Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - What about David Bowie
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhat about David Bowie

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 20:50

My vote will always be a firm yes, maybe not prog as main style, but underneath his songwriting there' always been an aspect of chalenging new things.

 
But the problem lies in the description of progressive music, and how people perceive it. Like mentioned before as long as people insist on making cases for bands based on their likeleness with other bands who are included, than I say be exclusive, rather than inclusive.
 
When the time comes and bands are judged purely and entirelly on their own merits, Bowie would be my first choice, I love the dude for what he created, and would love to see him here.
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
kebjourman View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 393
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 21:53
David Bowie!
 
yes!
 
here here!
Back to Top
Arsillus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 21:54
Bowie is excellent. He was always ahead of his time.




Back to Top
Kleynan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: January 28 2006
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 720
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2006 at 21:55
On wikipedia he is listed under art-rock...


You've just had a heavy session of electroshock therapy, and you're more relaxed than you've been in weeks.

Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 28 2006 at 03:18
Originally posted by Peter Rideout Peter Rideout wrote:

Once we started including artists along the lines of "Well, X are in here, and Y don't sound too much different," the site was bound to grow and mutate almost beyond recognition. (Y leads to Z, etc.)
Categorizing something that's as tied to individual response as music is, is very problematic. "Prog" is such an artificial, restrictive notion! How many musicians (these days) embrace the term? Precious few! Now why is that? [IMG]height=17 alt="Stern Smile" src="smileys/smiley22.gif" width=17 align=absMiddle>[
Speaking from a purely intellectual perspective, (perhaps not a practical, economic or emotional one)  I still think a name change for the Archives is warrented, in the long run.

Progcetera

    
I think the name ProgArchives is fine - we've been moving towards Progressive Music as opposed to Progressive Rock for a very long time - pretty much right from the inception.

For example, Progressive Metal is NOT a type of Progressive Rock - it is a different sort of music, being based largely on riffs.

However, that can only be a good thing, as being inclusive leads to fans of one band discovering others - and keeping the old music alive (as it so rightly deserves).

I agree that the reduction "Prog" is ambiguous as well as personally restrictive - but as a simple shortening of the term "progressive", it works well. And when journalists use the term "Prog Rock", I always think of the "dinosaurs" with affection, as a fan of the music. Who cares about cheap jibes from those who haven't got it yet?



The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20436
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 28 2006 at 04:28
Bowie is not really progressive in the sense that we are interested in the site.
 
And he was never art rock (he was Glam Rock or glitter rock) until some idiotic journalist started rewriting music's history, lumping all these glam "arty (as in artsy-farsty)" artistes (Mott and Roxy) and wanting to give them more credibility.
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 28 2006 at 08:17
With hindsight, it's quite obvious that his music fits the Art Rock description better than "Glam" or "Glitter" rock.

That fashion passed away decades ago, and Bowie moved on - many, many times. His recent music has little in common with T-Rex, The Glitter Band, The Sweet, Slade or any of that crowd.

His constant re-invention and willingess to experiment puts him firmly in Art Rock.
    

Edited by Certif1ed - September 28 2006 at 08:17
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
cuncuna View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 29 2005
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 4318
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 28 2006 at 11:27
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

With hindsight, it's quite obvious that his music fits the Art Rock description better than "Glam" or "Glitter" rock.

That fashion passed away decades ago, and Bowie moved on - many, many times. His recent music has little in common with T-Rex, The Glitter Band, The Sweet, Slade or any of that crowd.

His constant re-invention and willingess to experiment puts him firmly in Art Rock.
    

    

More important: he's not stuck on the past. His recent colaboration with Trent Reznor produced an incredible album. His constant dedication to grow within his own art is the reason why he is not extinct as creator, while other musicians insist in keep emulating a decade that is long gone already.
ĦBeware of the Bee!
   
Back to Top
Phil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1881
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2006 at 09:05
"Heroes" and "Low" both of which feature Eno are great albums and I think warrant a "progressive" tag. The rest of his work is great but not prog.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20436
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2006 at 09:19
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

With hindsight, it's quite obvious that his music fits the Art Rock description better than "Glam" or "Glitter" rock.

That fashion passed away decades ago, and Bowie moved on - many, many times. His recent music has little in common with T-Rex, The Glitter Band, The Sweet, Slade or any of that crowd.

His constant re-invention and willingess to experiment puts him firmly in Art Rock.
    
 
You do have a point. I always consider Bowie's oeuvre mainly under his 70's glam thing and the last album I really heard (against my will I must say) is that horrible Let's Dance. But nowadays, that period represent a small percebtage of his total works.
 
I've heard bits and pieces on the radio after the mid-80's, but it is very limited compared to his entire later discography. I am not so sure that he was that experimental, though, he tried to be alternative (not in the indie rock sense, though) for sure, though!!
 
 
as for Glam (which was used loosely after that period which ended roughly with Punk's arrival) it seems that there is a revival lately
 
then there was also that glam metal scene in the second part of the 80's which was also called HairMetal
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
WaywardSon View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 23 2006
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 2537
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2006 at 11:08
Seems like this thread is in the wrong place and should be in the Suggest new bands section.
But really., there have been tons of "Is Bowie Prog?" threads.
I think we spend far too much time on categorisations, and not enough time talking about the artist.
I also believe he is Art Rock or Prog Related in some way.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20436
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2006 at 05:53
But somehow I could not possibly imagine Bowie really included.
 
Should he be, it should not be in a full blown prog category. >> prog-related at best as is Roxy Music
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2006 at 06:03
Originally posted by WaywardSon WaywardSon wrote:

Seems like this thread is in the wrong place and should be in the Suggest new bands section.
But really., there have been tons of "Is Bowie Prog?" threads.
I think we spend far too much time on categorisations, and not enough time talking about the artist.
I also believe he is Art Rock or Prog Related in some way.


Point well taken, Greg - and thread moved!Wink
Back to Top
Australian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2006
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 3278
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2006 at 19:37

I have an idea, how about we work on the inclusion of bands already on the master list before suggesting anyone new.

Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2006 at 19:48
Originally posted by Australian Australian wrote:

I have an idea, how about we work on the inclusion of bands already on the master list before suggesting anyone new.




hmmmm.....



nah....LOLWink


what master list?.... we just add them when we find them...


discussion is a good thing Clap



The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
The Wizard View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2006 at 19:51
Prog or not, David Bowie kicks ass.
Back to Top
Australian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2006
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 3278
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2006 at 20:35
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by Australian Australian wrote:

I have an idea, how about we work on the inclusion of bands already on the master list before suggesting anyone new.




hmmmm.....



nah....LOLWink


what master list?.... we just add them when we find them...


discussion is a good thing Clap



 
I heard master list some where, probably dreamt of it or somethingLOLClown
 

Oh well its not my problem anyway...carry onWinkLOL

Back to Top
yesfan88 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 357
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2006 at 19:03
Originally posted by The Wizard The Wizard wrote:

Prog or not, David Bowie kicks ass.

    Yes! And I think he's prog-related. He's quite experimental.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"- Evelyn Beatrice Hall
Back to Top
Leningrad View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 15 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 7991
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2006 at 23:54
I just got a Bowie CD two days ago, and it rules.
Back to Top
gong View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 07 2006
Location: Neutral Zone
Status: Offline
Points: 366
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 04 2006 at 07:36
one of the greatest artists of 20th century!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 1.605 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.