Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
presdoug
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 24 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8618
|
Posted: September 16 2011 at 20:10 |
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17524
|
Posted: September 19 2011 at 16:23 |
TODDLER wrote:
... Badfinger fan but....you probably knew of them when they were fresh with their Magic Christian album or No Dice. You are probably 7 or 8 years older than me so you were old enough to drive possibly I don't know?
...
|
You mean that one weird film that had Spike Milligan eating the traffic ticket? And Lawrence Harvey doing a gay Hamlet with Roman Polansky talking about him? With Peter saying ... over to you radley to 1 ... and pull out the army for one pheasant? You mean that one Thunderclap Newman song with a whole bunch of people walking into the that ... that ... that ... to grab some money? ... bet you could do that today and everyone would show up! And Ken Thorne did the music. And Christopher Lee runs a muck for a while. And Raquel Welch shows off her ... still one of my favorite soundtrax of all time! Great music! ... geee, think it would be kosher to quote that Parrot, the Pervert poem in here?
... like I had missed the real deal. Apart from the underground prog scene in 76' ....regular straightt up rock music annoyed the crap out of me. I kept looking for people to play guitar like Peter Green and Mike Bloomfield and it just wasn't happening. Even Frampton on "Rockin' the Fillmore" had that beautiful rock guitar tone....
|
I don't think you missed anything. You're still in one piece and have a very valuable experience and view to share and express. THAT, above all, was what made us "progressive" ...but the music was another story and while there were a lot of people that went commercial, including most of my friends, in the end, I'm still feisty and artistic, and most of those other friends ... went away, and many of them are not happy ... and one of them is frustrated that 30 years later he can't play the "progressive" music ... his wife hates it!
I didn't quit! Even for ...
...
When people like Robin Trower and many others in the mid 70's rock vain turned up that ugly distortion I knew I was in the wrong generation. Like I said before....you had Mahavishnu with the interesting tone of John McLaughlin's guitar in the mid 70's along with many others..but not in ROCK music. No more Jeremy Spencer's or the sweet tone of Mick Taylor on John Mayall's Crusade. Danny Kirwan was still playing with a real nice tone on Bare Trees and Sands of Time...but most guitar players in rock had the buzz saw sound in 76'.....like Boston, Foghat, and BTO. I couldn't relate to that and collected mostly European underground albums only and from that point on.....and giving up completely on straight up rock music forever. |
Robin Trower was not the only one ... but it tells you that a lot of people banked on the "effects" in the instrument to make it sound heavier, better, worse ... whatever ... and to me that was not "progressive" and most of all, it was not interesting at all. But so what ... a one song album ... WOW! ... big deal ... you know how many bands fit that moniker?
And that was the main reason why, by that time, I had already gone off to the music in Italy, France, Spain, Germany, Japan and elsewhere, except America and England ... because too much of it was just big name people abusing the priviledge because they had the name ... and in my way of speaking, they were the folks that corrupted what we had before ... meaning that they were not there for the music ... they were there for something else ... and I'm sorry ... that is not a very "progressive" idealism to show off to younger people ... that you're just another capitalist and that ITCOTCK is just a bunch of rock songs!
Simply not true!
And the reason why I left so many behind, including ELP, Genesis and even KC after Lark's Tongues in Aspic.
In the end, they have a right to play their music! But not to make me feel guilty for not buying it, because I did not think it was as good as what else was available out there, which was vastly better and more interesting. That would be a very commercial attitude, similar to what is found in this board in some threads.
Edited by moshkito - September 19 2011 at 16:25
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17524
|
Posted: September 19 2011 at 17:07 |
Hi,
Just so we're all clear ... the "scene" did not start in 1969 or 1970!
The whole scene has its roots in a lot more other arts that we are willing to give them credit for. Don't forget where the Beatles fell apart if you are still blaming Yoko and her art shows! (How sad!) ... or the beat poets being all around and all over London and a lot of PF/Gong/SM folks were all over it and some of them living in the same house! And we refuse to see a connection.
The 60's were massive in film, theater, and the arts in general, and it took our generation's open-ness to help a lot of things get out there and appreciated. And Ravi Shakar, for example, had already been doing "East meets West" with Yehudi Menuhin and making massive waves and I can tell you stuupid stories of my "intelectual" family's parents and professors discussing it, and thinking ... how wonderful the music is ... but they would not even put on a Ravi Shankar album at all ... and also hear folks saying things like ... that can't be classical music ... look at all that improvisation ... sound familiar?
The same feelings were already in theater as there were a lot of experimental groups ... I got to see "The Living Theater" and "ETC La Mamma" and Joseph Chaikan ... and it would be really difficult for folks here that were too stoned and could only go see Black Sabbath or the like, to even appreciate where some of those bands got their kitch, or their own cliche! And BS, did not have anything to say ... it was all a "show" ... and still is! ... one song or another might resonate inside some, but not in an important way, other than ... a memory down the lane of yesterday, when you were stoned and your girlfriend was cool, and the drugs made the sex seem better than now or any other time!
Geeee ... has anything changed?
Film was the same. Jean Luc Godard was already tearing down the film conventions ... but no one here is capable of seeing a couple of those films and see the perspective. And in many ways, film was far more progressive than music ever was ... but somehow we only think of 2001, as a great stoney film, and nothing else! Both Fellini, Bergman and Antonioni and Bunuel had already busted open the whole thing in the 50's ... but no ... we think that rock music came first and the chicken came second.
And this was my biggest problem with most of the "rock'n'roll" audience ... they had never seen anything else and were too ripped to find out that there WAS something else out there. Likewise, I saw that Europe, Japan and other places had a lot more to offer than England or America in the 70's for music, both of the latter countries that were so damn stuck up on the commercialism, what with the big names buying out everything ... sorry Ertegun, I happen to not think you were good for the music over all ... maybe a couple of names , but not music in general ... and Giorgio Gomelsky is still not mentioned and discussed here ... as a man with a vision ... and on top of it, one fo the first men to give Jimmy Page a job! Guess who the visionary and dreamer was?
Dance was another scene that was getting massive with the free dance movement ... you had Bob Fosse here, what's her name over there, and then Misha had defected and was mixing free dance with his ballet. Guess what the music we love was also doing? ... instead of a new tutu, it was using a different chord or time scheme ... big fudging deal ... and it was the time and place that made it.
Toddler, the only thing I would have suggested to you is ... I wish we had met, because I would have said, get on to Europe and forget America. But it's still the same thing here today ... but a lot of it has to do with who and what you are and have inside and the strength that you draw from it. Think Peter Hammill ... not rich, but he never quit ... his richness is inside and can not be measured and we still appreciate it.
And that is what we did not realize fast enough and acted on it, otherwise we would all still be there doing it!
I'm still writing after all these years, even though in a place like this, a lot of it is passed over by trollers that have nothing to say, except add some crap to it to show their intelligence, and editorial mind. They sure do not have an experience, otherwise they would mention it, you think?
Edited by moshkito - September 19 2011 at 17:10
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
|
TODDLER
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
|
Posted: September 20 2011 at 11:14 |
In the 70's I had a very strange experience in school. Police came into the school and hancuffed schoolmates for the ritual murder of a young man who tutored kids from the 7th grade to 12th. He asked his friends to go with him to a place in the Menantico sandwash called "Clear Pond". He then asked them to tie and bound his hands and feet. They surfboarded him into the face down position. They waited to see if he would surface because he was a magician. Instead they saw bubbles and left. Yet they drove right over to a yearbook signing as if nothing happened, picked up a few friends and headed for Florida. When they returned ...they were arrested and they openly confessed to the murder. I don't buy into that...because there were 50 members of the sect and the police chief had suspected they were all present during the ritual. So they sent these 2 boys to Yardville prison while they conducted a 2 year investigation due to the undertone of the boy's death and the evidence which brought them to a new conculsion.
They investigated Lilith Sinclair and members of her group which during 1971 were a pre-"Temple of Set" In 1972 she officially formed the "Temple of Set" with her husband Michael Aquino.They searched the young man's room and discovered something specific in the literature they and ....also names that were written on paper. This evidence above every other evident discovery caused Charles Pangburn to conduct the 2 year investigation. Sinclair had revolted against Anton in the Church of Satan and traveled to the east coast reaching Vineland N.J where the "Palace of Depression" had been designed and built by the eccentric George Dayner in 1932. It was built from junk parts, car parts as such it was a beautiful shock and glory for the county. The palace attracted witches and Satan cults to our town. One particular underground Satan worshippers sect had settled in Vineland and posed in a church. They were very wealthy and owned some mansions where they held their meetings. Lilith Sinclair was the person in question. The young man's ritual derived from the works of Colin De Plancey. This was more of a Judeo-Christian concept. They were basing the investigation through the observation that Sinclair was practicing Judeo-Christian concepts and was forbidden by the Church of Satan. The young man 21 years of age told the 2 boys that he needed to die violently so he could return as a captain to rule over 40 legions of demons. Many followers of witchcraft or Satan belief dispute this being any sort of ritual whatsoever. However it could have been that the victim discovered a secret in the literature or maybe he wanted to gain the philosopher's stone. He was quite delusional to trust some ritual in a book. They elderly sect fled after the investigation died due to the lack of physical evidence on the young man's body.
In 1974 a Satan cult were spotted on Mays Landing Rd. in Vineland N.J repeating the tragic ritual of 71'. Two friends noticed they had 2 members tied and bound and walking them into a lake. The passenger ran to call the police and the driver confronted the cult. They stood and screamed at each other for a few minutes until the cult heard police sirens and so they fled. Vineland was infested with Satan cults for decades. There was the Black Magic ritual which Juan Rivera Aponte performed on a young boy in 1957. Aponte was a farmhand on Mill road where he fell in love with the farmer's daughter. He murdered a 13 year old boy and buried the body underneath a shack. He cut out the skull and hanged it to dry. He needed a powdered skull for the ritual to work. First police put the father ..the farmer behind bars and that went on for 6 months until they suspected Aponte. Aponte confessed.
Then in 1962 out in Mill Woods the third generation Watchtower Society was mentally abusing a young girl. The society were given RX's by doctors in the area. The girl was kept in a trance while they channeled demons through her. This was done next to a snake pit in Mill Woods and about 6 miles from my house. There were also a couple of vampire cults in Vineland during the 90's. One was picked up by the local police after a phone call from a distressed parent concerned over her son's state of mind. The young boy had been transported in their van and molested several times. The cult leader showed up in court dressed in a cape and a pancake make-up job on his face. Some members were sent to the Ancora Psychiatric Hospital.
There were underground tunnels and underground chambers located in a few abandoned farmland fields. There was worship there and also a kind of headquarters which was the elderly and rich sect from 1971. Headquarters was in a mansion. These were the higher ups. Barbara Hutton whose family owned the Woolworth Five and Dime stores owned a venue which was about a 30 minute drive from Vineland. She was interested in the spirit world. She was an actress who at one time was married to Cary Grant. Her venue featured original rock bands, black mirrors, and a staff dressed in black cloaks. The place had been designed exactly like a particular Spanish castle in history , but the name doesn't come to mind. The county tried everything to close her down and failed due to her money power. The castle was cool....I just don't take lightly walking into this place with my guitar and there is a girl outside the venue chanting while she's holding a rat. I suspected in the past that Hutton was connected to the elderly sect in Vineland
And it just repeats over the years like a disease. It was so vast in the 70's and even as a child during the 60's I remember running away with friends to the woods and discovering animal remains, pentagrams drawn in the dirt, black candle stubs, etc...and this went on always. So we all knew something was terribly wrong then as kids and tried to live with it...by just being kids and going off in our own world. But the murder of the young man in our school scared us into finding a job and moving away from the county quickly even before hitting the age of 18. There wasn't anything that could control them. If the cops had evidence...it was thrown out of court. They would sometimes have evidence to bust a cult leader here and there...but they never had enough power to overthrow the source which is telling. All the many times I would cruise around with a friend at night and sight 4 different Satan cults in a 2 hour period and all spottings would be far apart ranging in miles of 20 or 30 in distance from each other. Sometimes you could spot the fire and then the later...the cloaks. Sometimes they got a little daring and lit black candles which were spotted at the entrance of a path leading into the woods. All of my old classmates who were a witness to the murder in 71' have a dead pan look on their face and are lost. They never recovered from that experience. Vineland has been infested with a nightmare for decades. It is defined as "Hiding In Plainsight". A diversion of tattling on others to take attention away from what they themselves do. It's a kind of duo worship. God in the day vs. Satan of the night.
Steve Jublou wrote an article on his nightmarish experience at Menantico Sandwash in 70'. He was camping with his brother and heard a sing song chanting that developed into screams of worship. I couldn't wait for someone to write this article because I remembering hearing that in the woods with friends. It was always across the field beyond the wooded area of our camp. We would run to the edge of the woods and kneel down hearing chants and strange cries. They either used 55 gallon oil cans for drums or actual kettle drums ....but it was always extremely loud like Steve puts it....the slave driven gallery in Ben Hur. Alright I'm signing off....but think about this : The history of Satan cults, witchcraft, JW's, the ritual killings, the investigations, the victims..in Vineland traced back to the 50's is telling. The 60's and 70's were a nightmare for me and a few friends as we couldn't wait till we were teens and get the H out of there. Old cult, young cult,...it was a bit like the Dark Shadows series to me. I can tell you ..I wasn't fond of it.
Edited by TODDLER - September 20 2011 at 11:43
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17524
|
Posted: September 20 2011 at 20:06 |
Hi,
Funny that you should mention that story ... my biggest complaint against the "New Age" folks were that they were more plastic than plasticine, and had no idea what they were talking about, and on top of it, did not even believe half the stuff they said.
It was not "progressive" thinking at all ... it was very facile and romantic, and after the hour meditation or fun is over, they went home back to their families that they did not like!
I think, in the end, it is not so much about the details of what happened, and to whom, but what you learn and can relate to in the information and events around you. Remember that the fear and the hatred is your greatest adversary!
There is a certain aspect of the population that believes that "believing" in something is enough ... and they read the books, and memorize this and that and so on. There is another aspect that "knows" it, and they seem to live it through and through. And then there are the total skeptics and that are not sure.
I'm not an expert in that area and would not conceive to think or opine in those situations, despite my extensive reading and appreciation for the novels and literary work done with the subject matter and what not. I enjoyed reading Dennis Wheatley. I enjoyed reading Moonchild or Diary of a Drug Fiend, so by the time I read Castaneda, a lot of these things were not totally invisible and unclear to me. And I already knew for myself, that the only option that was valuable for this stuff -- to me -- was an artistic expression and that from the histories and the stories, there were hundred and hundreds of "martyrs" out there that thought they were doing this or that ... and the application of a lot of these things, which was also quite visible in Santa Barbara, just had no appeal and sometimes felt like a good reason to have a really nice orgy, and everyone have fun!
It was the same thing for the musicians around me. It was the same thing for all the "academicos" around me. It's not hard to tell who "is" into it, and who "knows" ... and being into it is not the same thing. Eventually that person can learn and pick it up along the way ... but it does not mean they know and understand the soul of it all. I may not have that sould within, to perfection, but I don't think you will ever find another person that speaks so lovingly about the arts that we helped create in those days, that are still not appreciated and treated as such ... and specially by this board and its membership!
I am not the art. The art is not "me". But the art is much bigger than us all and it lived! ... if we had opened our eyes and ears, not just turn on and tune in and then go get laid and forget about it in the morning!
Edited by moshkito - September 20 2011 at 20:07
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
|
TODDLER
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
|
Posted: September 20 2011 at 20:39 |
moshkito wrote:
Hi,
Just so we're all clear ... the "scene" did not start in 1969 or 1970!
The whole scene has its roots in a lot more other arts that we are willing to give them credit for. Don't forget where the Beatles fell apart if you are still blaming Yoko and her art shows! (How sad!) ... or the beat poets being all around and all over London and a lot of PF/Gong/SM folks were all over it and some of them living in the same house! And we refuse to see a connection.
The 60's were massive in film, theater, and the arts in general, and it took our generation's open-ness to help a lot of things get out there and appreciated. And Ravi Shakar, for example, had already been doing "East meets West" with Yehudi Menuhin and making massive waves and I can tell you stuupid stories of my "intelectual" family's parents and professors discussing it, and thinking ... how wonderful the music is ... but they would not even put on a Ravi Shankar album at all ... and also hear folks saying things like ... that can't be classical music ... look at all that improvisation ... sound familiar?
The same feelings were already in theater as there were a lot of experimental groups ... I got to see "The Living Theater" and "ETC La Mamma" and Joseph Chaikan ... and it would be really difficult for folks here that were too stoned and could only go see Black Sabbath or the like, to even appreciate where some of those bands got their kitch, or their own cliche! And BS, did not have anything to say ... it was all a "show" ... and still is! ... one song or another might resonate inside some, but not in an important way, other than ... a memory down the lane of yesterday, when you were stoned and your girlfriend was cool, and the drugs made the sex seem better than now or any other time!
Geeee ... has anything changed?
Film was the same. Jean Luc Godard was already tearing down the film conventions ... but no one here is capable of seeing a couple of those films and see the perspective. And in many ways, film was far more progressive than music ever was ... but somehow we only think of 2001, as a great stoney film, and nothing else! Both Fellini, Bergman and Antonioni and Bunuel had already busted open the whole thing in the 50's ... but no ... we think that rock music came first and the chicken came second.
And this was my biggest problem with most of the "rock'n'roll" audience ... they had never seen anything else and were too ripped to find out that there WAS something else out there. Likewise, I saw that Europe, Japan and other places had a lot more to offer than England or America in the 70's for music, both of the latter countries that were so damn stuck up on the commercialism, what with the big names buying out everything ... sorry Ertegun, I happen to not think you were good for the music over all ... maybe a couple of names , but not music in general ... and Giorgio Gomelsky is still not mentioned and discussed here ... as a man with a vision ... and on top of it, one fo the first men to give Jimmy Page a job! Guess who the visionary and dreamer was?
Dance was another scene that was getting massive with the free dance movement ... you had Bob Fosse here, what's her name over there, and then Misha had defected and was mixing free dance with his ballet. Guess what the music we love was also doing? ... instead of a new tutu, it was using a different chord or time scheme ... big fudging deal ... and it was the time and place that made it.
Toddler, the only thing I would have suggested to you is ... I wish we had met, because I would have said, get on to Europe and forget America. But it's still the same thing here today ... but a lot of it has to do with who and what you are and have inside and the strength that you draw from it. Think Peter Hammill ... not rich, but he never quit ... his richness is inside and can not be measured and we still appreciate it.
And that is what we did not realize fast enough and acted on it, otherwise we would all still be there doing it!
I'm still writing after all these years, even though in a place like this, a lot of it is passed over by trollers that have nothing to say, except add some crap to it to show their intelligence, and editorial mind. They sure do not have an experience, otherwise they would mention it, you think? |
Really interesting post!
|
|
cstack3
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7272
|
Posted: September 21 2011 at 00:32 |
TODDLER wrote:
Old cult, young cult,...it was a bit like the Dark Shadows series to me. I can tell you ..I wasn't fond of it.
|
Man, that is some f'ed up sh*t you bring up! I'm sure we had cult stuff going on in the Chicago area, but I never had any exposure like you are talking about!
Sorry you were so traumatized, the Chicago suburbs were mostly safe....kids that went to kindergarten together are still friends, we got high & formed bands together, some of us married childhood sweethearts, but we never had that type of victimization!
|
|
TODDLER
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
|
Posted: September 21 2011 at 08:53 |
cstack3 wrote:
TODDLER wrote:
Old cult, young cult,...it was a bit like the Dark Shadows series to me. I can tell you ..I wasn't fond of it.
|
Man, that is some f'ed up sh*t you bring up! I'm sure we had cult stuff going on in the Chicago area, but I never had any exposure like you are talking about!
Sorry you were so traumatized, the Chicago suburbs were mostly safe....kids that went to kindergarten together are still friends, we got high & formed bands together, some of us married childhood sweethearts, but we never had that type of victimization! |
That's because it's a special set of circumstances. I have always enjoyed science fiction novels and dark mysterious music, but so do many others and it doesn't mean we all cross the line over into a religion that worships Satan. Coming from a town like this..I have been pegged to be just that. That is how blind the average person is. The average person doesn't seem to know how to spot an individual who is into witchcraft or Satan so they can protect their children from them. They are not very good at telling the difference between a person who was traumatized from it and a person who indulged in it. Meanwhile you're in a pathetic situation where it feels like some smuck came along and threw a handful of quarters into the air ...landing heads or tails and determinating your destiny. What can you possibly do about that when you are a child?
I don't know if you have ever seen Rosemary's Baby? It's a ridiculous story to me and in so many ways I find it just completely stupied and corny. However ....there is one particular aspect to that film that Roman Polanski got right. He was in a concentration camp as a child and somehow years later where ever it was specifically that he traveled in Europe he understood the characteristics of Satan cult members and witches. The whole concept of Ruth Gordon coming across as hospitable and nosey is exacting. Many of the elderly folks from the Satan worshippers sect in my hometown did not dress in black or look mysterious in any fashion whatsoever. They came as your friends...just as they came to Rosemary in the movie. There was no reason to suspect anything wrong about them. It was the youth in the early 70's which took on that image to flaunt evil which later developed into a fad along with "Heavy Metal" music. Some parents are aware of the the goth image and take precautions with their children. I look for something else.
Folks in my hometown who belonged to the sect were sweet as pie and would attempt to replace the position of your parents by giving you your freedom or the material things you desired as a teen which your parents did not give you those things because they felt it was not in your best interest. Then you were drawn in and possibly a year later they might decide to get rid of you through a sacrifice or just throwing you off a balcony to die. These people were born to the sect and the older generations of their family tree derived originally from the shores of Europe where they had eventually migrated to America and stayed undercover posing in the community. Just as they did centuries ago prior to the Salem witch trials. There is nothing farce about it. In the "Satanic Panic" era people would read the newspapers. In those newspapers were stories about cults posing in Daycare centers, Churches, etc and the majority of society thought it was just good press. I disagree because history says otherwise. History tells us that it has always been done this way for centuries and I base my dis-belief in the public's belief due to my experience and research. Society thought it was farce because of all the punks in Satan cults who were getting busted for sacrificing a member in their cult or even killing an infant. They blamed it on the "Heavy Metal" music and the fad for the youth through the media.
The reason why many kids that perform a tragic act like this commit suicide behind bars is the from the pressure of the FBI. The FBI must investigate further to see if it's just a fringe group in the woods strung out on dope and thinking sadistic acts are a method of feeling special or if the kids were brainwashed by an elderly sect....like the kids in my hometown. You couldn't make it on the outside if you turned people in and were an x-mob member unless the witness protection program came into the picture as it did with Henry Hill ....which I don't know his entire story....but anyway....if you were a kid and had been brainwashed by a sect like this ....how would you make it on the outside if you were to turn important members in? If you turn one person in...then you've got to deal with the next one in line and so forth. So they will simply put an end to their life in jail rather than making the choice of being released in 10 years and being hunted down. Some kids who are members of a sect ..yet have nothing to do with a murder are released after so much time goes by and people forget. But not the sect. They may very well go after the person later in life just to keep a sacred bond in the sect. Just to clean it all up and be rid of the dirty past. Obviously there are and were Satan cults formed by the local punks who are on their personal mission and have zero to do with higher ranks. Not my experience at all because this was in 1971 before that pattern existed. Yet that is what precisely confuses society into believing there is nothing more than that.
Edited by TODDLER - September 21 2011 at 09:08
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17524
|
Posted: September 21 2011 at 16:34 |
cstack3 wrote:
TODDLER wrote:
Old cult, young cult,...it was a bit like the Dark Shadows series to me. I can tell you ..I wasn't fond of it.
|
Man, that is some f'ed up sh*t you bring up! I'm sure we had cult stuff going on in the Chicago area, but I never had any exposure like you are talking about!
Sorry you were so traumatized, the Chicago suburbs were mostly safe....kids that went to kindergarten together are still friends, we got high & formed bands together, some of us married childhood sweethearts, but we never had that type of victimization! |
Chicago was too tied up and busy with a different Daley ... but it still had a lot of nice things come by ... after all I did see Ravi Shankar and Yehudi Menuhin on the same day that I saw Richard Kiley do Man of La Mancha down the street, and spent the rest of the day looking at that lovely bunch of art at the Chicago Art Institute!
California had its thing too, and Santa Barbara was not immune to it, but it simply was not what I was into and being so literary and education minded, meant that for a lot of situations, it was just another form of fanaticism for my way of thinking.
And again, my "mysticism" is 100% centered on the arts of music, writing and painting and does not involve any form of ritual or church to go to. It's actually quite independent, too ...
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17524
|
Posted: September 21 2011 at 16:49 |
TODDLER wrote:
... landing heads or tails and determinating your destiny. What can you possibly do about that when you are a child?
...
|
It is very tough indeed. But I do know that the signals and hints are always there and in the end, the chance is there, but it is harder in some places than others. For example, in America you have the chance to make a decent living and even own a house during your life, but in Brazil where we lived, unless you were this or that, you would be a bum all your life and there is no God that will ever save you! And the chances to learn and find out more? ... very slim and it's really hard to discuss and talk about kharma/dharma in those situations.
TODDLER wrote:
...
However ....there is one particular aspect to that film that Roman Polanski got right. He was in a concentration camp as a child and somehow years later where ever it was specifically that he traveled in Europe he understood the characteristics of Satan cult members and witches. ...
|
Because the people that put him/family in the sewers in Poland were the equivalent of the cult members and the witches.
But there is another bit in the film that says more about you and I and all of us, than anything else ... and it is the bit that concerns this whole thing more than anything else in this discussion ... the curiosity factor ... and it is very visible in one famous shot where the camera is looking into the bedroom, and we can only see the foot of the bed, and everyone ... EVERYONE ... in the theater leaned their heads to the right to try and look/see beyond the door frame ... in the end, we are a conditioned bunch of folks think/feel that everything there is to know and do is always around the corner, or somewhere else ... and the only TRUTH that magic and spirit and soul has ever had is that it is not about the outside, it is about the inside and how you relate to it. You don't have to "see it" ... to know ... and this was the falacy of the "mysticism" in those days, in the new age days, and today. That is not to say that any of those arts are not valid ... of course they are, but in the wrong hands they are deadly and very dangerous, and not a game, or something that most people should get involved in!
And only those that are not capable of seeing within themselves will always be looking and driven by an idea, or something they see ... and it is no different wether it is music, a political idea or whatever ... what you don't know usually drives your ability to learn ... and if it is focused on the outside, you can not learn unless you have the inate ability to see inside and find the parallel within yourself.
The 60's also used the internal thing quite a bit, and the Beatles/Eastern thing was more about taking it further, but in the end, too many people were afraid ... and even then, there were folks saying that Transcendental Meditation was evil ... and that was a horrible lack of understanding about what it was in the first place.
Again, I was lucky ... I was from a house with 40k books of literature, so it was a bit easier to find what was better and what was not so good ... and which looked like stories and which were NOT stories ... and it's the same thing with this music ... all the main/important acts were not just a song ... and this is the perspective that this board lacks in the appreciation of what we wish to call "progressive music" that was so valuable in those days, and still lives today with different t-shirts and shorts!
Edited by moshkito - September 21 2011 at 16:53
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
|
cstack3
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7272
|
Posted: September 21 2011 at 16:52 |
moshkito wrote:
cstack3 wrote:
TODDLER wrote:
Old cult, young cult,...it was a bit like the Dark Shadows series to me. I can tell you ..I wasn't fond of it.
|
Man, that is some f'ed up sh*t you bring up! I'm sure we had cult stuff going on in the Chicago area, but I never had any exposure like you are talking about!
Sorry you were so traumatized, the Chicago suburbs were mostly safe....kids that went to kindergarten together are still friends, we got high & formed bands together, some of us married childhood sweethearts, but we never had that type of victimization! |
Chicago was too tied up and busy with a different Daley ... but it still had a lot of nice things come by ... after all I did see Ravi Shankar and Yehudi Menuhin on the same day that I saw Richard Kiley do Man of La Mancha down the street, and spent the rest of the day looking at that lovely bunch of art at the Chicago Art Institute!
California had its thing too, and Santa Barbara was not immune to it, but it simply was not what I was into and being so literary and education minded, meant that for a lot of situations, it was just another form of fanaticism for my way of thinking.
And again, my "mysticism" is 100% centered on the arts of music, writing and painting and does not involve any form of ritual or church to go to. It's actually quite independent, too ... |
Toddler & Moshkito, thanks for your insights! There were rumors of Satanist cults hereabouts, but I think the Chicagoland community, which is quite conservative, kept them pretty far underground. Of course, we had more than our share of pedophile Catholic priests....
For any readers who want to see how the USA was interested in Satanism back in the 1960's, please watch this Alfred Hitchcock TV show, "The Sign of Satan"....this is some scary stuff! Notice how they refer to the things Toddler talks about (European origins, US black masses etc.). I watched this as a kid, and at age 56, it still scares the bejeebers out of me! Toddler, I doubt if you'll find it interesting based on your history, you may want to take a pass.
|
|
TODDLER
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
|
Posted: September 21 2011 at 17:21 |
Vineland is the largest city in New Jersey. Back in the 60's the wooded areas and farmland was vast. In the 30's many Italian people migrated there from the north of Italy and not so much the south. They were already farmers in Italy and they decided to settle in Vineland during the great depression to continue farming. They used to enjoy jazz music, Classical music and they often sang Italian songs. During the hippie movement in Vineland this certain group of what would be defined as rednecks infested the place. Their mission was to beat up hippies which the irony of that began in the mid 70's when they themselves began to grow long hair and beards. They tried to emulate the people of the south and not doing a very good job at it....for they took on the nasty role of the redneck and NOT the hospitable one.
"A Place In The Sun" was opened in the early 70's by the drummer for the "Four Seasons". The James Gang is the only band I recall performing there ...however there were acts from the 60's every weekend. The venue was shut down after a few years of functioning. Italian farmers and rednecks in the social environment ignored the Satan cult killings and simply pretended for most of their lives not discussing it and living in denial. Steve Laury was a great guitarist who performed in Vineland and jammed with when I was 16. He left for the west coast and formed the west coast fusion band Fattburger. They released several cd's and then Steve went solo and then vanishing from the music business. I still speak to him by phone and it's very sad that he is not active. He is one of the greatest jazz guitarists in the world. Some of his concert footage can be viewed on youtube....but Steve says he had nothing to do with it and has nothing to do with the music business at all. Todd Rundgren used to drive down from Philadelphia when he worked with Woody's Truckstop. He used to visit Steve's house and they would hang out on the weekends. Steve wanted to help me, but...I was just too young and being 6 years older he had to move on with his career.
Vineland was a far cry from even arriving close to a city like Chicago, Philadelphia or N.Y.....with all it's lack of culture and it's back in the woods mentality. on the front it was all about getting the LED out, beating up wives and kids when they interrupted the Super Bowl, and just being a south Jersey yee-ha. When I was 15 ...I had a deep interest in the lyricism of Pete Sinfield. Clearly Vineland was not the place to be. To share a common interest such as that in Vineland during the year of 1971...you would have better luck conversing with the Satan cults ...which was dangerous and so I kept to myself. The place was evil on the fore-front and the underground. A hick town on the surface and a Satan worship gallery underneath.
Edited by TODDLER - October 03 2011 at 08:15
|
|
TODDLER
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
|
Posted: September 21 2011 at 17:36 |
I also recall being on the road in the music business from 76 or 77' on....and even though you could perform in original prog bands or cover prog bands to packed to the max venues ...I mean were talking about entering the stage to play "Watcher of the Skies" or "Perpetual Change" to a huge audience who was there to see IF you could play it...I was alone....because no one knew who David Bedford was and I'd end up in the Holiday Inn listening to his music. People who were into YES and GENESIS would give me the deer in the headlight look. Who is David Bedford? Who is Popol Vuh? I was again in the wrong place. I still wonder just how popular those artists were on European shores amongst fans of progressive and musicians.
Edited by TODDLER - September 21 2011 at 17:37
|
|
TODDLER
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
|
Posted: September 21 2011 at 17:50 |
moshkito wrote:
TODDLER wrote:
... landing heads or tails and determinating your destiny. What can you possibly do about that when you are a child?
...
|
It is very tough indeed. But I do know that the signals and hints are always there and in the end, the chance is there, but it is harder in some places than others. For example, in America you have the chance to make a decent living and even own a house during your life, but in Brazil where we lived, unless you were this or that, you would be a bum all your life and there is no God that will ever save you! And the chances to learn and find out more? ... very slim and it's really hard to discuss and talk about kharma/dharma in those situations.
TODDLER wrote:
...
However ....there is one particular aspect to that film that Roman Polanski got right. He was in a concentration camp as a child and somehow years later where ever it was specifically that he traveled in Europe he understood the characteristics of Satan cult members and witches. ...
|
Because the people that put him/family in the sewers in Poland were the equivalent of the cult members and the witches.
But there is another bit in the film that says more about you and I and all of us, than anything else ... and it is the bit that concerns this whole thing more than anything else in this discussion ... the curiosity factor ... and it is very visible in one famous shot where the camera is looking into the bedroom, and we can only see the foot of the bed, and everyone ... EVERYONE ... in the theater leaned their heads to the right to try and look/see beyond the door frame ... in the end, we are a conditioned bunch of folks think/feel that everything there is to know and do is always around the corner, or somewhere else ... and the only TRUTH that magic and spirit and soul has ever had is that it is not about the outside, it is about the inside and how you relate to it. You don't have to "see it" ... to know ... and this was the falacy of the "mysticism" in those days, in the new age days, and today. That is not to say that any of those arts are not valid ... of course they are, but in the wrong hands they are deadly and very dangerous, and not a game, or something that most people should get involved in!
And only those that are not capable of seeing within themselves will always be looking and driven by an idea, or something they see ... and it is no different wether it is music, a political idea or whatever ... what you don't know usually drives your ability to learn ... and if it is focused on the outside, you can not learn unless you have the inate ability to see inside and find the parallel within yourself.
The 60's also used the internal thing quite a bit, and the Beatles/Eastern thing was more about taking it further, but in the end, too many people were afraid ... and even then, there were folks saying that Transcendental Meditation was evil ... and that was a horrible lack of understanding about what it was in the first place.
Again, I was lucky ... I was from a house with 40k books of literature, so it was a bit easier to find what was better and what was not so good ... and which looked like stories and which were NOT stories ... and it's the same thing with this music ... all the main/important acts were not just a song ... and this is the perspective that this board lacks in the appreciation of what we wish to call "progressive music" that was so valuable in those days, and still lives today with different t-shirts and shorts! |
I really enjoyed this post. Thanks for your insight
|
|
Kashmir75
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 25 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1029
|
Posted: September 24 2011 at 23:09 |
I wasn't born yet but the impression I get is that music was not so cliquey back then. You had ELP, Sabbath, Tull, Lynyrd Skynyrd, and Deep Purple playing at the same festivals. Hell, Tony Iommi was even in Jethro Tull for a brief time. I just get the idea people were more open about experimentation and creativity in music. These days it's all about factions and labels.
One advantage about growing up now is that it is easier to access the music you want to listen to. But I would have liked to grow up in the late sixties or early seventies, in my mind the peak of rock music.
|
Hello, mirror. So glad to see you, my friend. It's been a while...
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17524
|
Posted: September 25 2011 at 12:14 |
Kashmir75 wrote:
I wasn't born yet but the impression I get is that music was not so cliquey back then. You had ELP, Sabbath, Tull, Lynyrd Skynyrd, and Deep Purple playing at the same festivals. Hell, Tony Iommi was even in Jethro Tull for a brief time. I just get the idea people were more open about experimentation and creativity in music. These days it's all about factions and labels. ... |
I never thought of it as cliquey, although in Madison there used to be a nasty rift between the ROTC and the rest of the folks that liked the new music. It was almost like someone at ROTC could not like Jimi, or Janis ... it was the stupidest thing and the most un-educated thing I ever saw in my life. It was way too separatist for my tastes, but then, most black music in America, was quite cliquey until Michael Jackson came along and you saw a larger mix than anyone else. To me, this is Michael's most important legacy of all. Experimentation was easier in Europe than America, what with their music history of hundreds of years. America spent its history killing the culture that was here, and then hide the black culture and this preventeda lot of things from making it to the front. Europe, at least, had some appreciation for the musicianship, which is something that America still lacks. For all intents and purposes Charlie Daniels is still a better fiddler than most wahoos out there playing the violin to some piece of classical music. Or Doug Kershaw. I di think that a lot more of this age, time and place, will be much more appreciated long after we are gone. Even the folks in this board are afraid to discuss those social elements that helped drive the music. And I think that too many of the long cuts in the early days of the Fillmore and such, are all forgotten because people were too damn stoned ... and the record companies never released these things and killed them. Even the Grateful Dead, the masters of the long cut that used to play all night long, is not remembered for that "tripping" any more ... it's more remembered for its hippy scene ... which brings down the music itself, and the members left are not musically adventurous a whole lot. Maybe Mickey, but even then, you rarely hear that on the GD albums! America, is really 4 or 5 countries in one, and therein lies the problem, otherwise the New York artistic scene would be remembered much better than it is, or the SF scene or the LA scene, or the New Orleans scene. Instead you get these cliques of music, like R&this and that, and the "traditional" stuff that is found in many areas. As a sad example, of the whole thing, Return to Forever and Zappa plays Zappa played in Eugene, OR, not Portland, OR which is a much bigger place, but has always been very "traditional" and old music minded in order to even appreciate the great music both those bands were playing ... but the Rose Garden will not spare you Rob Zombie or Brittany Spears. It's notcliquey ... it's just musically uneducated. We had the same issue at KTYD with Guy Guden and his Space Pirate Radio show ... but it will be a cold day in hell that many of those folks in there will actually appreciate the work that was done. And there was one of the other DJ's that interrupted Guy one time while playing Golden Earring, and said that it wasn't rock'n'roll, to which Guy stopped the record and then wound it back up and said ... "who cares? It's great music!" ... and to this day, something like that is still an issue! By the way, the name of the song was "Are You Receiving Me?" in case it matters to you some. It's about the music, not the "scene" or the "style" and this is the popularity contest that many folks can not get away from in this country and eventually will stop listening to it. Met one old friend from school and all he could think of was ... we were such kids then ... and the music did not mean anything! I don't see any difference, even today. I look at us here on this board as the difference makers, although I am not sure that most of them think of themselves likewise.
Edited by moshkito - September 25 2011 at 12:19
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
|
verslibre
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 01 2004
Location: CA
Status: Offline
Points: 17187
|
Posted: October 03 2011 at 04:25 |
cstack3 wrote:
For any readers who want to see how the USA was interested in Satanism back in the 1960's, please watch this Alfred Hitchcock TV show, "The Sign of Satan"....this is some scary stuff! Notice how they refer to the things Toddler talks about (European origins, US black masses etc.). I watched this as a kid, and at age 56, it still scares the bejeebers out of me! Toddler, I doubt if you'll find it interesting based on your history, you may want to take a pass.
|
Hmmmm...the hour groweth late. Should I watch this now, or later "today"? Decisions, decisions...
|
|
|
TODDLER
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
|
Posted: October 04 2011 at 07:52 |
Steve Laury I knew at age 16 and I was amazed by his talent. He was from Vineland N.J. and couldn't get a break in the music business on the east coast so he left for the west coast and formed Fattburger. No doubt he is my favorite guitarist.
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17524
|
Posted: October 06 2011 at 13:57 |
TODDLER wrote:
moshkito wrote:
...
But there is another bit in the film that says more about you and I and all of us, than anything else ... and it is the bit that concerns this whole thing more than anything else in this discussion ... the curiosity factor ... and it is very visible in one famous shot where the camera is looking into the bedroom, and we can only see the foot of the bed, and everyone ... EVERYONE ... in the theater leaned their heads to the right to try and look/see beyond the door frame ... in the end, we are a conditioned bunch of folks think/feel that everything there is to know and do is always around the corner, or somewhere else ... and the only TRUTH that magic and spirit and soul has ever had is that it is not about the outside, it is about the inside and how you relate to it. You don't have to "see it" ... to know ... and this was the falacy of the "mysticism" in those days, in the new age days, and today. That is not to say that any of those arts are not valid ... of course they are, but in the wrong hands they are deadly and very dangerous, and not a game, or something that most people should get involved in!
... |
I really enjoyed this post. Thanks for your insight |
This visual about the film is important. And it also shows how "progressive" Roman was in regards to film like many of his contemporaries. If you can find it, there is a film about cinematographers that is called "Visions of Light", and you will appreciate a lot of stuff in there, specially the WHEN for much of it, which is on par with the musical experiments at the time. Roman, in his "Tess" film also did something that is downright difficult and very harsh, but it's almost like it's real, but it would be something that he would know from the Concentration Camps or the Sewers in the war ... and it was the rape scene, when he used the handheld camera right on Natasha's face, body and person ... and the shooting of it, made the scene more horrific and even more important for the whole story and film.
In the end, it became almost single handedly about the "individuality" of the expression ... which a commercial style can not do and will not allow, in general ... and the 60's and early 70's were an artistic fight for expression and being seen ... and guess what is happening today all over again ... it keeps getting more and more commercial, right down to the classifications in order for most folks in this board to find ... the same thing they already are listening to!
To me, a Gaspar Noe, today, is almost the same as a Polanski then, or any other artist, like KC's album ITCOTCK, because it is a searing attack and comment on the time and place and people ... and how screwed up it all was ... and how much hope we had of making a change. In the end, we were not able to make a change, but we left behind an artistic legacy, and I think this is the importance of that time and place, and ALL of its art, regardless of which country it came from. And this is the part that is very difficult to discuss at PA, except in this thread where most folks have been above and beyond the call of duty and posted some very far out and wonderful mementos.
Look for some articles and books on the theater 1950's and 1960's. And notice the attempts, some very harsh, to break convention and find out what this is all about ... even that loud scream ... STELLLLLLLLLLLLLAAAAAA ... is important ... in this thread ... and then compare it to the first albums by KC, Yes, ELP and many of those bands ... and you will notice that very quickly these bands quit on their "idealism" and "aesthetics", which is the reason why I say that not all of it is as good as most people think, when compared to other works out there and artists that did a whole lot more ... in the end, Jean Luc Godard is the most progressive of all of these artists, with one exception ... many of us can't stand it and think it's pretentious, when in the end, he is just making fun of us for having turned our heads to find out what was on the other side of the door. And challenging our intelligence quota when listening and watching things, because too many of us immediately "default" to a standard socialized comment and idea.
It's conditioning. And if one does not break the conditioning along the way, sooner or later you're not going to enjoy that art or music or book or movie ... ohhh yeah ... get married get a job and have a kid and a half! Become just another number in the Social Studies class!
Edited by moshkito - October 06 2011 at 14:08
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
|
colorofmoney91
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 16 2008
Location: Biosphere
Status: Offline
Points: 22774
|
Posted: October 06 2011 at 20:19 |
The '70s sound awesome.
|
|
|