Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Who's the brain behind The Beatles?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWho's the brain behind The Beatles?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567>
Poll Question: Who is the mastermind?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
18 [26.87%]
6 [8.96%]
7 [10.45%]
22 [32.84%]
14 [20.90%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 00:47
Sacred 22

Please READ what Adorno himself have to say about The Beatles:

Follow the link: http://books.google.com.mx/books?id=dAZmVD_AV9cC&pg=RA1-PA420&lpg=RA1-PA420&dq=the+beatles+and+adorno&source=bl&ots=5TDdW4lE1n&sig=Rys0FGs9Fa1f5sqewXRUpzSX-P0&hl=es&ei=dDWrSt-OA-KDtgf4r82oCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3#v=onepage&q=the%20beatles%20and%20adorno&f=false


Edited by Alberto Muñoz - September 12 2009 at 00:48




Back to Top
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 00:55
More Clear:

n the book Adorno by Stefan Mueller-Doohm, I found this quote on page 420:
Adorno was keen to distinguish the Beatles from advanced modernity, whose condition could be measured by the progress of avant-garde art.
/quote Adorno:/ "What can be urged against the Beatles is simply that what these people have to offer is something that is retarded in terms of it's own objective content. It can be shown that the means of expression that are employed and preserved here are in reality no more than traditional techniques in a degraded form."
(Diskussion in the magazine Akzente, issue Summer 1965).





Back to Top
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 00:56
With this statement i don't think Adorno were sooo interest in "compose" beatles music




Back to Top
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 01:07
http://www.tinhouse.com/mag/back_issues/archive/issues/issue_10/feature.html

Good reading i enjoy the perspective.




Back to Top
Sacred 22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1509
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 12:12
Originally posted by Alberto Muñoz Alberto Muñoz wrote:

More Clear:

n the book Adorno by Stefan Mueller-Doohm, I found this quote on page 420:
Adorno was keen to distinguish the Beatles from advanced modernity, whose condition could be measured by the progress of avant-garde art.
/quote Adorno:/ "What can be urged against the Beatles is simply that what these people have to offer is something that is retarded in terms of it's own objective content. It can be shown that the means of expression that are employed and preserved here are in reality no more than traditional techniques in a degraded form."
(Diskussion in the magazine Akzente, issue Summer 1965).

 
Do you realize what he is saying here? He is not saying that the Beatles are a degraded form but that the psychological technique employed via the Beatles is degraded. Another words and I must thank you for digging this up, is that they were being used to create culture, a means to an end if you will; on route to a fascist state. Do you realize that Adorno held the right to the Beatles music? Like I say, there is much more to this puzzle than most people can imagine
Back to Top
Catholic Flame View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 295
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 12:34
Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

None of the above listed. Theodor W. Adorno was the brains behind the 'Beatles' as he held the rights to the music and eventually his estate sold those rights to Michael Jackson.
 
Adorno a classical musician wrote their music and it was all filtered down through Paul who could not read a note of music by the way. In fact the only half way real musician in the band was George Harrison. John was a poet who could strum a few chords and Ringo a hack drummer at best. George often wondered why they never wanted to use his songs. Oh and as an aside, Paul ended up being Knighted, and you don't get Knighted unless you have done as you were told and made your masters proud.

The Beatles were introduced to the public as a means to spread youth culture which led to the spreading of the 'New Age' culture and this was all geared to setting up a nylistic culture that is all to present today. It's called divide and conquer but this gets into a whole different 'Pandora's Box' if you will. Things are not what they seem.



Ya, well, I'll go with Lennon anyway.
“Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and fads and popular opinion.”

~Jack Kerouac
Back to Top
Catholic Flame View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 295
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 12:37
Originally posted by Alberto Muñoz Alberto Muñoz wrote:

More Clear:

n the book Adorno by Stefan Mueller-Doohm, I found this quote on page 420:
Adorno was keen to distinguish the Beatles from advanced modernity, whose condition could be measured by the progress of avant-garde art.
/quote Adorno:/ "What can be urged against the Beatles is simply that what these people have to offer is something that is retarded in terms of it's own objective content. It can be shown that the means of expression that are employed and preserved here are in reality no more than traditional techniques in a degraded form."
(Diskussion in the magazine Akzente, issue Summer 1965).



Yes, but it rocks.
“Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and fads and popular opinion.”

~Jack Kerouac
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 13:10
Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

None of the above listed. Theodor W. Adorno was the brains behind the 'Beatles' as he held the rights to the music and eventually his estate sold those rights to Michael Jackson.
 
Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

Do you realize that Adorno held the right to the Beatles music?
 
Proof?
 
In 1965 Northern Songs was made into a public company with the Beatles owning 33% of the shares, Dick James and Charles Silver 37.5%, Epstein 7.5% and the rest traded on the London Stock Exchange. In 1969 James & Silver along with several of the smaller stock holders sold their shares to Lew Grade's ATV Music, realising that they could not gain control of Northern Songs Lennon & McCartney sold ATV their shares too. ATV owned Northern Songs until 1985 when the whole company was bought by Michael Jackson for a reported $47M ... source Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Songs)
 
..so what proof do you have that Theodor W. Adorno's estate held the rights to The Beatles Music? Was he part of, or connected to, Lew Grade's Associated TeleVision empire? Highly improbable without proof.
What?
Back to Top
Catholic Flame View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 295
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 13:32
Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

None of the above listed. Theodor W. Adorno was the brains behind the 'Beatles' as he held the rights to the music and eventually his estate sold those rights to Michael Jackson.
 
Adorno a classical musician wrote their music and it was all filtered down through Paul who could not read a note of music by the way. In fact the only half way real musician in the band was George Harrison. John was a poet who could strum a few chords and Ringo a hack drummer at best. George often wondered why they never wanted to use his songs. Oh and as an aside, Paul ended up being Knighted, and you don't get Knighted unless you have done as you were told and made your masters proud.

The Beatles were introduced to the public as a means to spread youth culture which led to the spreading of the 'New Age' culture and this was all geared to setting up a nylistic culture that is all to present today. It's called divide and conquer but this gets into a whole different 'Pandora's Box' if you will. Things are not what they seem.



Was he also the one who had the android to replace McCartney with after he died?
“Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and fads and popular opinion.”

~Jack Kerouac
Back to Top
Catholic Flame View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 295
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 13:34
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

None of the above listed. Theodor W. Adorno was the brains behind the 'Beatles' as he held the rights to the music and eventually his estate sold those rights to Michael Jackson.
 
Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

Do you realize that Adorno held the right to the Beatles music?
 
Proof?
 
In 1965 Northern Songs was made into a public company with the Beatles owning 33% of the shares, Dick James and Charles Silver 37.5%, Epstein 7.5% and the rest traded on the London Stock Exchange. In 1969 James & Silver along with several of the smaller stock holders sold their shares to Lew Grade's ATV Music, realising that they could not gain control of Northern Songs Lennon & McCartney sold ATV their shares too. ATV owned Northern Songs until 1985 when the whole company was bought by Michael Jackson for a reported $47M ... source Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Songs)
 
..so what proof do you have that Theodor W. Adorno's estate held the rights to The Beatles Music? Was he part of, or connected to, Lew Grade's Associated TeleVision empire? Highly improbable without proof.


Maybe Adorno was replaced with an android and he bought the shares?
“Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and fads and popular opinion.”

~Jack Kerouac
Back to Top
Sacred 22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1509
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 18:59
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 20:21
Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

Here is something to read about it
 
 
LOLLOLLOL ErmmStern Smile that's the most puerile pile of incoherrant nonsense I've ever read - even the chronology is arse-backwards:
 

Quote Tavistock and Stanford Research then embarked on the second phase of the work commissioned by the Committee of 300. This new phase turned up the heat for social change in America. As quickly as the Beatles had appeared on the American scene, so too did the "beat generation," trigger words designed to separate and fragment society. The media now focused its attention on the"beat generation." Other Tavistock-coined words came seemingly out of nowhere: "beatniks," "hippies," "flower children" became part of the vocabulary of America. It became popular to "drop out" and wear dirty jeans, go about with long unwashed hair. The "beat generation" cut itself off from main-stream America. They became just as infamous as the cleaner Beatles before them.

No proof given, and actually not true: The word "beat generation" predates The Beatles by several years - there is even a 1959 US film called "The Beat Generation" - the movie tag line for which on it's original cinema release was "The wild, weird, world of the Beatniks! ...Sullen rebels, defiant chicks...searching for a life of their own! The pads...the jazz...the dives... those frantic "way-out" parties... beyond belief!"
 
Quote The phenomenon of the Beatles was not a spontaneous rebellion by youth against the old social system. Instead it was a carefully crafted plot to introduce by a conspiratorial body which could not be identified, a highly destructive and divisive element into a large population group targeted for change against its will. New words and new phrases--prepared by Tavistock(1)-- were introduced to America along with the Beatles. Words such as "rock" in relation to music sounds, "teenager," "cool," "discovered" and "pop music" were a lexicon of disguised code words signifying the acceptance of drugs and arrived with and accompanied the Beatles wherever they went, to be "discovered" by "teenagers." Incidentally, the word "teenagers" was never used until just before the Beatles arrived on the scene, courtesy of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations.
..again no proof given, and it's a fanciful notion anyway - the words "teenage" and "rock" were in common usage 8 years before The Beatles found popularity in the USA:
"The Blackboard Jungle" - original 1955 tagline: 'A DRAMA OF TEEN-AGE Terror!
"Rebel Without A Cause" - original 1955 tagline: ''Teenage terror torn from today's headlines'
"The Girl Can't Help It" - original 1956 tagline: "Rock yourself into your happiest time with THE GIRL CAN'T HELP IT"
...those words were introduced into England from America by such teen-movies as those I've listed and the general vocabulary of Rock'n'Roll that the music used in them carried. Before the advent of TV and the Internet, Films were the only way youth-culture was carried around the world - Rock'n'Roll music was brought to England in the soundtracks of them. Even then Beatles were heavily influenced by those films (their name was taken from the Marlon Brando film "The Wild Ones")
 
Quote Tavistock and its Stanford Research Center created trigger words which then came into general usage around "rock music" and its fans. Trigger words created a distinct new break-away largely young population group which was persuaded by social engineering and conditioning to believe that the Beatles really were their favorite group. All trigger words devised in the context of "rock music" were designed for mass control of the new targeted group, the youth of America.
Eh? Those so-called trigger words were in use long before The Beatles and the breaking-away, separatation and fragmentation of society started in the mid 1950 (as documented in Rebel Without Cause and Blackbiard Jungle etc) actually led four lads form Liverpool to start a skiffle group in the first place, not the other way around.
 
anyway... I don't know whether the next quote made me laugh or cry - either way it certainly puts the whole diatribe into perspective:
 
Quote Following the Beatles, who incidentally were put together by the Tavistock Institute, came other "Made in England" rock groups, who, like the Beatles, had Theo Adorno write their cult lyrics and compose all the "music." I hate to use these beautiful words in the context of "Beatlemania"; it reminds me of how wrongly the word "lover" is used when referring to the filthy interaction between two homosexuals writhing in pigswill. To call "rock" music, is an insult, likewise the language used in "rock lyrics."
 
...and you believe this drivel? Confused
 
 
 
No - honestly, without proof this is meaningless.


Edited by Dean - September 12 2009 at 20:36
What?
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 20:42
 ^ this is the really ugly part about this theory, it appears to be socio-politically driven.  Ironic, as it rallies against the public manipulations [i.e. the entertainment business] it disfavors only to replace it with myths of bizarre proportions, and completely blind to the creative process it calls into question.









Edited by Atavachron - September 12 2009 at 20:43
Back to Top
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 20:48
Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

Here is something to read about it
 
 


Yes i read  that in other forum

I know that you going to cite your "source".

 I'll illuminate you. It's very simple. *Everyone* who drags Adorno into this mess turns out to be drawing on Coleman and on Coleman alone. Each of them is a mythomaniac and adds their own little something to the brew, just some little detail that gives the story a personal touch. But Coleman is a crook. In reality, no one could be more distanced from conspiracy and more active in the other end of the spectrum than Adorno, if you look at his actual work. This is why he is now being persecuted, i suppose, plus, it is convenient to pick someone who died decades ago and can't defend themselves. Watt is obviously part of some project with the mission to to delude people and deprive them of any sense of culture and belonging. People like me are not easy to mislead; I have strong cultural roots, and I have actively participated in forming those roots. But most younger U.S. people are easy targets, for a large number of reasons.




Back to Top
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 20:57
Adorno's trademark as a philosopher was that he opposed everything mass media and mass culture or pop culture, and if anyone here had read Coleman's actual statements, they would know for a fact that *everything* that Coleman writes pertaining to the Beatles, except for the drug connection, is a blatant hoax and very possibly the weakest and most absurd conspiracy theory that ever existed. It seems like a big joke. He actually states that Adorno wrote the music, and also that the Beatles' music was atonal, and Bacchanial/Dionysian. It is the opposite to all that.




Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 21:03
^ it's actually dafter than that - Coleman claims that Adorno wrote the music for all the British Invasion artists: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_Invasion_Artists
What?
Back to Top
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 21:46
http://www.icce.rug.nl/~soundscapes/VOLUME01/The_sound_of_the_Beatles.shtml




Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 21:46
it reminds a bit of the Moon Landing theory (except for Coleman's homophobic quasi-religious agenda) which is so uninformed of the way physics, science and photography work that it's not even pushed by most theorists anymore

Coleman is a deeply angry, misinformed crusader who believes people don't actually do anything of freewill - put another way, that any influence on society is planned, and with malicious intent.  What he fails to realize is that anyone and anything may have an affect on any other thing.   That's just how it works, and his very article is proof of that.  You go, Mr. Coleman, you're proving that individuals can impact others simply by expressing themself.  Case in point; the Beatles.  Wake up and smell the coffee, and then move on with your life.









Edited by Atavachron - September 12 2009 at 22:02
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 22:13
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

You go, Mr. Coleman, you're proving that individuals can impact others simply by expressing themself.  Case in point; the Beatles.  Wake up and smell the coffee, and then move on with your life. 

I think it's hard for some people to accept the possibility of human talent reaching out to so many people.  They think they have seen through a conspiracy to mass influence people when in reality they simply lack faith in the boundless potential of human endeavour and what could be more pathetic!  I have met people who are genuinely indifferent to the Beatles and they are not the ones wasting time reading and trumpeting conspiracy theories, much less making them up, because they couldn't care less either way. Ergo, I have to conclude that the likes of Coleman are deeply resentful of talented bands like Beatles.  
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2009 at 22:16
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

You go, Mr. Coleman, you're proving that individuals can impact others simply by expressing themself.  Case in point; the Beatles.  Wake up and smell the coffee, and then move on with your life. 

I think it's hard for some people to accept the possibility of human talent reaching out to so many people.  They think they have seen through a conspiracy to mass influence people when in reality they simply lack faith in the boundless potential of human endeavour


exactly


Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

I have met people who are genuinely indifferent to the Beatles and they are not the ones wasting time reading and trumpeting conspiracy theories, much less making them up, because they couldn't care less either way. Ergo, I have to conclude that the likes of Coleman are deeply resentful of talented bands like Beatles.  


interesting idea



Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.180 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.