Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
7headedchicken
Forum Newbie
Joined: April 21 2011
Location: CA
Status: Offline
Points: 39
|
Posted: December 14 2011 at 13:09 |
Dellinger wrote:
The thing that bothers me the most about the MP3 becoming more commercial than CD's is that we are taking a step backwards as far as sound quality is concerned. I'm afraid I do listen on my Ipod very often because of it's portability, but I like much better to buy CD's. I'm not yet into SACD or such things, but I want at least CD quality. Now, if the hard drives of Ipods, and even computers could carry without problem the hundreds or thousends of songs on WAV files (as well as internet being fast enough for downloading such files instead of MP3), it wouldn't bother me so much to buy my music online. |
That's another reason I prefer Cd's, besides the physical aspect. Supposedly, the higher quality mp3's sound as good or better, but I haven't heard any myself that sound as good... maybe technically they are higher quality, but something is missing. I've noticed that even some radio stations today are playing mp3's now, which is a step in the wrong direction, I think. Not all, though - there are still a few around that play real CD's, and believe it or not, there are a select few that still play vinyl.
|
|
JS19
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 10 2010
Location: Lancaster, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 1321
|
Posted: December 14 2011 at 13:35 |
7headedchicken wrote:
Dellinger wrote:
The thing that bothers me the most about the MP3 becoming more commercial than CD's is that we are taking a step backwards as far as sound quality is concerned. I'm afraid I do listen on my Ipod very often because of it's portability, but I like much better to buy CD's. I'm not yet into SACD or such things, but I want at least CD quality. Now, if the hard drives of Ipods, and even computers could carry without problem the hundreds or thousends of songs on WAV files (as well as internet being fast enough for downloading such files instead of MP3), it wouldn't bother me so much to buy my music online. |
That's another reason I prefer Cd's, besides the physical aspect. Supposedly, the higher quality mp3's sound as good or better, but I haven't heard any myself that sound as good... maybe technically they are higher quality, but something is missing. I've noticed that even some radio stations today are playing mp3's now, which is a step in the wrong direction, I think. Not all, though - there are still a few around that play real CD's, and believe it or not, there are a select few that still play vinyl. |
Higher quality mp3s do sound as good, but your output source does not. An iPod will never be as good a source as a CD player hence poorer audio quality, it's not the actual MP3s that are the problem...
|
|
TODDLER
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
|
Posted: December 18 2011 at 12:56 |
rogerthat wrote:
That's a pretty ambitious suggestion, TODDLER, and would take a real dreamer given the bad rep prog goes. The question is why do people who do listen to progressive music like jazz restrict themselves to just jazz and why not progressive music within rock? From the time I got into Western music, I have never understood the obsession with formats nor understood how one could get through being exclusively focused on one format because I never could. I would get very bored, very quickly of listening to one kind of music all the time. To that extent, I feel a bit disappointed with those audiences who only listen to classical or jazz or even musicians who restrict themselves to specific formats? Why shut doors and why not open your mind instead? If I could go from listening to complacent Indian music to, um, grindcore, I really cannot fathom jazz snobbery at all. What's the big deal? It would hand in hand give all sorts of musicians a bigger audience rather than having to carefully cultivate fragmented niches.
|
You could say that Jeff Beck neglected practicing guitar as he spent long hours working on cars. On the guitar he seems to desire staying on the same playing level and allowing his talents of progression to evolve slowly INSTEAD of some over the top player who practices feverishly between 12 to 15 hours a day. The serious Jazz musicians who vary in different sections of the world and it's highest numbers in population being in the United States for sure.......would look down upon this and express that snobby Jazz mentality There are no inbetween's with this and it depends on what particular music college you choose.
Jazz music presents an observation for me. It derives from the "Black Community" and was developed through their bloodline. Their bloodline into the creation of new music....Blues, "Rock N' Roll", Jazz, Gospel and to minus all that inventive music from the western culture ....it would be scary to imagine what would have developed instead. I am very thankful they developed this music in America.
So many positives and negatives in music culture and obviously within all walks of life...but more extreme with the emotional side to being a musician and struggling for that serious life. I believe that an ego should shut itself down every so often like hitting a switch. Musicians who struggle with their lack of talent to master something new...yet are talented enough to be great writers often become discouraged over themselves and desire to be egotistical for power. A great player who is humble will struggle with a difficult piece of music and not think of themselves and only focus on the art. I'm not sure why great musicians have ego's. There is a personal history of composers centuries ago who were put under extreme pressure to write the perfect composition. They seem to have a different upbringing where the evidence of ego driven ideas begin at age 13. One kid who is multi talented tells the other kid (who is quite talented at only one particular instrument)....that he must be a moron because he does not know what a rudiment is. Every child or teenager travels through the identity crisis ...but one day they will be sitting in music college hearing some devoted musician playing the most inferior pieces in the world. They either have to wake up then and realize that the possibilities are endless in music and that the smart thing to do would be to remain humble or become a nasty ego inflated baby. Which is how a lot of great musicians turn out because their parents were not musicians yet forced a macho attitude upon them that doesn't work well in the development of an instrument.
You already have hours of hard devotion on an instrument.....letting your ego stand in the way is the last thing on earth you want. Parents will force the wrong kind of encouragment or support to the child. My dog is better than your dog or my son can pitch a baseball finer than yours. Then the kid is excepted into music college at 18 and some respected music professor teaches him a thing or 2 about music and about what dedicated musicians define as practices. Now the kid thinks to himself...."Why was my father teaching me all this nonsense?" Why do that to your kid? Why not tell them the truth in the beginning and then prepare them for the trials in music college Parents do not want their children to lack confidence yet their macho method of raising them will shatter into pieces when their child is faced with the realization that he/she must study more..... and that alone is quite a larger blow to a full blown ego well developed at age 18 than any honest step in life they could have taken to prevent the nightmare itself.
Edited by TODDLER - December 18 2011 at 13:04
|
|
Jbird
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 338
|
Posted: December 21 2011 at 17:47 |
MarkOne wrote:
Merch desks at the gigs are the best opportunity to sell CDs, and these are often not very busy. I guess for every 100 people at the gig, maybe 5 or perhaps 10 buy the CDs. |
If I care enough about a band to pay the bucks to see them in concert, chances are I own at least all of their studio albums at least. I'm by no means a collector of even my favorite bands. I don't own all the special editions, special live albums, singles w/an unreleased B-side, etc unless I find it for cheap, but I'll have all of their 'standard' releases almost guaranteed.
Therefore, I almost never buy cd's at concerts. I'd bet alot more are like me, too.
|
|
MarkOne
Forum Groupie
Joined: August 18 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 90
|
Posted: December 21 2011 at 17:58 |
Jbird wrote:
MarkOne wrote:
Merch desks at the gigs are the best opportunity to sell CDs, and these are often not very busy. I guess for every 100 people at the gig, maybe 5 or perhaps 10 buy the CDs. |
If I care enough about a band to pay the bucks to see them in concert, chances are I own at least all of their studio albums at least. I'm by no means a collector of even my favorite bands. I don't own all the special editions, special live albums, singles w/an unreleased B-side, etc unless I find it for cheap, but I'll have all of their 'standard' releases almost guaranteed.
Therefore, I almost never buy cd's at concerts. I'd bet alot more are like me, too. |
I guess I was thinking of a different kind of gig, the kind of cellar club with a couple of bands, each with one or two indie releases, each scaring up 20 or so mates and hoping that their leafleting of the area and hopefully the noise on the street outside will entice in some extra punters, as might the happy hour bar prices. I'm really talking the long-tail end of the business not the 1000 seat city venue tour with trucks and a tour bus. But where you can have a beer with the bass player and lead vocalist...
I go to quite a few of these type of gig, bands with tiny followings who have outlaid several grand of personal money to get their music recorded, who might get some positive noise on sites like this and are trying to get heard.
And as far as I can tell much of the prog scene is exactly like I describe.
|
|
|
SMSM
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 210
|
Posted: December 23 2011 at 14:38 |
Thank God for internet applications like Youtube, Prog Archives etc where we can be exposed to this music, where before we were dependent on a few DJs, record stores and friendswho may or may not have played prog,
TS if you were out in the boondocks where the only music played was country or greatest hits music
|
|
wjohnd
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 16 2011
Location: Scotland, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 327
|
Posted: December 23 2011 at 15:35 |
i've pretty much embraced the digital revolution - although I own hundreds of CDs most of the music i buy now is on MP3 or listened to via Spotify. CDs were a poor substitute for the joy of a double gate-fold sleeve anyway and I don't really miss them. LPs were great until they scratched or had a poor quality or filler track that you couldn't easily ignore.
|
|
|
Ben Enochian
Forum Newbie
Joined: June 24 2009
Location: Portsmouth
Status: Offline
Points: 39
|
Posted: January 13 2012 at 15:54 |
I'd say I'm with most people here...it's a double edged sword.
I'm in the business...but I am also, of course, a music lover...and as such, will go to great ends to get something I want.
I like the artwork and I like the physical product that an artist delivers.
The effort the band put into creating a product needs to be acknowledged, one feels.
I know how difficult it is to create something like that, the time it takes and nights lost fearing about your business future...so why would you want just collection of O's and 1' bleeping on your laptop, when you can have a glorious colour booklet to peruse, while you spin the CD?
Sure, by all means...rip to your computer or I-monkey (whatever)...but I insist on lossless copying or I reject it out of hand. Hell, I even get annoyed about having to share 320kps, 44'100 Hz MP3's with people as a means of promo. I miss the older days for sending a CD in a slipcase...but convenience and money rule now.
For a band in the position we are in, we NEED sales or we get dropped, simple as that....and thus, here is a my argument AGAINST piracy and such. If you buy the MP3's, then great...cheers, you're a pal. If not, then you're kind of scummy really.
It is theft and there isn't any other way to argue the case. I discuss this subject quite a lot with people I meet on the road and it's always interesting to hear poeple opinions.
The fact the industry took SOOOOOO long to embrace the 'digital age' is their own fault and as such, a lot of labels have gone down the drain or 're-structured'.
I could go on for hours about this subject...but alas...it's hometime from work and I have a bottle of beer to consume.
|
www.enochiantheory.co.uk
www.myspace.com/enochiantheoryband
"Direction...what we need to achieve..."
|
|
AmbianceMan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 30 2009
Location: Dayton, OH
Status: Offline
Points: 113
|
Posted: January 14 2012 at 09:34 |
I always heard it said tht CD's aren't very big money makers for the artist. With the digital revolution, I could see how some artists may actually BENEFIT by recording/releasing their own material with less overhead. Merchandise (T-shirts, posters) have traditionally provided some income, but let's face it, prog bands don't get a lot of adult money for t-shirts and posters. Gigs used to be the big moneymaker for average to wel-known bands. I dunno, I'm not an industry whiz, but i do miss the Album/CD art that seems to be faing away.
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: January 14 2012 at 10:34 |
wjohnd wrote:
i've pretty much embraced the digital revolution - although I own hundreds of CDs most of the music i buy now is on MP3 or listened to via Spotify.CDs were a poor substitute for the joy of a double gate-fold sleeve anyway and I don't really miss them. LPs were great until they scratched or had a poor quality or filler track that you couldn't easily ignore.
|
I'll never get on board for the pay to download express. Cds came a long way since their inception when often they were just duplications of music that was mastered for LP had just a single page insert and the back/sides thingy for cover art. The LPs I hang on are mostly kept for either their cover art or being not available on CD.
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
bernZ
Forum Newbie
Joined: January 14 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 11
|
Posted: January 14 2012 at 20:40 |
Hi, I,m new to the site, but can so relate to the prog lovers need to physically have the music. Just recently obtained the amazing Ammerland by Fuhrs and Frohling and my immediate reaction upon receipt was to copy 5 times and hide the original...seems crazy, but i am so afraid this kind of music will disappear that i have to hoard it.....!
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.