beatles/why??? - Progressive Rock Music Forum

Author

Message

Topic Search

Topic Options

Guests

Forum Guest Group

Topic: beatles/why???
Posted: February 23 2006 at 09:00

why are people reviewing beatle albums still why ,let it die please

FragileDT

Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: June 20 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1485

Posted: February 23 2006 at 09:05

please be quite.

One likes to believe
In the freedom of music
But glittering prizes
And endless Compromises
Shatter the illusion
Of integrity

TheProgtologist View Drop Down

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802

Posted: February 23 2006 at 09:08

Because they are in the archives,why else?

They are here,they will stay here,they aren't leaving.

MOVE ON.........GET OVER IT.

Guests

Forum Guest Group

Posted: February 23 2006 at 09:09

U,nless you own this site , I dont need you to tell me to be quite i have a right to voice my opion...

TheProgtologist View Drop Down

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802

Posted: February 23 2006 at 09:14

It's spelled.....Q..U..I..E..T.

JayDee

Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: September 07 2005
Location: Elysian Fields
Status: Offline
Points: 10063

Posted: February 23 2006 at 09:24

yankeerose wrote:

U,nless you own this site , I dont need you to tell me to be quite i have a right to voice my opion...

as others have the right to voice their own opinion and review any beatles album thats here in the archives.

chopper

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20030

Posted: February 23 2006 at 09:52

Majestic_Mayhem wrote:

yankeerose wrote:

U,nless you own this site , I dont need you to tell me to be quite i have a right to voice my opion...

as others have the right to voice their own opinion and review any beatles album thats here in the archives.

Well said. Actually, I'm not in favour of proto-prog albums being included in the PA Top 100, but since the Beatles are here, and they happen to be something I know a lot about, then I will continue to review them.

So there.

And why is this in Prog Polls?

Edited by chopper

mission4prog View Drop Down

Forum Newbie

Joined: February 17 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 25

Posted: February 23 2006 at 11:59

it's called a spell checker. try it.

i agree: no Beatles.

m4p

"The hypocrites are slandering the sacred halls of Truth."

Flip_Stone View Drop Down

Forum Senior Member

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 388

Posted: February 23 2006 at 13:06

Yeah, including The Beatles on this site is one of those strange things that happens in life (like when when people spontaneously combust). You can't logically explain it. You just have to deal with the rulers of the webrealm and whatever rationale they are using...

Edited by Flip_Stone

Atkingani

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Terra Brasilis
Status: Offline
Points: 12288

Posted: February 23 2006 at 14:55

My personal opinion:

Unlike many other progressive sites (no matter in what language), ProgArchives also cares about the History of Progressive Rock, which means that proto-prog bands and artists are being included so the genre we like may be seen as an entity with a natural beginning, a real genesis. Prog-rock was not artificially created, it did not appear from nothing or nowhere. Consequently all influences and contributions shall be taken in account. A similar thinking may be applied to prog-related bands and artists.

Instead of complaining about the inclusion of A or B, members should post suggestions of how to deal with proto-prog and/or prog-related stuff, always remembering that a suggestion is something to be evaluated by others not a law to be followed.

End of my personal opinion.

Guigo

~~~~~~

chopper

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20030

Posted: February 23 2006 at 15:26

Atkingani wrote:

My personal opinion:

End of my personal opinion.

Well said.

My feeling is that proto-prog albums should not be included in the PA Top 500, as the inclusion of The Beatles has left us open to the possibility, however unlikely, of Please Please Me being in the prog charts, which would frankly be nonsense.

Okay I've said my piece, I'm off to review another Beatles album now.

Peter

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669

Posted: February 23 2006 at 16:02

Flip_Stone wrote:

Yeah, including The Beatles on this site is one of those strange things that happens in life (like when when people spontaneously combust). You can't logically explain it. You just have to deal with the rulers of the webrealm and whatever rationale they are using...

People don't really "spontaneously combust," BTW -- that's Victorian legend/superstition. IMO. Stern Smile

It's impossible, and, to my knowledge, there are no modern, well-documented cases of it. Geek

So there!

Wink

Edited by Peter

"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.

MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21157

Posted: February 23 2006 at 17:15

mission4prog wrote:

it's called a spell checker. try it.

i agree: no Beatles.

m4p

I doubt that a spell checker would tell you when you confuse quite and quiet.

Recently listened to:

Peter

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669

Posted: February 23 2006 at 17:34

MikeEnRegalia wrote:

mission4prog wrote:

it's called a spell checker. try it.

i agree: no Beatles.

m4p

I doubt that a spell checker would tell you when you confuse quite and quiet.

True -- both are real words. A grammar-checking program would be needed. Geek

"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.

Atkingani

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Terra Brasilis
Status: Offline
Points: 12288

Posted: February 23 2006 at 17:48

The grammar-checking program is a great tool but it helps little in my first language: Portuguese.

A simple regular verb like 'andar' (to walk) has 56 single different forms (not counting the composed and reflexive forms) and we have to memorize them all at school.

Edited by Atkingani

Guigo

~~~~~~

MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21157

Posted: February 23 2006 at 17:48

Peter wrote:

Flip_Stone wrote:

People don't really "spontaneously combust," BTW -- that's Victorian legend/superstition. IMO. Stern Smile

It's impossible, and, to my knowledge, there are no modern, well-documented cases of it. Geek

So there!

Wink

It is so true - I saw it in a South Park episode!

Recently listened to:

JayDee

Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: September 07 2005
Location: Elysian Fields
Status: Offline
Points: 10063

Posted: February 23 2006 at 19:21

Atkingani wrote:

The grammar-checking program is a great tool but it helps little in my first language: Portuguese.

A simple regular verb like 'andar' (to walk) has 56 single different forms (not counting the composed and reflexive forms) and we have to memorize them all at school.

Andar here means to move about/ move forward.. thats nice.. actually some of our words are spanish sounding (philippines was colonized by the spaniards for more than 300 years) we have words like: Lababo (sink ie kitchen sink) Lamesa (table) Abre lata (can opener) Abre botelya (bottle opener) and others...

Atkingani

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Terra Brasilis
Status: Offline
Points: 12288

Posted: February 23 2006 at 20:15

Majestic_Mayhem wrote:

Atkingani wrote:

The grammar-checking program is a great tool but it helps little in my first language: Portuguese.

A simple regular verb like 'andar' (to walk) has 56 single different forms (not counting the composed and reflexive forms) and we have to memorize them all at school.

Portuguese & Spanish: andar; Italian: andare; French: aller... all have the same origin: the good old Latin, a great language.

Portuguese and Spanish are close but not so close as many people think. The language that's closer to Portuguese is the Gallego, spoken in Galiza, Northern Spain. Some say that Gallego is a dialect; but the main differences between language and dialect are ships and guns.

P.S.: the language you talk I believe to be the tagalog. Am I sure?

Guigo

~~~~~~

dralan

Forum Senior Member

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 339

Posted: February 24 2006 at 11:14

yankeerose wrote:

why are people reviewing beatle albums still why ,let it die please

The same reason people are still reviewing Yes and Genesis albums from 30+ years ago. Because its timeless, awesome music. You wouldnt have King Crimson or ELP without the standard set by Sgt. Pepper or Revolver. Well you might but I guarantee you popular music would have been alot different without the Beatles influence of artistic merit in rock-n-roll music.

PROGMAN

Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: February 03 2004
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 2664

Posted: February 24 2006 at 12:58

Because they are one of the main pioneers in dveloping PROG music, maybe they didn't think in consideration that it would be called PROG/PROGRESSIVE music at that time!

CYMRU AM BYTH