Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
kawkaw123
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 11 2009
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 445
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 09:32 |
KC is more innovative than Genesis ever was but i still voted for Genesis because they were better song writers.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
The Monodrone
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 21 2010
Location: Indiana, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4489
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 09:41 |
Pretty hard one.............
but I think I'll go Genesis.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
b4usleep
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 21 2009
Location: Istanbul
Status: Offline
Points: 620
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 10:09 |
Well, this is teribbly difficult. My vote goes to Genesis since they are enough to define the term progressive rock (at least with their works till 1975)
|
Really don't mind if you sit this one out.
My words but a whisper, your deafness a shout.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
rod65
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 28 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 248
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 10:27 |
Hard call, but Hacket-era Genesis moves me more than KC. Purely subjective response.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 11:10 |
Pleasantly surprised, had fully expected Genesis to be running away with this one when I came in to vote. This site must have changed a lot from what I remember it to be not so long ago. Voted for KC.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
MonsterMagnet
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 31 2010
Location: Liège, Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 561
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 11:21 |
King Crimson of courte
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
thehallway
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 13 2010
Location: Dorset, England
Status: Offline
Points: 1433
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 11:53 |
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Lizzy
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: March 15 2010
Location: Schnitzelland
Status: Offline
Points: 4675
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 11:53 |
From an objective point of view - KC.
|
Property of Queen Productions...
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 11:55 |
Going with KC here.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Triceratopsoil
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 11:57 |
James McProgger wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
The one that never turned into a mainstream pop poop-bucket
|
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
lazland
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13792
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 11:59 |
I'd like to make a suggestion that, in future, we ban all Yes fans with less than 20,000 posts on the forum from voting in future polls, so as not to skew and alter the result of otherwise fairly straightforward polls
|
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
thehallway
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 13 2010
Location: Dorset, England
Status: Offline
Points: 1433
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 12:06 |
lazland wrote:
I'd like to make a suggestion that, in future, we ban all Yes fans with less than 20,000 posts on the forum from voting in future polls, so as not to skew and alter the result of otherwise fairly straightforward polls![LOL LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif) |
1. Just because somebody prefers Yes to Genesis does not mean they don't happen to also prefer King Crimson to Genesis; there is nothing skewed about that.
2. How can you define a Yes fan? And in any case, many Yes fans are also Genesis fans.
3. Number of posts does not equate to intelligence, right to vote, value of opinion.... anything really, other than how frequently you are on this website.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Lark the Starless
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 15 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 1902
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 12:07 |
I seriously thought Genesis would be winning, not by much, by nonetheless, winning.
Genesis, all the way.
I hope that Rush can beat Pink Floyd ![Wink Wink](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif)
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Lark the Starless
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 15 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 1902
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 12:08 |
thehallway wrote:
lazland wrote:
I'd like to make a suggestion that, in future, we ban all Yes fans with less than 20,000 posts on the forum from voting in future polls, so as not to skew and alter the result of otherwise fairly straightforward polls![LOL LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif) |
1. Just because somebody prefers Yes to Genesis does not mean they don't happen to also prefer King Crimson to Genesis; there is nothing skewed about that.
2. How can you define a Yes fan? And in any case, many Yes fans are also Genesis fans.
3. Number of posts does not equate to intelligence, right to vote, value of opinion.... anything really, other than how frequently you are on this website. |
I believe Lazland was just kidding. ![Ermm Ermm](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley24.gif)
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 12:09 |
Lark the Starless wrote:
I hope that Rush can beat Pink Floyd ![Wink Wink](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif) |
I hope so too, but I don't think they have a snowball's chance in hell.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Lark the Starless
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 15 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 1902
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 12:11 |
It'd be amazing if they could.
But, it looks like it'll be KC and PF...the two I enjoy the least from the top 4.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
lazland
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13792
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 12:12 |
Lark the Starless wrote:
thehallway wrote:
lazland wrote:
I'd like to make a suggestion that, in future, we ban all Yes fans with less than 20,000 posts on the forum from voting in future polls, so as not to skew and alter the result of otherwise fairly straightforward polls![LOL LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif) |
1. Just because somebody prefers Yes to Genesis does not mean they don't happen to also prefer King Crimson to Genesis; there is nothing skewed about that.
2. How can you define a Yes fan? And in any case, many Yes fans are also Genesis fans.
3. Number of posts does not equate to intelligence, right to vote, value of opinion.... anything really, other than how frequently you are on this website. |
I believe Lazland was just kidding. ![Ermm Ermm](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley24.gif) |
Indeed I was ![Clap Clap](smileys/smiley32.gif) Believe me, I have far more serious matters to worry about and take seriously.
|
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
thehallway
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 13 2010
Location: Dorset, England
Status: Offline
Points: 1433
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 12:15 |
Kidding, not kidding...... doesn't make the post any less stupid......
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Lark the Starless
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 15 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 1902
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 12:18 |
thehallway wrote:
Kidding, not kidding...... doesn't make the post any less stupid...... |
It wasn't stupid. He's just poking fun. You don't have to take it so seriously. Jeez.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
WalterDigsTunes
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 11 2007
Location: SanDiegoTijuana
Status: Offline
Points: 4373
|
Posted: November 09 2010 at 12:20 |
Lark the Starless wrote:
I seriously thought Genesis would be winning, not by much, by nonetheless, winning.
Genesis, all the way.
I hope that Rush can beat Pink Floyd ![Wink Wink](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif) |
Jeezus christ, that's gonna be the dullest poll ever.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.