it still is, considered ... "fusion".
The main problem today with a lot of this stuff is that some bands are using more effects and then calling themselves "metal" or "prog", where the one that goes "jazz'ier" is more instrumental and leaning towards the less effect style of work.
If I take the effects out of Dream Theater's guitar, I probably have someone just as good as Johnny Mac ... however, most folks will say that Johhny Mac is more important because he was born 20 years earlier ... and didn't use effects on the guitar! He used his fingers!
Edited by moshkito - April 04 2012 at 12:30
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
|