Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: August 07 2008
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Status: Offline
Points: 7826
Posted: November 27 2009 at 18:58
King By-Tor wrote:
any time anyone EVER says that three, four or five albums by one band are all worthy of 5-stars I get suspicious. I think Rush barely makes that and I'm a bloody fanboy.
So any band that has produced three, four, or five excellent albums makes you suspicious? Sorry, but that's a pretty lame theory
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 24598
Posted: November 27 2009 at 20:10
J-Man wrote:
King By-Tor wrote:
any time anyone EVER says that three, four or five albums by one band are all worthy of 5-stars I get suspicious. I think Rush barely makes that and I'm a bloody fanboy.
So any band that has produced three, four, or five excellent albums makes you suspicious? Sorry, but that's a pretty lame theory
I'm with Jeff here. If I honestly think a band has made a masterpiece, I will gladly rate it as such. That being said, if I think a band has made an utter piece of sh*t, I will also gladly say so. I also used to take progressiveness into account for ratings on this site but I gave that up awhile ago. To me, a good album is a good album, prog or not.
Also, Dumb and Dumber ftw
Edited by birdwithteeth11 - November 27 2009 at 20:15
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.289 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.