Rush "Snakes & Arrows" (in retrospect)

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   Torn between a three and a four. Can't even give a proper reason for it. A solid album, certainly, but I think some of the songs could have been more (or better) developed.

Poll Question: In retrospect what would you rate Snakes & Arrows ?
Poll Choice	Votes	Poll Statistics
1 star	0	[0.00%]
2 stars	6	[8.96%]
3 stars	14	[20.90%]
4 stars	41	[61.19%]
5 stars	6	[8.96%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
TGM: Orb Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Reviewer page Prog Reviewer Joined: October 21 2007 Location: n/a Status: Offline Points: 8052	Posted: December 22 2007 at 17:32
	Torn between a three and a four. Can't even give a proper reason for it. A solid album, certainly, but I think some of the songs could have been more (or better) developed.

heyitsthatguy Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Reviewer page Forum Senior Member Joined: April 17 2006 Location: Washington Hgts Status: Offline Points: 10094	Posted: December 22 2007 at 17:35
	3 stars. Not amazing, but better than their recent output


Woodbridge Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Reviewer page Forum Newbie Joined: November 17 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 28	Posted: December 23 2007 at 00:36
	Great album! Several well-written songs, and per usual, top-notch instrumentation from the boys. However, it does seem a bit long and a couple songs are "samey" to me. Maybe if one were to trim two or three songs off the album, it'd be a more effective package and hit the listener harder. Still a great release though, best in a long time.. 4 stars.