Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Report abuse here
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Offensive signature
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedOffensive signature

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
Author
Message
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Offensive signature
    Posted: April 04 2006 at 02:26

I believe I've been very tolerant with religious beliefs and disbeliefs, but the use of Satanic symbols is at least looking for trouble, already Drew made a comment and honestly I find it offensive against my beliefs.

USER: DeepPhreeze

I believe this should be stopped, lately some newbies are trying to cause problems.

I'm sure that if any member made a signature asking for people to tuirn to some religion or cult or even saying Jesus Loves You, there will be a lot of people asking for that sig to be deleted with reason, because this is not a place for religious propaganda.

Please delete this signature and tell the kid to stop asking for troubles.

This is worst IMO.

Iván



Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M
            
Back to Top
Tuzvihar View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 18 2005
Location: C. Schinesghe
Status: Offline
Points: 13536
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 05:58
Well, it doesn't bother me that much. Though I was a little confused at first I must admit. Maybe I'm not as religious as you Ivan. But if you find it offensive then I believe it certainly should be removed.
"Music is much like f**king, but some composers can't climax and others climax too often, leaving themselves and the listener jaded and spent."

Charles Bukowski
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21134
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 06:01
I think that all religious or political statements in signatures should be removed - no big discussion about whether or not the particular signature is offensive or not.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 06:17
I don't find it offensive in the least.
Back to Top
Tuzvihar View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 18 2005
Location: C. Schinesghe
Status: Offline
Points: 13536
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 06:17
I believe that avatar and signature are very personal places for everybody to express themselves. Each to his own. So why should we bother? Let's just pay no heed to them.
"Music is much like f**king, but some composers can't climax and others climax too often, leaving themselves and the listener jaded and spent."

Charles Bukowski
Back to Top
bigjoeagago View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 31
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 07:03
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

I believe I've been very tolerant with religious beliefs and disbeliefs, but the use of Satanic symbols is at least looking for trouble, already Drew made a comment and honestly I find it offensive against my beliefs.

USER: DeepPhreeze

I believe this should be stopped, lately some newbies are trying to cause problems.

I'm sure that if any member made a signature asking for people to tuirn to some religion or cult or even saying Jesus Loves You, there will be a lot of people asking for that sig to be deleted with reason, because this is not a place for religious propaganda.

Please delete this signature and tell the kid to stop asking for troubles.

This is worst IMO.

Iván

i really couldn't care less. if that is how he/she wants to display such a symbol as part of a wider belief system then so be it.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21134
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 07:11
^ if you all have no problem with that signature that's fine, no problem. But you cannot demand of everyone else that they also don't have a problem with it.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 07:23

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ if you all have no problem with that signature that's fine, no problem. But you cannot demand of everyone else that they also don't have a problem with it.

So de we have to tiptoe around everyone in case it might hurt their feelings or be against their beliefs?

Back to Top
Trotsky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 07:35
The admin is discussing this issue ...
"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”

"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
Back to Top
Fitzcarraldo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 08:22

Interesting that the complaint relates to the symbol but not to the mention of the drug DXM in the sig.

 

Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 08:23
Originally posted by Fitzcarraldo Fitzcarraldo wrote:

Interesting that the complaint relates to the symbol but not to the mention of the drug DXM in the sig.

 

Thats because I never heard of it!

Back to Top
The Hemulen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 09:13
A thick skin's all that's needed here. Banning the use of religious symbols is both unworkable and dubious.
Back to Top
Duncan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 23 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 180
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 09:20
How about just banning absurdly huge signature images?
Back to Top
Empathy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 30 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1864
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 09:34
Originally posted by Trouserpress Trouserpress wrote:

A thick skin's all that's needed here. Banning the use of religious symbols is both unworkable and dubious.


I must concur with TP.
Pure Brilliance:
Back to Top
Joolz View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 24 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1377
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 09:41
Originally posted by Duncan Duncan wrote:

How about just banning absurdly huge signature images?


Or, doing away with signatures altogether. Do they actually serve any purpose? I find they are extremely irritating, no matter what the subject.
 
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67407
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 11:16
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Fitzcarraldo Fitzcarraldo wrote:

Interesting that the complaint relates to the symbol but not to the mention of the drug DXM in the sig.

 

Thats because I never heard of it!



I've never heard about it either, but if it's illegal, I suppose that this particular signature should be removed just because of the drug reference, right?
Back to Top
Tuzvihar View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 18 2005
Location: C. Schinesghe
Status: Offline
Points: 13536
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 11:37
Originally posted by Vompatti Vompatti wrote:


Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Fitzcarraldo Fitzcarraldo wrote:


Interesting that the complaint relates to the symbol but not to the mention of the drug DXM in the sig.


 



Thats because I never heard of it!

I've never heard about it either, but if it's illegal, I suppose that this particular signature should be removed just because of the drug reference, right?


I never heard of this drug before either but if that's the case then I agree that the signature should be removed. But only because of the drug reference.
"Music is much like f**king, but some composers can't climax and others climax too often, leaving themselves and the listener jaded and spent."

Charles Bukowski
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 11:44
Originally posted by Vompatti Vompatti wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Fitzcarraldo Fitzcarraldo wrote:

Interesting that the complaint relates to the symbol but not to the mention of the drug DXM in the sig.

 

Thats because I never heard of it!



I've never heard about it either, but if it's illegal, I suppose that this particular signature should be removed just because of the drug reference, right?

It isn't illegal. Irs an over the counter drug which is used in chest medicines. Google it.

And even if ir was illegal, does that mean that we can't show pics of canabis leaves too?

Alcohol is illegal in most muslim countries, should we ban pics of beer here too?



Edited by Snow Dog
Back to Top
Trickster F. View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Belize
Status: Offline
Points: 5308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 12:00

Is my sig offensive too? I mean, it's kind of dreadful.

 -- Ivan

sig
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 04 2006 at 12:03
Originally posted by ivansfr0st ivansfr0st wrote:

Is my sig offensive too? I mean, it's kind of dreadful.

 -- Ivan

I don't personally like it, but i wouldn't say it was offensive.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.195 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.