Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Reviews discussion
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Reviews discussion

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 139140141142143 182>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ivan_Melgar_M Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2007 at 15:44
Originally posted by professormarvel professormarvel wrote:

Ive read and re-read this review

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=10564

and can't help feeling that the last paragraph is advocating bootlegging

''''If you already have it, well you know why you bought it, there is music for every taste, but if you're a fan of early Genesis, save your money and buy any decent bootleg if you have all the progressive albums.'''''

I'd be curious as to the reviewers and other members opinions



PM


 
Hello Lady Iona: See you're back with another nick.
 
The only "bootlegs" I know from Genesis Gabriel era concerts ARE ALL LEGAL
 
  1. TV special for the Belgium TV.
  2. TONY STRATTON SMITH PRESENTS: GENESIS IN CONCERT 1973 (VCD)  

    100% LEGAL  with release number (VCD) (RareVCD02)
  3. Genesis A Band in Concert: 100% Legal Phil Collins Genesis during the Wind & Wuthering era. Widescreen Edition (VCD) (RareVCD04 SE)
  4. Boootlegs provided in the Genesis a History video-biography LEGALLY SOLD AT ANY STORE

Bootleg doesn't mean Illegal, bootleg just means unofficia filml, taken in the concert with less than proffesional equipment.

Those items were legally for sale except the Belgium TV which you can have absolutely legally according to the Betamax Case Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984)
 
 Don't try to teach me laws, if you buy a product by Internet in a store with a release number, you have to assume it's legal, if not, it''s responsability of the store, not of the buyer with good faith.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - May 20 2007 at 18:36
            
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snow Dog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2007 at 15:40
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Lets see if it's worth the effort to translate them:
 
Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

PAIN OF SALVATION — Entropia
Review by shubb (rodrigo)

5%20stars un disco debut increible............para mi el mejor disco de POS...nada que decir...ademas bajo un titulo bastante complejo de describir como la propia musica que realizan...... como dijo alguien por ahi grandiosas historias mescladas con una lirica increible unoda por un estilo de musica tan versatil como la increible voz de Daniel que es uno de los vocalistas(¡¡¡¡¡¡que musico mas completol!!!!) mas creaivos el mundo del Metal, combinando una cantidad de estilos impresionantes...una obra maestra ...........algo demasiado versatil.....solo me queda agradecer y espero una gira por LATINOAMERICA......Gracias(thanks)

Posted Saturday, May 19, 2007, 01:13 EST
Review Permanent link | Submit a review for this album

Translation Summary:
  1. Incredible debut.
  2. Complex title as the music
  3. Daniel's voice is versatile as the music
  4. Metal combined with everything
  5. I hope they visit Latin America
 
 
 
PAIN%20OF%20SALVATION%20The%20Perfect%20Element%20Part%201%20progressive%20rock%20album%20and%20reviews Progressive Metal
(Studio Album, 2001)
Avg: 4.42/5
from 161 ratings

5%20stars La verdad es que no se si este disco es el mejor de POS, pero lo que si puedo asegurar es que este trabajo es una completa obra maestra del progmetal y ni si quiera eso...es un disco esencial para cualquier amante del progressive....Al escucharlo por primera vez fueron varias las sensaciones que me produjo....una combinacion de estilos increible, en algunos caso muy parecido al industrial como Ashes o muy parecido a la mejor veta del progmetal como reconcilation...sin duda un grupo que con sus trabajos conceptuales da mucho que decir....y que reune una cantidad de conceptos increible. Con un Daniel Gildenlæw que con un registro vocal igualando a vacas sagradas del rock como por ejemplo Mike Patton, y ademas llenando completamente con su forma registrar sonidos en guitarra y otros instrumentos......no hay mucho que decir...es Mi banda preferida y un recomendable absolutamente para cualquier amante de la buena musica

Translation Summary:
  1. I don't know if this album is the best by POS
  2. It´s essential for every Proghead
  3. Incredible combination of styles
  4. Daniel Gidellow has a voice as good as the ones from the Prog Sacred Cows.
  5. Not much to say IT'S MY FAVORITE BAND and for this reason recommended to any fan of good music,

Not worth to translate, delete it without any guilt, you won't loose anything.

If you add his record:
 

 
We are before a POS fanboy.
 
Iván

 
Case closed!
 
Nice one Ivan.LOLClap
Back to Top
Atkingani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Terra Brasilis
Status: Offline
Points: 12291
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atkingani Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2007 at 10:59
Not exactly the same, Kid.A...
 
Mastodon's review discusses basically the progressiveness of the album LEVIATHAN. The reviewer leaves the door opened for other band releases. Also, he isn't questioning the band's inclusion here.
 
Pink Floyd's review discusses the progressiveness of the band as a whole and consequently their inclusion here. Considering the band's more than 40 years on-the-road it's a real deceitful point. Anyway, I sent a message to the reviewer and left room for a new text.
Guigo

~~~~~~
Back to Top
Kid.A View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: April 08 2007
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 10
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kid.A Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2007 at 09:25
Originally posted by Atkingani Atkingani wrote:

I think that all recent reports were dealt with... thanks!


I cant understand why this one is removed/deleted for breaking "rule 5"

PINK FLOYD — Wish You Were Here

Review by jrfernan

3%20stars Wow! I'm reviewing PF's WYWH and doing so on a site related to PROG music, no less!

This is a tough one, a REAL TOUGH one, to review; at least for me it is. As I'm typing this review the CD is playing in the background. 'Have a Cigar' just finished and 'Wish You Were Here' is making its entrance. As I'm listening, colorful memories and images of my youth pop into my head(some more vivid than others) and I can't help but feel nostalgic. Ah, the 70s!

That being said, I have some SERIOUS reservations about this, or any other, PF album being considered "prog". Why? you ask........well, very simple: PF is first and foremost a Blues band. They play blues and not much else. Granted, nobody plays the blues like The Floyd. They invented and perfected "Symphonic Blues" and although many have tried to copy them, none have succeeded. But that's what they are: a blues band; more more, no less.

If we allow blues bands to enter the prog realm then we need to make room for Hendrix's "Electric Lady Land' and Santana's "Abraxas". Each of those, IMO, MUCH better than WYWH. The musicianship on those two FAR EXCEEDS anything on WYWH. Heck, while we're at it, why not let Miles Davis into the mix as well! Wanna talk about progressive! Get the picture? :-)

But, I think I get it now....As long as the band/artist is British, or European(take Eloy, another blues band, PF clone) then they can be categorized as prog! Is that it?! It sure seems that way to me. For PF to be in the top five and no Hendrix or Santana seems kinda strange to me.


Now, as for the music on WYWH...

The 'Shine On You Crazy Diamond' suite is a nice piece of blues. Not much else. Sure, it has the psychedelic touch and the funky keyboard comping at the end of the second part. It's all very moody and mellow, but it gets old after a few dozen listens. Not very technical and extremely basic to be considered prog.

'Have a Cigar' and 'Wish You Were Here' are radio friendly, Classic Rock songs. I struggle to find anything progressive about them.

Welcome to the Machine is the only piece I would consider prog on this recording. It takes some chances by adding analog synths to the mix, but again, nothing very intricate is going on there either.

Pink Floyd are what they are: a Classic Rock/Blues band that reached unprecedented heights via meticulous studio recordings and impeccable live reproduction of said recordings. But they are not progressive because their music is entrenched in the blues. If we allow blues to infiltrate the prog realm then we might as well open the door to blue grass. How about Bella Fleck?! Is he prog?!

Three stars for WYWH.



When this one is  discussed and kept

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=105217

Clearly breaking the same rule........





Edited by Kid.A - May 20 2007 at 09:26
Back to Top
professormarvel View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: May 19 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote professormarvel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 20 2007 at 09:05
Ive read and re-read this review

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=10564

and can't help feeling that the last paragraph is advocating bootlegging

''''If you already have it, well you know why you bought it, there is music for every taste, but if you're a fan of early Genesis, save your money and buy any decent bootleg if you have all the progressive albums.'''''

I'd be curious as to the reviewers and other members opinions



PM


Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote debrewguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2007 at 11:59
Originally posted by billbuckner billbuckner wrote:

Originally posted by progismylife progismylife wrote:

 If we allow blues to infiltrate the prog realm then we might as well open the door to blue grass. How about Bella Fleck?! Is he prog?!


Where's the connection between blues and bluegrass besides the word blues? Confused

The irony here is that Bela Fleck would make a nice addition to Fusion.

True, it also ironic that a music fan could be so simplistic. I say we assign him to moderate the anti-Phil Collins thread. LOL
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote debrewguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2007 at 11:47
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

This one blatantly breaks rule 5:
 

PINK FLOYD — Wish You Were Here

Review by jrfernan

3%20stars Wow! I'm reviewing PF's WYWH and doing so on a site related to PROG music, no less!

This is a tough one, a REAL TOUGH one, to review; at least for me it is. As I'm typing this review the CD is playing in the background. 'Have a Cigar' just finished and 'Wish You Were Here' is making its entrance. As I'm listening, colorful memories and images of my youth pop into my head(some more vivid than others) and I can't help but feel nostalgic. Ah, the 70s!

That being said, I have some SERIOUS reservations about this, or any other, PF album being considered "prog". Why? you ask........well, very simple: PF is first and foremost a Blues band. They play blues and not much else. Granted, nobody plays the blues like The Floyd. They invented and perfected "Symphonic Blues" and although many have tried to copy them, none have succeeded. But that's what they are: a blues band; more more, no less.

If we allow blues bands to enter the prog realm then we need to make room for Hendrix's "Electric Lady Land' and Santana's "Abraxas". Each of those, IMO, MUCH better than WYWH. The musicianship on those two FAR EXCEEDS anything on WYWH. Heck, while we're at it, why not let Miles Davis into the mix as well! Wanna talk about progressive! Get the picture? :-)

But, I think I get it now....As long as the band/artist is British, or European(take Eloy, another blues band, PF clone) then they can be categorized as prog! Is that it?! It sure seems that way to me. For PF to be in the top five and no Hendrix or Santana seems kinda strange to me.

Now, as for the music on WYWH...

The 'Shine On You Crazy Diamond' suite is a nice piece of blues. Not much else. Sure, it has the psychedelic touch and the funky keyboard comping at the end of the second part. It's all very moody and mellow, but it gets old after a few dozen listens. Not very technical and extremely basic to be considered prog.

'Have a Cigar' and 'Wish You Were Here' are radio friendly, Classic Rock songs. I struggle to find anything progressive about them.

Welcome to the Machine is the only piece I would consider prog on this recording. It takes some chances by adding analog synths to the mix, but again, nothing very intricate is going on there either.

Pink Floyd are what they are: a Classic Rock/Blues band that reached unprecedented heights via meticulous studio recordings and impeccable live reproduction of said recordings. But they are not progressive because their music is entrenched in the blues. If we allow blues to infiltrate the prog realm then we might as well open the door to blue grass. How about Bella Fleck?! Is he prog?!

Three stars for WYWH.

 
 
5 - Do not voice general opinions on matters such as whether a band/album/sub-genre should be included in the site, whether you agree with the star rating system, etc.. Such matters should be discussed in the forum. Keep the review pertinent to the specific album concerned. The reviews section is NOT the place for initiating or prolonging a debate.
 
 
 
Sorry, jrfernan, but you HAD to click OK to accept this before you submitted your review.
 
Oh, BTW,  Pink Floyd is NOT just a blues band, and your review does not validate your opinion beyond that - an opinion, which is not shared by the Prog community at large.
 
Please feel free to start a discussion on the subject - which I will look forward to Big%20smile

 You mean we can't argue that King Crimson started out as a jazz band, and are now a heavy metal group & thus barely qualify for inclusion ??? Wink
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
billbuckner View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 433
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote billbuckner Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2007 at 07:57
Originally posted by progismylife progismylife wrote:

 If we allow blues to infiltrate the prog realm then we might as well open the door to blue grass. How about Bella Fleck?! Is he prog?!


Where's the connection between blues and bluegrass besides the word blues? Confused

The irony here is that Bela Fleck would make a nice addition to Fusion.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snow Dog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2007 at 06:24
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

^Mademoiselle Nobs and Seamus are the same song, and Money isn't strictly a blues song - it started out as one, but evolved, just as the Floyd started out as a blues band.
 
The reviews aren't a place for such a discussion - or the below discussion about which bands should or should not be in the archives (as Rule 5 states!):
 
"If we allow blues bands to enter the prog realm then we need to make room for Hendrix's "Electric Lady Land' and Santana's "Abraxas". Each of those, IMO, MUCH better than WYWH. The musicianship on those two FAR EXCEEDS anything on WYWH. Heck, while we're at it, why not let Miles Davis into the mix as well! Wanna talk about progressive! Get the picture? :-)

But, I think I get it now....As long as the band/artist is British, or European(take Eloy, another blues band, PF clone) then they can be categorized as prog! Is that it?! It sure seems that way to me. For PF to be in the top five and no Hendrix or Santana seems kinda strange to me.
"
 
 
Who's quote is that Cert?
 
I want to disagree with him.Big%20smile
 
Edit
 
Its ok, I worked it out. Your above post has been moved from another thread and the above is a review.Embarrassed


Edited by Snow Dog - May 19 2007 at 06:27
Back to Top
progismylife View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote progismylife Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2007 at 05:40
 If we allow blues to infiltrate the prog realm then we might as well open the door to blue grass. How about Bella Fleck?! Is he prog?!


Where's the connection between blues and bluegrass besides the word blues? Confused
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Certif1ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2007 at 01:27
^Mademoiselle Nobs and Seamus are the same song, and Money isn't strictly a blues song - it started out as one, but evolved, just as the Floyd started out as a blues band.
 
The reviews aren't a place for such a discussion - or the below discussion about which bands should or should not be in the archives (as Rule 5 states!):
 
"If we allow blues bands to enter the prog realm then we need to make room for Hendrix's "Electric Lady Land' and Santana's "Abraxas". Each of those, IMO, MUCH better than WYWH. The musicianship on those two FAR EXCEEDS anything on WYWH. Heck, while we're at it, why not let Miles Davis into the mix as well! Wanna talk about progressive! Get the picture? :-)

But, I think I get it now....As long as the band/artist is British, or European(take Eloy, another blues band, PF clone) then they can be categorized as prog! Is that it?! It sure seems that way to me. For PF to be in the top five and no Hendrix or Santana seems kinda strange to me.
"
 


Edited by Certif1ed - May 19 2007 at 01:28
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Kotro View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 16 2004
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 2815
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kotro Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2007 at 18:02
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

I thought about this a while and I can't name a single Blues song by Pink Floyd.LOL
 
From the top of my head:
 
-More Blues
-Two Bar Blues
-Seamus
-Mademoiselle Knobs
-Childhood's End
-Money
-Shine On You Crazy Diamond part 3-5
 
But calling them a blues band is just way off-target... Even though I believe blues CAN be progressive. 
 
Bigger on the inside.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21820
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MikeEnRegalia Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2007 at 16:51
I thought about this a while and I can't name a single Blues song by Pink Floyd.LOL
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
billbuckner View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 433
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote billbuckner Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2007 at 16:36
Pink Floyd a blues band? You kidding?
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The T Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2007 at 14:01

Originally posted by progismylife progismylife wrote:

^You'll put Kayo Dot at the top?



Wink

Of course!

Straight to the top of the trash can, that is...Big%20smileLOL (just kidding...Am I? Yes! Am I? Big%20smile)

Back to Top
progismylife View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote progismylife Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2007 at 02:06
^You'll put Kayo Dot at the top?













Wink
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The T Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2007 at 00:34
If I get A to M, there's not much question about which bands would go straight to the top.... (any of you really have to wonder?)... So maybe for the interest of fairness, I'll accept N to Z....Big%20smile
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote debrewguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 17 2007 at 21:37
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:

I just thought of the perfect way to determine the top of "genre" lists. Me & the T split the site's bands in two & exercise our god like talents to help others know once & for all what's what. And that finally means Klaatu & Ange will reign supreme as they deserve to. I mean, if I get the A to L listed artists. If not, then PFM & Rush get their just desserts. Smile
 
I Couldn't agree more. Tongue

OK, so now I just have to do like that SnakePlisken guy did with his four most recent Rush 5 star reviews. Use the same paragraph, cut & paste PA member's names one by one, then wait for them to agree & claim that everyone agrees with me.
I am so smart I am so smart ... S M R T... doh !
Big%20smileBig%20smileBig%20smile
P.S. The main condition stands. If I get A to L, Klaatu & Ange go to the top. If I get M to Z, then PFM & Rush. Other than that , I'm flexible.

Big%20smileBig%20smile
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The T Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 17 2007 at 19:36
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:

I just thought of the perfect way to determine the top of "genre" lists. Me & the T split the site's bands in two & exercise our god like talents to help others know once & for all what's what. And that finally means Klaatu & Ange will reign supreme as they deserve to. I mean, if I get the A to L listed artists. If not, then PFM & Rush get their just desserts. Smile
 
I Couldn't agree more. Tongue
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote debrewguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 17 2007 at 17:57
I just thought of the perfect way to determine the top of "genre" lists. Me & the T split the site's bands in two & exercise our god like talents to help others know once & for all what's what. And that finally means Klaatu & Ange will reign supreme as they deserve to. I mean, if I get the A to L listed artists. If not, then PFM & Rush get their just desserts. Smile
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 139140141142143 182>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.152 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.