Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage") |
Reviews discussion |
Post Reply 
|
Page <1234 182> |
| Author | ||||||
Angelo 
Special Collaborator 
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 07 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 13244 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: September 10 2006 at 12:02 |
|||||
|
It does suggest so, it doesn't warn or enforce it when you submit.
|
||||||
|
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected] |
||||||
 |
||||||
|
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator
Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Offline Points: 20239 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 13 2006 at 08:20 |
|||||
Hang on here! This kind of decision belongs to M@X as far as I know and the man does not want to delete ratings without reviews for reasons that everyone should be able to express his/her opinions regardless of the English possibilities. And extending the reviews to 100 words will make it even tougher, than!! Note that my reviews should hover betwenn the 200 and 400 words, so I do not feel threatened by this. Edited by Sean Trane - September 13 2006 at 11:10 |
||||||
|
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Atkingani
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: October 21 2005 Location: Terra Brasilis Status: Offline Points: 12288 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 13 2006 at 10:43 |
|||||
Still showing 50 words minimum, Bob. However, 75 words minimum could be a good step.
 In any situation, the final decision belongs to M@x and Rony...
 |
||||||
|
Guigo
~~~~~~ |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 13 2006 at 11:51 |
|||||
|
I knew I'd seen it somewhere.
Just above the submit review text box it says:
THE MARS VOLTA De-loused in the Comatorium review (your text here, 75+ words suggested)
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Atkingani
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: October 21 2005 Location: Terra Brasilis Status: Offline Points: 12288 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 13 2006 at 12:22 |
|||||
  |
||||||
|
Guigo
~~~~~~ |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Ricochet
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 27 2005 Location: Nauru Status: Offline Points: 46301 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 13 2006 at 14:57 |
|||||
|
75 words! OMG...I'm like in a difficult situation.
 
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator
Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Offline Points: 20239 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 15 2006 at 05:53 |
|||||
Actually I disagree with this change or increase of minimal count of words. This time 75 and next year 100.
  I dio not think it is fair to ask me to go back on all my reviews that have 50 or 55 words, add more text just in order to reach a new amount just so that the reviews stays visible.
|
||||||
|
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
||||||
|
||||||
|
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 15 2006 at 06:01 |
|||||
|
Yes, we should better be demanding about quality, not quantity. |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Atkingani
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: October 21 2005 Location: Terra Brasilis Status: Offline Points: 12288 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 15 2006 at 12:09 |
|||||
Only an idea, buddies... don't need to maul me!
 BTW, in the case, the 75 or 100 words rule is adopted it shall not invalidate reviews done by the old rule. It will be valid for reviews done from the eventual date of adoption.
|
||||||
|
Guigo
~~~~~~ |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 15 2006 at 14:10 |
|||||
|
As you'll see from the wording, it says 75 words recommended.
There has been no change to the parameters for checking review length (which is actually 200 characters), and no current proposal to do so.
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
chopper
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 13 2005 Location: Essex, UK Status: Offline Points: 20029 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 17 2006 at 15:18 |
|||||
|
This one wins the prize for the worst spelling ever (e.g. "Masterpiece! that is a word you culd yuse to describe this 70's classis"
http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=89876 Also an almost total lack of punctuation makes it even harder to read. |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Fassbinder
Forum Senior Member 
VIP Member Joined: May 27 2006 Location: My world Status: Offline Points: 3497 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 17 2006 at 15:30 |
|||||
Priceless!!! A challenging reading though... Kind of semi-phonetical style...
Seriously, though, why not to check a review before posting? Some misspellings might be avoided...
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Atkingani
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: October 21 2005 Location: Terra Brasilis Status: Offline Points: 12288 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 17 2006 at 15:36 |
|||||
|
Mandy's rival?
|
||||||
|
Guigo
~~~~~~ |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Angelo
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 07 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 13244 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October 15 2006 at 07:06 |
|||||
Figured that, I even got censored by Bob when quoting the review... |
||||||
|
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected] |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October 15 2006 at 11:18 |
|||||
|
Not so much censored Angelo, I just don't like giving such reviews ongoing publicity once they have been dealt with.
Starve them of oxygen and they'll hopefully go away!
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Peter
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October 15 2006 at 15:08 |
|||||
 Actually, I thought that one fell (just) within the bounds of an acceptable review. It describes the music in a vivid (if highly scathing) manner, and Minkovitch's rating is justified by his saying that the album completely lacks "creativity, imagination, songwriting talent and emotional content."Negative reviews can be useful, and are normally among the most concise -- or even humourous. (I have written one or two similar reviews in my time -- see Renaissance "Camera Camera.") I think that even a fan of "alternative" music (and/or Radiohead) can get a feel of what this disk sounds like, from this review.
It's a tough call, but I wouldn't have cut this one. What are his other reviews like? Edited by Peter Rideout - October 15 2006 at 15:14 |
||||||
|
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
||||||
|
||||||
|
tardis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2005 Location: Victoria, BC Status: Offline Points: 14378 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October 15 2006 at 15:22 |
|||||
Agreed. It's lazy and extremely unhelpful. I'm interested in getting the listener's original perspective on an album! |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Peter
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October 15 2006 at 15:29 |
|||||
 This is a bit confusing Easy: is this the appropriate thread for reporting questionable reviews? Your first post seems to indicate it is not, but it's now being used that way, nonetheless.
(So I'm sorry if I posted/responded in the wrong thread. I have now also posted my prior post in the other reviews thread. Perhaps this thread needs a new title -- something like "Review Writing.")
|
||||||
|
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Atkingani
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: October 21 2005 Location: Terra Brasilis Status: Offline Points: 12288 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October 15 2006 at 15:30 |
|||||
|
Peter, this review has much less than 50 words or 200 characters, it did not go to the PA homepage and doesn't appear in the album page. It counts as a rating-without-review.
EDIT: Anyway, this thread split is new. One for the inappropriate reviews and the other to discuss the content (or not) of some reviews. With time, I guess that people will be used to both. Edited by Atkingani - October 15 2006 at 15:39 |
||||||
|
Guigo
~~~~~~ |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Peter
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: October 15 2006 at 15:32 |
|||||
|
^ See? Tardis seems to have posted in the "wrong" reviews thread too! (He's quoting my post from the other thread. Is this a technical glitch?)
|
||||||
|
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 182> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
TheProgtologist wrote:
Review | 
What more needs to be added? This is an essential part of the Genesis canon.