Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Prog Metal: Organizing the categories
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProg Metal: Organizing the categories

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1213141516 42>
Author
Message
W.Chuck View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 606
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 11:54
hmm CANVAS SOLARIS are an avant-instrumental band
and propably WASTERFALL also belong
in the Avant-Section as well as THE QUIET ROOM

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 11:57

Wastefall are pretty close to Pain of Salvation ... thanks for the info on the other two bands, I already changed the chart.



Edited by MikeEnRegalia
Back to Top
Tristan Mulders View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 28 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 1723
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 12:03

Okay, here are some more thoughts (what else to do with my spare time, I have about 25min left before I need to head for the station):

Borknagar - move this one from the Power/Heavy section to Extreme. It's closer to the bands in that subgenre than to the ones in Power/Heavy.

(not included as progmetal at all, in the archives as art rock) Kopecky. This band is definitely metal to my ears, I'd say symphonic.

Aina - move this one to the power/heavy section, simply because it is (officially) power metal and it has a lot of similarities with the standards in that genre (just compare it to the likes of Edguy, a band that has some prog tendencies by the way)

Digital Ruin - maybe Experimental? It certainly has space rock influences... but I'm not an expert on this band, I must admit

Dan Swanö - He's fine in the Neo ProgMetal categorie I think, the only thing that makes it vary from the rest is the grunt vocals, but it is very neo prog metal

Green Carnation - No orchestral at least, they definitely could fit in the Power/Heavy section, but looking at their Light of Day album, I'd also say it could be experimental...

Power of Omens - This is definitely extreme. Their music is very difficult to get used to, because of the major complexity.

 

That's it for now, I'm off for today (going to see Oceansize live in a couple of hourse, but have to travel 2 hr's to get there )

 

Cheers,

- Tristan

Interested in my reviews?
You can find them HERE

"...He will search until He's found a Way to take the Days..."
Back to Top
Kohllapse View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 14 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1063
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 12:07

Mike , here is a link for  WYZARDS with a soundclip.

http://www.infoclub.com.np/entertain/music/hollywood/htmfile /lesserknown/wyzards.html

The Final Catastrophe is awesome!! , I wish the Glass Hammer guys would make another Wyzards cd.

 



Edited by Kohllapse
Back to Top
W.Chuck View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 606
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 12:25
does not work

Back to Top
W.Chuck View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 606
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 12:30
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Wastefall are pretty close to Pain of Salvation ...


Of course you can compare them to Pain of Salvation but they are much harder and more complex...

Edited by W.Chuck

Back to Top
Kohllapse View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 14 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1063
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 12:33
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 12:37
Originally posted by W.Chuck W.Chuck wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Wastefall are pretty close to Pain of Salvation ...


Of course you can compare them to Pain of Salvation but they are much harder and more complex...

A bit like One Hour by the Concrete Lake? I think that Wastefall are still a nice addition to the symphonic genre.

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 12:41
Originally posted by Kohllapse Kohllapse wrote:

Originally posted by W.Chuck W.Chuck wrote:

does not work

Fixed

http://www.infoclub.com.np/entertain/music/hollywood/htmfile /lesserknown/wyzards.html

Where would you put them? Based on that sample and the description, I would rather move them to Art Rock.

Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 13:13
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by ivan_2068 ivan_2068 wrote:

Originally posted by CaptainWafflos CaptainWafflos wrote:

I beg those of you criticizing the further division of prog metal: listen to Meshuggah and then perhaps a band like Dream Theater and tell me in honesty that you can support these two bands being in the same genre.

Agree 100% but I beg yoiu listen:

  • Rush
  • Hackett, Steve
  • Kansas

    The three are in Art Rock, even when Rush is closer to Hard Rock, Kansas Symphonic and teve Hackett should bementioned in more than one genre including Symphonic.

    Or listen:

  • Gabriel, Peter
  • Supertramp
  • Queen

    All are considered Prog related, Peter Gabriel has nothing in common with Queen and much less with Supertramp.

    Or maybe

  • Moody Blues
  • Deep Purple
  • Procol Harum
  • Nice

    Absolutely nothing in common Moody Blues is more like early Psychedelia, Deep Pureple Hard Rock, Procul Harum is clearly closer to Symphonic and The Nice is a Symphonic or Classical Prog band

    Or even The Pseudo Symphonic:

  • Genesis
  • King Crimson
  • Emerson Lake & Palmer (ELP)
  • Gentle Giant
  • Van der Graaf Generator

  • You're only proving that the other genres need re-organisation as well. It is difficult, and much more so than defining categories for metal. Yesterday I made some suggestions for a Classic Popular Prog genre ... I can already see that for example on Genesis Friede, You and I have three different opinions.

    But as different as those bands may are ... the difference between Meshuggah and Dream Theater is IMO much greater than of any of the above bands (in the same genre). 

    I think you still don't get my point Mike, I know every Prog Sub-genre must be reorganized, because we're sending bands to categories that are not accurate, but please try to understand me:

    • Every Sub-genre of Progressive Rock is roughly the union of Progressive Rock with another Genre
      • Symphonic Prog is the union of all Classical genres with Progressive Rock (Too wide IMO, because Medieval and Modern Classical are two different influences)
      • Fusion is the union between Progressive Rock and Jazz (Not too wide because the structure differences between all Jazz sub-genres and eras is not so dramatic).
      • Folk Prog is the union of Folk/Celtic music with Progressive Rock (Again too wide because for Example Strawbs, Aphrodite's Child and Los Jaivas have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IN COMMON, any metal differences are small in comnparison with for example Celtic Folk and Latin American Folk), sut still are all in one single genre
      • Prog Metal is the union of METAL and PROGRESSIVE ROCK, not to create a new brand genre, but to create a sub-genre of Progressive Rock, so there should be only one sub-genre and no further divisions.

    The reasons why Biographies exist is to clarify the differences between the bands of the same genre, there you can say Ok, this bands mixes Symphonic and Gothic influences, but to create sub-sub-genres is going too far IMHO.

    Just a couple more points:

    • By an honest mistake Bald Jean (I believe) said I mentioned some inferiority complex in Prog Metal fans, I believe it was another member, I wasn't, but I understand she could make that mistake after so many posts (14 pages in one day).
    • Bald Jean said it seems that Prog Metal Fans are trying to take over this site and there I agree with her, I don't say Mike, Bryan or any person involved in this project want to do that, but I read too many posts, like Prog Metal is different to Prog Rock, if Prog Rock has sub-genres why should Prog Metal don't, etc.
    • Just check, Prog Metal is a relative new genre officially born with Dream Theater (Even when I believe it was pioneered by such bands as Led Zeppelin, Uriah Heep and Deep Purple) , but it has more additions than any other sub-genre which would not be wrong if all were  Progressive, but there are a lot of bands in this genre which are not even remotely Progressive, just find a metal band with keyboards and the next day will be added for sure. 

    Just my point of view.

    Iván

     

     

                
    Back to Top
    MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
    Special Collaborator
    Special Collaborator
    Avatar
    Honorary Collaborator

    Joined: April 22 2005
    Location: Sweden
    Status: Offline
    Points: 21138
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 13:20

    ^ Ivan: I don't think that Symphonic Prog is the fusion of Rock and classical genres ... far from it. It rather is the principles of classical composition applied to Rock.

    About Folk: philippe and Erik are far more knowledgable about that genre ... but from what I've heard it would be more suitable to have an Ethno Prog genre for "Folk" bands from other roots than what is commonly known as Folk.

    About the birth of Prog Metal: It was far earlier than the first official releases by Dream Theater. Prog Metal dates back to at least 1986, with the first releases by Fates Warning and Queensryche. Depending on where you draw the line between Proto-Prog Metal (Metal with Prog influences) and "real" Prog Metal it even goes back as early as 1980.

    Back to Top
    MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
    Special Collaborator
    Special Collaborator
    Avatar
    Honorary Collaborator

    Joined: April 22 2005
    Location: Sweden
    Status: Offline
    Points: 21138
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 13:22

    BTW: Someone created a poll about this:

    http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=13641& amp; amp;PN=1

    Make your choice ...

    BTW: I'm constantly modifying my chart of prog metal, have a look:

    http://uneasy-listening.com/elements/apps/mreviews/https/Pro gMetal.html

    The bands marked in red are still not stable (a couple of black ones also might be better suited for other categories, give me a hint). Please also note the links ... I'll provide links to the band homepages for many of the bands, where you can download samples.



    Edited by MikeEnRegalia
    Back to Top
    Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
    Special Collaborator
    Special Collaborator

    Honorary Collaborator

    Joined: April 27 2004
    Location: Peru
    Status: Offline
    Points: 19535
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 14:06

    Mike wrote:

    Quote ^ Ivan: I don't think that Symphonic Prog is the fusion of Rock and classical genres ... far from it. It rather is the principles of classical composition applied to Rock.

    Mike please.........it's exactly the same thing but in other words. Classical music is the main influence of Symphonic and that's the point, you and I know it, we can change the words but it's exactly the same thing.

    If you apply the principles of Classical Music to Rock, you're making a union of both genres, it's obvious, but if you want, use your own words.

    If you listen Close to the Edge or Watcher of the Slkes you will find Baroque keyboard solos played by Wakeman and Banks that could have easily been made by Johan Sebastian Bach...Isn't that a fusion????

    If you listen Piano Concerto N° 1, The Enemy God Dances with the Black Spirits or Pictures at an Ehhibition don't you notice they are making a fusion between Rachmaninoff, Janacek and Mussorgsky with Rock in each case????

    At the end of Journey to the Centre of the Earth Rick Wakeman plays In the Hall of the Mountain King from the Peer Gynt Suite by Grieg, Isn't that a fusion of Classical and Rock?

    But Classical is a very wide term, it applies to music from the late XI Century to XXI Century, we're talking about almost 1,000 years of influence all in one genre, for God's sake Metal doesn't have four decades and you're creating several sub-genres.

    The Medieval Trouvadore's music has nothing in Common with Tchaikovski or Rachmaninoff, Bach has very small connections with lets say Wagner (Even when both are almost from the same period).

    Mike wrote:

    Quote About Folk: philippe and Erik are far more knowledgable about that genre ... but from what I've heard it would be more suitable to have an Ethno Prog genre for "Folk" bands from other roots than what is commonly known as Folk.

    Surely they know more than me about some Folk or Ethnic music, but Ok, change the name, Still what's the common ethnic and/or musical connection between Peruvian - Chiilean Music from the Pre-Hispanic era, Celtic Medieval Music, and Greelk Orthodox Canonic music (Jaivas, Strawbs and Aphrodite's Child)??? Can they be in the same genre???

    Probably NO would be the answer to both questions, but can we create a sub genre for each ethnia and/or country (As you're trying to do with the different Metal sub-genres), the answer is again no.

    There must be another solution and together we can find it.

    Mike wrote:

    Quote About the birth of Prog Metal: It was far earlier than the first official releases by Dream Theater. Prog Metal dates back to at least 1986, with the first releases by Fates Warning and Queensryche. Depending on where you draw the line between Proto-Prog Metal (Metal with Prog influences) and "real" Prog Metal it even goes back as early as 1980.

    I never claimed to be an expert in Prog Metal, but again you're creating a new sub-sub-genre (Proto Prog Metal), this sub-sub-genres are artificiall, because you're using Metal and Progressive Rock categories and transporting them to Prog Metal, where they don't belong.

    But I still believe the pioneers of Prog Metal could be found before 1980 with the already mentioned band as Led Zep, UH and DP.

    It seems hat there are different rules for Progressive Rock and Progressive metal bands:

    1. If you find a Progressive Rock band that you can't include in any place, lump them in Art Rock, there's always room for one more, nobody cares if they have nothing in common with the rest.
    2. If you find a Prog Metal band that you can't include in any place, create a new sub-sub-genre for them, they deserve to have their individuality recognized.

    Iván



    Edited by ivan_2068
                
    Back to Top
    King of Loss View Drop Down
    Prog Reviewer
    Prog Reviewer
    Avatar

    Joined: April 21 2005
    Location: Boston, MA
    Status: Offline
    Points: 16435
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 14:11
    ^ I like that list, Mike.

    But however with Mr. Ivan's saying of how Deep Purple and
    Led Zeppelin are the first innovators of Prog Metal, which is
    totally untrue. These bands were not even Metal, but rather
    Hard Rock.

    For me, the birth of Prog Metal started at around the early- mid
    80s with bands like Queensryche, Watchtower and Fates
    Warning.

    Anyways, I don't agree with the Neo/Symphonic area,
    especially if they have a connection between both like DT has.
    It should be one or the other or a fusion like DT. So having a
    Neo/Symphonic section plus a Symphonic and Neo section
    should be good.
    Back to Top
    Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
    Special Collaborator
    Special Collaborator

    Honorary Collaborator

    Joined: April 27 2004
    Location: Peru
    Status: Offline
    Points: 19535
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 14:35

    King of loss wrote:

    Quote But however with Mr. Ivan's saying of how Deep Purple and
    Led Zeppelin are the first innovators of Prog Metal, which is
    totally untrue. These bands were not even Metal, but rather
    Hard Rock.

    For me, the birth of Prog Metal started at around the early- mid
    80s with bands like Queensryche, Watchtower and Fates
    Warning.

     

    a)      I said I’m not an expert on Prog Metal.

    b)      When I don’t know something well I try to learn by reading opinions of people who know more than me.

    c)      Serious Progressive Rock pages as Progressive Ears, Gibraltar Encyclopedia of Progressive Rock, Progressor etc. name Uriah Heep, Deep Purple and Led Zeppelin as the first pioneers of Prog Metal.

    d)      Your escapism techniques are better than Houdini’s, the main point of my post is not when Prog Metal was born, but you choose just a comment or personal opinion to discredit my opinion.

    e)      You said: “For me the birth of Prog Metal started around the early mid 80’s (early mid 80’s strange term BTW, are we talking about early, mid or late 80’s?), well for GEPR, Progressor and Progressive Ears started with the bands I mentioned, it’s a matter of opinions.

     

    Go back to the main point and don’t use a simple comment by a non Prog Metal expert (Who recognizes this) to seem wiser.

     

    Iván
                
    Back to Top
    MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
    Special Collaborator
    Special Collaborator
    Avatar
    Honorary Collaborator

    Joined: April 22 2005
    Location: Sweden
    Status: Offline
    Points: 21138
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 14:36
    Originally posted by ivan_2068 ivan_2068 wrote:

    Mike wrote:

    Quote ^ Ivan: I don't think that Symphonic Prog is the fusion of Rock and classical genres ... far from it. It rather is the principles of classical composition applied to Rock.

    Mike please.........it's exactly the same thing but in other words. Classical music is the main influence of Symphonic and that's the point, you and I know it, we can change the words but it's exactly the same thing.

    If you apply the principles of Classical Music to Rock, you're making a union of both genres, it's obvious, but if you want, use your own words.

    If you listen Close to the Edge or Watcher of the Slkes you will find Baroque keyboard solos played by Wakeman and Banks that could have easily been made by Johan Sebastian Bach...Isn't that a fusion????

    Listen to Deep Purple - concerto for group and orchestra, and you'll see the difference. One is merely putting together a rock band and an orchestra, the other is composing rock songs with the same complexity that classical music uses.

    Back to Top
    BaldFriede View Drop Down
    Prog Reviewer
    Prog Reviewer
    Avatar

    Joined: June 02 2005
    Location: Germany
    Status: Offline
    Points: 10261
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 14:42
    Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

    Originally posted by ivan_2068 ivan_2068 wrote:

    Mike wrote:

    Quote ^ Ivan: I don't think that Symphonic Prog is the fusion of Rock and classical genres ... far from it. It rather is the principles of classical composition applied to Rock.

    Mike please.........it's exactly the same thing but in other words. Classical music is the main influence of Symphonic and that's the point, you and I know it, we can change the words but it's exactly the same thing.

    If you apply the principles of Classical Music to Rock, you're making a union of both genres, it's obvious, but if you want, use your own words.

    If you listen Close to the Edge or Watcher of the Slkes you will find Baroque keyboard solos played by Wakeman and Banks that could have easily been made by Johan Sebastian Bach...Isn't that a fusion????

    Listen to Deep Purple - concerto for group and orchestra, and you'll see the difference. One is merely putting together a rock band and an orchestra, the other is composing rock songs with the same complexity that classical music uses.

    Oh come on, Mike, that's overdoing it a little! Not even Gentle Giant, who are arguably one of the most complex bands in prog, even come close to the complexity of classical music.



    BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
    Back to Top
    MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
    Special Collaborator
    Special Collaborator
    Avatar
    Honorary Collaborator

    Joined: April 22 2005
    Location: Sweden
    Status: Offline
    Points: 21138
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 14:43
    Originally posted by ivan_2068 ivan_2068 wrote:

    a)      c)      Serious Progressive Rock pages as Progressive Ears, Gibraltar Encyclopedia of Progressive Rock, Progressor etc. name Uriah Heep, Deep Purple and Led Zeppelin as the first pioneers of Prog Metal. These bands are sometimes referred to as the Roots of Prog Metal or also "Classic Prog Metal".

    e)      You said: “For me the birth of Prog Metal started around the early mid 80’s (early mid 80’s strange term BTW, are we talking about early, mid or late 80’s?), well for GEPR, Progressor and Progressive Ears started with the bands I mentioned, it’s a matter of opinions. We are talking about two different kinds of Prog Metal. Deep Purple are certainly not a Prog Metal band. However, if you consider them Progressive, and if you think that every music which uses heavily distorted guitars qualifies as Metal, then you can call it Progressive Metal. For many websites the genre of Progressive Metal starts with Queensryche and Fates Warning, and that's about 1985. However, if you consider certain bands of the NWOBHM to be Progressive Metal, it's 1980. So depending on the definition it's early 80s to mid 80s.

    Go back to the main point and don’t use a simple comment by a non Prog Metal expert (Who recognizes this) to seem wiser.

    Iván
    Back to Top
    Kohllapse View Drop Down
    Forum Senior Member
    Forum Senior Member


    Joined: August 14 2005
    Status: Offline
    Points: 1063
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 14:44
    Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

    Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

    Originally posted by ivan_2068 ivan_2068 wrote:

    Mike wrote:

    Quote ^ Ivan: I don't think that Symphonic Prog is the fusion of Rock and classical genres ... far from it. It rather is the principles of classical composition applied to Rock.

    Mike please.........it's exactly the same thing but in other words. Classical music is the main influence of Symphonic and that's the point, you and I know it, we can change the words but it's exactly the same thing.

    If you apply the principles of Classical Music to Rock, you're making a union of both genres, it's obvious, but if you want, use your own words.

    If you listen Close to the Edge or Watcher of the Slkes you will find Baroque keyboard solos played by Wakeman and Banks that could have easily been made by Johan Sebastian Bach...Isn't that a fusion????

    Listen to Deep Purple - concerto for group and orchestra, and you'll see the difference. One is merely putting together a rock band and an orchestra, the other is composing rock songs with the same complexity that classical music uses.

    Oh come on, Mike, that's overdoing it a little! Not even Gentle Giant, who are arguably one of the most complex bands in prog, even come close to the complexity of classical music.

    Back to Top
    MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
    Special Collaborator
    Special Collaborator
    Avatar
    Honorary Collaborator

    Joined: April 22 2005
    Location: Sweden
    Status: Offline
    Points: 21138
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2005 at 14:49
    Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

    Oh come on, Mike, that's overdoing it a little! Not even Gentle Giant, who are arguably one of the most complex bands in prog, even come close to the complexity of classical music.

    Sure, but they're trying, that's the point. They are not just adding string sections or operatic singing (like Orchestral Metal bands, Nightwish, Therion etc.) but they are trying to use polyphony, counterpoint etc. much more than any other prog genre. Read the genre definition for Symphonic Prog Rock if you disagree ...

    Back to Top
     Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1213141516 42>

    Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



    This page was generated in 0.119 seconds.
    Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.