TOP 100 Progressive Music Albums |
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 12> |
Author | |
Desoc
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 12 2006 Location: Oslo, Norway Status: Offline Points: 216 |
Posted: July 24 2007 at 05:36 |
I completely agree, but it would be an easy "mistake" to use the total number of albums in the database, and not only the number of albums with ratings, as a basis for calculating the average rating of all albums. Hence the question.
|
|
eduur
Forum Newbie Joined: December 06 2005 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Posted: August 01 2007 at 02:57 |
Mike thanks for your explanation on the 23th of kuly. I see how you compute "the average" but for whom ?? With your example with two albums: ================ N=10 now we have an album which has only one rating of 5.0: n=1 The weighted average is: avg = (N*R + n*r) / (N+n) In this case: avg = (10*3.80 + 1*5) / (10+1) = 43/11 = 3.91 ==================== That's nice, but what average? It's the overall average for all albums. I hate to tell you I have a PhD in Mathematics but it still doesn't make sense to me. |
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21156 |
Posted: August 01 2007 at 07:00 |
^ You got it all wrong .. N/R does not stand for a single album:
N = Average number of ratings for all albums in the database. So if there are 100 albums and a total of 1000 ratings in the database, N would be 10. R = Average rating of all the albums in the database. This is a traditional arithmetical mean, like the avg(...) aggregate function in SQL does. So N and R are constant values in this algorithm - they're the same for all albums (during the calculation of the weighted average ... of course when new ratings are submitted or existing ratings edited, these constants change). Now for any given album we first calculate these constants and then apply avg = (N*R + n*r) / (N + n) for n = the number of ratings for the given albm r = the average rating of the album (arithmetical mean*) * this has nothing to do with the calculation of this weighted average ... but for the sake of completeness it should be mentioned that the mean value used here is also a slightly "tweaked" arithmetical mean calculation ... for each rating a weight is applied depending on the rating (no review text / review text / collab). |
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21156 |
Posted: August 01 2007 at 07:13 |
Incidentally: Another good way to understand what this algorithm does is this:
Suppose that in the archives each album has 10 ratings on average, and the average rating of all albums is 3.5. The average for any given album is then calculated as if the album had 10 additional ratings of 3.5 stars. So new albums with only one rating of 5 stars get "dragged down" towards 3.5 stars ... new albums with one low rating get dragged up towards 3.5 stars. Albums with 10 ratings end up halfway between their own average rating and the total average rating ... and albums with much more than 10 ratings are not really affected, their own average rating remains unaffected. |
|
eduur
Forum Newbie Joined: December 06 2005 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Posted: August 01 2007 at 11:21 |
Mike, I now understand thanks! So, in the above case where there are two albums with one album n1=10 and the other n2=1 N = 11/2 =5.5 album1 = (N*R+n1*r1) / (N+n1) = (5.5*3.91+10*3.8) / (5.5+10)= 3.83 Is this correct? And do you know R and N for Progarchives... |
|
digdug
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 13 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4707 |
Posted: August 07 2007 at 08:42 |
Possible Ratings algorithm error ??? I looked at the top 100 for Experimaental/Post Rock
and did not see
Le Notti Difficili by Lazona..... This album has a rating of 3.36 based on 11 ratings....
The top 100 includes many albums with a rating less than 3.36 and less ratings.
Please explain.....
Thanks
|
|
Prog On!
|
|
Desoc
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 12 2006 Location: Oslo, Norway Status: Offline Points: 216 |
Posted: October 07 2007 at 12:19 |
Seems like a valid point... More people than digdug would like an answer to this ..out of curiosity and search for knowledge, of course. Perhaps Mike could provide an answer given his record in this thread?
|
|
progressive
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 08 2005 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 366 |
Posted: February 24 2008 at 14:02 |
Now it's much much more difficult to search new band when there's
"Only albums with at least 25 ratings and an average ratings over 3.5/5 are displayed in theses lists" , so eg Zeuhl has only 11 albums in the list and prog folk 30. Why can't people decide themselves how to set the list?? You got the material, large amount of reviews, why can't it be utilized progressively? but.. good luck Edited by progressive - February 24 2008 at 14:03 |
|
► rateyourmusic.com/~Fastro 2672 ratings ▲ last.fm/user/Fastro 5556 artists ▲ www.progarchives.com/Collaborators.asp?id=4933 266◄ |
|
Ricochet
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 27 2005 Location: Nauru Status: Offline Points: 46301 |
Posted: February 24 2008 at 15:10 |
I think we should create multiple topics about the new system, whether we wanna write a positive or negative opinion on it.
That is, we can use this one. |
|
|
|
dalt99
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 23 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 454 |
Posted: February 24 2008 at 23:19 |
What was wrong with the way it was? I don't understand the change. Why not add an option of what we want to see? If we want to see "Only albums with at least 25 ratings and an average ratings over 3.5/5 are displayed in theses lists", than fine, but we should also be able to CHOOSE to see ALL albums in a genre/studio album/year, etc. of all rating number. Even albums with no votes could be seen. This list was one of the best ways to find out about new album (and more unknown) albums that had only a few ratings but were very good.
|
|
Best of 2006 that I've heard:
PFM-Stati Di Immaginazione Zenit-Surrender (Best "unknown" album) Oaksenham - Conquest of Pacific 2007: Phideaux - Doomsday Afternoon La Torre Del Alchimista - Neo |
|
Harkonnen
Forum Newbie Joined: November 12 2007 Location: New Zealand Status: Offline Points: 8 |
Posted: January 06 2009 at 20:10 |
Dear all,
I was looking at the imdb movie database and came accross the "True Bayesian Estimate" to rank the best 250 movies. I think that such method could work well in our PA database.
BTW, I just love the flexibility to choose exactly what you want on the Top 100/250 section.
I normally choose the studio and live albums with a score higher than 3.8 and more than 50 reviews. I copy the results to Excel and make a table. I normally add a column where I multiply the score times the number of reviews... Not very elegant.
I just did the TBE calculation and I like the results... Please give it a try:
WR = (vR + mC) / (v + m)
Where:
WR: Weighted Rank (Score, 0-5)
v = number of reviews
R = average score for that particular album
m = minimum number of reviews to be considered (In my case, 50)
C = average rating of the whole database
|
|
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Posted: January 07 2009 at 02:50 |
I think our algorithm is similar.
|
|
615694
Forum Newbie Joined: January 18 2009 Location: INDIANA Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Posted: January 19 2009 at 20:26 |
Wondering why "Close to the Edge" isn't listed in the Top 100 or did I miss it?
It's one of my "5 albums marooned on an island" picks.
|
|
"Helm, full dive on the planes."
|
|
Moogtron III
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 26 2005 Location: Belgium Status: Offline Points: 10616 |
Posted: January 20 2009 at 02:23 |
It's at nr. 3 .
|
|
maru19206
Forum Newbie Joined: January 20 2009 Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Posted: January 20 2009 at 07:53 |
Again, how we know N and R, number of all in the database?
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: January 20 2009 at 08:04 |
^ they are dynamic numbers it is not possible to know them because they keep changing as more ratings are posted. They are calculated internally when the chart positions are calculated and are not displayed. I doubt that even M@X knows what the precise values are at any one time.
|
|
What?
|
|
maru19206
Forum Newbie Joined: January 20 2009 Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Posted: January 21 2009 at 06:54 |
Ah, yes I got it. Thanks a lot.
Keep on Proggin'. |
|
M@X
Forum & Site Admin Group Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster Joined: January 29 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4028 |
Posted: May 15 2009 at 02:10 |
Many changes during the past days to the TOP PROG ALBUM tool and the sub-genre list of key albums.
Basically , the algorithm is mostly the same, it's the default value use in the calculation that have changed. Here the updated info describing the calculations variables and filters in the TOP PROG ALBUM tool:
The results have changed in both the PA TOP 100 PROG albums and in the sub-genre too because of the changes in the default variables. Please post your sugg. and comments here. |
|
Prog On !
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: May 15 2009 at 10:58 |
I believe that for a bunch of people who follow an unpopular genre which rarely is presented in charts, we care damn too much for the top list.
When i invite somebody to PA I don't tell him/her "Check the ratings", I tell them "Read the reviews".
Iván
|
|
|
|
M@X
Forum & Site Admin Group Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster Joined: January 29 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4028 |
Posted: May 15 2009 at 11:14 |
I understand your point IVAN but in the end, we must "anyway" offer some kind of charts as a prog rock web site. And now, with the update algorithm and default value, I believe it's more accurate.
Opinions ? Edited by M@X - May 15 2009 at 11:15 |
|
Prog On !
|
|
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |