Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - How.....? Its so sad that....
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedHow.....? Its so sad that....
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
twilight_mage View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: December 26 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 9 		Direct Link To This Post Topic: How.....? Its so sad that....
    Posted: July 16 2007 at 15:56
It makes me sad and furious Angry, that some noise makers, like lacrimosa, are in progarchives!!!!!! I think this page was made for us, the prog lovers, not the gothic punks!!!! this is very disapointing, that noise makers do not belong here!!!!!! how they could....?? Cry this was my favorite page, but now I dont know if i can find good prog in this pages, because I realize that is plagued with those noise makers.... Cry 
l am, i was not, then, i came to be, I cannot remember NOT be...
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 15:57
As a noise maker, I resent that. Wink 
Back to Top
progismylife View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 15:58
Uh dude there are at least 2000 other bands in the database. If you don't like one band don't let it ruin your ProgArchives experience...look at something else.

I'm pretty sure everyone is unhappy about one band or another being in the archives.


Edited by progismylife - July 16 2007 at 16:01
Back to Top
twilight_mage View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: December 26 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 9 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 16:03
yep, i agree, but I feel sad than progarchives accepted those kind of noise makers
l am, i was not, then, i came to be, I cannot remember NOT be...
Back to Top
Visitor13 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 16:07
Speaking of noise-making - it's threads like these that screw up Progarchives' signal-to-noise ratio.
Back to Top
The Miracle View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 16:09
It's only your opinion that they are "noise makers". The fact that you don't like them doesn't make them any less prog, either
last.fm
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21319 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 16:19
For the record: I also don't think that Lacrimosa fit in here ... but then again I haven't heard all of their (numerous) albums. I guess that objectively they did have a few ambitious symphonic albums.
2024 Release Poll

Listened to:
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 16:25
Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

Speaking of noise-making - it's threads like these that screw up Progarchives' signal-to-noise ratio.


Clap
Back to Top
twilight_mage View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: December 26 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 9 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 16:27
yep but symphonic is different from symphonyc prog. each have things that difference each other, I remain thinking that they don´t fit here
l am, i was not, then, i came to be, I cannot remember NOT be...
Back to Top
Chicapah View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8238 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 16:36
One listener's noise is another's symphony.  Approve
"Literature is well enough, as a time-passer, and for the improvement and general elevation and purification of mankind, but it has no practical value" - Mark Twain
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 16:59
Just a couple of general observations using this thread as an example.
 
A well considered and appropriate thread title can make all the difference to the success of a thread. People will often remember a thread a few weeks after it has disappeared from view. When they search for it, they will expect to find certain key words such as the band name in the title. In this case, the thread title is weak and give no indication of the topic being raised.
 
Secondly, the initial post in a thread will often set the mood for the discuussion. In this case, the post is confrontational and is bound to upset those who think the band mentioned has a place here. Often, it ain't what you say, it's the way you say it.
 
No rules have been broken here, the points made above are intended only to show how thread such as this could be more successful and less likely to end in closure.
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 17:00
Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

Speaking of noise-making - it's threads like these that screw up Progarchives' signal-to-noise ratio.
 
LOL
 
I was just thinking the same thing!
 
Prog and let Prog. Forever and whatever. Amen.
Back to Top
limeyrob View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: January 15 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 1402 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 17:02

I'd not heard of Lacrimosa before and having heard a few tracks on MyMusic I can safely say that this band is not really my cup of tea. There are many other bands of this type (Gothic?) I personally prefer such as Autumn, Sirenia and Leaves Eye. But then we are probably into a new category here. I've no problem with listing them as it brings more variety to the site and I've discovered some great albums by accident almost.
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 17:03
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

Just a couple of general observations using this thread as an example.
 
A well considered and appropriate thread title can make all the difference to the success of a thread. People will often remember a thread a few weeks after it has disappeared from view. When they search for it, they will expect to find certain key words such as the band name in the title. In this case, the thread title is weak and give no indication of the topic being raised.
 
Secondly, the initial post in a thread will often set the mood for the discuussion. In this case, the post is confrontational and is bound to upset those who think the band mentioned has a place here. Often, it ain't what you say, it's the way you say it.
 
No rules have been broken here, the points made above are intended only to show how thread such as this could be more successful and less likely to end in closure.
 
What chapter of Dale Carnegie's book was that from? Wink LOL
 
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 18:26
Originally posted by twilight_mage twilight_mage wrote:

It makes me sad and furious Angry, that some noise makers, like lacrimosa, are in progarchives!!!!!! I think this page was made for us, the prog lovers, not the gothic punks!!!! this is very disapointing, that noise makers do not belong here!!!!!! how they could....?? Cry this was my favorite page, but now I dont know if i can find good prog in this pages, because I realize that is plagued with those noise makers.... Cry 
Could you explain how Lacrimosa are "noise makers"?
 
I cannot see how that phrase can apply to them: there is no discordancy their music - its not as if they are playing symphonic black metal or grindcore. The music they make is symphonic to a degree in that they make heavy use of string arrangements and programming, but it is also melodic, ethereal, complex and multilayered. Although they are considerably less 'metal' than many of the Progressive-metal bands listed here, when they do hit-metal they rock with more orignality than most (some of the guitar solos are the sweetest ever recorded - pure bliss IMHO) and it is still Progressive Metal by the accepted definition (and not just another Dream Theater clone).
 
Tilo Wolff's vocals are about the only gothic sounding element about them, and to be fair, he is not that different to some of the Krautrock vocalists in style, but you cannot argue with the beauty of Anne Nurmi's vocals surely.
 
If you are going to be negative, you have to be more specific - what is it exactly that you do not like about Lacrimosa that makes them unworthy of a listing in the PA?
  
(I'm also struggling with the phrase "gothic punks", but that's another issue) Evil%20Smile
What?
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 18:32
I think you'll prefer the Japanese RIO/Avant-Prog band Lacrymosa. Wink
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 19:39
Lacrimosa were added by the founder of this site,and if he wants them here,here they will remain.


Back to Top
Meddler View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 29 2005
Location: Massillon
Status: Offline
Points: 881 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 19:44
Keep it up and Merzbow is next. ;)
[IMG]http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i165/amorfous/astro-1.jpg">

Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 19:47
Or Boris or Lightning Bolt. Wink
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 20:12
Originally posted by twilight_mage twilight_mage wrote:

It makes me sad and furious Angry, that some noise makers, like lacrimosa, are in progarchives!!!!!! I think this page was made for us, the prog lovers, not the gothic punks!!!! this is very disapointing, that noise makers do not belong here!!!!!! how they could....?? Cry this was my favorite page, but now I dont know if i can find good prog in this pages, because I realize that is plagued with those noise makers.... Cry 


pffff..... easy.... quit listening and caring about that modern sh*t and tune into thisLOL

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=36487

plenty of great prog in these pages...


The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.164 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.