![]() |
Reviews discussion |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 9596979899 182> |
Author | ||
Easy Money ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 11 2007 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 10694 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Peter Gabriel pfffft we have Whistler, Vompatti and Micky. Now that's wit.
Edited by Easy Money - August 16 2009 at 20:53 |
||
![]() |
||
LinusW ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 27 2007 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 10665 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
From the Reviews Reporting Thread
That's simply not true. There are loads of excellent reviewers around, and I dare say way more than in the sites infancy. What has happened is that the site has a wider scope, with wider tastes and way more reviewers. That is a good thing, not a bad thing - it's variation. Of course there'll be more reviews you consider bad, but you're just one voice of many. It's an increasingly heterogeneous site, and you must accept that as either good or bad. I think it makes PA richer and way more interesting. Edited by LinusW - August 17 2009 at 10:51 |
||
![]() |
||
Equality 7-2521 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
From the same thread.
And what do you come here for just to explicitly insult others reviews and implicitly claim the same about my reviews. |
||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
||
![]() |
||
Easy Money ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 11 2007 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 10694 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I actually think Pat was showing his care for the site and it's integrity, he just used sarcasm that's all.
It was inappropriate in review form, he and I agree on that now, the review is gone and all is well, Amen. Edited by Easy Money - August 17 2009 at 11:39 |
||
![]() |
||
Vibrationbaby ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: February 13 2004 Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
OK am I on the right thread here? I'd like to know whre I've been insulting people's reviews. I'm speaking for myself. it used to be fun here writing reviews and bios and reading what others might have to say about bands and albums. I even had an interview lined up ( that I put a bit of work into ) with a rather big name in the spring but I eventually declined to do it because of all the embarrasing nonesense that has been going on not only in the reviews but on the site in general.
|
||
![]() |
||
Equality 7-2521 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I do believe this is insulting people's reviews.
|
||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
||
![]() |
||
Vibrationbaby ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: February 13 2004 Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Well do you come here to f*** around? I don`t think so. If you don`t then I guess I wasn`t referring to you. So what are you worrying about? I was obviously referring to these jokers whose assinine reviews show up on the reviews reporting thread. Now that I`m on the correct thread I`ll say this again. I honestly think that the new review standards should be introduced in order to prevent these monkeys, who evidently have no life, from ruining what should be a positive, constructive and even fun thing. You can tell that some guys are not too experienced at this thing but that`s not what I was referring to. I wasn`t too good at it in the beginning and I occasionally even suprise myself.
|
||
![]() |
||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37598 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
There were some great reviews back in the old good old days. This is one of my favourites from an illustrious member:
I much prefer reading one star reviews, to be honest (especially when it comes to albums I love). So many resist giving low ratings to respected albums even if they hate them (try to be objective that way, when I prefer subjective-based ratings, even though I'd be uncomfortable just rating that way). Edited by Logan - August 18 2009 at 13:35 |
||
![]() |
||
Equality 7-2521 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Well see you can insult me regardless of the truth of the matter so your point is really irrelevant, and since my review was just reported in the abuse thread before you said this I guess that you are now explicitly referring to me.
|
||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
||
![]() |
||
Equality 7-2521 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Agree with everything you said. And yes a great quality review from back in the day where the sun didn't set and rain never fell.
|
||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
||
![]() |
||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37598 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Those were the days, when men were men and camels were Canterbury. ;) |
||
![]() |
||
Phideaux ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 27 2007 Status: Offline Points: 378 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
And the snow goose flew east with the Matching Mole for the glorious good of the Party...
|
||
![]() |
||
Dean ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
one hump or two? As I see it the site is big enough for people to come here to write reviews, discuss music in a serious manner and/or just play around on the forum - but when people think they can f*** about with reviews then we act: short, sharp and with vengence.
|
||
What?
|
||
![]() |
||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
And Canterbury was just part of Kent.
|
||
![]() |
||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37598 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
But, c'est dommage, it was all a Mirage. With a nod and a wink, the mole exclaimed, the land of grey and pink seems very red today, shall we sing a song to Che?
|
||
![]() |
||
Tony R ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: July 16 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 11979 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Easy Money ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 11 2007 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 10694 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Ian, your last post was a personal insult so I hid it, stay on topic.
I say we put Bob on the JR team, he really knows his stuff there, plus his obvious appreciation of all things jazz. Edited by Easy Money - August 18 2009 at 14:50 |
||
![]() |
||
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37598 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
He said he doesn't like Trad jazz in particular of course, but I would not have thought of Third as traditional jazz (I guess he's not really saying it is Trad jazz, just that he doesn't like Trad jazz, and rap, it's not a rap album either and of course he's not saying it is). But the best reviews often make you consider things in a light that would not occur to you. Much as I love reading the review, it could be more exact. For instance, to say "Soft Machine are usually branded as part of
the Canterbury sound, but to do so is a gross insult to the likes of
Caravan and Camel" could cause some confusion. Soft Machine is much more likely to be branded Canterbury Scene than Camel, and is one of the most significant bands from it. I consider it to be THE Canterbury Scene band (of course the Wilde Flowers were the seminal one). Course I think that line was intended by tongue-in-cheek, like much of the review (of course he knows its musical and has form and structure, but hyperbole can be effective in writing for impact). Humour is sometimes lacking in reviews here, and EL, like many, knows how not to be dry and boring, has wit to spare, which is a reason why, even though I may not share the same perspective, I find him to be one of the most entertaining reviewers here (particularly his low ratings). He has a delightful and very English acerbity to some of his reviews. If often find the best writers to be from England because they are very good with irony and word-play (partially thanks to all the cryptic crosswords they have there, and the influence of Cockney rhyming slang).
And no irony for me (I'm not good at irony and sarcasm). This is, after all, also an appreciation thread. Some of the the most boring reviews, imo, are the really formulaic ones. Like every review from a reviewer follows the same pattern. And I generally like a nice conclusion in reviews. Anecdotes are nice when possible to personalise the review, and of course ones that showcase people's idiosyncrasies. But there's room for all different types of reviews as long as they're not abusive. We all have our favourites. I read so many great ones of different types, and really wish I could write half as well as most of the reviewers here. Edited by Logan - August 18 2009 at 16:01 |
||
![]() |
||
CCVP ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: September 15 2007 Location: Vitória, Brasil Status: Offline Points: 7971 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Some reviews, bashing DT:
dashrendar ![]() This album starts out terribly. Completely robotic, uninspired sounds and noises. There is absolutely no creativity left in those guys. Plain, simple and boring showing off of their technical musicianship--nothing more. It was so bad that midway I switched to "Scenes From A Memory Metropolis Part II". Ahhhh, thank god. Mike Portnoy needs to calm the f*ck down. This ass still can't do a smooth natural sounding and appealing drum fill. LaBrie should quit singing completely. Petrucci and Rudess should utilize their amazing guitar and keyboard skills, respectively, elsewhere. I mean it tells you something when they do a better job in their side projects than in their main band. Those guys need to sit down and think instead of pumping out crap. ___________________________________________________________________________________ JJLehto
Maybe they have just been around too long? The Simpsons have been around 20 years and though they used to be one the greatest TV shows there was....they are not just stale. They have lost it. I fear that is what happened with Dream Theater. They have just burned out/stop trying/out of ideas I do not know, but maybe they should have just hung it up. It is sad when a TV show goes off in its prime, we miss it but enjoy the great re-runs. Dream Theater should have gone the route of Mash and called it quits when they were on top and play what they have already done. OK, enough depressed ranting and TV references. How would I describe this album? Generic. Stale. Cheesy. Now when it comes to prog metal, (and certain bands in particular) I expect some cheese and really do not have a problem with it. However, this album has enough cheese to make a pizza which is compounded by the fact that not much is new, and what is new sounds generic. This all adds up to one word. Boring. Now, Mr. LaBrie. He is the butt of many a joke and while he is far from my favorite vocalist, (OK very far) he could be worse. On this album he is. I absolutely can not stand his vocals on this album. Of course there are a few good parts, I really like some riffs in the first song. However, I can not make it through the whole thing. This is the scenario with all the others. Some parts may be good but when you can not make it through the whole song, you have a problem. The Shattered Fortress. This song is the perfect example of almost everything I have said. This is finally the completion of Portnoy's journey through the 12 step program. It uses pieces from all the other various songs throughout. Talk about boring! OK, I'm sure they will say as the final piece of journey it encompasses every part of it. Is this true? Is this just a feeble attempt to cover up the fact they had nothing else? Who knows. What I do know is it is boring. The song is just a bunch of other DT songs connected with predictable solo's and they are frankly, even starting to all sound similar. I guess it is a cool idea, but it is just really uncreative. The only neat thing about it is near the end of "The Shattered Fortress" is the opening part to "The Glass Prison". Get it??? It's kind of cool, and if they made a different song but still used that outro it would have been awesome, and not just cheesy and uninspired. As I said above, there are some cool parts in the songs, but I can not get through a single one. When you are struggling to stay with it, skip to next song, repeat, repeat, until you are at the end of the album, well that is a failure in my opinion. "Systematic Chaos" was the beginning of this and it has continued. I would like to say this is just a streak and not a trend, but I doubt it. Boring, uncreative, and the worst LaBrie vocals yet. One Star ___________________________________________________________________________________MrMan2000 ![]() I'm stunned that so many review are giving this such a high ranking. The simplest measure of my feelings for this disc is that when I'm listening I honestly can't wait for it to be over so I can get on to listening to something better. In my car I still have a 6 CD player and the mood change as it switches from this disc to Symphony X's Paradise Lost is unmistakable. (The fact I can't seem to pull Paradise Lost out of the player should tell you my feelings about that release). Anyway....the faults with BC&SL are pretty evident and describe 1. Lack of new ideas 2. Poor songwriting further tarnished by abysmal lyrics 3. Musical w**kery leading to needlessly long songs 1. Lack of new ideas: as anyone who's been listening to DT since the early days will readily admit, they've been regurgitating the same ideas for the last 10 years. The last act of originality from this band was Scenes From A Memory. Everything since has been reinventions of works they've done previously. Now this ailment plagues many a band and doesn't mean that their current efforts suck. It does mean they need to bring some other high-quality elements (like song ideas and lyrics, for instance). When I look at SDOITurbulence, ToThought, Octavarium and Systematic Chaos I hear reworked ideas but there's enough quality and variety to keep the listener interested. On BC&SL however, there is not a single song, passage, bridge, intro, outro, solo or transition here that the band hasn't done before, and done better. Literally, not a single song get me going when listening. Again, this lack of new musical ideas would be okay if it weren't for problem number 2.... 2. Poor songwriting and abysmal lyrics: the lack of creativity is most evident in the poor craft of songwriting. Admittedly, this has never been a real DT strength (they're not Bono or Bruce Springsteen, after all). But, they've had some damn good ideas in the past, especially with their 90's output. I mean, if you outline the ideas the drove ACOSeasons compared to The Count of Tuscany it doesn't seem possible they came from the same people. One tells the story of life lived, of going through the "Spring" of youth and possibilities to a dark winter when life's realities bring the storyteller down to a rebirth and finally coming full circle when he watches a sunset with his son. A cohesive, compelling, full-circle story. The Count of Tuscany is about accepting a ride from a stranger while in Italy, going to a castle, being scared and finding out you had no need to be scared. Seriously, who would write about such a thing? And if you did write about it, what makes you think it's a solid foundation for a 20-minute "epic"? The quality of ideas found on BC&SL are infinitely inferior to other DT efforts. The atrocious lyrics used to complete these sub-standard ideas just make it worse. Crap like "Life goes by in the blink of an eye, with so much left to say". "Thank you for the inspiration. Thank you for the smiles. All the unconditional love that carried me for miles". I absolutely cringe throughout this album it is just so, so bad. Again, hard to believe the people who wrote this penned ACOS, Learning to Live, Voice, Scarred, and the many other well-written songs they've done in the past. Which brings us to the final problem.... 3. Musical w**kery. The best example here is A Nightmare to Remember. This actually has the makings of a good song. The story of a family enjoying a night of celebration then suddenly having it all taken away in a car accident. The intro, first two verses and chorus and first break all work. Then there is a transition where, even on first listen you can tell the band has abandoned whatever store was being told and shifted instead into "we're gonna jam for a while here and perform outrageous workouts on our instruments, regardless of whether it fits the mood / tone of the story; and we're only gonna stop when we're damn certain we've proved to everyone that we know how to play our instruments really, really, really well". Amazingly, they do this, then bring in an outrageous attempt at death-metal growling from Portnoy, then go into a second needless, extended jam. Now, this is DT and awesome musical prowess is a key component of the band and always has been. However, where once these musical wanderings were a 1 or 2 time diversion from otherwise standard song structures they are now pursued on virtually every song. It's one dimensional, formulaic, and frankly lazy. A Nightmare to Remember COULD be a good 6-8 minute song but instead is 15 minutes of drudgery. Virtually every song on this disc goes on too long (and about half of all DT songs since SFAMemory are too long). Bottom line...I don't even want to listen to this thing and probably won't. Those of you claiming
this is DT at their best really need to re-visit the first half of their catalog and make a sober
comparison. I kinda want to give it two stars but I am a DT completist (own every CD, video and
bootleg available through YTSEJAM) and even I don't like this. One star. Menswear Prog Reviewer ![]() Some guys buy a bike, some others date a younger chick, well Dream Theater wears eyeliner and act tough. Everybody has it's thing. When I played this in the car, 2 minutes of track 4, my wife gave me a 'look'. The look that said: 'Shut it off, now'. She got really annoyed because of the intensity of the songs in general; not really the soothing type holding the steering wheel. Okay honey, that's true, they pushed the throttle too much this time. But hey, there's not much more to this than brutal speed and road-rage music: it's just too loud, too fast, too angry and too repetitive. Again, DT's gothier than before, with mean attitude. Let's put the word mean between quotes, because the band is as scary as fathers at the mall just out of Buffalo Jeans. When Octavarium got out, I was surprised how this modern-tech-goth edge suited well DT, but this is many steps towards ridicule: Church-Dracula organ, Metallica references by the dozen, pseudo-rapping and yes, the final step...growling. I mean, if this album is your first ecounter with the band, you'll think you've discovered a gold mine, and true, the album has many qualities( but qualities that made their reputation 20 years ago. How about something refreshing? ). To the fan who followed them since 1993 (me), it seems like a complete lost in translation and I feel I"ve lost my little secret garden. Where's the band that claimed Rush as their main influence? ___________________________________________________________________________________ richardh Prog Reviewer ![]() ___________________________________________________________________________________ poslednijat_colobar Prog Reviewer ![]() Edited by CCVP - August 18 2009 at 21:58 |
||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Atkingani ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: October 21 2005 Location: Terra Brasilis Status: Offline Points: 12288 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Actually some of the reviews shown above although sincere infringe some basic rules in relation to the band and its members. Some edition will be needed to say the least.
|
||
Guigo
~~~~~~ |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 9596979899 182> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |