Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - VDGG Live
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedVDGG Live

 Post Reply Post Reply
Poll Question: Real Time vs. Vital
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
6 [60.00%]
4 [40.00%]
0 [0.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Asyte2c00 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 15 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2099
Direct Link To This Post Topic: VDGG Live
    Posted: May 10 2007 at 23:41
What do you guys think?
Back to Top
Fassbinder View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 27 2006
Location: My world
Status: Offline
Points: 3497
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 11 2007 at 05:12
Firdt of all, I'm not azquainted with any VdGG 70s bootleg.
 
You might put Maida Vale live recording in the poll, by the way.
 
Vital is an excellent album.
 
And I don't own Real Time yet. But I was in the concert, so I know the material, I heard it. And I definitely like Real Time more than Vital.
 
Eugene
Back to Top
Fassbinder View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 27 2006
Location: My world
Status: Offline
Points: 3497
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 11 2007 at 05:59
On the other hand, these two albums are quite difficult to compare.
 
Real Time is a Van der Graaf Generator album -- it has a classical Van der Graaf Generator line-up as well as it contains a classical VdGG repertoire.
 
Vital, in fact, is a Van der Graaf album, performing numbers from both Van der Graaf and Van der Graaf Generator albums, plus Peter Hammill solo track from the Van der Graaf period.
Back to Top
RaphaelT View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 17 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1453
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 11 2007 at 11:08
Therefore this poll is unfair for Vital - I should also add that it was very badly recorded (on used tape, on borrowed recording gear). Real Time had a better time.
yet you still have time!
Back to Top
farflung View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: February 04 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2007 at 13:29
Sound quality is poor on Vital.... but I'm not sure that's THE critical consideration for live albums.   Are they not recreating the less than perfect listening conditions at any gig?
 
I can think of abysmal King Crimson (Earthbound), Gentle Giant (Live in Rome), and String Driven thing (live on the road)  but these live albums are almost a different genre - and I quite like their muddied and uneven sound
Back to Top
Asyte2c00 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 15 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2099
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2007 at 18:18
Yeah, the VDGG Bootlegs I have listened to sound like your standing thirty feet away from the stage and a coat is over you head. 
 
You heard hammill's vocal fury but cannot understand what he's saying. 
 
I have rendition of "La Rossa" which makes the studio version sound like a warm up run-though. 
Back to Top
rileydog22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 13 2007 at 19:11
I'm a fan of the seventies bootlegs, but I also love Vital.  I haven't got Real Time yet.  

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.