Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Report errors & omissions here
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Pink Floyd's Live At Pompeii
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPink Floyd's Live At Pompeii

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Desoc View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 12 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 216
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Pink Floyd's Live At Pompeii
    Posted: April 03 2011 at 13:06
There are two separate entries for Live at Pompeii:
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=15681
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=7221

The first is the original version, the second is the director's cut released in 2003. These two versions were earlier possible to distinguish by separate titles (there was a (VHS) added to the first title), but now their titles are identical. They have different covers, but this is not unusual also among identical records released in different points in time. So I believe this could easily cause people to review (or buy) the wrong version.

I suggest: Either
a) re-label the first version with a VHS tag, or
b) label the second version with a Director's Cut tag, or
c) merge the entries - the director's cut also includes the original version, so it could easily be compared to special edition albums which do not qualify for a separate entry.


Edited by Desoc - April 03 2011 at 13:07
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2011 at 13:11
I need to bring the info all under one release.
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2011 at 13:17
I noticed the disappearance of the "VHS" tag from the descriptors of video releases, too. But if M@x reintroduces it, it will show up at all the video releases, including the Live At Pompeii 2003 DVD. I think we'll just have to trust people in knowing that there weren't any DVDs back in the 80s LOL
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2011 at 13:18
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

I need to bring the info all under one release.


I don't think that would be a good idea, they're practically two different films, even if based on the same concert. The review make the difference well enough, too. For example, some like the VHS version and not the DVD (while for me it's viceversa).
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2011 at 13:22
Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

I need to bring the info all under one release.


I don't think that would be a good idea, they're practically two different films, even if based on the same concert. The review make the difference well enough, too. For example, some like the VHS version and not the DVD (while for me it's viceversa).

I understand. But it is the common practise. And all the info will be there under one, and the reviewer can say which one is being refered to.

But I'm not a dictator, I will let admin decide.
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2011 at 13:27
Well, in the case of the 40th anniversary edition of ITCOCK there was less of a reason to make a new entry, but it was added as a compilation. There exceptions to the rule, but it's indeed difficult to know where to draw the line.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2011 at 13:33
Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Well, in the case of the 40th anniversary edition of ITCOCK there was less of a reason to make a new entry, but it was added as a compilation. There exceptions to the rule, but it's indeed difficult to know where to draw the line.

Which is why I prefer everything to be treated the same. Is that you in your Avatar?
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2011 at 13:35
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Well, in the case of the 40th anniversary edition of ITCOCK there was less of a reason to make a new entry, but it was added as a compilation. There exceptions to the rule, but it's indeed difficult to know where to draw the line.

Which is why I prefer everything to be treated the same. Is that you in your Avatar?


I can't argue with your position, it makes sense, I'd just prefer it stays like it is now because I don't like change. Tongue And that's me, yes.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2011 at 13:37
Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Well, in the case of the 40th anniversary edition of ITCOCK there was less of a reason to make a new entry, but it was added as a compilation. There exceptions to the rule, but it's indeed difficult to know where to draw the line.

Which is why I prefer everything to be treated the same. Is that you in your Avatar?


I can't argue with your position, it makes sense, I'd just prefer it stays like it is now because I don't like change. Tongue And that's me, yes.

You look a little like my friend Gethyn. Are you out photographing?
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2011 at 13:43
Yes, that's a Nikon D60 I am holding, in the gardens of Versailles (last autumn). 
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2011 at 13:48
Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

Yes, that's a Nikon D60 I am holding, in the gardens of Versailles (last autumn). 

Nice!

At first glance it looks like you are playing a guitar.With the strap and the tree in the background looking like the neck.
Back to Top
Desoc View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 12 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 216
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2011 at 14:01
Well, this certainly got off topic Tongue

But back to the point: It seems that my option b) might be the smallest common denominator? At least I think there should be some kind of title change to keep the titles separated.
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2011 at 14:05
@Ian: I've been told I look like holding a pistol LOL

Originally posted by Desoc Desoc wrote:

Well, this certainly got off topic Tongue

But back to the point: It seems that my option b) might be the smallest common denominator? At least I think there should be some kind of title change to keep the titles separated.


Embarrassed

I agree, that should do for the moment, until we get Admin input.
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 03 2011 at 14:20

It would probably be preferable to bring them under the one heading, but for long established duplications such as this, it becomes impractical. The complexities of the ratings calculations mean that was cannot move reviews from one album to another. (M@x withdrew the faciliity to move reviews as it was screwing up the calculations) The only way we can now move them is to contact each reviewer and ask them to re-post their review. That's OK when there are a handful and they are recent, but when there are a number of them and they have been there a while, it can mean reviews getting lost.

In this case, I'd suggest adding the "Video" moniker back into the title.
 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.104 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.