Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Peter Hammill vs Jon Anderson
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPeter Hammill vs Jon Anderson

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 6>
Poll Question: Which singer suits your tastes better?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
75 [55.15%]
47 [34.56%]
14 [10.29%]
0 [0.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 22 2010 at 23:22
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

I never got why people hate Jon's lyrics so much, it's nothing really obnoxious or stupid or anything, they're really too abstract and cryptic for me to have an opinion on them, but I like that I don't really know what the hell he's singing about because that adds a mystery to it and allows me to imagine what a Yes song is about by letting the music speak to myself, I get my own visualizations of the music without it being ruined by some typical rock lyrics about generic love and sex topics. Radiohead are the same way.
 
Because some of us like intelligent lyrics with some meaning, Jon's lyrics are silly and IMHO cheesy.
 
Personally I think Jon's lyrics were just fine until they started being you know, coherent, like on Tormato. He should have stuck to his abstract style because that way I can't tell if they're really banal or not. I don't think his lyrics are really that pretentious, because having read about his inspiration for the lyrics on CTTE and Tales he really takes that stuff to heart and because I have't read Siddhartha or Autobiography of a Yoga I can't really critique his grasping of the concepts explored in those works, I doubt most people who criticize his lyrics have read them either. I know it's a cliche thing to say but I really think it's a text example of people loving to bash things they simply don't understand.
 
YOu got a point, I don't understand them, heard his lyrics for almost 30 years, read them, read his comments and still have no meaning to me.
 
The problem is that there's nothing to understand, until Tormato his lyroics are mostly sonic poetry, he says nothing, just sounds good with the music, the meaning or message is not important.
 
Also, he indeeed uses vibrato but not too often. Really, isn't vibrato just a cheap trick for singers to sound "emotional" anyway? Jon isn't trying to impress anybody with his singing. I think for his kinda voice it's best to keep it reserved and not to try and sing like most rock singers and be aggressive. Because then he'd probably sound like freaking Bon Scott or something.
 
Vibratto a cheap thing?
 
That depends in who uses it, have you heard Edith Piaff? or David Surkamp, both are masters of vibratto and great vocalists,
 
I also think it's very unfair to say his vocals have no technique, he doesn't have an opera singers voice but he makes the best of what he has. I think it was David Byrne who said that the better a singer someone is the harder it is to believe what they're saying. Geek
 
Honestly, I find no technique at all, almost made a party when Trevor Horn replaced him. Jon is absolutely predictable, no changes no feeling (IMO of course), it's flat, repetitive and boring.
 
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 22 2010 at 23:24
For me the tone of the voice is more important than the technique. Ian and the two Peters are more technically skilled but save Gabriel I prefer Jon (though much love to Hammill and Anderson), I don't think singing that isn't very emotive equals dull singing because sometimes the voice does everything that needs to be done,  I think that's the case with Jon. And yes the quality of a voice in terms of how it sounds and how aesthetically pleasing it is is a purely subjective thing.
 
David Byrne and Jim Morrison can't sing like Steve Perry or Geoff Tate, but I find the former to have way more interesting voices. I'm not really impressed by very technical singers who come off as generic and American Idol-ish.
 
I think Jon makes up for his limitations but knowing what they are and finding a way around that. I can't really think of a band with better vocal harmonies than Yes, save The Beatles and Beach Boys of course.


Edited by boo boo - May 22 2010 at 23:26
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 22 2010 at 23:24
Haw, didn't notice that, vibrato a cheap trick! LOL  But I guess what booboo might have been trying to say is some singers just force a big, fat vibrato down your throat under the pretext of emoting (*cough* La Brie *cough*).  But vibrato can sound beautiful when worked by great hands (throats).  Gabriel uses his vibrato far better than Anderson, for one.
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 22 2010 at 23:30
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

For me the tone of the voice is more important than the technique. Those 3 are more technically skilled but save Gabriel I prefer Jon (though much love to Peter and Ian), I don't think singing that isn't very emotive equals dull singing because sometimes the voice does everything that needs to be done. And yes the quality of a voice is a subjective thing.


See, the problem here is you are evaluating the music rather than the singing.  Most people don't separate the quality of the songwriting from the quality of the performances.  Jon's voice somewhat works well with Yes but if I independently assess his singing, it's not very impressive.  And when he consistently doesn't emote, I can't buy that he would have been able to do so as well as those three. What is funny though is that you then wonder how people can like a band if they don't like the singer.  Yes, because I/we can rate the songwriting independent of the singer. 
 
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

David Byrne and Jim Morrison can't sing like Steve Perry or Geoff Tate, but I find the former to have way more interesting voices. I'm not really impressed by very technical singers who come off as generic and American Idol-ish.


That is all fine but technical accomplishment isn't about preferences, it is an objective thing. I don't know why you are debating this when you say you did not make assertions about Jon's technical prowess, I am just saying he is not all that accomplished.
 
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

I think Jon makes up for his limitations but knowing what they are and finding a way around that. I can't really think of a band with better vocal harmonies than Yes, save The Beatles and Beach Boys of course.


Er, Queen? Gentle Giant? And if you are talking of Beach Boys, how about ABBA?
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 22 2010 at 23:31

I admit that it's possible that Jon is full of it and only comes up with words for how they fit the music (though I don't think that is the case) but if fitting with the music is the goal I'd say he succeeds admirably.

Personally I don't give a darn about lyrics in general, I have never really anaylized any of Jon's lyrics because I'm not one to anaylize lyrics really, below average or even terrible lyrics (unless it's like Insane Clown Posse level or something) really doesn't ruin the listening experience for me if the music works.
 
I'd much rather listen to great, exciting music with banal lyrics than really boring, generic music with great lyrics.

Edited by boo boo - May 22 2010 at 23:35
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 00:01
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

For me the tone of the voice is more important than the technique. Ian and the two Peters are more technically skilled but save Gabriel I prefer Jon (though much love to Hammill and Anderson), I don't think singing that isn't very emotive equals dull singing because sometimes the voice does everything that needs to be done,  I think that's the case with Jon. And yes the quality of a voice in terms of how it sounds and how aesthetically pleasing it is is a purely subjective thing.
  
 
That's a matter of taste Boo Boo,. I can't stand so extremely acute voices without real emotion, take Gabriel, in Musical Box ending, it's really breathtaking or when he sings Supper's Ready:
 
 There's an angel standing in the sun, and he's crying with a loud voice,
"This is the supper of the mighty One",
The Lord of Lords,
King of Kings,
Has returned to lead His children home,
To take them to the new Jerusalem.
God, that's emotion, and the lyrics help´, because he's shouting that the Lord is coming and you believe it, the guy is pure emotion.
 
 
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

David Byrne and Jim Morrison can't sing like Steve Perry or Geoff Tate, but I find the former to have way more interesting voices. I'm not really impressed by very technical singers who come off as generic and American Idol-ish.
 
Well, Jim Morrison had one of the best voices I ever heard, guys like him or Greg Lake, don't require a great dose of technique, because heir range is so good, that vcan't get better.
 
BTW: When talking of technique, I'm not talking about over acted American Ido contestants (most of which don't have a great technique, by the contrary, they abuse of he extreme ranges to impress), I'm talking about guys who have a limited range, but use their weakness in the benefirt of the msic, already talked about David Surkamp from Pavlov's Dog, when he sings Julia, the guy has an horrendous voice and extremely acute, but that vibratto llows him to be unique, even when Pavlov's Dog was a great band, withou Surkamp (probably their weakest link), they would be just one more melodic Prog band with nothing special.
 
Or Peter Gabriel, is not a secret he's not comfortable with high ranges, so when he doesn't reach a note, he makes that unique semi yodel like in Biko (Sounds like a cry of pain) or In the Cage (The yodelling is a scream of terror and claustrophobia tha makes the listener feel trapped in the cave.
 
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

I think Jon makes up for his limitations but knowing what they are and finding a way around that. I can't really think of a band with better vocal harmonies than Yes, save The Beatles and Beach Boys of course
 
Hmm..What about:
  1. Mamas & the Papas
  2. Sweetwater
  3. Queen
  4. Styx
  5. Genesis (Listen when Gabriel is backed by Collins)
  6. Osibisa
  7. Renassance (Listen Song of Sheherezade)

The problem with Jon is that I believe he does nothing to take advantage of his limitations.

Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

I'd much rather listen to great, exciting music with banal lyrics than really boring, generic music with great lyrics.

I much rather listen great music with great lyrics, so why should I take less?
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - May 23 2010 at 00:03
            
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 00:30
In any case, Geoff Tate is not an American Idol-ish ham, his singing is perfect for the music of Queensryche, which is heavy metal, not symphonic prog.  He also doesn't abuse the melisma the way American Idol contestants do.  The way you - Booboo - put it, anybody who sings beautifully with great technique, like the late Ronnie James Dio, is an American Idol type singer.
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 00:40
Morrison had very little range and really only sang in two modes, crooning and screaming. But he sings with power and has a very hyponotic allure in his voice that can make even his most silly lyrics sound haunting and effective, and he could build up the tension in a way very few singers could hope to achieve. His style is very different from Jon so he's not the best example I could have used. A better example would have been Ian Curtis of Joy Division or David Gilmour and Rick Wright, or even Randy Newman, as they sing in a very reserved way and don't use a lot of vocal tricks and instead solely rely on the uniqueness of their voices. 
 
It's not that I don't like powerful and emotive singing (check avatar) but it's not the only way to sing.
 
Also I prefer the harmonies of Yes to the bands you mentioned though Genesis and Queen have great harmonies as well, as do the other bands you listed. Another band I think has excellent harmonies is Gentle Giant, I know you're not a fan of them.
 
And no I don't think Dio is "American idol-ish" in the slightest, indeed he had one of the most effective voices in metal, he's great on a technical level of course but that's not what makes him a legendary singer, it's that nobody really sounds like him, even though god knows how many metal singers have tried.
 
I'm not saying emotive singers are "American Idol-ish hams", I'm saying that emotive, technically gifted singers WITHOUT a very interesting voice come off that way to me. Tate doesn't really have a unique or interesting voice to me but I can understand that people feel differently. Everyone's ears work differently.


Edited by boo boo - May 23 2010 at 00:51
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 00:46
Yes, David Gilmour sings in a somewhat reserved way. And yes, he's an excellent singer.  I don't understand what similarity in approach there is between him and Jon.  Jon sings flatly in the high register which - and Ivan makes a good point - can get very irritating.  He could at least move up and down the pitches to create some semblance of variety, but no, he always floats in the stratosphere! I don't understand how not liking Jon could be interpreted as saying singers should necessarily project emotions dramatically because there's a huge middle ground between that and Jon's 'style'.
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 00:50
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

 
And no I don't think Dio is "American idol-ish" in the slightest, indeed he had one of the most effective voices in metal, he's great on a technical level of course but that's not what makes him a legendary singer, it's that nobody really sounds like him, even though god knows how many metal singers have tried.


You are wrong. There is an excellent cover of Holy Diver on the tribute album with a near dead-on Dio impression. Ray Gillen nailed the Dio songs too in his all too brief stint with Sabbath. A singer can be mimicked to a large extent especially if people decide that is an end in itself for them but Dio's style was very original and his projection of personality distinct and unmistakable when he arrived on the scene, that's what makes him legendary.  Tate was to an extent foreshadowed by Halford and Bruce which is why I wouldn't put him in the same category as Dio but he certainly has a distinct style. When you call him generic, you are referring to the myriad power/heavy metal bands ever since that have singers trying to sing like Tate.
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 00:56
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Yes, David Gilmour sings in a somewhat reserved way. And yes, he's an excellent singer.  I don't understand what similarity in approach there is between him and Jon.  Jon sings flatly in the high register which - and Ivan makes a good point - can get very irritating.  He could at least move up and down the pitches to create some semblance of variety, but no, he always floats in the stratosphere! I don't understand how not liking Jon could be interpreted as saying singers should necessarily project emotions dramatically because there's a huge middle ground between that and Jon's 'style'.
 
Jon DOES sing in different pitches, of course his octave range is very limited so it's always gonna sound distinctly Jon, again the guy has no control over the voice he was born with and he makes the best of his limitations.
 
My biggest complaint about the new guy is that he doesnt change his register at all and sings in the highest register on every part of every Yes song even when Jon sang in a lower register. And that really does ruin some of the songs for me. And it comes to show that Jon is not as disposable as you (and apparrently the band) seem to think.


Edited by boo boo - May 23 2010 at 00:59
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 01:00
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

 
Jon DOES sing in different pitches, of course his octave range is very limited so it's always gonna sound distinctly Jon, again the guy has no control over the voice he was born with and he makes the best of his limitations.
 
My biggest complaint about the new guy is that he doesnt change his register at all and sings in the highest register on every part of every Yes song even when Jon sang in a lower register.


Er, I didn't mean it THAT literally. Dead  I am talking about like how on Dancing with the Moonlit Knight,  Gabriel starts off somewhere in the middle, then goes low on "By the POUND", then high on "Dance my lord".  There's nowhere near so much variation in Jon's singing.  Which could be got over - because range is not such an important criterion - but then he also sings so flatly.
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 01:31
Again, I'm not denying that Gabriel has a far superior octave range. But you can't ask Jon to do something that for him is physically impossible.
 
The big difference is that Gabriel's range suits what HE does because he plays a wide variety of characters, which is NOT what Jon does. Jon doesn't even try to do what Gabriel does. Jon uses stream of conciousness lyrics and the way he sings is somewhat similar to chanting, he doesn't attempt the kind of theatrics that Gabriel is such a pro at. It's a completely different style of singing and there's not really much of a point in comparing the two. You prefer one style over the other and that's understandable. But there's no objectively "correct" way to sing. Everybody has their own method.
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 01:39
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

Again, I'm not denying that Gabriel has a far superior octave range. But you can't ask Jon to do something that for him is physically impossible.
 
The big difference is that Gabriel's range suits what HE does because he plays a wide variety of characters, which is NOT what Jon does. Jon doesn't even try to do what Gabriel does. Jon uses stream of conciousness lyrics and the way he sings is somewhat similar to chanting, he doesn't attempt the kind of theatrics that Gabriel is such a pro at. It's a completely different style of singing and there's not really much of a point in comparing the two. You prefer one style over the other and that's understandable. But there's no objectively "correct" way to sing. Everybody has their own method.


I didn't say there is.  But I do have trouble understanding how Jon is supposed to be one of the most accomplished singers in prog.  I didn't call into question your preference because you are entitled to yours as I am to mine. Confused
Back to Top
Anderson III View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 25 2007
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 708
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 02:03
No other singer I know sounds so out of place than Hammill on everything I've heard him on! He absolutely always sticks out like a sore thumb - something a musician should never do, I think!
With his singing it's always like he's saying "look mom, I can make really ugly voices!" But why? There are some musicians who can make powerful screams, Hammill just isn't one of them.

Jon would automaticly get my vote, even if I didn't think his singing is pure positive energy!
"Music expresses that which cannot be put into words and cannot remain silent" - Victor Hugo
Back to Top
Anderson III View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 25 2007
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 708
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 02:13
Originally posted by progkidjoel progkidjoel wrote:

Anderson has an amazing voice, whilst for me, Hammil sounds incredibly melodramatic in an really forced and unenjoyable way 90% of the time.


ClapClapClapClapClap

Perhaps we should start a poll with Peter Hammill & Toby Driver! They would be much more compatible for comparing. I feel like Driver is doing now what everybody thinks Hammill was doing back then... only Driver makes it work with music!

The only reason I haven't started a poll like this, is because I can't stand watching Toby take a beating like that! LOL


Edited by Anderson III - May 23 2010 at 02:13
"Music expresses that which cannot be put into words and cannot remain silent" - Victor Hugo
Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 02:32
Originally posted by Anderson III Anderson III wrote:



Originally posted by progkidjoel progkidjoel wrote:

Anderson has an amazing voice, whilst for me, Hammil sounds incredibly melodramatic in an really forced and unenjoyable way 90% of the time.
ClapClapClapClapClap

Perhaps we should start a poll with Peter Hammill & Toby Driver! They would be much more compatible for comparing. I feel like Driver is doing now what everybody thinks Hammill was doing back then... only Driver makes it work with music!

The only reason I haven't started a poll like this, is because I can't stand watching Toby take a beating like that! LOL


Toby's voice sounds genuine to me, I guess that's the difference between Toby and Peter for me though. Amazing growls and screams (Marathon), wonderful vocal harmonies (Blue Lambency Downward) and super dissonant commentaries (Calonyction Girl). He'd definitely get my vote!

Not really sure whilst Hammill is being compared to Anderson, anyway - Anderson relies on melody and range whilst Hammill uses theatrics and drama much more... Very different styles...
Back to Top
EatThatPhonebook View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2009
Location: Norwich, VT
Status: Offline
Points: 788
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 04:28
PH is one of my favorite Prog vocalists ever!!
Back to Top
Bonnek View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 01 2009
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 4521
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 05:08

Hammill is the one of the most emotive prog vocalist, he's also the most versatile one, and he has an amazing solo career.
Jon Anderson is a squeaking mouse compared to him. (But he suits Yes just fine for me)


Edited by Bonnek - May 23 2010 at 05:09
Back to Top
Zombywoof View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: November 26 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1217
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2010 at 08:33
Originally posted by LiquidEternity LiquidEternity wrote:

I'm surprised Petey's way ahead here. I love the guy, and he's way, way ahead of that weak little Anderson, but I figured Yes had enough hardcore fans to win any poll involving the band in any way.


Me too. I thought PH would be massacred in this poll, but I'm pleasantly surprised.
Continue the prog discussion here: http://zombyprog.proboards.com/index.cgi ...
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 6>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.984 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.