Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Raff
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
|
Posted: September 23 2007 at 13:04 |
I have a burning question: if Prog was killed, why are we here? Are we holding a wake or what? ![Confused](smileys/smiley5.gif)
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: September 23 2007 at 13:00 |
|
What?
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Sunhillow_
Forum Groupie
Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 57
|
Posted: September 21 2007 at 22:40 |
hehehe probably, Never Mind The Bollocks by Sex Pistols hhehehe
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Dim
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 17 2007
Location: Austin TX
Status: Offline
Points: 6890
|
Posted: September 21 2007 at 22:17 |
I no longer like this thread
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Tapfret
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Online
Points: 8614
|
Posted: September 21 2007 at 20:42 |
The more I think about it, I have to side with those that say prog isn't really a genre anyway, but an approach to a given genre. It is no more a musical style than forward or reverse are automobile styles.
Prog did not die, prog was beaten, robbed, molested and pimped for drug money. And I know the culprit.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
daz2112
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 18 2006
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 4483
|
Posted: September 19 2007 at 13:33 |
I agree with most people, prog is NOT dead!! Very much alive!
|
In the constellation of cygnus,There lurks a mysterious force...The black hole
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Britrocker
Forum Newbie
Joined: September 08 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 7
|
Posted: September 19 2007 at 09:41 |
Hate to hark back to the whole "definition of Progressive" thing. But check the dictionary.
Seems to me that the those guilty of :
NOT moving forward, developing, changing their ideas and methods.
In other words being 'PROGRESSIVE" were some of the fans. Some things never change it would seem.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
pelican
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 18 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 112
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 21:42 |
MajesterX wrote:
No other music killed prog, it was the end of an era and a change in people that caused it's end.
You can't say Prog killed late 60's psychedelic or that alternative rock "killed" the 80's hair bands, it's musical evolution.
If would make no sense to say that if punk & disco never came along or if prog bands didn't start doing pop that prog would have lived on strong for another 6 years as strong as ever.
No pop music style really lasts all that long- ie there is a constant evolution in music that will never change. Even when new and different bands come and become more popular and fresh than the bands we might love, we can't blame them for destroying that music.
BTW, the Sex Pistol's singer was a huge Peter Hammill fan, and if we told him he caused the end of Peter Hammill's small ammount of popularity, he would call us crazy.
|
The singer (John Lydon) is also a huge Van Der Graf Generator and Kate Bush fan!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Teh_Slippermenz
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 11 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 321
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 21:16 |
Peter wrote:
Many classic rock and prog (a sub-genre of classic rock) "dinosaur" acts went extinct, while others adapted, "walked right out of the machinery" and evolved, finding new ways to be "prog." (See Gabriel's groundbreaking and commercially-sucessful third solo effort, and Bowie's constant reinvention of himself, especially in his "Berlin" trilogy of albums, and even Let's Dance.)
Times change -- and change they did.
Another prog album that helped to turn the tide against prog was of course Yes's messy, fatally-flawed Topographic Oceans. The pretension levels and mystic, druggy "obtuseness" of it all were leaving even many longterm fans of the band behind, and shaking their heads in perplexed bemusement. ( Genesis had a similar, fan-polarizing album with The Lamb Lies Down.)
|
Indeed, most progressive rock bands evolved (Yes, Genesis), and found new ways to be progressive. Genesis had "Duke", which was like progreessive pop, and an EXPERIMENTAL ROCK album called "Abacab", which many mistake for pop. None of that album except the song "Man on the Corner" can be classified as pure pop. Yes during the Rabin-era were just pop rock, which is why I didn't bother to listen to them past "90125", it didn't exactly kill PROG, but it killed YES. After Trevor Rabin left I took an interest in them again. Also, another Genesis album that was semi-progressive was "Genesis", AKA the Shapes album. While it wasn't experimental or true prog pop like "Duke", it did feature "Home by the Sea" and "Second Home by the Sea", which is prog pop. It is most likely an art rock album, but it isn't as progressive as Duke or Abacab, and after that, Genesis would be pure pop. I'm afraid I disagree about Tales from Topographic Oceans. It was a lovely album (but not better than what I consider to be their magnum opus, "Relayer"), and it was a modern day symphony. Unfortunately, it was too progressive for casual listeners, and especially some UK critics. On the subject of The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway, I liked it, and it had some classic moments (none of which include "The Carpet Crawlers" for me), but in my opinion, it pales in comparison to "Foxtrot" and "Selling England by the Pound", both of which were magnificent albums, more so than The Lamb. I am probably one of those polarized fans, I guess. I much prefer its follow-up, "A Trick of the Tail".
Edited by Teh_Slippermenz - September 18 2007 at 21:17
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
debrewguy
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 19:34 |
BTO's Not Fragile. After that, who could hear anything ...
|
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Time Signature
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 20 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 362
|
Posted: September 14 2007 at 17:58 |
Teh_Slippermenz wrote:
Anyway, I vote for "90125" by Yes. That....is a desecration of Yes.
|
It's interesting that so many people hate that album. Maybe it's just because I'm too young to have experienced Yes chronologically, but I think it's a pretty interesting album and I don't consider it any form of musical degeneration. I like it better than "Going for the one", and I find it as interesting as, say, "Fragile" or "Time and a Word". Yes, I know, I'll get my head ripped off for this, and will be banished from PA in all eternity.
I think that prog is not dead in the sense that as long as there will be conformist music, there will always also be progressive music. It's like yin and yang, I suppose.
Edited by Time Signature - September 14 2007 at 17:58
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
laplace
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 06 2005
Location: popupControl();
Status: Offline
Points: 7606
|
Posted: September 14 2007 at 17:44 |
I almost wish I could vote for "In the Court" here. I think that what really brought it to its knees - and what invited all the negative attention - was Fripp's accidental comment that defined the genre in the first place. You can tell he regretted it afterwards.
don't want to get into the semantics of this or that genre being dead or thriving... but I think prog is dead. ;P a lot of the contemporary stuff I hear nowadays is something else altogether, at least to me.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group
Site Admin
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Online
Points: 37136
|
Posted: September 14 2007 at 17:32 |
Teh_Slippermenz wrote:
Progressive rock is not dead. (Marillion, Porcupine Tree, or Dream Theater anybody?)
But the album that had to have killed prog commercially was ELP's "Love Beach"...so not prog. Anyway, I vote for "90125" by Yes. That....is a desecration of Yes.
|
Not disagreeing with you so much as having a bit of fun with my response. 1. They couldn't even give Prog a decent burial. Such revivalism kind of
makes me wish Prog was dead and buried (rather than on life-support).
I'm glad that good progressive music never died; the progressive spirit
not only lived, but prospered with so-called avant-proggish bands.
2. Point well-taken, but I don't blame Love Beach, it was an indication of the weariness of the Prog movement (and of ELP). I think it's the excessiveness and
pretentiousness of music such as earlier ELP that was the harbinger of
Prog doom. Sure ELP was very commercially successful, but it was just a matter of time before the public turned away from such overblown, bombastic, pompous w**kery (in my opinion of course). Though a live album, Pictures at an Exhibition might be a good reference point. Fans of Mussorgsky would largely be unimpressed, think it showed gall and is overly ambitious, and most fans of rock would not enjoy it overmuch. Rather like it myself. As for Yes, well sure, yes. A sign of the times. I'd choose the earlier Tormato, though. *throws rotten tormatos* Oh darn, I meant this to be a pithy opinion post.
Edited by Logan - September 14 2007 at 17:34
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Teh_Slippermenz
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 11 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 321
|
Posted: September 14 2007 at 16:54 |
Progressive rock is not dead. (Marillion, Porcupine Tree, or Dream Theater anybody?)
But the album that had to have killed prog commercially was ELP's "Love Beach"...so not prog. Anyway, I vote for "90125" by Yes. That....is a desecration of Yes.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Easy Money
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10678
|
Posted: September 13 2007 at 23:01 |
Seeing ELP during their Works tour got me off prog for a long long time. Later I saw the cover for Love Beach ![](smileys/smiley19.gif) much much much later I bought a used copy of Love Beach to see how bad it was and it still had an insert advertising sexy running shorts and tight T-shirts with the Love Beach logo!!!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Losendos
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 03 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 571
|
Posted: September 09 2007 at 07:09 |
The golden era was 1969 to 1977 but there were good albums after that and Alan Parsons and Mike Oldfield remained popular . To me ATTW3 would have to be the most disappointing album ending the heyday and if you see the lyrics to the first track it is a calculated sell out. Musically however it is much better than the abysmal love beach and not such a bad albumthough it has a certain sameness.Funny though Genesis dabbled again with prog on Duke . The one that is always dragged out for another flogging is TFTO not listed here . To me 90125 was something of a return to form.
My vote went to love beach a very sad album indeed.
|
How wonderful to be so profound
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
MajesterX
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 30 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 513
|
Posted: September 08 2007 at 11:11 |
No other music killed prog, it was the end of an era and a change in people that caused it's end.
You can't say Prog killed late 60's psychedelic or that alternative rock "killed" the 80's hair bands, it's musical evolution.
If would make no sense to say that if punk & disco never came along or if prog bands didn't start doing pop that prog would have lived on strong for another 6 years as strong as ever.
No pop music style really lasts all that long- ie there is a constant evolution in music that will never change. Even when new and different bands come and become more popular and fresh than the bands we might love, we can't blame them for destroying that music.
BTW, the Sex Pistol's singer was a huge Peter Hammill fan, and if we told him he caused the end of Peter Hammill's small ammount of popularity, he would call us crazy.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
zicIy
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 04 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 413
|
Posted: September 08 2007 at 02:59 |
voted Genesis -And Then There Were Three as one disaster, wrost album on this list,imo, NOT because i think this album "killed" Prog...there is not an album on the list which "killed" anything.
Edited by zicIy - September 08 2007 at 03:08
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
ten years after
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 07 2007
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1008
|
Posted: September 08 2007 at 00:35 |
I agree with this. By the time NMtB came out, prog's work here was done after a brief but incredibly brilliant life. Plenty of prog has been written since, of course, but I'm content with what was already there by 1976.
When Never Mind the Bollocks came out it became very clear that music was now heading in a totally different direction.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
mystic fred
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 13 2006
Location: Londinium
Status: Offline
Points: 4252
|
Posted: August 21 2007 at 04:30 |
The Album That Killed Prog?
Although i agree with the opinions expressed in this thread that Prog seemed to shoot itself in the foot, looking back to 1976 the above album caused a huge impression in the public "sheep" conciousness, causing many of my friends and critics to scoff at the music i loved - i almost felt like a recluse, clinging on to my dream that all was not lost, sanity would return and things would be "normal" again (seems to be now thank God).
As for Punk, ironically this pretentious drivel that made Quo look like esoteric fusion virtuosos was about fashion and band-wagon jumping, nothing to do with music, but there is no accounting for public taste they say - blandness, fashion, bad taste and the bandwagon still rules. ![Disapprove](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley13.gif)
Edited by mystic fred - August 21 2007 at 04:35
|
![](http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i247/mysticfred/PROG1small.jpg) Prog Archives Tour Van
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.