Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Reviews discussion
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Reviews discussion

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 125126127128129 182>
Author
Message
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17335
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Finnforest Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 10:24
I wouldn't have used a thank you button though....I would have posted here or sent a PMTongue
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
Andrea Cortese View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 05 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 4411
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Andrea Cortese Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 10:49
^^^ yeah, I wouldn't too!Wink
Back to Top
octopus-4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams

Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14589
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote octopus-4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2011 at 15:29
This is the private message that I've sent him. As for the previous review, I don't see anything "illegal" and I don't care about what's the top rated album. I have made SEBTP loose the top with my three stars review some weeks ago.

Comment about your YES Close To The Edge review http://www.progarchives.com/review.asp?id=401000

CTTE is not easy,effectively. You may try to approach YES with THE YES ALBUM or GOING FOR THE ONE that are easier, but if you don't like Jon Anderson's falsetto you can give up to their whole discography. The strange thing is that you say you like King Crimson that I think are harder to digest than YES, apart their debut. However it's always question of personal tastes.


* Report abuse here http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=20

I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AtomicCrimsonRush Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2011 at 21:03
Originally posted by Formentera Lady Formentera Lady wrote:

With interest I read the controversy about the person who reviewed TAAB with 2 stars and whose reviews disappeared mysteriously. Now with the same curiosity I am awaiting what you are saying to this one:

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=401000

Similar wording, comparison with Genesis etc.. Today signed up, first review.
(Not that I think it is illegal, though.)
I do not agree with the reviewers opinion. But it is a review, justifying the 2 stars, and deserves to be here.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37525
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2011 at 21:09
Originally posted by AtomicCrimsonRush AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:

Originally posted by Formentera Lady Formentera Lady wrote:

With interest I read the controversy about the person who reviewed TAAB with 2 stars and whose reviews disappeared mysteriously. Now with the same curiosity I am awaiting what you are saying to this one:

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=401000

Similar wording, comparison with Genesis etc.. Today signed up, first review.
(Not that I think it is illegal, though.)
I do not agree with the reviewers opinion. But it is a review, justifying the 2 stars, and deserves to be here.


I'd like to move comments to Reviews discussion after supper.

I took it that the problem is not that the review itself is problematic, but that it looks like the same person might have written it who wrote the removed TAAB review (multiple account issue then).




Edited by Logan - February 15 2011 at 21:10
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Henry Plainview Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2011 at 21:32
 
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

 I took it that the problem is not that the review itself is problematic, but that it looks like the same person might have written it who wrote the removed TAAB review (multiple account issue then).

Is that really a problem? If we're assuming it is the same person, maybe he decided to jettison the old account, and as long as the ratings don't overlap I think that's ok. 


if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37525
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2011 at 21:50
I don't know if there's any problem, but I took it that that was likely to be FM's (edit meant FL's as in Formentera Lady) concern, not that review itself was problematic.  It would take an admin to investigate and determine if there was any problem.

Edited by Logan - February 15 2011 at 22:04
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37525
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2011 at 21:57
I moved several posts from the Reviews Abuse thread: CLICK
Discussion may be continued here.  Thanks.
Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AtomicCrimsonRush Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2011 at 23:17
It beamed over here. Once again the review itself is not that bad but its a bit misinformed... as to what prog is. Since when was melody important? 
Back to Top
octopus-4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams

Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14589
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote octopus-4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2011 at 00:08
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Earlier posts formerly were moved to Reviews Discussion and the latest post has followed.  Please discuss in Reviews Discussion - CLICK.
Good choice. Let's continue, if it's the case, on a most appropriate place.
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Back to Top
octopus-4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams

Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14589
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote octopus-4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2011 at 00:12
Good point. But he's mainly from Symphonic and neo-prog. For him melody is important. My concern was about KC that are not always so "melodic", and this is what I wrote in my message.
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Back to Top
frippism View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 27 2010
Location: Tel Aviv
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote frippism Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2011 at 13:01
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

 
Originally posted by AtomicCrimsonRush AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:

    The problem is it takes one second to rate an album and too many are doing this. It gets me annoyed that they have the power to bring great albums down by rating 1 star

A single rating only on a popular album has close to zero impact on the final rating, so they really don't. Assuming I didn't screw up the math because it's late, for one of the least popular albums in the top 100, an additional 1 star rating would bring it down .01%, on a midrange .003%, and on the second most popular (only because I didn't feel like manually counting the reviews on CTTE)  .0017%. Oh, the humanity. 
Henry is right, and this is something I have been saying for years, rating manipulation is futile and ineffective.

Definitely on the bigger albums, but the smaller (less popular) albums? Albums that are complete masterpieces, yet some jerk rated it 1 star, not knowing anything of the album, and ruins the rating, and nobody would interested in discovering the album, and nobody would be interested in listening to it to review it and attract a wider audience. It's dangerous. I say delete ratings in general. 

Concerning Silber, which rated all RIO albums 1 star, and the only album he decided to review, is Cardiacs' "Sing To God", and also Ahmetbolanyig, who has rated almost all (all but "Hot Rats") one star, and "Sing To God" is one of his only reviews, have dramatically hurt the general view of the album, and of Cardiacs. And considering the situation, where as I already said, lead singer Tim Smith is 2.5 years now recovering from a stroke, this review hurts album sales, and decreases people's interest, in a time where every album sold goes straight to help Tim Smith's recovery And these 2 reviews have dramatically decreased the album's rating, and less people will be interested in buying it. AND of course, considering the music is so great in the first place, and all they are doing is reviewing a whole sub-genre and labeling crap, without really knowing what they're talking about many times!
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dean Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2011 at 15:18
Originally posted by frippism frippism wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

 
Originally posted by AtomicCrimsonRush AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:

    The problem is it takes one second to rate an album and too many are doing this. It gets me annoyed that they have the power to bring great albums down by rating 1 star

A single rating only on a popular album has close to zero impact on the final rating, so they really don't. Assuming I didn't screw up the math because it's late, for one of the least popular albums in the top 100, an additional 1 star rating would bring it down .01%, on a midrange .003%, and on the second most popular (only because I didn't feel like manually counting the reviews on CTTE)  .0017%. Oh, the humanity. 
Henry is right, and this is something I have been saying for years, rating manipulation is futile and ineffective.

Definitely on the bigger albums, but the smaller (less popular) albums? Albums that are complete masterpieces, yet some jerk rated it 1 star, not knowing anything of the album, and ruins the rating, and nobody would interested in discovering the album, and nobody would be interested in listening to it to review it and attract a wider audience. It's dangerous. I say delete ratings in general. 

Concerning Silber, which rated all RIO albums 1 star, and the only album he decided to review, is Cardiacs' "Sing To God", and also Ahmetbolanyig, who has rated almost all (all but "Hot Rats") one star, and "Sing To God" is one of his only reviews, have dramatically hurt the general view of the album, and of Cardiacs. And considering the situation, where as I already said, lead singer Tim Smith is 2.5 years now recovering from a stroke, this review hurts album sales, and decreases people's interest, in a time where every album sold goes straight to help Tim Smith's recovery And these 2 reviews have dramatically decreased the album's rating, and less people will be interested in buying it. AND of course, considering the music is so great in the first place, and all they are doing is reviewing a whole sub-genre and labeling crap, without really knowing what they're talking about many times!
Siber and Ahmetbolanyig have been kicked off the site, but not for how they rate or review albums. They were ejected for being the same person and for no other reason.
 
The rating for "Sing to God" should go up to 4.55 (ish) soon, once the removal of this miscreant has filtered through the cache. Whether an album is rated at 4.31 or 4.55 will not affect its sales.
 
HOWEVER: People can review an album however they like - it is not for us to decide that someone is not permitted to review just because we don't agree with them. To do that is fundamentally wrong.
 


Edited by Dean - March 19 2011 at 18:24
What?
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ivan_Melgar_M Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2011 at 16:26
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

 
HOWEVER: People can review an album however they like - it is not for us to decide that someone is not permitted to review just because we don't agree with them. To do that is fundamentally wrong.
 

Yes Dean, but I believe there must be a limit.

I rated one Tech Extreme Metal album with 2 stars. but:
  1. I took the time to write a review to explain WHY
  2. I haven't rated more albums of this genre, because obviously I don't like it
  3. I discovered Tech Extreme Metal is not my style al,most as soon as I heard the first album, and even when I heard many more, in friends houses, I won't expend my money in something I don't like.
I don't believe for a second that this guy bought 56 albums of a genre he hates (all are rated with one star) and 100 Prog Metal albums,  (All except 2 a re rated with one star)...Each and every album without a support or a reason.

Sorry, I don't buy this and I'm 100% sure that if this guy has heard 3 albums out of 156 is too much.

Iván.


            
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dean Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2011 at 18:12
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

 
HOWEVER: People can review an album however they like - it is not for us to decide that someone is not permitted to review just because we don't agree with them. To do that is fundamentally wrong.
 

Yes Dean, but I believe there must be a limit.

I rated one Tech Extreme Metal album with 2 stars. but:
  1. I took the time to write a review to explain WHY
  2. I haven't rated more albums of this genre, because obviously I don't like it
  3. I discovered Tech Extreme Metal is not my style al,most as soon as I heard the first album, and even when I heard many more, in friends houses, I won't expend my money in something I don't like.
I don't believe for a second that this guy bought 56 albums of a genre he hates (all are rated with one star) and 100 Prog Metal albums,  (All except 2 a re rated with one star)...Each and every album without a support or a reason.

Sorry, I don't buy this and I'm 100% sure that if this guy has heard 3 albums out of 156 is too much.

Iván.


I don't disagree with you, but I don't agree with you either. I find it incredibly hard to believe he listened to that many albums of a genre he apparently doesn't like - he must be incredibly stupid to keep "buying" them if he doesn't like them and he must be inordinately dumb to bother to spend time rating them on a website such as ours when the votes he gives them count for so little and affect nothing - none of those albums he rated against affected anything he liked so it's not exactly smart rating manipulation, and that he took the time and energy to create two member accounts so he could repeat the exercise qualifies him as a brain worthy of laboratory investigation. BUT where do you draw the line? How many albums that he doesn't like is any one member permitted to rate/review? Is 8 1-star ratings for Genesis too much? I personally object most strongly to your Opeth review - I think it is a disgrace of the lowest order to deliberately down-mark what you consider to be a possible 4-star album by a whole 2-stars just because you cannot stomach death-growls - that's positively abysmal rating strategy and that you "took the time" (ie bothered) to write a review just makes it worse since your "rating" is now multiplied by 20 because you are a collab and because you wrote a review - HOWEVER - that's your opinion for which you are fully entitled and while I object to the rating value and your logic in applying it, I recognise your right to give it.
What?
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Epignosis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2011 at 18:16
I object to Ivan giving the Parish guy Spock's Beard's "f**k YOU!" album for the poor kids.  LOL
Back to Top
frippism View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 27 2010
Location: Tel Aviv
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote frippism Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2011 at 18:33
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

 
HOWEVER: People can review an album however they like - it is not for us to decide that someone is not permitted to review just because we don't agree with them. To do that is fundamentally wrong.
 

Yes Dean, but I believe there must be a limit.

I rated one Tech Extreme Metal album with 2 stars. but:
  1. I took the time to write a review to explain WHY
  2. I haven't rated more albums of this genre, because obviously I don't like it
  3. I discovered Tech Extreme Metal is not my style al,most as soon as I heard the first album, and even when I heard many more, in friends houses, I won't expend my money in something I don't like.
I don't believe for a second that this guy bought 56 albums of a genre he hates (all are rated with one star) and 100 Prog Metal albums,  (All except 2 a re rated with one star)...Each and every album without a support or a reason.

Sorry, I don't buy this and I'm 100% sure that if this guy has heard 3 albums out of 156 is too much.

Iván.


I don't disagree with you, but I don't agree with you either. I find it incredibly hard to believe he listened to that many albums of a genre he apparently doesn't like - he must be incredibly stupid to keep "buying" them if he doesn't like them and he must be inordinately dumb to bother to spend time rating them on a website such as ours when the votes he gives them count for so little and affect nothing - none of those albums he rated against affected anything he liked so it's not exactly smart rating manipulation, and that he took the time and energy to create two member accounts so he could repeat the exercise qualifies him as a brain worthy of laboratory investigation. BUT where do you draw the line? How many albums that he doesn't like is any one member permitted to rate/review? Is 8 1-star ratings for Genesis too much? I personally object most strongly to your Opeth review - I think it is a disgrace of the lowest order to deliberately down-mark what you consider to be a possible 4-star album by a whole 2-stars just because you cannot stomach death-growls - that's positively abysmal rating strategy and that you "took the time" (ie bothered) to write a review just makes it worse since your "rating" is now multiplied by 20 because you are a collab and because you wrote a review - HOWEVER - that's your opinion for which you are fully entitled and while I object to the rating value and your logic in applying it, I recognise your right to give it.

Look, of course that drawing a line is a difficult if not impossible thing to do. But you can see that this guy is off to screw up an entire sub-genre for no particular reason. If you gave me eight one-star reviews of all Genesis albums, and elaborated on why you dislike the albums so much and what are the reasons these albums shouldn't listened to, than fine! Even excellent! If anyone would review an album like "Sing To God", which I put in my top 2 albums, and give it a one-star, but justify why he gives this album one star and explains the faults of the album, what am I to do against it? It's when an album gets unfairly reviewed when I have a problem. I don't think people should review sub-genres here that they have some sort of grudge against (not that I'm the one to stop them from doing it). For example, I disagree so very strongly with Neo-Prog and the music many of these groups wrote and the elements used in the album that I would give all their albums no higher than 2-stars. But I'll never do it because Neo-Prog is a sub-genre I have not learned to understand or appreciate, and it's not fair for people looking for the very things that I don't like to listen to, as my reviews and rating would spoil the band's rating average (or whatever you call it), and band's who made great (great not for me but still great) music won't be as popular or as widespread because one jerk, or many jerks, have just an annoying hatred for Neo-Prog or any other sub-genre. When someone like Silber comes just to rate albums 1-star, because he dislikes genres as a whole, that ticks me off I won't lie. Is he entitled to his opinion? Of course. But when he hasn't listened to any of these albums (I'm assuming he at least didn't listen to most of them), it's... trolling. There's really no word to describe it. And when it's this obvious this guy isn't really legitimate he deserves to banned, because he's giving his official critique to something he hasn't really put much time and thought in. 
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dean Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2011 at 19:23
Originally posted by frippism frippism wrote:

Look, of course that drawing a line is a difficult if not impossible thing to do. But you can see that this guy is off to screw up an entire sub-genre for no particular reason. If you gave me eight one-star reviews of all Genesis albums, and elaborated on why you dislike the albums so much and what are the reasons these albums shouldn't listened to, than fine! Even excellent! If anyone would review an album like "Sing To God", which I put in my top 2 albums, and give it a one-star, but justify why he gives this album one star and explains the faults of the album, what am I to do against it? It's when an album gets unfairly reviewed when I have a problem. I don't think people should review sub-genres here that they have some sort of grudge against (not that I'm the one to stop them from doing it). For example, I disagree so very strongly with Neo-Prog and the music many of these groups wrote and the elements used in the album that I would give all their albums no higher than 2-stars. But I'll never do it because Neo-Prog is a sub-genre I have not learned to understand or appreciate, and it's not fair for people looking for the very things that I don't like to listen to, as my reviews and rating would spoil the band's rating average (or whatever you call it), and band's who made great (great not for me but still great) music won't be as popular or as widespread because one jerk, or many jerks, have just an annoying hatred for Neo-Prog or any other sub-genre. When someone like Silber comes just to rate albums 1-star, because he dislikes genres as a whole, that ticks me off I won't lie. Is he entitled to his opinion? Of course. But when he hasn't listened to any of these albums (I'm assuming he at least didn't listen to most of them), it's... trolling. There's really no word to describe it. And when it's this obvious this guy isn't really legitimate he deserves to banned, because he's giving his official critique to something he hasn't really put much time and thought in. 
Well no. How can you tell how much time and thought he put into reviewing that album? As a non-English speaker he evidently put a some amount of effort into writing them, and certainly they were as long and as informative as countless other reviews I've read. If we banned everyone who I believed hadn't given enought time and thought into reviewing an album our site would be empty - how anyone can write a review after hearing an album for merely a month puzzles me, that they can write a review after hearing an album once is something I'll never accept - some reviews around here read like the reviewer is writing it as they hear the album for the first time - HOWEVER, we have no such rule and people can put as much or as little effort into writing a review as they like.
 
Similarly we cannot dictate which subgenres and albums a member is not allowed to review, to do that would be wrong - any member can review or rate any number of albums in any subgenre - to impose any rule to the contrary would be wrong - that would be the worse kind of censorship and something that I cannot and will not support.
 
Nor should we ban them for writing reviews for a subgenre they clearly do not like - to do that would also be wrong. It is impossibe to screw-up a genre by 1-star rating - the mathematics proves that - one member one vote/album - the voting of one member isn't going to affect the consensus vote enough to make a difference. Also, how can you assume that 8 1-star ratings for Genesis would not be unfair but one 1-star review for The Cardiacs is unfair - that does not make sense, if I said that all those 1-star reviews were for Collins era Genesis then some kind of grudge could be construed from that, but that still wouldn't be proof. And even it it was true and could be proven that still isn't breaking any rules or a reason for banning them.
 
Mr Bolanyig got banned for having two accounts (proven by two separate methods which I will not elaborate on), not for what he reviewed or how many 1-star ratings he gave. He broke a rule that earns an instant banning - "no multiple accounts are permitted".
 
 
What?
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ivan_Melgar_M Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2011 at 23:33
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

I personally object most strongly to your Opeth review - I think it is a disgrace of the lowest order to deliberately down-mark what you consider to be a possible 4-star album by a whole 2-stars just because you cannot stomach death-growls - that's positively abysmal rating strategy and that you "took the time" (ie bothered) to write a review just makes it worse since your "rating" is now multiplied by 20 because you are a collab and because you wrote a review - HOWEVER - that's your opinion for which you are fully entitled and while I object to the rating value and your logic in applying it, I recognise your right to give it.

  1. You may not like my Opeth review, but:
      1. I explained my reasons and people know if they must trust or not my review.
      2. You may object my logic, but if I hate growls, is logic that I will find an album with massive growls absolutely terrible..
      3. My review is worth 20 times, because I took the time to express my opinion in a 500 words review that took me a lot of effort, mainly because I am hardly an expert in Tech Extreme Metal. 
      4. Now, I never said "Still Life" is a 4 star album, I said "t's could  3 MAYBE 4 star album, if it wasn't ruined by Akkerfeld, I value vocals a lot, in some cases almost as much as the instrumentation, so if a guy makes terrible and distasteful noises (at least for me), it's ruined.
      5. I reviewed and rated ONE Tech Extreme Metal album, not 56 albums just to give them all one star.
  2. I believe a review says more about the album than 200 5 stars ratings of people that we don't know if they have even heard the album or if they have multiple accounts.
My opinion hasn't changed, I believe ratings without reviews are negative and say nothing, but if a person rates ALL THE ALBUMS OF ONE GENRE or even 90%, this person is not really interested in collaborating with the site, but misleading people.

Iván

BTW: I'm not the only one who has that opinion, there's a 1 star review saying "Please, members of Opeth, if you are reading this: STOP the growls. Make another album like Damnation. Please. Stop wasting your talents."...So there's people who agree with my opinion.

And even if not...At least they have something to agree or disagree with


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - March 19 2011 at 23:45
            
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ivan_Melgar_M Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2011 at 23:38
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

I object to Ivan giving the Parish guy Spock's Beard's "f**k YOU!" album for the poor kids.  LOL

Hey,. I'm giving them all the albums my sister left in the houwe before marrying, like Grease, Ricky Martin or Donna Summer,  that will hurt the poor kids more than the anodyne and toothless Spock's Beard. Wink,

The problem is that the church will more likely sell Grease or Ricky Martin than Spock's Beard Confused

Iván
            
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 125126127128129 182>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.457 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.