![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12345 7> |
Author | |||
chamberry ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 24 2005 Location: Puerto Rico Status: Offline Points: 9008 |
![]() |
||
They are for me.
They're prog in a doing-something-new kind of way with some obvious hints on prog as genre as well. |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
The Wizard ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: July 18 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7341 |
![]() |
||
I think they are nowadays. I read an article in Mojo about the new songs they've been writing and they sound very progressive as far as their descriptions. OK Computer is about as prog as modern Porcupine Tree to, except Radiohead have shorter songs and are far more creative.
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
mothershabooboo ![]() Forum Newbie ![]() Joined: March 03 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 33 |
![]() |
||
I was thinking about this myself when I found out that Radiohead was deemed prog by this site. Ture, they have some prog qualitys to them, but so does alot of other bands whom arnt on this sight (the Canadian band Arcade Fire for exsample, last time I cheacked was not on the sight, yet have more prog qualitys aboot them).
So I think the verdict will be unconfurmed for a while, if ever. Are they or arnt they? To me, they are not, but that does not make them a bad band. In fact, they are one of my favourit bands, but I persanaly dont think they are Prog.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
stonebeard ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 27 2005 Location: NE Indiana Status: Offline Points: 28057 |
![]() |
||
Radiohead is in a new genre: "mumble rock."
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21711 |
![]() |
||
^ that would be "independent". I know, these labels suck ...
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() |
||
Im not really talking about any literal meaning of "alternative" in a genre sense. Im talking in an alternative to mainstream chart music sense.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||
You forgot the main element PUNK INSPIRED in different degrees.
Prog is previous to Punk, so hardly can be Punk inspired.
Iván
|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() |
||
Sounds like it could encompass prog too.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||
Alternative Rock or Alternative Music:
No comments required to the definition of Alternative (With capital A) used.
Iván Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - March 03 2007 at 14:31 |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
||
exactly.... and since this is an inclusive site... they sould be included since none of us thinks they know better than anyone else do they. Opinoins are very devided..which in my prog-view is a good thing. Prog is a road well travelled.. if you can say...yes.. that is prog.. it's probably because you've heard it a 100 times.. and done even better. Radiohead is prog.. and will thrown my considerable stubborness to make sure they stay in AR. Which can be quite considerable ![]() ![]() |
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||
Honestly I hear it LOL
This is subjective, specially when a band generates so dicvided o'pinions as in this case.
Iván
|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Melomaniac ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: May 07 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4088 |
![]() |
||
You got that right, I have to admit... But some will not like this statement at all !
Here's a
![]() |
|||
"One likes to believe in the freedom of Music" - Neil Peart, The Spirit of Radio
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() |
||
Alternative to what? The mainstream? In which case Prog fills thet nicely and is also "alternative".
|
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21711 |
![]() |
||
^ none of what you describe above can be heard on Kid A.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||
Mike I'm not insisting in anything I clearly stated:
But if I'm asked my opinion, I won't lie, I see them barely Prog in a couple of albums, but the repetitive essense of their music the variations over the same theme, the clear references to REM, Pearl Jam and Talking Heads, their own iinfluence on Btritpop bands like Coldplay and Muse, the "I give a damn for life" sound a la Nirvana, make me think in the word Alternative ecvery time I listen them. Iván
|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21711 |
![]() |
||
^ maybe you're just more "genre elitist" than me. Radiohead are an alternative band, and part of a "genre" which is called "Alternative Experimental" by some. In a way these bands relate to modern prog like the "Krautrock" bands related to the Prog Rock bands of the 70s. Technically bands like Can aren't "Prog Rock" either ... but their presence is tolerated by most prog fans.
But why do you insist that they're moved to prog related ... do you really think that albums like Kid A or Amnesiac are not progressive enough? There are far less complex bands in the archives ... and I'm not talking about borderline bands like Rhapsody or Nightwish. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||
You hit the nail in the head Mike.
I believe Radiohead belongs in Prog Archives (I even reviewed one of their albums), has a lot of Alternative/Indie elements and some Prog too, but IMHO belongs in Prog Related being that they are not a 100% Prog band.
Iván
|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21711 |
![]() |
||
@Iván:
I did not quote your answer in order to keep this post short ... I respect your opinion but I just don't think it is representative of the "public opinion". This includes the archives and all the major (and minor) websites as well as the countless magazines and every music fan in the world. I think that Certif1ed is completely right with his definition of prog, and using this definition Radiohead fit in very well. However, this very abstract and logical definition differs from a "genre elitist" type of definition. It includes much more genres and styles as long as the music is sufficiently complex in various basic aspects, while the "genre elitists" tend to emphasize the stylistic similarities rather than the musical properties. I mean that for them a band that sounds like 70s Genesis has a good chance of being accepted as prog, even if the music itself is only a re-hash of the original. BTW: Personally I think that either position is too extreme to be applied in real life ... I use a bit of both worlds. Radiohead are an alternative band ... they started as an alternative rock band (although I think that Pablo Honey is a bit underrated - compare it to other successful brit rock/pop bands of the time and you'll notice the difference), and as much as they evolved they are still related to that style, which is not very compatible with the spirit of 70s prog rock ... alternative rock doesn't sit too well with "prog snobs". I don't mean that in any derogative way ... I'm one myself, at least to some extent. But eventually the snobism changes into close-mindedness, if we're not careful ... In the words of Dream Theater: "seasons change and so must I" ... Times are changing, and so does Prog. With a new generation of people, would it really be surprising that we also get a new generation of prog ... which is as different to the classic prog as the people of the new generation are to their parents? |
|||
![]() |
|||
Floydian42 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: January 13 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 846 |
![]() |
||
I apologize, Don't mean to falsely accuse, I just mean to say most people judge on only a few things they have heard, so I've grown used to expecting that. Alright, so other website site Radiohead as Alternative/Indie. Both you and I know Prog isn't a very common title, and anyway, I still want to know why you don't consider them prog.... or better yet how you justify albums such as Amnesiac and Kid A as Alternative and Indie. (And no, I know I'm not going to say your opinion, I doubt anyone would from a random stranger on the internet. I just like knowing the answer.) Edited by Floydian42 - March 03 2007 at 13:27 |
|||
![]() |
|||
andu ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 27 2006 Location: Romania Status: Offline Points: 3089 |
![]() |
||
I was a britpop fan in the 90s with Oasis, Verve, Blur, Travis, etc. as major favourites. I liked Radiohead albums, OK Computer the most. I felt it as both good and accessible. Then I heard samples form Kid A and understood nothing - they had changed and evolved beyonf my comprehension from that time, and didn't interest me anymore. So yes there is a strong connection with alternative britpop of the time, and at times identity. However they did reach something the normal britpop and alternative fan, like me, couldn't understand. I'll try to have a listen to their latter albums and come back telling if that something is prog or not.
|
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12345 7> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |