Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Reviews discussion
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Reviews discussion

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 9596979899 182>
Author
Message
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10694
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Easy Money Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 16 2009 at 18:52
Peter Gabriel pfffft we have Whistler, Vompatti and Micky. Now that's wit.

Edited by Easy Money - August 16 2009 at 20:53
Back to Top
LinusW View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 27 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 10665
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LinusW Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2009 at 10:50
From the Reviews Reporting Thread
Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

Well, when the site was in it`s infancy I was asked by Max if I wanted this reviewer title I actually thought about it for about a week before I said what the hell. I had never written a word about music prior to that. I`ll admit some of my reviews are not worthy but I can write something with some substance  when I sit down and try.  Back in the beginning it seemed that the reviews in general were much better. People cared. These days people just come here to f*** around. I dunno give me another beer. Maybe I`ll write a review this afternoon if I can find the inspiration


That's simply not true. There are loads of excellent reviewers around, and I dare say way more than in the sites infancy. What has happened is that the site has a wider scope, with wider tastes and way more reviewers. That is a good thing, not a bad thing - it's variation. Of course there'll be more reviews you consider bad, but you're just one voice of many. It's an increasingly heterogeneous site, and you must accept that as either good or bad. I think it makes PA richer and way more interesting. 


Edited by LinusW - August 17 2009 at 10:51
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Equality 7-2521 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2009 at 10:54
From the same thread.

Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

Well, when the site was in it`s infancy I was asked by Max if I wanted this reviewer title I actually thought about it for about a week before I said what the hell. I had never written a word about music prior to that. I`ll admit some of my reviews are not worthy but I can write something with some substance  when I sit down and try.  Back in the beginning it seemed that the reviews in general were much better. People cared. These days people just come here to f*** around. I dunno give me another beer. Maybe I`ll write a review this afternoon if I can find the inspiration


And what do you come here for just to explicitly insult others reviews and implicitly claim the same about my reviews.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10694
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Easy Money Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2009 at 11:35
I actually think Pat was showing his care for the site and it's integrity, he just used sarcasm that's all.

It was inappropriate in review form, he and I agree on that now, the review is gone and all is well, Amen.

Edited by Easy Money - August 17 2009 at 11:39
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Vibrationbaby Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 11:06
OK am I on the right thread here? I'd like to know whre I've been insulting people's reviews. I'm speaking for myself. it used to be fun here writing reviews and bios and reading what others might have to say about bands and albums. I even had an interview lined up ( that I put a bit of work into )  with a rather big name in the spring but I eventually declined to do it because of all the embarrasing nonesense that has been going on not only in the reviews but on the site in general.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Equality 7-2521 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 11:29
Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

Back in the beginning it seemed that the reviews in general were much better. People cared. These days people just come here to f*** around.

I do believe this is insulting people's reviews.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Vibrationbaby Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 12:53
Well do you come here to f*** around? I don`t think so. If you don`t then I guess I wasn`t referring to you. So what are you worrying about? I was obviously referring to  these jokers whose assinine reviews show up on the reviews reporting thread. Now that I`m on the correct thread I`ll say this again. I honestly think that the new review standards should be introduced in order to prevent these monkeys, who evidently have no life, from ruining what should be a positive, constructive and even fun thing. You can tell that some guys are not too experienced at this thing but that`s not what I was referring to. I wasn`t too good at it in the beginning and I occasionally even suprise myself. 
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37598
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 13:15
There were some great reviews back in the old good old days.  This is one of my favourites from an illustrious member:

Easy Livin
Admin Group
Site Admin & Moderator
1 stars Turds

So what's all the fuss about then? I have to admit up front that trad jazz (along with rap) is about the only type of music I just do not like.

I first heard this album in the early 70's and thought it was dreadful. My tastes have "matured" somewhat since then, so I bought the album on CD thinking that I must have missed something way back then. Unfortunately, I hadn't, it's still dreadful.

Setting aside "Moon in June" for the moment, there is nothing remotely musical here. All there is rambling free form jazz, with no form or structure. It's hard to tell at times whether any of the band are actually capable of playing their instruments, so disjointed is the overall sound. "Moon in June" does have suggestions of a tune. It would be an exaggeration to call it the best track, it's not really good enough to warrant such an accolade, but it is better than the others.

Soft Machine are usually branded as part of the Canterbury sound, but to do so is a gross insult to the likes of Caravan and Camel.

Send comments to Easy Livin (BETA) | Report this review (#22020)
Posted 3:18:56 PM EST, 5/2/2004
It doesn't matter that I disagree with it.  It's one of my favourite albums, plus I don't consider Camel representative of the Canterbury Scene (so would question that comment, but then he was livin' the music when I was in diapers) and I can't see how it's not remotely musical (not sure what that means exactly), and I don't just hear rambling free form jazz and find structure and form there (but people hear and interpret music differently) but it's got personality and humour, which to me is really important.  The older ones often were less analytical and sterile and more entertaining.  People didn't worry so much about certain thing, wrote more for fun back them methinks) One thing I've found is that many reviewers are writing longer and longer reviews.  A really entertaining review, to my tastes (and I can't write short) has humour, strong opinion, is direct, and is pithy.  It doesn't even have to be strictly accurate.  I wish I had the ability, but I'm a flip-flopper.... If I were to write a review I'd be thinking ttoo hard about different possible perspectives.  "One could say that the album is ... but on the other hand .... Additioanlly, one could say ... but then.... and ... Hmm, now what was my point?"

I much prefer reading one star reviews, to be honest (especially when it comes to albums I love).  So many resist giving low ratings to respected albums even if they hate them (try to be objective that way, when I prefer subjective-based ratings, even though I'd be uncomfortable just rating that way).


Edited by Logan - August 18 2009 at 13:35
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Equality 7-2521 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 13:20
Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

Well do you come here to f*** around? I don`t think so. If you don`t then I guess I wasn`t referring to you. So what are you worrying about? I was obviously referring to  these jokers whose assinine reviews show up on the reviews reporting thread. Now that I`m on the correct thread I`ll say this again. I honestly think that the new review standards should be introduced in order to prevent these monkeys, who evidently have no life, from ruining what should be a positive, constructive and even fun thing. You can tell that some guys are not too experienced at this thing but that`s not what I was referring to. I wasn`t too good at it in the beginning and I occasionally even suprise myself. 

Well see you can insult me regardless of the truth of the matter so your point is really irrelevant, and since my review was just reported in the abuse thread before you said this I guess that you are now explicitly referring to me.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Equality 7-2521 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 13:24
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

It doesn't matter that I disagree with it.  It's one of my favourite albums, plus I don't consider Camel representative of the Canterbury Scene (so would question that comment, but then he was livin' the music when I was in diapers) and I can't see how it's not remotely musical (not sure what that means exactly), but it's got personality and humour.  The older ones often were less analytical and sterile and more entertaining.  One thing I've found is that mnay reviewers are writing longer and longer reviews.  A really entertaining review, to my tastes (and I can't write short) has humour, strong opinion, and is pithy.  It doesn't even have to be strictly accurate.

I much prefer reading one star reviews, to be honest (especially when it comes to albums I love),

Agree with everything you said. And yes a great quality review from back in the day where the sun didn't set and rain never fell.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37598
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 13:38
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Agree with everything you said. And yes a great quality review from back in the day where the sun didn't set and rain never fell.


Those were the days, when men were men and camels were Canterbury. ;)
Back to Top
Phideaux View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 27 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 378
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Phideaux Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 13:44
And the snow goose flew east with the Matching Mole for the glorious good of the Party...
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dean Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 13:48

one hump or two?

As I see it the site is big enough for people to come here to write reviews, discuss music in a serious manner and/or just play around on the forum - but when people think they can f*** about with reviews then we act: short, sharp and with vengence.
What?
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snow Dog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 13:51
Originally posted by Phideaux Phideaux wrote:

And the snow goose flew east with the Matching Mole for the glorious good of the Party...

And Canterbury was just part of Kent.
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37598
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 13:53
But, c'est dommage, it was all a Mirage.  With a nod and a wink, the mole exclaimed, the land of grey and pink seems very red today, shall we sing a song to Che?
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tony R Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 14:47
Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

OK am I on the right thread here? I'd like to know whre I've been insulting people's reviews. I'm speaking for myself. it used to be fun here writing reviews and bios and reading what others might have to say about bands and albums. I even had an interview lined up ( that I put a bit of work into )  with a rather big name in the spring but I eventually declined to do it because of all the embarrasing nonesense that has been going on not only in the reviews but on the site in general.


Ermm

Wacko



Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10694
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Easy Money Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 14:48
Ian, your last post was a personal insult so I hid it, stay on topic.

I say we put Bob on the JR team, he really knows his stuff there, plus his obvious appreciation of all things jazz.

Edited by Easy Money - August 18 2009 at 14:50
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37598
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Logan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 15:57
He said he doesn't like Trad jazz in particular of course, but I would not have thought of Third as traditional jazz (I guess he's not really saying it is Trad jazz, just that he doesn't like Trad jazz, and rap, it's not a rap album either and of course he's not saying it is). But the best reviews often make you consider things in a light that would not occur to you.  Much as I love reading the review, it could be more exact.  For instance, to say "Soft Machine are usually branded as part of the Canterbury sound, but to do so is a gross insult to the likes of Caravan and Camel" could cause some confusion.  Soft Machine is much more likely to be branded Canterbury Scene than Camel, and is one of the most significant bands from it.  I consider it to be THE Canterbury Scene band (of course the Wilde Flowers were the seminal one).  Course I think that line was intended by tongue-in-cheek, like much of the review (of course he knows its musical and has form and structure, but hyperbole can be effective in writing for impact).  Humour is sometimes lacking in reviews here, and EL, like many, knows how not to be dry and boring, has wit to spare, which is a reason why, even though I may not share the same perspective, I find him to be one of the most entertaining reviewers here (particularly his low ratings).  He has a delightful and very English acerbity to some of his reviews.  If often find the best writers to be from England because they are very good with irony and word-play (partially thanks to all the cryptic crosswords they have there, and the influence of Cockney rhyming slang).
And no irony for me (I'm not good at irony and sarcasm).

This is, after all, also an appreciation thread.

Some of the the most boring reviews, imo, are the really formulaic ones.  Like every review from a reviewer follows the same pattern. And I generally like a nice conclusion in reviews.  Anecdotes are nice when possible to personalise the review, and of course ones that showcase people's idiosyncrasies.

But there's room for all different types of reviews as long as they're not abusive.  We all have our favourites.  I read so many great ones of different types, and really wish I could write half as well as most of the reviewers here.



Edited by Logan - August 18 2009 at 16:01
Back to Top
CCVP View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 15 2007
Location: Vitória, Brasil
Status: Offline
Points: 7971
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CCVP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 21:58
Some reviews, bashing DT:

dashrendar 1 stars I guess I am a completionist because I still buy Dream Theater albums even though I saw the beginning of their decline with "Train of Thought". I read people here say this album starts out great and that is what Dream Theater is good about.

This album starts out terribly. Completely robotic, uninspired sounds and noises. There is absolutely no creativity left in those guys. Plain, simple and boring showing off of their technical musicianship--nothing more. It was so bad that midway I switched to "Scenes From A Memory Metropolis Part II". Ahhhh, thank god.

Mike Portnoy needs to calm the f*ck down. This ass still can't do a smooth natural sounding and appealing drum fill. LaBrie should quit singing completely. Petrucci and Rudess should utilize their amazing guitar and keyboard skills, respectively, elsewhere. I mean it tells you something when they do a better job in their side projects than in their main band.

Those guys need to sit down and think instead of pumping out crap.

___________________________________________________________________________________

JJLehto 1 stars After the disappointment that was "Systematic Chaos" I had mixed expectations for this latest album. I was hopeful, (more like praying) that this would be a turnaround, but in my brain, and stomach, I was bracing for a let down. Unfortunately, I was right.

Maybe they have just been around too long? The Simpsons have been around 20 years and though they used to be one the greatest TV shows there was....they are not just stale. They have lost it. I fear that is what happened with Dream Theater. They have just burned out/stop trying/out of ideas I do not know, but maybe they should have just hung it up. It is sad when a TV show goes off in its prime, we miss it but enjoy the great re-runs. Dream Theater should have gone the route of Mash and called it quits when they were on top and play what they have already done.

OK, enough depressed ranting and TV references. How would I describe this album? Generic. Stale. Cheesy. Now when it comes to prog metal, (and certain bands in particular) I expect some cheese and really do not have a problem with it. However, this album has enough cheese to make a pizza which is compounded by the fact that not much is new, and what is new sounds generic. This all adds up to one word. Boring.

Now, Mr. LaBrie. He is the butt of many a joke and while he is far from my favorite vocalist, (OK very far) he could be worse. On this album he is. I absolutely can not stand his vocals on this album.

Of course there are a few good parts, I really like some riffs in the first song. However, I can not make it through the whole thing. This is the scenario with all the others. Some parts may be good but when you can not make it through the whole song, you have a problem.

The Shattered Fortress. This song is the perfect example of almost everything I have said. This is finally the completion of Portnoy's journey through the 12 step program. It uses pieces from all the other various songs throughout. Talk about boring! OK, I'm sure they will say as the final piece of journey it encompasses every part of it. Is this true? Is this just a feeble attempt to cover up the fact they had nothing else? Who knows. What I do know is it is boring. The song is just a bunch of other DT songs connected with predictable solo's and they are frankly, even starting to all sound similar. I guess it is a cool idea, but it is just really uncreative. The only neat thing about it is near the end of "The Shattered Fortress" is the opening part to "The Glass Prison". Get it??? It's kind of cool, and if they made a different song but still used that outro it would have been awesome, and not just cheesy and uninspired.

As I said above, there are some cool parts in the songs, but I can not get through a single one. When you are struggling to stay with it, skip to next song, repeat, repeat, until you are at the end of the album, well that is a failure in my opinion. "Systematic Chaos" was the beginning of this and it has continued. I would like to say this is just a streak and not a trend, but I doubt it. Boring, uncreative, and the worst LaBrie vocals yet.

One Star

___________________________________________________________________________________

MrMan2000 1 stars I purchased BC&SL the day it came out, like I have all DT releases since Images & Words. And, like every other release, I give it a few weeks to sink in as I find their music takes a while to digest. Having given it adequate time to ferment my initial impression has been confirmed: this is, without question, the worst Dream Theater release ever.

I'm stunned that so many review are giving this such a high ranking. The simplest measure of my feelings for this disc is that when I'm listening I honestly can't wait for it to be over so I can get on to listening to something better. In my car I still have a 6 CD player and the mood change as it switches from this disc to Symphony X's Paradise Lost is unmistakable. (The fact I can't seem to pull Paradise Lost out of the player should tell you my feelings about that release).

Anyway....the faults with BC&SL are pretty evident and describe

1. Lack of new ideas 2. Poor songwriting further tarnished by abysmal lyrics 3. Musical w**kery leading to needlessly long songs

1. Lack of new ideas: as anyone who's been listening to DT since the early days will readily admit, they've been regurgitating the same ideas for the last 10 years. The last act of originality from this band was Scenes From A Memory. Everything since has been reinventions of works they've done previously. Now this ailment plagues many a band and doesn't mean that their current efforts suck. It does mean they need to bring some other high-quality elements (like song ideas and lyrics, for instance). When I look at SDOITurbulence, ToThought, Octavarium and Systematic Chaos I hear reworked ideas but there's enough quality and variety to keep the listener interested. On BC&SL however, there is not a single song, passage, bridge, intro, outro, solo or transition here that the band hasn't done before, and done better. Literally, not a single song get me going when listening. Again, this lack of new musical ideas would be okay if it weren't for problem number 2....

2. Poor songwriting and abysmal lyrics: the lack of creativity is most evident in the poor craft of songwriting. Admittedly, this has never been a real DT strength (they're not Bono or Bruce Springsteen, after all). But, they've had some damn good ideas in the past, especially with their 90's output. I mean, if you outline the ideas the drove ACOSeasons compared to The Count of Tuscany it doesn't seem possible they came from the same people. One tells the story of life lived, of going through the "Spring" of youth and possibilities to a dark winter when life's realities bring the storyteller down to a rebirth and finally coming full circle when he watches a sunset with his son. A cohesive, compelling, full-circle story. The Count of Tuscany is about accepting a ride from a stranger while in Italy, going to a castle, being scared and finding out you had no need to be scared. Seriously, who would write about such a thing? And if you did write about it, what makes you think it's a solid foundation for a 20-minute "epic"? The quality of ideas found on BC&SL are infinitely inferior to other DT efforts.

The atrocious lyrics used to complete these sub-standard ideas just make it worse. Crap like "Life goes by in the blink of an eye, with so much left to say". "Thank you for the inspiration. Thank you for the smiles. All the unconditional love that carried me for miles". I absolutely cringe throughout this album it is just so, so bad. Again, hard to believe the people who wrote this penned ACOS, Learning to Live, Voice, Scarred, and the many other well-written songs they've done in the past. Which brings us to the final problem....

3. Musical w**kery. The best example here is A Nightmare to Remember. This actually has the makings of a good song. The story of a family enjoying a night of celebration then suddenly having it all taken away in a car accident. The intro, first two verses and chorus and first break all work. Then there is a transition where, even on first listen you can tell the band has abandoned whatever store was being told and shifted instead into "we're gonna jam for a while here and perform outrageous workouts on our instruments, regardless of whether it fits the mood / tone of the story; and we're only gonna stop when we're damn certain we've proved to everyone that we know how to play our instruments really, really, really well". Amazingly, they do this, then bring in an outrageous attempt at death-metal growling from Portnoy, then go into a second needless, extended jam.

Now, this is DT and awesome musical prowess is a key component of the band and always has been. However, where once these musical wanderings were a 1 or 2 time diversion from otherwise standard song structures they are now pursued on virtually every song. It's one dimensional, formulaic, and frankly lazy. A Nightmare to Remember COULD be a good 6-8 minute song but instead is 15 minutes of drudgery. Virtually every song on this disc goes on too long (and about half of all DT songs since SFAMemory are too long).

Bottom line...I don't even want to listen to this thing and probably won't. Those of you claiming this is DT at their best really need to re-visit the first half of their catalog and make a sober comparison. I kinda want to give it two stars but I am a DT completist (own every CD, video and bootleg available through YTSEJAM) and even I don't like this. One star.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Menswear
Prog Reviewer
2 stars Middle age crisis.

Some guys buy a bike, some others date a younger chick, well Dream Theater wears eyeliner and act tough. Everybody has it's thing.

When I played this in the car, 2 minutes of track 4, my wife gave me a 'look'. The look that said: 'Shut it off, now'. She got really annoyed because of the intensity of the songs in general; not really the soothing type holding the steering wheel. Okay honey, that's true, they pushed the throttle too much this time. But hey, there's not much more to this than brutal speed and road-rage music: it's just too loud, too fast, too angry and too repetitive.

Again, DT's gothier than before, with mean attitude. Let's put the word mean between quotes, because the band is as scary as fathers at the mall just out of Buffalo Jeans. When Octavarium got out, I was surprised how this modern-tech-goth edge suited well DT, but this is many steps towards ridicule: Church-Dracula organ, Metallica references by the dozen, pseudo-rapping and yes, the final step...growling.

I mean, if this album is your first ecounter with the band, you'll think you've discovered a gold mine, and true, the album has many qualities( but qualities that made their reputation 20 years ago. How about something refreshing? ). To the fan who followed them since 1993 (me), it seems like a complete lost in translation and I feel I"ve lost my little secret garden.

Where's the band that claimed Rush as their main influence?

In this particular case i don't think the guy even listened to the album. Anyone who did can tell how much Rush there is in The Best of Times and, to some degree, in Count of Tuscany.

___________________________________________________________________________________

richardh
Prog Reviewer
1 stars I don't normally give such low marks to any album but this is the most boring load of tripe I've ever heard.DT were always inferior to Rush and now they have slunk back to their roots in coming out with a basic heavy metal style record.The world has enough of this sort of stuff.I'd rather listen to Iron Maiden who are a lot more fun quite frankly.

___________________________________________________________________________________

poslednijat_colobar
Prog Reviewer
2 stars The album is little bit longer,than it should be! The songs are longer than they should,too! It's full of repetitions. The album is good in terms of technical abilities, but most if the songs are boring and the problem is the lack of melody in there. There are a few instruments and vocals, but I would like to ask where is the melody? That make all of the songs boring and the album boring as whole. Here in Awake we can find one of the best Dream Theater's songs - Erotomania - it's just great and it's one of the most progressive songs I've ever heard.6:00,Caught in a Web and Voices are somewhat good songs,but everything else is boring. The length of the album is negative for its overall quality. Probably the reason for the success of the album is the success of the previous one,which is quite better, but very overrated, too! Decent album with one special hint!


Edited by CCVP - August 18 2009 at 21:58
Back to Top
Atkingani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Terra Brasilis
Status: Offline
Points: 12288
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atkingani Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 18 2009 at 22:25
Actually some of the reviews shown above although sincere infringe some basic rules in relation to the band and its members. Some edition will be needed to say the least.
Guigo

~~~~~~
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 9596979899 182>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.234 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.