![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | ||
Chipiron ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 05 2005 Location: Spain Status: Offline Points: 780 |
![]() Posted: September 15 2005 at 07:42 |
|
Perhaps this thread is not new, but I haven't found it ... I want to compare the sound quality of several audio formats: mp3, wma and aac. I know wma and mp3 but I've never used aac I will use the files for a portable device, so, I don't need a higher quality than 128 kbps wma or so. What would be the equivalent in aac? I know the equivalence is not exact but I need some orientation. Is there any good article on the subject on the web? Thanks a lot. Edited by Chipiron |
||
[IMG]http://www.belderrain.es/GIFs/tora.gif">
|
||
![]() |
||
oliverstoned ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
![]() |
|
The higher the compression, the harsher the sound.
|
||
![]() |
||
Lindsay Lohan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: May 25 2005 Location: Norway Status: Offline Points: 3254 |
![]() |
|
NEVER USE WMA...the f**king files is encrypted with DRM wich makes them unplayable on other pc's....I am currently having the trouble of my life crackin this DRM protection...as for MP3'S you should atleast concider 192 or even 256kbps because 128 is quite awfull to listen to... |
||
![]() |
||
Chipiron ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 05 2005 Location: Spain Status: Offline Points: 780 |
![]() |
|
I've never had trouble changing files from one PC to another device... I use my own CDs as a source. Maybe that solves the problem?
|
||
[IMG]http://www.belderrain.es/GIFs/tora.gif">
|
||
![]() |
||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21464 |
![]() |
|
Not exactly true, you can configure the Windows Media Player to encode the files unencrypted. |
||
![]() |
||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21464 |
![]() |
|
My opinion is that all these formats sound pretty much the same. They are all highly optimized, and perhaps WMA 64kbps and AAC 64kbps have a little advantage compared to mp3 64kbps ... but who would want to listen to that anyway? With 128kpbs, I can hear no differences. BTW: Depending on the quality of your portable device, encoding in 192kbps can make a HUGE difference. I use mp3 64-192kbps VBR ... this results in files with 160kbps avg. |
||
![]() |
||
GoldenSpiral ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 27 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3839 |
![]() |
|
From my experience, having used all 3 formats, mp3 is still the most
versatile. both wma and aac get slightly better quality at lower
bitrate, but aac was annoying to me because it could only play in
itunes, and I couldnt find a reliable file converter to change them if
i wanted to use them elsewhere (i.e. burn a data cd for use in an mp3
compatible CD player), and the same goes for .wma. Technically
they are better for sound quality, but most devices nowadays are
compatible to mp3 files, but not all 3.
so, my recommendation is to use mp3's but rip at 192kbps. 128 is awful. 256 is nice but takes up a good deal of space, which is a problem when you have a large collection. |
||
![]() |
||
Chipiron ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 05 2005 Location: Spain Status: Offline Points: 780 |
![]() |
|
Thank you all! I've read that both wma and aac claim to get acceptable quality at 64kbps. I've checked that it's false for wma, and it seems to me that, following your advice, it's false for aac as well... |
||
[IMG]http://www.belderrain.es/GIFs/tora.gif">
|
||
![]() |
||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21464 |
![]() |
|
^ that's entirely subjective. 64kbps can be sufficient with really crappy headphones ... but even then you hear the compression quite clearly.
|
||
![]() |
||
Lindsay Lohan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: May 25 2005 Location: Norway Status: Offline Points: 3254 |
![]() |
|
No f**king way...i ripped some stuff from cd's to wma files on a old machines and backed up the wma files...Now on my new machine it wont play on any kind of media player because it says it needs the liceneces from the old machine...but i dont got the f**king licensces and you cant f**king turn them off f**kING MICROSOFT MEDIA PLAYER |
||
![]() |
||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21464 |
![]() |
|
^ Right beneath the dropdown in the options where you can select the format of the ripped files, there should be a checkbox to enable/disable copy protection. Of course this decision has to be made when the files are created ... once encrypted, they can only be decrypted with the appropriate keys. Edited by MikeEnRegalia |
||
![]() |
||
Lindsay Lohan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: May 25 2005 Location: Norway Status: Offline Points: 3254 |
![]() |
|
ah i thought the copy protection was something else but its too late blah...i guess i have to use my hacking skills to try to decrypt the code it is pretty old it was encryptet in DRM Ver2 so i guess that will make it a bit easier |
||
![]() |
||
oliverstoned ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
![]() |
|
Mike, how can you listen to Rammstein?
![]() ![]() ![]() For sure, you can listen to it over compressed on a PC. |
||
![]() |
||
goose ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 20 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4097 |
![]() |
|
Don't use CBR, use a good VBR model for the best quality relative to bitrate.
Have a read of http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=Main_Page#Audi o_Formats and indeed a search through www.hydrogenaudio.org for a comprehensive answer.
|
||
![]() |
||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21464 |
![]() |
|
I listen to www.last.fm radio player ... sometimes a track is played and when I'm at work I 'm busy and can't skip it fast enough ... Edited by MikeEnRegalia |
||
![]() |
||
Fitzcarraldo ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 30 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1835 |
![]() |
|
Chipiron, You might find the following threads useful. Some of them discuss the various formats MP3/WMA/OOG/AAC/FLAC etc. and also give URLs for sites which have audio comparisons and further details. There is also discussion on the SACD vs DVD-A debate and the vinyl vs CD debate, with some interesting comments. It's worth reading through them all - you'll probably learn quite a bit. http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4034 http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=990 http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1795 http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716 http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=864
|
||
![]() |
||
Chipiron ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 05 2005 Location: Spain Status: Offline Points: 780 |
![]() |
|
Thank you, Fitzcarraldo! I'm going to study a lot!!! |
||
[IMG]http://www.belderrain.es/GIFs/tora.gif">
|
||
![]() |
||
oVerCaffeinated ![]() Forum Newbie ![]() Joined: June 17 2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 15 |
![]() |
|
I'd use Ogg Vorbis if I was doing low bitrate encodes.
|
||
Remain calm, there is a dog in the vents.
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |