Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Online
Points: 17332
|
Topic: Handicapping Posted: September 02 2007 at 23:37 |
When rating prog music for the site, do you do any type of handicapping?
Do you compare every band equally regardless of status, recording budget, whether it's their first album or their 20th, etc...
If a little known band has a great album but the production sucks, and a behemoth group has a mediocre album of music but the production and artwork are amazing, who has earned the higher rating?
I realize the question launches many "well it depends" responses, but in general, are there any circumstances under which you occasionally "handicap" a rating depending on peripheral issues such as these?
Sometimes I find myself being more generous to first efforts almost subconsciously, I suppose to be encouraging to new artists, whereas I will be expecting much more from a Genesis level band. Maybe that isn't fair. Thoughts?
|
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
|
 |
ProgBagel
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2819
|
Posted: September 02 2007 at 23:47 |
Some albums I would give 5's because they are essential....others would also get 5's because they are essential to the genre, an album can't be for everyone.
You could say that if a 5 meant essential to any collection....prog-metal would have nothing above a 4.
|
 |
el böthy
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 27 2005
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 6336
|
Posted: September 02 2007 at 23:52 |
Production is a big deal for me, so, if it sucks... I cant look the other way. But other than that, I dont think I give some bands just because they are THOSE bands more credit or higher ratings than others.
|
"You want me to play what, Robert?"
|
 |
Walker
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 20 2005
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Points: 824
|
Posted: September 02 2007 at 23:56 |
I tend to rate the actual music higher in importance than the technical aspects. Now if this was an audiophile site it would be different of course!
|
 |
kazansky
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 24 2006
Location: Indonesia
Status: Offline
Points: 5085
|
Posted: September 03 2007 at 00:15 |
production usually...although i won't compare 70's records with stuff from 2000s. and for something from around 1990-now, i'd be bit more harsh on production matter.
i also tend not to compare a particular band with other bands, even if those bands have a similar styles. also, i usually don't really matter if the first 2-3 albums of a band aren't really good (or even weak) compared to what they've done later as long as it's not the other way around.
|
The devil we blame our atrocities on is really just each one of us.
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.