![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 17181920> |
Author | ||
MovingPictures07 ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: January 09 2008 Location: Beasty Heart Status: Offline Points: 32181 |
![]() |
|
Wow! That's the first time in my life I actually won a random drawing like that.
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
M@X ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster Joined: January 29 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4049 |
![]() |
|
The Winning Members of the Month of November are:
Amazon.com 25$ PROGLEGGS Doug Larson's Imports 25$ MOVINGPICTURES07 Robert Berieau Full Digital Album of "Selfishness: Source of War & Violence" TORODDFUGLESTEG randomly picked from 1095 reviews Winners will be emailed details of their prizes. Thanks to all participants, Good luck for the December reviewers, next draw, January 1st, 2009 Edited by M@X - December 01 2008 at 18:49 |
||
Prog On !
|
||
![]() |
||
Vibrationbaby ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: February 13 2004 Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
![]() |
|
What if the winner ah................ never mind I forgot that I`m living in the future. Anyone out there get a PM from a fictional website asking for reviews?
Now, and I`ve mentioned this before, I don`t know if this has happened to anyone else out there but a lot of my crappy reviews have been stolen from other websites and I`ve even seen snippets of some of them on youtube. The same thing has happened with bits and pieces of some of the band bios I`ve written here. Personally, I write reviews and these bios for the fun of it when I have time or sometimes because I just want to spread the good word. One thing I`ve also noticed is that a lot of the reviews I`ve read here are far superior to most of these so-called professional reviews because they are more informed. That`s it. I have to catch the next time machine back to the mid sixteenth century. ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
LinusW ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 27 2007 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 10665 |
![]() |
|
Exciting! Good luck all
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
M@X ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster Joined: January 29 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4049 |
![]() |
|
Today is the 1st draw, reviewer from the month of November , good luck !!!!
The winners will be listed here later today.
|
||
Prog On !
|
||
![]() |
||
Epignosis ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32552 |
![]() |
|
Once again, thanks so much. To be clear (because I'm generally a loser ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Seyo ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 08 2004 Location: Bosnia Status: Offline Points: 1320 |
![]() |
|
OK, thanks Max. Let's see how it will look like...
|
||
![]() |
||
M@X ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster Joined: January 29 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4049 |
![]() |
|
Ok , to be clear for all participants, the giveaway is still open to all reviews posted in the previous month.
No limitation on new album or first review of albums. Good luck to all. |
||
Prog On !
|
||
![]() |
||
LinusW ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 27 2007 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 10665 |
![]() |
|
Saddening, and with a rating system we'd make that even more uncontrollable. |
||
![]() |
||
Epignosis ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32552 |
![]() |
|
I got reamed for giving In the Court of the Crimson King three stars- I was further advised that I should not be writing reviews. ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
LinusW ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 27 2007 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 10665 |
![]() |
|
![]() I can't say I'd like a rating system for reviews. It hate to see my hard work and my opinion being dragged through the mud because I have a EDIT: Freudian slip or just mistake? ![]() Edited by LinusW - November 27 2008 at 20:04 |
||
![]() |
||
M@X ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster Joined: January 29 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4049 |
![]() |
|
It's something like that, Amazon-like reviews rating system...
|
||
Prog On !
|
||
![]() |
||
The Doctor ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 23 2005 Location: The Tardis Status: Offline Points: 8543 |
![]() |
|
![]() I like the idea of reader appreciation. I think that may be the way to go. But first won't we need a system for rating the reviews? Like they have at Amazon (or is it CD Universe?).
|
||
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
|
||
![]() |
||
Epignosis ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32552 |
![]() |
|
I like the idea, especially since my reviews tend to be long- the only pitfall, though, is that many words don't always mean more thoughtful, unfortunately. I've read Moby Dick. ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
M@X ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster Joined: January 29 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4049 |
![]() |
|
In a near future you'll see a new system that will also consider the appreciation of readers. So the weight will be based on the appreciation also.
What do you think of that ? I think it's more objective that the number of words.... a nice idea though !
|
||
Prog On !
|
||
![]() |
||
The Doctor ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 23 2005 Location: The Tardis Status: Offline Points: 8543 |
![]() |
|
By the way...nice one M@x for setting that up.
![]() |
||
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
|
||
![]() |
||
The Doctor ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 23 2005 Location: The Tardis Status: Offline Points: 8543 |
![]() |
|
Just a random thought...is it possible to put weight based on the number of words, instead of number of reviews?
That way, whatever album someone chooses to review, you put more weight on the more thoughtful reviews? Not that I've been a big reviewer on the site (something I'm hoping to change in the near future), but, it does seem to me that those who put in the time to write a 500 word review deserve more of a chance than someone who puts in a 50 word review. Edited by The Doctor - November 27 2008 at 19:25 |
||
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
|
||
![]() |
||
M@X ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster Joined: January 29 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4049 |
![]() |
|
That is some good argumens Epignosis !!!!!!
Thank you for that. I support your thoughts on this manner.
|
||
Prog On !
|
||
![]() |
||
Epignosis ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32552 |
![]() |
|
To be honest, I don't have the kind of money to be acquiring new albums all the time (I'm still working on obtaining classic albums also). On top of that, I've noticed that Kansas's albums get far less attention than Porcupine Tree's recent work, for instance (Fear of a Blank Planet - 132 reviews, Leftoverture -74 reviews). So I don't really suppose it's fair to reward reviewers simply because they are about more recent albums. Plus, there are many old albums with only a few or no reviews. But I do spent quite a bit of time writing my reviews, and I put a lot of thought into them. I give a track by track analysis of every record. So when I get around to writing one about "Close to the Edge" or "Thick as a Brick," I'll put just as much thought into those. |
||
![]() |
||
Epignosis ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32552 |
![]() |
|
M@X is making my Prog Trading Cards look like rubbish...
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 17181920> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |