Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Is The GOP Race Over?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedIs The GOP Race Over?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1718192021 49>
Author
Message
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 13 2012 at 17:45
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

This may have already been asked, but are you Paul supporters going to hold your nose and vote for Romney or sit it out?


Is that even serious? LOL


And it is pretty hilarious the "dilemma" with Republicans. I love how all my friends cite the basic bullet points they like and there's the guy who espouses it but he's a loon, a "crazy senile old man! Romney is my vote. "
Makes sooo much sense.

Yes that was serious.  Is Obama vs Romney such a bad choice that our libertarians would go for none of the above.  And I got some serious answers.




Obama has $240M, Willard has $120M,
so why does Obama keep asking me for $5?
LOL

South Carolina Is As Red As It Gets


Edited by Slartibartfast - January 14 2012 at 07:28
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 15 2012 at 23:28
Well, down to 5 now. Huntsman is gone. The question is how long will Perry and Gingrich last.

On Slarti's question, Obama vs Romney would be so horrible. I wouldn't know who to give my first-ever presidential useless vote. I can't just no-vote the first time I can vote though...
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 00:12
Huntsman drops out and outside of tv studios and newsrooms everywhere the real people let out a collective yawn. 


Time always wins.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 08:12
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Well, down to 5 now. Huntsman is gone. The question is how long will Perry and Gingrich last.

On Slarti's question, Obama vs Romney would be so horrible. I wouldn't know who to give my first-ever presidential useless vote. I can't just no-vote the first time I can vote though...

Take a word of advice from me, the presidential race isn't going to be the only thing on your ballot.  We often get uncontested judges up for vote.  I just skip them and vote for the other things.  Also it's worth keeping in mind that your vote counts the most in elections that get the least attention.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 15:25
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 19:29


Time always wins.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 19:57
Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

Opposing Imperialism is not Isolationsim.... or my title: Why establishment republicans and Slartitarians ("progressives") both fear a Paul nomination

Wait a second, I've got a cult following?  How can I make money off of them?  Seriously, I think a Paul/Obama contest would be good for the country.

I mean think about it, a guy who thinks racial discrimination is a good thing because he is utterly devoted to his philosophy vs. a guy who is a product of white and black parents?


Edited by Slartibartfast - January 16 2012 at 20:03
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 21:03
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:



I mean think about it, a guy who thinks racial discrimination is a good thing because he is utterly devoted to his philosophy vs. a guy who is a product of white and black parents?


Smiley

Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 21:32

And at 20:03 on January 16, 2012 Slarti hits a new partisan hack low.  Wow, just unbelievably sickening.  Thinking Jim Crow laws were repulsive afronts to liberty is supporting racial discrimination because....well.... Obama's not completely white: I see it all so clearly now.



Edited by manofmystery - January 16 2012 at 21:33


Time always wins.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 21:41
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:



I mean think about it, a guy who thinks racial discrimination is a good thing because he is utterly devoted to his philosophy vs. a guy who is a product of white and black parents?


What?Wacko
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 21:52
I do fear in one 3 minute stretch Dr. Paul served up neo-cons, dems, and the MSM the keys to crippling his recent surge.  I'm not feeling good after this debate.  In politics you have to #dodge sometimes.


Time always wins.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 22:08
Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

I do fear in one 3 minute stretch Dr. Paul served up neo-cons, dems, and the MSM the keys to crippling his recent surge.  I'm not feeling good after this debate.  In politics you have to #dodge sometimes.


Frankly, Paul flubbed the foreign policy questions tonight- bad.  Relatively speaking, he isn't that articulate to begin with, and this time he really stumbled over his words.  We all know where he stands- but his audience is obviously a crowd who doesn't realize that you can't destroy our enemies and bring the troops home at the same time.


Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 22:08
Are you talking about the questions about foreign policy?
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 22:12
The crowd was yelling like crazy in support of aggresion. I think Paul had a good moment when he said, emphatically, that we don't need more wars and more but te audience's intelligence will not be enough to understand. Ron Paul has always had a problem with making sure his points can be understood even by idiots like many in today's audience. His obsession with talking about bubbles and keynesian this and that doesn't help when you have guys like Romney whose slogans appeal to the lowest common denominator.
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 22:12
Specifically, the Bin Laden question.  The way he answered was a political disaster in that it was hard to understand and can be easily be taken out of context and used in anti-Paul soundbites.


Time always wins.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 22:17
The ultimate question is this: Does America want platitudes or substance?  Romney offers one.  Paul offers the other.

But these debates are obvious BS.  How much speaking time did Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum get compared to Paul?  The moderators chided Paul when he finished his sentence, but let the other three guys run the show.  Angry
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 22:21
The large amount of sickos that fox let be in the debate crowd didn't help, either.  Newt gets a standing ovation for believing minority children should be made to be school janitors?  They boo the golden rule?
 
If it wasn't for the shameful crowd reactions and Ron's stumble then the debate would have been pretty funny:
- Rick Perry says SC at war with the federal government (Civil War much)
- Senator Frothy Mix asked a question about the plight of blacks in America.  He's probably the only person to ever live in Penn Hills (Pittsburgh,  PA), and maybe it's because he only faked living there, that has never met a black person.
- Mitt Romney comes out as strongly anti-Bigfoot on a day in which Animal Planet is airing a marathon of their awful Finding Bigfoot show


Time always wins.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 22:26
How about Santorum, in the same breath, said he believes in a 17.5% flat tax on businesses (because it's fair), but because social security is in trouble, rich retirees shouldn't benefit from a system they were forced to pay into their entire lives.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 22:34
They gave Paul a lot of time in the foreign policy section, of course, where his views and the modern republicans' differ the most.

Another weak comeback was when he and Santorum got into the gun control thing. Paul's final reply was kind of awkward.

On other news, I still can't understand Slarti's last post.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2012 at 22:38
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1718192021 49>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.242 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.