Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The most musically complex prog band(s)?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe most musically complex prog band(s)?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213>
Author
Message
avalanchemaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2010 at 13:03
Area.  so layered and complex.  Most of the stuff mentioned I do not consider complex.... with the exception of certain classical composers...
Back to Top
presdoug View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 24 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8620
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2010 at 14:31
Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

It is correct that some classical is more complex than a lot of prog.  For instance, Iannis Xenakis used fractal math and other advanced mathematics for his compositions.  Plus they usually aren't as rigid in their song structures.... way more "free" than a lot of prog with more shifting rhythms... well that is at least most 20th century avant garde composers.  Once I got into them, prog took a backseat...
complexity is pretty important to me, in terms of appreciating music-i very much love complex classical music, the best for me being the world of the symphony, the most complex symphonic music being that of the late romantics Mahler and Bruckner-the ultimate in musical depth-to quote the late conductor Bruno Walter-"I could not live my life without the music of Bruckner and Mahler"
Back to Top
avalanchemaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2010 at 15:19
Originally posted by presdoug presdoug wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

It is correct that some classical is more complex than a lot of prog.  For instance, Iannis Xenakis used fractal math and other advanced mathematics for his compositions.  Plus they usually aren't as rigid in their song structures.... way more "free" than a lot of prog with more shifting rhythms... well that is at least most 20th century avant garde composers.  Once I got into them, prog took a backseat...
complexity is pretty important to me, in terms of appreciating music-i very much love complex classical music, the best for me being the world of the symphony, the most complex symphonic music being that of the late romantics Mahler and Bruckner-the ultimate in musical depth-to quote the late conductor Bruno Walter-"I could not live my life without the music of Bruckner and Mahler"

well then, give me some recommendations of which compositions/conductors/cd companies to start with(for these two composers)... Do they have any of those super cheap Naxos discs?
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11415
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2010 at 15:29
It's a long time since I dug the critter out and listened to it but Swiss band Island did an album called Pictures circa the late 70's and from memory it was one of the most impenetrably complex records I have ever heard.

I think I played it twice and found myself thinking it made Gentle Giant sound like the Ramones.

(If only I could find the damn thing Confused)
Back to Top
presdoug View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 24 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8620
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2010 at 16:50
Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

Originally posted by presdoug presdoug wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

It is correct that some classical is more complex than a lot of prog.  For instance, Iannis Xenakis used fractal math and other advanced mathematics for his compositions.  Plus they usually aren't as rigid in their song structures.... way more "free" than a lot of prog with more shifting rhythms... well that is at least most 20th century avant garde composers.  Once I got into them, prog took a backseat...
complexity is pretty important to me, in terms of appreciating music-i very much love complex classical music, the best for me being the world of the symphony, the most complex symphonic music being that of the late romantics Mahler and Bruckner-the ultimate in musical depth-to quote the late conductor Bruno Walter-"I could not live my life without the music of Bruckner and Mahler"

well then, give me some recommendations of which compositions/conductors/cd companies to start with(for these two composers)... Do they have any of those super cheap Naxos discs?
there are Mahler and Bruckner symphonies on Naxos-stay away from the Naxos Bruckner-they are not worth it-as far as Mahler symphonies on Naxos-go for the 5th Symphony conducted by Bruno Walter-(historical Naxos)-also would recommend Mahler's 4th Symphony also conducted by Bruno Walter with singer Kathleen Ferrier(historical Naxos)
    As far as the best performances of Bruckner and Mahler symphonies-conductor Bruno Walter is at the top of both mountain peaks-essential Bruckner from him are symphonies 4,7, and 9 with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra, sym. 8 with the New York Phil. from 1941-(Music and Arts CD), and his Mahler sym. 1 and 2 with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra and New York Philharmonic Orchestras respectively, and his stereo recording of Mahler's 9th with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra.
              Also great Bruckner is available from conductor Oswald Kabasta (sym. 4,7 and 9-Munich Phil.)
          the  Bruckner's are on Sony (Walter) and Music and Arts(Walter sym. 8)and Music and Arts(Kabasta)
            the non Naxos Mahler's are on Sony
Back to Top
avalanchemaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2010 at 20:27
Originally posted by presdoug presdoug wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

Originally posted by presdoug presdoug wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

It is correct that some classical is more complex than a lot of prog.  For instance, Iannis Xenakis used fractal math and other advanced mathematics for his compositions.  Plus they usually aren't as rigid in their song structures.... way more "free" than a lot of prog with more shifting rhythms... well that is at least most 20th century avant garde composers.  Once I got into them, prog took a backseat...
complexity is pretty important to me, in terms of appreciating music-i very much love complex classical music, the best for me being the world of the symphony, the most complex symphonic music being that of the late romantics Mahler and Bruckner-the ultimate in musical depth-to quote the late conductor Bruno Walter-"I could not live my life without the music of Bruckner and Mahler"

well then, give me some recommendations of which compositions/conductors/cd companies to start with(for these two composers)... Do they have any of those super cheap Naxos discs?
there are Mahler and Bruckner symphonies on Naxos-stay away from the Naxos Bruckner-they are not worth it-as far as Mahler symphonies on Naxos-go for the 5th Symphony conducted by Bruno Walter-(historical Naxos)-also would recommend Mahler's 4th Symphony also conducted by Bruno Walter with singer Kathleen Ferrier(historical Naxos)
    As far as the best performances of Bruckner and Mahler symphonies-conductor Bruno Walter is at the top of both mountain peaks-essential Bruckner from him are symphonies 4,7, and 9 with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra, sym. 8 with the New York Phil. from 1941-(Music and Arts CD), and his Mahler sym. 1 and 2 with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra and New York Philharmonic Orchestras respectively, and his stereo recording of Mahler's 9th with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra.
              Also great Bruckner is available from conductor Oswald Kabasta (sym. 4,7 and 9-Munich Phil.)
          the  Bruckner's are on Sony (Walter) and Music and Arts(Walter sym. 8)and Music and Arts(Kabasta)
            the non Naxos Mahler's are on Sony


thanks.  That is a very lengthy list to choose from!
Back to Top
avalanchemaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2010 at 20:28
Originally posted by presdoug presdoug wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

Originally posted by presdoug presdoug wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

It is correct that some classical is more complex than a lot of prog.  For instance, Iannis Xenakis used fractal math and other advanced mathematics for his compositions.  Plus they usually aren't as rigid in their song structures.... way more "free" than a lot of prog with more shifting rhythms... well that is at least most 20th century avant garde composers.  Once I got into them, prog took a backseat...
complexity is pretty important to me, in terms of appreciating music-i very much love complex classical music, the best for me being the world of the symphony, the most complex symphonic music being that of the late romantics Mahler and Bruckner-the ultimate in musical depth-to quote the late conductor Bruno Walter-"I could not live my life without the music of Bruckner and Mahler"

well then, give me some recommendations of which compositions/conductors/cd companies to start with(for these two composers)... Do they have any of those super cheap Naxos discs?
there are Mahler and Bruckner symphonies on Naxos-stay away from the Naxos Bruckner-they are not worth it-as far as Mahler symphonies on Naxos-go for the 5th Symphony conducted by Bruno Walter-(historical Naxos)-also would recommend Mahler's 4th Symphony also conducted by Bruno Walter with singer Kathleen Ferrier(historical Naxos)
    As far as the best performances of Bruckner and Mahler symphonies-conductor Bruno Walter is at the top of both mountain peaks-essential Bruckner from him are symphonies 4,7, and 9 with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra, sym. 8 with the New York Phil. from 1941-(Music and Arts CD), and his Mahler sym. 1 and 2 with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra and New York Philharmonic Orchestras respectively, and his stereo recording of Mahler's 9th with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra.
              Also great Bruckner is available from conductor Oswald Kabasta (sym. 4,7 and 9-Munich Phil.)
          the  Bruckner's are on Sony (Walter) and Music and Arts(Walter sym. 8)and Music and Arts(Kabasta)
            the non Naxos Mahler's are on Sony


Thanks!  That is a very lengthy list to choose from.. Clap
Back to Top
Jake Kobrin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 20 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 1303
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 21 2010 at 20:44
Deathspell Omega

is probably the most complex metal band out there... And theyre on the site.
Back to Top
sigod View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 23 2010 at 06:26
The early Echolyn albums are good examples of pretty dense musical arrangement (and who owe a little of their sound to what I consider to be one of the more musical exponents of discipline in arrangement: Gentle Giant - as has been mentioned many times here).
 
If complexity means dexterity and skill behind your chosen instrument, I think The Dillenger Escape Plan have some game as indeed do some of the technical metal groups like Fellsilent or even the IDM guys like Squarepusher.
 
Personally I think harmonic complexity i.e. chord and melodic structure, often gets overlooked if seated in a song without fast musical passages or odd time signatures. Many Post Rock bands such as Godspeed... or even Stars Of he Lid can get passed over as a result because it's all about what's shines brightly in the front window (and is therefore easy to spot) rather than the interesting items that lurk at the back of the musical store (so to speak). 


Edited by sigod - March 23 2010 at 06:30
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
Back to Top
shockedjazz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 12 2008
Location: Madrid (spain)
Status: Offline
Points: 169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 23 2010 at 10:25

First of all Van der Graaf absolutely.....but the thing with them is their not trying to sound complex for the sake of mere complexity but...well what can you do without bass and guitar? (Pawn hearts avant-masterpiece no doubt).

Its another side of complexity.......if your trying to do a "wall of sound" with just one flute...it have to be complex...it have to sound like your playing two flutes at least...but thats ridicule no one would dare to play two flutes or two saxophones at the same time...if theres is someone doing it must be a f..great geniusShockedWink
 
Then Zappa no doubt
 
And the Italian progers are also kind of complex ( Il Banchetto avant garde sections)
 
But Rio i think get the price as a style.
 
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 23 2010 at 11:06
Il Balletto di Bronzo: God, they are extremely complex, you can't expect anything while listening them.
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
Zeromus218 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: March 03 2010
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 33
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 24 2010 at 01:21
Of course i'd like to quote for Deathspell omega ^_^. nice band out there, but i really think that the most complex structured band is still MAGMA! 
Back to Top
progressive View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 366
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 24 2010 at 16:50
Here's some RUINS you might have not heard, it's the "symphonic" ruins, not so math rock -oriented...

Ruins - (1998) Symphonica - 06 - Infect: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7ASQaktTlQ

I don't know about the complexity but this was some kind of answer to the thing mentioned that Ruins would be just a bass player and a drummer and therefore cannot be compositionally complex, but mostly only technically.


Edited by progressive - March 24 2010 at 17:04

► rateyourmusic.com/~Fastro 2672 ratings ▲ last.fm/user/Fastro 5556 artists ▲ www.progarchives.com/Collaborators.asp?id=4933 266◄
Back to Top
Junges View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 19 2006
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 645
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 24 2010 at 18:43
Deathspell Omega is complex, but is a horrible band.
Back to Top
progressive View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 366
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 25 2010 at 07:59
Deathspell Omega is nice, but not a complex band.

I mean, of course they are complex, but so is many other metal bands, and there's other chaotic bands. I like the chaos and heaviness! It's like noise and determined structure together. I have "Si Monumentum Requires, Circumspice" and "Fas - Ite, Maledicti, in Ignem" and monumentum is more straightforward black metal and not complex, but ignem is more like post-jazz-sludgenoisecore or something like that lol, and it's a great album.

And thanks for presdoug


Edited by progressive - March 25 2010 at 09:05

► rateyourmusic.com/~Fastro 2672 ratings ▲ last.fm/user/Fastro 5556 artists ▲ www.progarchives.com/Collaborators.asp?id=4933 266◄
Back to Top
esky View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 12 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2010 at 11:55
Big smile  When they weren't trying to be poppy, FM.
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2010 at 12:03
Karcius?  Ohm? 


Back to Top
BaldJean View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2010 at 12:17
Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

Originally posted by presdoug presdoug wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

Originally posted by presdoug presdoug wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

It is correct that some classical is more complex than a lot of prog.  For instance, Iannis Xenakis used fractal math and other advanced mathematics for his compositions.  Plus they usually aren't as rigid in their song structures.... way more "free" than a lot of prog with more shifting rhythms... well that is at least most 20th century avant garde composers.  Once I got into them, prog took a backseat...
complexity is pretty important to me, in terms of appreciating music-i very much love complex classical music, the best for me being the world of the symphony, the most complex symphonic music being that of the late romantics Mahler and Bruckner-the ultimate in musical depth-to quote the late conductor Bruno Walter-"I could not live my life without the music of Bruckner and Mahler"

well then, give me some recommendations of which compositions/conductors/cd companies to start with(for these two composers)... Do they have any of those super cheap Naxos discs?
there are Mahler and Bruckner symphonies on Naxos-stay away from the Naxos Bruckner-they are not worth it-as far as Mahler symphonies on Naxos-go for the 5th Symphony conducted by Bruno Walter-(historical Naxos)-also would recommend Mahler's 4th Symphony also conducted by Bruno Walter with singer Kathleen Ferrier(historical Naxos)
    As far as the best performances of Bruckner and Mahler symphonies-conductor Bruno Walter is at the top of both mountain peaks-essential Bruckner from him are symphonies 4,7, and 9 with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra, sym. 8 with the New York Phil. from 1941-(Music and Arts CD), and his Mahler sym. 1 and 2 with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra and New York Philharmonic Orchestras respectively, and his stereo recording of Mahler's 9th with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra.
              Also great Bruckner is available from conductor Oswald Kabasta (sym. 4,7 and 9-Munich Phil.)
          the  Bruckner's are on Sony (Walter) and Music and Arts(Walter sym. 8)and Music and Arts(Kabasta)
            the non Naxos Mahler's are on Sony


Thanks!  That is a very lengthy list to choose from.. Clap

I consider Johann Sebastian Bach to be a lot more complex than Mahler and definitely more complex than Bruckner with his quite simple triads. I love Mahler, but Bruckner leaves me absolutely cold


A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Back to Top
rdtprog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Heavy, RPI, Symph, JR/F Canterbury Teams

Joined: April 04 2009
Location: Mtl, QC
Status: Offline
Points: 5285
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2010 at 12:57
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Karcius?  Ohm? 


Karcius!There a complexity that i really enjoy!  If we talk about switching to different syles in the same song, this band could be complex. I think also Estradasphere that i enjoy. But i am not really listening to a lot of complex music. So i would say that the bands who play a prog genre with classical influence would be the most musically complex. (Enid, maybe...) 
Music is the refuge of souls ulcerated by happiness.

Emile M. Cioran







Back to Top
presdoug View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 24 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8620
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2010 at 15:21
Originally posted by BaldJean BaldJean wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

Originally posted by presdoug presdoug wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

Originally posted by presdoug presdoug wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

It is correct that some classical is more complex than a lot of prog.  For instance, Iannis Xenakis used fractal math and other advanced mathematics for his compositions.  Plus they usually aren't as rigid in their song structures.... way more "free" than a lot of prog with more shifting rhythms... well that is at least most 20th century avant garde composers.  Once I got into them, prog took a backseat...
complexity is pretty important to me, in terms of appreciating music-i very much love complex classical music, the best for me being the world of the symphony, the most complex symphonic music being that of the late romantics Mahler and Bruckner-the ultimate in musical depth-to quote the late conductor Bruno Walter-"I could not live my life without the music of Bruckner and Mahler"

well then, give me some recommendations of which compositions/conductors/cd companies to start with(for these two composers)... Do they have any of those super cheap Naxos discs?
there are Mahler and Bruckner symphonies on Naxos-stay away from the Naxos Bruckner-they are not worth it-as far as Mahler symphonies on Naxos-go for the 5th Symphony conducted by Bruno Walter-(historical Naxos)-also would recommend Mahler's 4th Symphony also conducted by Bruno Walter with singer Kathleen Ferrier(historical Naxos)
    As far as the best performances of Bruckner and Mahler symphonies-conductor Bruno Walter is at the top of both mountain peaks-essential Bruckner from him are symphonies 4,7, and 9 with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra, sym. 8 with the New York Phil. from 1941-(Music and Arts CD), and his Mahler sym. 1 and 2 with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra and New York Philharmonic Orchestras respectively, and his stereo recording of Mahler's 9th with the Columbia Symphony Orchestra.
              Also great Bruckner is available from conductor Oswald Kabasta (sym. 4,7 and 9-Munich Phil.)
          the  Bruckner's are on Sony (Walter) and Music and Arts(Walter sym. 8)and Music and Arts(Kabasta)
            the non Naxos Mahler's are on Sony


Thanks!  That is a very lengthy list to choose from.. Clap

I consider Johann Sebastian Bach to be a lot more complex than Mahler and definitely more complex than Bruckner with his quite simple triads. I love Mahler, but Bruckner leaves me absolutely cold
Have you ever heard Bruno Walter's Bruckner recordings? In them, there  is a special, inimitable warmth and glow, quite the opposite of cold-Bruno Walter could maybe make you a convert?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.184 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.