Band additions; it takes 10 minutes.WITH YOUR HELP |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | ||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: September 13 2007 at 14:12 | |
i like your self promotion... Reminds me of a cerTain masTer....
|
||
Slartibartfast
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29630 |
Posted: September 13 2007 at 14:07 | |
Ok, if you guys need help then you really need to promote me. I've contributed a lot of first time reviews and added a lot of albums for artists that have already been added. I already spend too much of my free time on this site and would be happy to help. Nudge nudge wink wink...
|
||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: September 13 2007 at 13:52 | |
I'm new here, and I can tell you, you're wrong. The approvals DO take time... If we listened only 5 mp3 files, that still makes like 30 minutes (we're talking prog here, not 3:00 pop songs)... and of course, if we have the chance to hear MORE than just 5 mp3 files, we'll do it, as, you know, 5 songs are not the best measure to judge a band progresiveness (even a whole album sometimes isn't...)....I work 30-40 hours a week and go to school, and besides that, I have to eat and sleep, don't I? Maybe it's easier for people still in high school but most of us don't have loads and loads of time. We also have to check the info sent to us (well, I've only had to do that once yet, since I'm new )... who assures us that whoever sent the information is right or didn't just write a lot of nonsense? And then the addition process which is smooth but needs you to be focused... So, please, if you have 6 hours a day 7 days a week, be my guest...
|
||
Tristan Mulders
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 28 2004 Status: Offline Points: 1723 |
Posted: September 13 2007 at 06:55 | |
Everything will of course have to be checked. It's not been the first time someone send in a heavily biased biography for an artist, mentioning genres that don't fit or comparisons that were incorrect. And as said before, these are all volunteers, so you cannot expect them to instantly listen/read anything presented to them. |
||
Interested in my reviews?
You can find them HERE "...He will search until He's found a Way to take the Days..." |
||
Ricochet
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 27 2005 Location: Nauru Status: Offline Points: 46301 |
Posted: September 13 2007 at 06:02 | |
@Kotro: it is as I've mentioned; if we would do the approval of a band in the pace you've just described, we could just as well call ourselves "[Prog Genre] Amateurs", because it would be a work made in haste and imprecision.
|
||
|
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65268 |
Posted: September 13 2007 at 05:40 | |
yes, and that's just to start, there's also-- - multiple listenings (which can be important) - fact-checking and finding back-up information - evaluations, discussions and debates with teammates - checking with other teams to make sure we're all on the same page - making sure 'Band Q' is the right 'Band Q', as there are many acts with the same name and other things too... it takes time to do a good job, even in your spare time |
||
Raff
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 29 2005 Location: None Status: Offline Points: 24429 |
Posted: September 13 2007 at 05:27 | |
Much more than you would expect, especially if you remember that we're all working FOR FREE and that we also have lives outside PA. I can listen to samples because at the moment I'm working at home, but many other people (like Micky, for instance) only have the evening hours at their disposal. As to the "copypasteable" info pack, personally I always look through bios and discographies in order to edit them and make them presentable. You'd be surprised how sloppy people can be when writing stuff - and then, there are guidelines to be respected, if we don't want the poor guys in the Errors and Omissions team to spend all their time tracking down poorly written entries. |
||
Kotro
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 16 2004 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 2815 |
Posted: September 13 2007 at 05:20 | |
From what I can see from an outsider perspective, it is indeed the aprovals, not the aditions, that take time. Especially when we are required to provide an all-copypasteable info pack with the submissions. How long can people take to read 3 Word pages and listen to 5 mp3 files? Edited by Kotro - September 13 2007 at 05:20 |
||
Bigger on the inside.
|
||
chopper
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 13 2005 Location: Essex, UK Status: Offline Points: 20030 |
Posted: September 12 2007 at 17:50 | |
This is why we ask for all the relevant info before accepting a submission. Edited by chopper - September 12 2007 at 17:50 |
||
Ricochet
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 27 2005 Location: Nauru Status: Offline Points: 46301 |
Posted: September 12 2007 at 16:02 | |
very nice and consoling speech towards our good and sometimes harder than imagined efforts, THEO!
but, of course, we'll have to always specify that these 10 minutes will happen if that band is on the approved list. After all, some Teams still work on approving or appreciating a band, before it has been suggested. That takes a normal time that, otherwise, would be called rush and neglijence.
I myself love doing hard and obscure jobs, it's part of the devotion towards prog music, but, even with 30 minutes going down the drain in one day, the thing about when we receive cheap and obscure informations and datas, about a band being suggested, still stands painfully true - and should be improved.
|
||
|
||
Melomaniac
Prog Reviewer Joined: May 07 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4088 |
Posted: September 12 2007 at 14:57 | |
Since my guess is that Theo's initial post in this thread is in no small part due to a certain mishap from me yesterday, I have made my mea-culpa : I have posted a bio for the band I proposed to the prog metal team along with links that I used as references, including a myspace page with 4 songs. I have also (like I said previously) uploaded their two first albums to make them available for the guys.
I am more than happy to provide help ! and will gladly do so if I can help any further.
I would also like to take a few words to apologize to anyone who's feelings I may have hurt with my impromptu exit yesterday (Jody and Theo in particular, sorry guys!!!).
I will try to phrase my thoughts so they are not accusing or attacking in any way in the future.
|
||
"One likes to believe in the freedom of Music" - Neil Peart, The Spirit of Radio
|
||
debrewguy
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 30 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3596 |
Posted: September 12 2007 at 14:47 | |
At one point I tried to add Caramel Mou & Eclipse (quebec prog) but was asked to include mp3 zip files which I did not feel comfortable doing. |
||
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
|
||
Raff
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 29 2005 Location: None Status: Offline Points: 24429 |
Posted: September 12 2007 at 14:04 | |
Teo, you're a marvel... Thank you for putting into much better words what I expressed yesterday in the Collabs zone. BTW, what you said is the gospel truth... It can take even more than 30 minutes if the act is obscure, or if you don't have any samples at your disposal. So, fellow members, draw your own conclusions!
|
||
darkmatter
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 23 2006 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 2760 |
Posted: September 12 2007 at 14:02 | |
Good call, T. I don't really like those threads where people list bands they think should be added, or complain, "Why isn't so-and-so band here?!" I'm sure providing samples and a brief synopsis of the band would help many times more then just a list of bands or complaints.
|
||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: September 12 2007 at 13:58 | |
Well, it might seem quite audacious for me, the newest collaborator, to be saying this, but anyway, in the few days since I was promoted, I've already noticed two things:
1. It takes some time to add bands, specially obscure bands which you don't know. Now I understand why bands can't just..."get added". People here have to find 30 (at least) minutes on their days to add a band they don't have any info about.
2. It takes 10 MINUTES when someone helps with either the bio, the data, or everything. Some member wanted a metal band added which had already been approved; he sent me the bio, the discography, the links, about 75% of what was needed, and about 95%of the links neccesary to get what was missing. So it took like 10 minutes.
So, for all the members that want to have a band added, well, it takes an eternity without help (well, not that much, but who has 30-60 minutes to spare these days?); it takes 10 MINUTES with help.
So don't complain and act!!
|
||
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |