Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Is The GOP Race Over?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedIs The GOP Race Over?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 49>
Author
Message
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2011 at 13:39
Well I don't really nowLOL though it's got nothing to do with his political roots. More his actions. Pretty much all of them.
It's well known he is from the land of milk of honey...of political corruption but hate to be that cynical guy....like we're getting anything else >_>

I reckon Ron Paul has no real scandals or anything like that.
*ensue massive Paul fellatio festival*




Edited by JJLehto - December 17 2011 at 13:40
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2011 at 13:40
Originally posted by timothy leary timothy leary wrote:

When you see where Obama's political roots are, the Chicago political machine, the most corrupt political machinery in the entire nation, why would you want to vote for him??

When you dismiss him so easily you understand nothing.  But good job in absorbing and regurgitating talking points of the right wing noise machine. Thumbs Up


Edited by Slartibartfast - December 17 2011 at 13:43
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2011 at 13:42
Yeah hate to give the answer no one wants to hear but politically, he's pretty "clean" if you hate him, think he's a commie or the anti christ than fine but despite the greatest attempts to do so...no one could really pin anything on him.

It's all what you want to believe. He's a corrupt politician to the core, or he's not. I believe the latter, even though he's from Chicago.
He still sucks though, we seriously should've just given Bush a third term, and a fourth while we're at it!
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2011 at 14:03
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by timothy leary timothy leary wrote:

When you see where Obama's political roots are, the Chicago political machine, the most corrupt political machinery in the entire nation, why would you want to vote for him??

When you dismiss him so easily you understand nothing.  But good job in absorbing and regurgitating talking points of the right wing noise machine. Thumbs Up

I never embraced him so I never dismissed him. As for my understanding, I know cronyism when I see it and having been born and raised in Chicago it was a given. Blago  trying to sell Obamas seat was nothing new, he just got caught.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2011 at 14:11
Fair enough.  I know a thing or two about Georgia politics and I crack up at the notion of Newt getting the repub nomination.  I freely admit voting for Obama in the primaries and I would have voted for Edwards if he hadn't dropped out already.


Edited by Slartibartfast - December 17 2011 at 14:14
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2011 at 14:28
Edwards might be an even bigger scumbag than Newt.  If that's possible.
 
Obama is corrupt as anyone (energy bailouts, Fast & Furious) in a system the is set up for corruption.  He's just proven to be an even larger totalitarian than W.  Big government warmonger who is set to sign in a law allowing the indefinite imprisonment of American citizens without charges.  Will you at least think twice about throwing him your vote, slarti, after he signs the NDAA?


Time always wins.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2011 at 14:45
^It could be Stalin running for the democrats vs Jesus running for the republicans and Slarti would still vote democrat.
Back to Top
cannon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 03 2010
Location: Coho Country
Status: Offline
Points: 1302
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2011 at 14:47
What about "third" party candidates? Donald Trump? (yeah right. What a clown). Michael Bloomberg? Ron Paul if he doesn't get the GOP nomination.
 
In the end I'll think it'll be Romney. Newton is already slippin'. The "smarts" of the GOP held out this cycle to run in 2016.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2011 at 07:22
What Voters Didn’t Learn from All the Republican Debates in 2011
"
Candidates are also adroit at confecting crowd-pleasing banalities instead of real answers. Romney boldly declared, "It has to be the American century. America has to lead the free world.""
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2011 at 07:29
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

What Voters Didn’t Learn from All the Republican Debates in 2011
"
Candidates are also adroit at confecting crowd-pleasing banalities instead of real answers. Romney boldly declared, "It has to be the American century. America has to lead the free world.""


Yeah, I agree, and that's a shame, because I really think we'd see who would make the best President of those folks if they had more specific executive-based questions.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2011 at 07:32
Just a general technical question.  How many more debates are in the hopper before they settle on a candidate.  It can't be infinite can it?
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2011 at 07:37
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Just a general technical question.  How many more debates are in the hopper before they settle on a candidate.  It can't be infinite can it?


Ten, not counting those that have been canceled.  And more to come as they are announced.


Edited by Epignosis - December 18 2011 at 07:38
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2011 at 08:07
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Just a general technical question.  How many more debates are in the hopper before they settle on a candidate.  It can't be infinite can it?


Ten, not counting those that have been canceled.  And more to come as they are announced.

A political junkie cardboard cookie for you then. Big smile
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2011 at 22:58


Time always wins.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2011 at 23:05
^Be careful Dr Paul. If you win in Iowa and then in another state, they will pull a Lee Harvey on you, and this one WILL be a crazy real conspiracy...
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2011 at 23:15

I should have paired the above link with this one:



Time always wins.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2011 at 06:29
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2011 at 06:40
Whatever one may think of Ron Paul, it is macabre how the media ignore him, in light of his polling success, and the amount of apparent support he has, especially among younger voters.

I was watching 'CrossTalk' on Russia Today, this morning, and the dabate was about Newt Gingrich. At numerous points in the discussion, ALL the GOP candidates were metioned, every single one, with the exception of Ron Paul, who was not mentioned once.

I'm sorry, but this is a conspiracy in it's own right. What further evidience do people need, that there is a concerted effort afoot, to prevent this candidate from rising up and challenging the power structure that pulls the strings for both politcal parties. Are people deliberately ignoring reality?
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17304
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2011 at 06:43
Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

I should have paired the above link with this one:




Thanks for that, I'd forgotten about that Buchanan stuff.  I'm starting to actually think in terms of Paul vs. Obama.  That would probably be the most interesting race in our lifetime. 


Edited by Finnforest - December 19 2011 at 06:43
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2011 at 07:09
Iowa is a bit overrated as a kingmaker these days.  New Hampshire, too.  They're so full of themselves.  We should really just ignore them. LOL
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 49>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.258 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.